Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:08:44  
uk.net.news.config jms 

>There we go - you *are* a pervert - I thought as much.

Good thing I am well mannered enough not to express my perverse thoughts 
about you.

-- 
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days

In uk.net.news.config on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:01:30 +0100, Geoff Berrow
 wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:56:49 +0100, "kat" 
> wrote:
>
>>>> Maybe "irruption" is a collective noun for a halfwitted
>>>> trollery(whatever a 'trollery' is)?
>>>>
>>> Out of interest,the word "irrupt" is identical in meaning to "erupt",
>>> or is there a subtle difference?
>>
>>Erupt is to break out, irrupt is to break into.   As far as I can see 
>>anyway.
>
> Fascinating.  Stuff you learn on Usenet , eh? 
>
> Never heard the word before but should have known that PJR wouldn't
> make a pikey mistake. 

Anybody who disagrees is irrisible!

:-)

"Irrisible" is an obsolete equivalent of "risible", according to my
old SOED, but "irruption" has been in continuous and meaningful use
since 1533.

"The action of bursting or breaking in; a violent entry, inroad,
incursion or invasion, esp. of a hostile force or tribe."

So trolls irrupt. If they merely erupted, they'd gain no attention.

On the same page of the dictionary are words like "irroration" and
"ischiadic", both of which are new to me, and likely to be forgotten
soon.




-- 
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:16:55 +0100, "Wm...the fuckwit "
 wrote:

>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:59:11  
>uk.net.news.config jms 
>
>>I think Ross probably isn't a "man" - probably a school kid - throwing
>>one off as he types the naughty word.
>
>I think that makes you the pervert.  Everyone else's supposed fantasies 
>were about adults up till now.

I think that there is only you and Ross who are fanaticising about
anything.

--  
The BMA (British Medical Association) urges legislation to make the wearing of cycle helmets compulsory for both adults and children.

The evidence from those countries where compulsory cycle helmet use has already been introduced is that such legislation has a beneficial effect on cycle-related deaths and head injuries.
This strongly supports the case for introducing legislation in the UK.  Such legislation should result in a reduction in the morbidity and mortality associated with cycling accidents.

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:16:55 +0100, "Wm..."
 wrote:

>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:59:11  
>uk.net.news.config jms 
>
>>I think Ross probably isn't a "man" - probably a school kid - throwing
>>one off as he types the naughty word.
>
>I think that makes you the pervert.  Everyone else's supposed fantasies 
>were about adults up till now.

Perhaps so, since it is trivially easy to verify who PJR is and that
he is manifestly not a schoolboy.

Guy
-- 
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/urc | http://www.nohelmetlaw.org.uk/
"Nullius in Verba" - take no man's word for it.
 - attr. Horace, chosen by John Evelyn for the Royal Society

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:36:27 -0400, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
 wrote:

>On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:16:55 +0100, "Wm..."
> wrote:
>
>>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:59:11  
>>uk.net.news.config jms 
>>
>>>I think Ross probably isn't a "man" - probably a school kid - throwing
>>>one off as he types the naughty word.
>>
>>I think that makes you the pervert.  Everyone else's supposed fantasies 
>>were about adults up till now.
>
>Perhaps so, since it is trivially easy to verify who PJR is and that
>he is manifestly not a schoolboy.
>
>Guy

Are you saying he is a grown up?
Are you saying he is not a child?
Are you saying he should know better?

In which case I will correct it:

"He has the mind of a school kid - probably throwing one off as he
types the naughty word."

However, naughty, naughty Guy - but I did what you wanted:

I googled for "Peter J Ross"  news

The first entry:

"Where can you read usenet group
alt.deadbeat-dads.such-as.peter-j-ross"


Thanks for the heads up.



--     

British Medical Association (BMA)
View on helmets:

Several studies provided solid scientific evidence that bicycle helmets
protect against head, brain, severe brain and facial injuries,
as well as death, as a result of cycling accidents