|
|
|
date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:45:43 +0100,
group: uk.net.news.config
back
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:14:07
uk.net.news.config jms
>So you admit
I made no admission
> that you are interested in my body - you really are a
>pervert.
I don't see your jump from being interested in a body to being a
pervert.
Why should a person interested in bodies be a pervert? Bodies are just
things people inhabit after all.
--
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days
date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:33:44 +0100
author: Wm...
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
In uk.net.news.config on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:45:26 +0100, jms
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:20:26 +0100, Phil W Lee
> <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
>
>>Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid> considered Mon, 10 Aug 2009
>>22:32:32 +0100 the perfect time to write:
> <snip>
>
>>>Seriously, folks, if an irruption of halfwitted trollery such as jms
>>>exhibits is a good reason to create a moderated newsgroup, we might as
>>>well make all of Usenet moderated right now.
>>
>>You propose that, I'd vote for it.
>>A troll free usenet would be a wonderful thing.
>
> You need to understand what a troll is.
Most of the people posting in this thread know what a troll is. For
example, you're a troll. You're a very clumsy troll, but you've gained
a lot of victims.
Well done, jms!
--
PJR :-)
slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:45:43 +0100
author: Peter J Ross lid
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:35:32 +0100, Keitht <KeithT> wrote:
>jms wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:03:00 +0100, Keitht <KeithT> wrote:
>>
>>> jms wrote:
>>>
>>>> Still - if it is important to you - and it obviously is - I'll let
>>>> you use the origin you want to and not pull you up over it.
>>>>
>>> Ta, it saves me finding more definitions for you, now you've admitted I
>>> was right.
>>
>>
>> 'Fraid not - that is not the *only* definition of the origin of
>> trolling - or what it means.
>>
>> Don't forget to tell everyone else who uses the "bridge" reference
>> that they are wrong 121,00 hits on Google news groups.
>>
>> as you said:
>>
>> FFS
>>
>>
>
>Missed it again?
>
>I didn't say that fishing was the only one - just that it's the origin
>of the ng meaning.
Good - so when I said : " Most of them wouldn't know a troll if it
jumped out from under the bridge and bit them on the arse."
There was not actually anything wrong with it; I am surprised you
thought it was worth the FFS comment.
Why has it rattled your cage?
Anyway - I am please to have been able to help you there.
Now what stats are you interested in:
Did you know that DfT say that in the UK between 1980 and 2007, the
distance traveled by pedal cycle fell by 17 per cent.
I think it is because people are becoming aware of how dangerous
cycling is. Have you any strong views or alternative explanations?
--
British Medical Association (BMA)
View on helmets:
Several studies provided solid scientific evidence that bicycle helmets
protect against head, brain, severe brain and facial injuries,
as well as death, as a result of cycling accidents
date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:03:30 +0100
author: jms
|
|
|