Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet
In uk.net.news.management on Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:52:42 +0000, Sn!pe
wrote:
> John Hall wrote:
>
>> In article <1j8lndj.60r5bli09g1bN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>,
>> Sn!pe writes:
>
>> >I have a stable of eleven good, free, text newsservers, collected over
>> >the years. Of those at least half offer a perceived service every bit as
>> >good as e.g. NIN; several run Cleanfeed. Nobody need pay for text Usenet
>> >service these days.
>>
>> Eleven! That seems somewhat excessive. If they are so good, then why do
>> you need so many?
>
> Oh, it's a bit of a hobby ever since freeserve dropped Usenet service.
I didn't know they'd done that. Yet another purveyor of net.idiocy
has bitten the dust!
> I went looking in alt.free.newsservers, became fascinated and stayed.
> This was in the days before afn got trashed of course, although even
> today there is still a hard core of worthwhile posters there.
I still subscribe to AFN, but mostly I don't have time to do more than
skim the Subjects, notice which nutters are noisiest, and then mark
the group read.
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:30:34 +0000
author: Peter J Ross lid
|