On 2 July, 11:37, jms  wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:16:20 퍝, Phil W Lee
>
>
>
>
>
> <phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> >jms  considered Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:15:13
> >퍝 the perfect time to write:
>
> >>On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:04:57 퍝, Marc
> >> wrote:
>
> >>>jms wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:08:03 퍝, "Wm..."
> >>>>  wrote:
>
> >>>> <snip>
>
> >>>>>> Chapman was caught nym-shifting - full stop.
> >>>>> Prove it.  Assertions don't count here.
>
> >>>> Just ask him:  "Did you make the first Lou Knee post?"
>
> >>>That isn't "proof".
>
> >>I am not suggesting it is - the use of the same IP address was proof
> >>enough me and others - certainly beyond reasonable doubt.
>
> >>For those who do not believe that proof - I suggest they just ask
> >>Chapman.
>
> >Ah yes, that IP address used by a web proxy.
> >It's a bit like claiming DNA proved it because it had a Y chromosome.
> >Who were these "others" that you claim to have accepted such flimsy
> >evidence?
> >Of course that's been pointed out to you before, but you never accept
> >anything that you disagree with.
>
> >You've obviously been doing plenty of thcreaming.
>
> Just ask Chapman the question - the technicalities are obviously too
> difficult for you.
>
> Even you should be able to understand if he gives a simple answer of
> yes or no to the question : Did you make the first Lou Knee post?"
>
> Perhaps you should also ask yourself - why does Chapman not just
> answer the question and kill the topic stone dead?

What has this to do with unnc? Don't you realise no-one cares about
Lou Knee except you and Nuxxy? It is boring and doesn't merit what
feels like a near infinite number of postings.

Rudi