On 2009-10-03, Richard Kettlewell  wrote:
>> Wrong. Read it again.
>
> Don't be so patronizing.

Why? You should know better. You're the ones whining about the group
being treated the same as every other group, wanting not to follow
long-established standards that exist for good reasons, wanting to
be "special" with no obvious justification whatsoever.

> usenet.org.uk could just forward to moderators.isc.org, in the case of
> a uk.* group that for whatever reason didn't want to follow the petty
> insistence on going via usenet.org.uk.

Yeah, let's set everything up for urcm in some weird unique way
rather than doing it the normal way. That sounds a fantastic idea.
Think of all the advantages! Oh, wait, there aren't any.