Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:37:09 +0000, Molly Mockford
wrote:
>
>I'm beginning to wonder to what extent there is any point at all in
>trying to discuss *anything* sensible with the anonymous Dipstick.
Brilliant. Substituting what you think is a humerous variation on
somebody's name for argument or discussion.
date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:38:17 +0000
author: Cherry Chapstick ly
|
Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:38:17 +0000, Cherry Chapstick
<azure@invalid.really.really> wrote:
>On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:37:09 +0000, Molly Mockford
> wrote:
>
>>
>>I'm beginning to wonder to what extent there is any point at all in
>>trying to discuss *anything* sensible with the anonymous Dipstick.
>
>Brilliant. Substituting what you think is a humerous variation on
>somebody's name for argument or discussion.
But is was funny - and also very appropriate.
Have you not met Bilbo Braggins and Phil W.Anchor Lee, what about
Steve Filth?
--
As a pedestrian, you're more likely to be hit and injured by a moped than by a cyclist. (Guy Chapman)
Absolute rubbish - please produce evidence (Judith Smith)
date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:41:35 +0000
author: jms
|