On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:49:13 +0000 (UTC), Ian Smith
 wrote:

>On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:41:36 +0100, Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote:
>>  Ian Smith  wrote:
>[actually, Steve Firth said this bit]
>> > >
>> > > <sigh> More abuse from the supposedly clean as the driven snow 
>> > > URC regulars. Maybe it's a sign of how little urc interests me 
>> > > in the great scheme of things that the couple of crossposts that 
>> > > I am responsible for had escaped my memory.
>> > 
>> > Oooh look - teh Judith Smith defence.  "Yes I lied, but I it's _me_, 
>> > and obviously it doesn't matter when _I_ lie".
>> 
>>  Do you have a reading disability? Or perhaps you're having problems
>>  witht he definition of the word "lie". I'll help you out. Making a
>>  statement that one believes to be true is not a lie. Hence I didn't lie.
>
>Yes, that's her other favourite - yes I lied, but I didn't mean to, so 
>I didn't.  You've got it down pat, well done.
>
>regards,   Ian SMith

I think you are confusing me with someone else.

I do not (intentionally) lie.  I may make a genuine mistake sometimes.
Please feel free to point out where you think I have lied.

The fuckwit Wm..   said he would provide some information if I emailed
him.  he didn't -  that was a lie.

The fuckwit Chapman said he had *never* said he encouraged his
children to wear cycle helmets - he had - that was a lie.

Perhaps you are unsure what a lie actually is.

--    

Members of the medical profession refer to cyclists as "donors".
(Daily Mail)

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:43:29 +0100, "Wm...the lying fuckwit"
 wrote:

>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:16:35  
>uk.net.news.config Judith M Smith 
>
>
>>The fuckwit Wm..   said he would provide some information if I emailed
>>him.  he didn't -  that was a lie.
>
>Not true.

I refer you to your comment:

"I have a name, an address and a pub.  I have details of which way you
might travel to and from the pub.  I think I can locate you to within 
100m."



So I dreamt that you said :

 "if you send me an 
e-mail I will provide you details that you can deny or confirm." - did
I?


I sent you the email - please provide the details.

Otherwise you are an out and out liar - it is as simple as that.

(Is it you who is scanning the system I use to send email from.  Is
that what you wanted an IP address for?)

--    

Members of the medical profession refer to cyclists as "donors".
(Daily Mail)

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:57:54 +0100, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:30:14  
>uk.net.news.config Judith M Smith 
>
>>On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:43:29 +0100, "Wm...the lying fuckwit"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:16:35 
>>>uk.net.news.config Judith M Smith 
>>>
>>>
>>>>The fuckwit Wm..   said he would provide some information if I emailed
>>>>him.  he didn't -  that was a lie.
>>>
>>>Not true.
>>
>>I refer you to your comment:
>>
>>"I have a name, an address and a pub.  I have details of which way you
>>might travel to and from the pub.  I think I can locate you to within
>>100m."
>
>>So I dreamt that you said :
>>
>> "if you send me an
>>e-mail I will provide you details that you can deny or confirm." - did
>>I?
>
>No.  You are neither a clear thinker or reader.

Good - you admit  I did not dream it  - so please honour your part of
the bargain.

--  

British Medical Association (BMA)
View on helmets:

Several studies provided solid scientific evidence that bicycle helmets
protect against head, brain, severe brain and facial injuries,
as well as death, as a result of cycling accidents