On 6 Oct, 20:26, Judith M Smith  wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:39:05 -0700 (PDT), RudiL 
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 6 Oct, 11:20, Ian Jackson  wrote:
> >> In article ,
> >> one of our trolls wrote:
>
> >> >[more vacuous vitriol]
>
> >> I've been dutifully reading this group without the benefit of a
> >> killfile since being told that it was essential for a proponent, but I
> >> think the time has come for me to return to a more sensible
> >> newsreading approach.
>
> >> So from now on, please do not infer anything in particular if I fail
> >> to respond to trolls even if it seems that their posting could
> >> usefully benefit from a contribution from me.
>
> >Don't blame you. And indeed there is no need for you to read
> >everything on this group any longer as the discussion about the new
> >group is now over. It would be nice if the new group came soon though.
> >By the way be prepared for posts apparently from long standing members
> >of urc but actually from you know who. I was caught out by an email
> >like this recently. It may be worth considering PGP authentication
>
> >Rudi
>
> Did you spill any beans?
>
> Who was it from?

It was from a nym-shifting trolling hotmail user who for some reason
was clearly very very worried by what I might or might not know about
the trolling nym-shifting jms

Rudi