|
|
|
date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:56:21 +0100,
group: uk.net.news.config
back
Re: Moderated group voting procedure
At 15:00:33 on Thu, 30 Jul 2009, jms wrote
in :
>On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:24:24 +0100, "Wm..."
> wrote:
>
>>UKV counts votes. The committee instructs Control or the deputy to
>>create a group. Usually this is happily based on fair people saying yes
>>and no as counted by UKV.
>>
>>Please don't underestimate what the Committee might do if it feels a
>>certain way.
>
>Remind us please - what part do you take in the formal process?
For the avoidance of doubt on the part of those who are not regulars in
unn*: Wm... is neither a Committee member nor a member or UKVoting, nor
has he ever been either. He has been around these groups for quite some
while, and during that time he has observed proceedings, and drawn his
own conclusions. He may post profusely, but his words carry exactly as
much clout as those of anybody else who might post here. He has no
special power or authority, and no inside knowledge of the secrets of
how things work.
Speaking as someone who has served for years on first UKVoting and then
on Committee, there is in fact *far* less inside knowledge (let alone
power and authority) than many people assume there must be. The only
official secret is the Black Helicopter/Chocolate Hobnobs Interface
(TINBHCHI).
Best to relax, and let go of the paranoia. It'll give you indigestion.
--
Molly
I don't speak for the Committee. If I ever do, it will be made
specifically clear.
My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not be so for ever.
date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:16:02 +0100
author: Molly Mockford
|
Re: Proposed Unofficial Call to Votes
In uk.net.news.config on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:39:18 +0100, jms
wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:14:26 +0100, Peter J Ross <pjr@example.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>>Don't the rules say "The committee shall promptly obey all
>>instructions given by anonymous cowards"?
>
> I don't think you should call Wm.. that
I didn't.
> - or were you referring to
> people who use anonymous email addresses.
I wasn't.
> You know something like xyz@example.invalid
>
> "The e-mail addresses given in "From:", "Reply-To:", and "Sender:"
> SHOULD be yours (i.e. you should be entitled to use it)"
I'm entitled to use @example.invalid, just like everybody else.
> knob
I like your new .sig.
--
PJR :-)
news.admin.announce (a low-volume, moderated Usenet group)
Read and post announcements of interest to news administrators.
See <http://www.robomod.net/news.admin.announce/info.html>.
date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:56:21 +0100
author: Peter J Ross lid
|
|
|