On 2009-10-03, Richard Kettlewell  wrote:
> Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> writes:
>> Yeah, let's set everything up for urcm in some weird unique way
>> rather than doing it the normal way. That sounds a fantastic idea.
>> Think of all the advantages! Oh, wait, there aren't any.
>
> For example: one less point of failure in the path from poster to
> submission.

Or indeed one *more* point of failure, depending on the configuration
of the poster's news server.