Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:13:31 +0100, Keitht <KeithT> wrote:
>Rex M F Smith wrote:
>> In message , "Just zis Guy,
>> you know?" writes
>>
>>> Quite why jms, who claims to have made multiple votes, would want to
>>> stir up that particular muddy pool is another matter.
>>
>> Paranoid checking sucks up the vote-taker's time and energy?
>>
>> (Just a thought)
>
>It's the game, remember?
>
>Group created - jms wins
>Group not created - jms wins
>
>Yup, real wierd but that's the way it is - we are all prawns in the game
>of jms.
>
>yeh, sad, real sad.
If someone wants to accuse me of playing a game (I think that you were
the first to do so) - I am more than happy to throw in snippets like
"I win both ways" - just to wind up the fuckwits like you.
You started "the game" - I joined in with you.
If you do not want to play games - then do not start them.
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:07:24 +0100
author: jms
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:18:41 +0100, "Wm..the fuckwit."
wrote:
>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:07:24
>uk.rec.cycling jms
>
>>If someone wants to accuse me of playing a game (I think that you were
>>the first to do so) - I am more than happy to throw in snippets like
>>"I win both ways" - just to wind up the fuckwits like you.
>>
>>You started "the game" - I joined in with you.
>>
>>If you do not want to play games - then do not start them.
>
>What will you do after you have lost this game?
I know of no game.
Which particular game are you talking about?
--
DfT Figures 2007
Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured: Pedal Cyclists : 533 Pedestrians 384
All casualties: Pedal Cyclists : 3739 Pedestrians : 1795
Please draw your own conclusion.
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:41:06 +0100
author: jms
|