Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:37:43  
uk.net.news.config Judith M Smith 

>On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:16:55 +0100, "Wm...the fuckwit "
> wrote:
>
>>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:59:11 
>>uk.net.news.config jms 
>>
>>>I think Ross probably isn't a "man" - probably a school kid - throwing
>>>one off as he types the naughty word.
>>
>>I think that makes you the pervert.  Everyone else's supposed fantasies
>>were about adults up till now.
>
>I think that there is only you and Ross who are fanaticising about
>anything.

I said fantasising not fanaticising.

There is a difference, fool.

You don't have fans; I don't want them.

-- 
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days

At 10:38:22 on Sun, 16 Aug 2009, "Just zis Guy, you know?" 
 wrote in 
:

>I am constantly amazed at the goods vehicle drivers who
>double-declutch when changing up - this will have the precise opposite
>of the desired effect.

I don't see why?  The desired effect of double de-clutching is to match 
the engine speed to the gear about to be selected.  Double de-clutching 
when changing up could be defined as: into neutral - increase revs - 
into gear;  which is certainly a rather more difficult technique to 
master than changing down, which is simply: into neutral - revs drop - 
into gear (although the option is always there for: into neutral - brake 
- into gear).  However, in a large vehicle without synchromesh, it 
remains an essential skill, especially in situations where the driver 
wishes to skip a gear, surely?
-- 
Molly
I don't speak for the Committee.  If I ever do, it will be made
specifically clear.
My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not be so for ever.