On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:20:08 +0100
"Wm..."  wrote:

> We've done that before, unnc includes a broad spectrum of people with 
> wide interests.  Some of us cycle, some of us know a bit about music, 
> together we know quite a lot, I'm inclined to invite you to stick
> around in unn.* after the group in question is created.
> 
Creepy - get out while you can Guy ...

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:30:20 -0700 (PDT), James
 wrote:

>On Aug 1, 7:48 am, Tom Crispin <kije.rem...@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge>
>wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:29:09 +0100, "Clive George"
>>
>>  wrote:
>> >Earlier Tom Crispin gave the example of a thread which he thought was a
>> >flame war which would be banned - but others, mods included, pointed out it
>> >wouldn't. Robust discussion, yes, and it would be allowed.
>>
>> The 500 post thread was a helmet flamefest.  If it was allowed the
>> moderators would not be upholding the stated aims of urcm.  There was
>> plenty of nastiness, including a particularly vicious suggestion by
>> one potential moderator that Kristian was laughing at the death of a
>> young lad.  Kristian stopped posting very shortly afterwards.
>
>"Particularly vicious"?
>
>I'd say you were having a laugh, but in fact it seems more like you
>are just making up outright lies.
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling/msg/479577ab67d9a15f
>
>James


Braggins would  of course make an excellent moderator with that
attitude.

I don't think I'll vote for him.

Oh .... bugger ......


-- 


Vote NO to the proposed group uk.rec.cycling.moderated aka uk.rec.cycling.censored