Re: Responsibility for the health of Usenet (was Re: Questions for Chibal)
At 01:21:22 on Sun, 1 Nov 2009, kat wrote in
:
>Nice.:-) Funnily enough the woman in the next bed called her son
>Alexander and I thought at the time they would have had the same name.
>Had I been a boy I was to have been called Lindsay, and I think I might
>have suffered after we moved south to where Lindsays were all girls!
>Names are every intercangeable these days.
Lindsay/Lindsey is a good unisex name in most parts of Britain, and
there are plenty of other such, even if the odd vowel tends to differ
(like Lesley/Leslie). Many a name can unexpectedly belong to either
sex, though - I was at Sunday School with a girl called Rodney. You
won't believe this, but her brother was Charles; so of course, every
single week, they had to face the greetings of "Hello, Rodney!" "Hello,
Charles!"
(A joke for the older reader, that one.)
I understand that Sikh forenames are gender-free, which has all kinds of
advantages. But at this point I think I'll leave the subject alone, and
go to bed!
--
Molly
I don't speak for the Committee. If I ever do, it will be made
specifically clear.
My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not be so for ever.
date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:34:29 +0000
author: Molly Mockford
|