Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:28:23  
uk.net.news.config Geoff Berrow 

GrahamD:
>>I stand by what I said, there is no "no-HTML" rule, the no binaries
>>clause does not cover HTML in my opinion.
>
>I agree with Graham.  Opinion is, of course, divided and if you've
>been reading the discussion you'll see why.

Has anyone really read all of it?  If so why?

>All we've ever said (and by we I mean most of those who were around
>when this was first discussed) is that if you deviate from what has
>become the standard wording then an argument is likely to ensue.

Minds aren't going to change as the result of meta discussion about 
this.  RFD the issue or leave it is my opinion.

>As it happens, it appears we have such a shortage of good arguments in
>here these days, that we've decided to have one anyway.

Did you say "good"?  I must have missed something.

>Hey-ho...

Hey-ho, the binaries are faux
They're HTML?
Oh no, they aren't
Hey-ho ... etc

-- 
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days