only 1p at the moment

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=260253341088&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT&ih=016

Steve Hammond  wrote:

> only 1p at the moment

I thik that's it, time to kill file anyone using Google groups.
Especially since complaining about spam etc gets no response from
Google.

As someone said some time ago it must be well past time for UDP on
Google.

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:05:02 +0100, %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
wrote:

>Steve Hammond  wrote:
>
>> only 1p at the moment
>
>I thik that's it, time to kill file anyone using Google groups.
>Especially since complaining about spam etc gets no response from
>Google.
>
>As someone said some time ago it must be well past time for UDP on
>Google.


UDP?

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:09:36 +0100, Lister  wrote:

> UDP?

Usenet Death Penalty - whereby other news services would refuse to peer or
to accept any articles injected locally there.

Tony

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:28:05 +0100, "Anthony R. Gold"
 wrote:

>On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:09:36 +0100, Lister  wrote:
>
>> UDP?
>
>Usenet Death Penalty - whereby other news services would refuse to peer or
>to accept any articles injected locally there.
>
>Tony


Sounds good :)

The message <1ijamm5.1ty4hkc1lsh1haN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
from %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) contains these words:
> Steve Hammond  wrote:

> > only 1p at the moment

> I thik that's it, time to kill file anyone using Google groups.
> Especially since complaining about spam etc gets no response from
> Google.

> As someone said some time ago it must be well past time for UDP on
> Google.

I've had google gripes kf'd for yonks.

-- 
Rusty
Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk
Separator in search of a sig

Rusty Hinge 2  wrote:

> I've had google gripes kf'd for yonks.

Then you are more sensible than I. Lst time I mumbled about it in a
newsgroup some of the regulars who are sensible howled about how unjust
it would be to killfile everyone using Google. I've come to the
conclusion that the information lost would be negligible.

The message <1ijg7q6.1shhuo74yyh2iN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>
from %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) contains these words:

> Rusty Hinge 2  wrote:

> > I've had google gripes kf'd for yonks.

> Then you are more sensible than I. Lst time I mumbled about it in a
> newsgroup some of the regulars who are sensible howled about how unjust
> it would be to killfile everyone using Google. I've come to the
> conclusion that the information lost would be negligible.

If I see a reply to a sensible googlepost, I make an exception for the
author. I have several Sheddi so excepted innit.

-- 
Rusty
Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk
Separator in search of a sig

On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 22:08:52 +0100, Rusty Hinge 2
 wrote:

>> Then you are more sensible than I. Lst time I mumbled about it in a
>> newsgroup some of the regulars who are sensible howled about how unjust
>> it would be to killfile everyone using Google. I've come to the
>> conclusion that the information lost would be negligible.
>
>If I see a reply to a sensible googlepost, I make an exception for the
>author. I have several Sheddi so excepted innit.

There is a certain perverse irony in those two paragraphs, when read
together :-)

The message 
from .mother   contains these words:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 22:08:52 +0100, Rusty Hinge 2
>  wrote:

> >> Then you are more sensible than I. Lst time I mumbled about it in a
> >> newsgroup some of the regulars who are sensible howled about how unjust
> >> it would be to killfile everyone using Google. I've come to the
> >> conclusion that the information lost would be negligible.
> >
> >If I see a reply to a sensible googlepost, I make an exception for the
> >author. I have several Sheddi so excepted innit.

> There is a certain perverse irony in those two paragraphs, when read
> together :-)

Ah, dogs were it, you Dalmatianed.

-- 
Rusty
Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk
Separator in search of a sig