On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:49:47 +0100, Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid>
wrote:

>In uk.net.news.config on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:48:21 +0100, kat
> wrote:
>
>> Peter J Ross said:
>>
>>> Newsgroups SHOULD NOT be created just because there's a fashion for
>>> using software that lacks standard coring/killfiling features that are
>>> incorporated in all adequate Usenet software. Users of Google Groups,
>>> Outlook Express, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, Forte Agent and the
>>> like need to be *educated*, not bowed down to.
>>>
>>
>> Aside from the fact I consider that to be elitist crap, I would imagine most 
>> of them will be driven away by the mind numbingly boring content of groups 
>> such as urc is in the current circumstances, before you get the chance.
>>
>> But, if they do learn anything, I wouldn't be one bit surprised if people 
>> with your attitude were the first into the killfile.
>
>You're very welcome to killfile me, Ms OE-user.

Bugger - someone has shown me up with a reasoned statement - lets
ridicule them because  they use some particular  software.

What a very odd - but pathetic attitude.

You'll be putting glib little comments in ROT13 soon - that'll show
how really clever you are won't it?

Any view on chiark not accepting emails from  live and hotmail
accounts - that'll be right up your street I bet.

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:58:31 +0100, Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid>
wrote:

<snip>


>> Bugger - someone has shown me up with a reasoned statement - lets
>> ridicule them because  they use some particular  software.
>
>It remains hilarious that you're flaming me for sharing your
>opposition to the creation of URCM.

It  is hilarious that you can think that.



>Meanwhile, kat wrote something that I took a little too personally,
>and in reply I wrote something that kat took a little too personally,
>but I expect we'll start getting along with each other well enough at
>some future date.

Indeed -  she may have found you to be obnoxious in some of the things
you have said. 

So have I.

>I'd probably start getting along quite well even with you, if you
>apologised for your abuse of the voting process and your vandalism of
>a harmless newsgroup.

I have no wish to get on quite well with you.  It is interesting that
this  seems  to be quite important for you - I note your similar
comment to kat above.

I have not abused the voting process.

I have not vandalised a harmless newsgroup.

I have promoted my views quite strongly.

I have disagreed with some people.

I have identified some people as  fuckwits.

jms wrote:

> 
> I have not abused the voting process.
> 

But posted elsewhere to try and gain support

> I have not vandalised a harmless newsgroup.
> 
But flood it with shite instead

> I have promoted my views quite strongly.

But rarely with any point to them other than scoring points

> 
> I have disagreed with some people.

Make that many or most and not ust here

> 
> I have identified some people as  fuckwits.

By first looking in the mirror as a prime example.



Next


-- 

Come to Dave & Boris - your cycle security experts.

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:29:36 +0100, Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid>
wrote:

>In uk.net.news.config on Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:29:59 +0100, jms
> wrote:
>
>> I have not abused the voting process.
>
>> I have not vandalised a harmless newsgroup.
>
>"In response to a polite request, I, jms, got my tits out for the
>lads."
>
>The three statements are equally truthful.
>
>
>What do we what? Tits!
>When do we want 'em? Now!


Very grown up and mature.