In uk.net.news.management on Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:56:04 -0000, Mr Benn
<nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> "Sn!pe"  wrote in message 
> news:1j8lqef.15qzcth101ip0fN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk...
>
>> I do not intend to discuss my antipathy to the militant cyclism party
>> in this place, maybe I should go to urcm.
>
> I can assure you that you will not be allowed to discuss your antipathy in 
> the moderated cycling newsgroup.  Such postings will be rejected by the 
> moderators who are mostly sympathetic to militant cycling doctrines.  You 
> are better off directing it to the unmoderated newsgroup. 

You write as if Sn!pe, or any other sane person, would be interested
in posting to one or both of those groups.

I'm just looking forward to the end of this election so I can start
filtering "cycling" the way I filter "politics", "religion" and
"ponds". I think we (tinw) have heard enough about cycling recently to
put us off all two-wheeled modes of travel for the rest of our lives.


-- 
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator