On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:17:53 +0100, "Wm...the fuckwit"
 wrote:

>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:52:42 <lBGaorEqhSiKFwG+@gehena.demon.co.uk> 
>uk.net.news.config Rex M F Smith 
>
>>In message , "Just zis Guy, 
>>you know?"  writes
>>
>>>Quite why jms, who claims to have made multiple votes, would want to
>>>stir up that particular muddy pool is another matter.
>>
>>Paranoid checking sucks up the vote-taker's time and energy?
>>
>>(Just a thought)
>
>The votetaker was also ill during that time but seems to have soldiered 
>on.  Thanks, Pedt.
>
>Why jms and it's ilk do what they do?  I've no idea really but my guess 
>is that they (if there is more than one person) figure they've lost the 
>battle and will simply make life unpleasant for as many people as 
>possible for as long as possible.


What do you mean "do what they do"?  - be precise with your accusation
please.

On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:17:04 +0100, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:55:51  
>uk.rec.cycling jms 
>
>>What do you mean "do what they do"?  - be precise with your accusation
>>please.
>
>making more than one vote


more than one vote is permitted is it not?

--  
The BMA (British Medical Association) urges legislation to make the wearing of cycle helmets compulsory for both adults and children.

The evidence from those countries where compulsory cycle helmet use has already been introduced is that such legislation has a beneficial effect on cycle-related deaths and head injuries.
This strongly supports the case for introducing legislation in the UK.  Such legislation should result in a reduction in the morbidity and mortality associated with cycling accidents.