Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
In message , Cherry
Chapstick <azure@invalid.really.really> wrote:
>>>Is the committe not already telling users what they ought to do with
>>>reference to group creation?
>It is clear that the committee can, for example, refuse or allow
>objections to fast track RFDs for the creation of groups - some
>guidelines are given as to what are valid objections. There are no
>guidelines given to as to on what grounds the committee can refuse to
>fast track RFDs for rmgrouping or reshaping the uk.* structure.
I don't see the link.
The committee can take a dubious objection ("the proponent didn't answer
my 86th posting in the discussion") and use it as a lever to force a
vote instead of allowing a fast-track.
To quote Isaac Asimov quoting Arthur C. Clarke: "So what?" [1].
[1] In reply to "Your HAL 9000 broke the First Law of Robotics."
--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Mobile: +44 7973 377646 | Web: <http://www.davros.org>
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:
date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:13:49 +0000
author: Clive D. W. Feather
|