Quoting  .m   :
> wrote:
>>Still, I guess the current Committee finds it easier to swear at people
>>than to tell the truth, right?
>Wrong.  You wouldn't know the 'truth' if a 747 with TRUTH encrusted in
>diamonds along the side in 10 foot high letters flew up your arse.

Yes, dear. I notice you don't seem to be producing any actual _evidence_
that this fantasy that the Committee kindly stepped in to reduce the
discussion period by, er, imposing a change after the discussion period
was over _is_ the truth, diamond-encrusted or not.

And why not? Because it is a lie.
-- 
David Damerell  Oil is for sissies
Yesterday was First Epithumia, October - a weekend.
Today is First Olethros, October - a weekend.
Tomorrow will be Gaiman, October - a public holiday.

On 16 Oct 2009 15:18:03 +0100 (BST), David Damerell
 wrote:

>Yes, dear. I notice you don't seem to be producing any actual _evidence_
>that this fantasy that the Committee kindly stepped in to reduce the
>discussion period by, er, imposing a change after the discussion period
>was over _is_ the truth, diamond-encrusted or not.
>
>And why not? Because it is a lie.

You've just maxed out on the "irritating, clueless fuckwit" scale and
can therefore reside your irrational paranoid wibblings in my killfile
along with jms and other bolloock-brained twunts.

Quoting  .m   :
> wrote:
>>Yes, dear. I notice you don't seem to be producing any actual _evidence_
>>that this fantasy that the Committee kindly stepped in to reduce the
>>discussion period by, er, imposing a change after the discussion period
>>was over _is_ the truth, diamond-encrusted or not.
>You've just maxed out on the "irritating, clueless fuckwit" scale

Still evading the point, I see. Perhaps some Committee member less stuck
on the Tourette's Channel would like to explain how making a change
after the end of the discussion period helped to prevent further
discussion?

Didn't think so.
-- 
David Damerell  Oil is for sissies
Yesterday was First Epithumia, October - a weekend.
Today is First Olethros, October - a weekend.
Tomorrow will be Gaiman, October - a public holiday.

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:58:56 +0100, .m  
wrote:

>On 16 Oct 2009 15:18:03 +0100 (BST), David Damerell
> wrote:
>
>>Yes, dear. I notice you don't seem to be producing any actual _evidence_
>>that this fantasy that the Committee kindly stepped in to reduce the
>>discussion period by, er, imposing a change after the discussion period
>>was over _is_ the truth, diamond-encrusted or not.
>>
>>And why not? Because it is a lie.
>
>You've just maxed out on the "irritating, clueless fuckwit" scale and
>can therefore reside your irrational paranoid wibblings in my killfile
>along with jms and other bolloock-brained twunts.


I love the way that you are so grown up and mature about all of these
things.

Do you always have difficulty expressing yourself without the language
of the gutter?  Or are you just so more at home with it?

I bet it gets you a lot of respect.

In article ,
.m    wrote:
>You've just maxed out on the "irritating, clueless fuckwit" scale and
>can therefore reside your irrational paranoid wibblings in my killfile
>along with jms and other bolloock-brained twunts.

 You might as well add me now and save yourself time later.

-- 
Jonathan Amery.   yo-yo, n.:
   #####                  Something that is occasionally up
  #######__o              but normally down.
  #######'/               (see also Computer).