On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:52:12 +0100, Phil W Lee
<phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:

>James  considered Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:47:23
>-0700 (PDT) the perfect time to write:
>
>>On Jul 4, 7:02 am, Ian Smith  wrote:
>>
>>> I have said that sig and body should be judged ion exactly the same
>>> criterion.  Repeatedly.  In both RFD processes.
>>
>>Which is plainly ridiculous, since sigs routinely contain repetitive
>>and off-topic material that would be cause for rejection under any
>>sane moderation policy. (Probably these issues would be overwhelmed by
>>the body of the post in many cases, but certainly not all.)
>>
>>James
>
>It looks to me as if people are in violent agreement, in concept if
>not in wording.


Oh really - Mr Jackson and his hand-picked team have yet to say what
they would do with my example BMA sig.