Tom Crispin <kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> writes:

> Danny has already said that he emailed three former subscribers to
> urc.  Unless he says otherwise, he did so with an expectation that
> they would vote for the new group.  I call that canvassing.

Notifying someone of the existence of a poll isn't canvassing (whatever
your exectation of how they might vote). Trying to influence how they
vote is.

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:40:11 +0100, %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
wrote:

>Tom Crispin <kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>
>> Thank you.  It is behind us now.
>
>Christ on a bike, what a toss-pot you are.

From you, I take that as a great compliment.

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:25:30 +0100, jms 
wrote:

>On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:48:00 +0100, "Wm..."
> wrote:
>
>>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:08:08  
>>uk.net.news.config . m <nospam@notnominet.name.invalid>
>>
>>>On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:45:11 +0100, Tom Crispin
>>><kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>>>
>>>>If you have apologised, I have missed the apology.
>>>
>>>Wm... FFS just say sorry for any misunderstandings or offence caused
>>>and get on with enjoying RL should the two of you ever meet again.
>>
>>I thought I had apologised. 
>
>
>
>Good one - so you still haven't then.

Keep up, Judith, if you can.  We met fleetingly last Sunday.

On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:40:15 +0100, %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
wrote:

>Hmm of course by this time, any denials that the URC regulars are a
>bunch of monomanical, over-testosteroned tosspots who couldn't organise
>the supply of pea soup in a brewery and simply want to do anything they
>can to be contrary are wearing a bit thin.

The irony of a regular in uk.tosspot accusing the non-drivers of
testosterone poisoning is not lost on anyone, I think.
 
Guy
-- 
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/