In uk.net.news.config on Sun, 16 Aug 2009 02:40:10 +0100, Phil W Lee
<phil> wrote:

> Sara Merriman  considered Sat, 15 Aug
> 2009 20:43:49 +0100 the perfect time to write:
>
>>In article ,
>> Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> 
>>> But at best you have two functioning groups for the same topic, and at
>>> worst you have at least one abandoned midden.
>>
>>If that's the worst that can happen, then it doesn't seem that bad to me.
>
> Indeed.
> It beats the hell out of having no functional group at all.

Which parts of "at best" and "at worst" were difficult for all of you
to understand?

Maybe I expressed myself unclearly.

At best you have two newsgroups where one would suffice. At worst you
have two spamtraps.

I repeat what I've said before: the natural consequence of this RFD is
the eventual removal of URC.

-- 
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator