Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:25:01  
uk.net.news.config jms 

>On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:34:22 +0100, "Wm..the fuckwit ."
> wrote:
>
>>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:55:46 <1j4ah7n.11yuq8013p2midN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
>>uk.net.news.config Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
>>
>>>jms  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry Filth- you have lost me:
>>>
>>>Oh, I don't doubt it, Pubeith. That happens a lot when people like me
>>>talk to pondscum like you.
>>
>>Do we know who the jms is yet?
>
>
>What do you mean  - what do you want - dob, address phone number?

That would be handy for the vote taker.  You have voted haven't you?

>What an unusual request on a newsgroup?

Not really.  Most of us don't behave in a sufficiently bad way that 
anyone else asks.

>Who is this  "we" - you plus who? - are you saying that you have
>friends or colleagues?

Yes

>Perhaps you could explain why you need this extra information?

Validation

>What do you have in mind - nuisance calls, subscriptions?

Not my thing

>You really are an objectionable piece of shit.

The more dirt you throw the more amusing you remain.

I say a man wearing girls pants.

-- 
Wm...
Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days

On 11 Aug, 19:38, "Wm..."  wrote:
> Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:25:01 
> uk.net.news.config jms 
>
>
>
> >On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:34:22 퍝, "Wm..the fuckwit ."
> > wrote:
>
> >>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:55:46 <1j4ah7n.11yuq8013p2midN%%ste...@malloc.co.uk> >>uk.net.news.config Steve Firth <%ste...@malloc.co.uk>
>
> >>>jms  wrote:
>
> >>>> Sorry Filth- you have lost me:
>
> >>>Oh, I don't doubt it, Pubeith. That happens a lot when people like me
> >>>talk to pondscum like you.
>
> >>Do we know who the jms is yet?
>
> >What do you mean  - what do you want - dob, address phone number?
>
> That would be handy for the vote taker.  You have voted haven't you?
>
> >What an unusual request on a newsgroup?
>
> Not really.  Most of us don't behave in a sufficiently bad way that
> anyone else asks.
>
> >Who is this  "we" - you plus who? - are you saying that you have
> >friends or colleagues?
>
> Yes
>
> >Perhaps you could explain why you need this extra information?
>
> Validation
>
> >What do you have in mind - nuisance calls, subscriptions?
>
> Not my thing
>
> >You really are an objectionable piece of shit.
>
> The more dirt you throw the more amusing you remain.
>
> I say a man wearing girls pants.
>

So close, but the jms PC camera reveals only this:-
http://www.wordpress.tokyotimes.org/archives/bra_man.jpg