> It was a humourous dig at the person who posted with a latin anonymous name.
<t>
This is of intensely inward when you to work not , till then , prayer when show to be your name. I wonder if you wish you fui anyone to hide. I suspected when this is so. This is a shame when you are not mighty to gain full respect of thin skin those ground , since you would to meet with when they truly are a belonging to a household ground and unshaken to share its to use. Never mind , this is your loss , is this not?
</t>
The translation was not very good, and I don't see it as a "Humorous dig", it was an attempt to try and look big at my expense. Why could there not of been a nice reply.


>The fact of the matter is that most of us are fed up with people using false names, auto-remailers and any other method of hiding their identity whilst having a free pop at the rest for whatever reason.

Just because I use a CX remailer for newsgroup access does not mean that I have other intentions, it is just the only way I can currently access newsgroups as my Texan ISP has stopped usenet access for all users. So because I have limited usenet access does that warrent you to provoke fun at me.

Just show me where I have in this newsgroup I have had "a free pop" at you or anyone. I have not, therefore you just jumped into this assumption and abused me whilst trying to gain pickwick points with your fellow buds.

Besides if I want to hide my identity then this is not a crime especially if you look through previous posters on this new group who have also done the same and they did not get abused in latin

On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:15:39 +0200, Anonymous  wrote:

A number of out of context quotes to several different post and replys
>
>> It was a humourous dig at the person who posted with a latin anonymous name.
> <t>
> This is of intensely inward when you to work not , till then , prayer when show
> to be your name. I wonder if you wish you fui anyone to hide. I suspected when
> this is so. This is a shame when you are not mighty to gain full respect of thin
> skin those ground , since you would to meet with when they truly are a belonging
> to a household ground and unshaken to share its to use. Never mind , this is your
> loss , is this not?
> </t>

> The translation was not very good, and I don't see it as a "Humorous dig", it was
> an attempt to try and look big at my expense. Why could there not of been a nice reply.

Well thats how I saw it. Maybe it's my british sense of humour?

>
>> The fact of the matter is that most of us are fed up with people using false names,
>> auto-remailers and any other method of hiding their identity whilst having a free pop
>> at the rest for whatever reason.
>
> Just because I use a CX remailer for newsgroup access does not mean that I have other
> intentions, it is just the only way I can currently access newsgroups as my Texan ISP
> has stopped usenet access for all users. So because I have limited usenet access does
> that warrent you to provoke fun at me.

I think you meant "warrant" and "poke"? Have you tried Google groups?
I assume your ISP hasnt blocked Google? Then you could post messages
which wrap text a little more succesfully.
>
> Just show me where I have in this newsgroup I have had "a free pop" at you or anyone.
> I have not, therefore you just jumped into this assumption and abused me whilst trying 
> to gain pickwick points with your fellow buds.

I dont think the poster said that you had taken a "free pop" they were
explaining that we have a spate of anonymous and rude posts recently.
I havent a clue what "pickwick points" are. Something to do with
arrowheads? I think you are barking up the wrong tree if you think
folks are trying to score points off you. I think you are being a
little too sensitive about this.

>
> Besides if I want to hide my identity then this is not a crime especially if you look
> through previous posters on this new group who have also done the
> same and they did not get abused in latin
>

 As to the anonymous issue you could add a signature to your posts so
at least we had some clue as to who was posting.

Perhaps you could help us? Are you the same person who has posted as
:-
 "Anonymous ", 
"George Orwell " and
"Nomen Nescio " ?

 Or are there three of you out there?

As a friendly gesture have a free template sig:-
"
--

<your first name here>
Rocket Flyer
Somewhere in Texas
USA
"

Then we could tell it was you despite having posted via three
different anonomysing services.

To be fair a number of people have tried to help you and have posted
replys with the kind of info you are after or explained why there isnt
info available. You havent replied to any of these posts or
acknowledge their help.

Cheers Mike 8-{>

--
UKRA #1208 L2 RSO             EARS # 1118
TRA  #3207 L1
-=*=- Gravity is a harsh Mistress -=*=-
-=*=-          The Tick           -=*=-
Remove .co.uk from Reply To: address.

On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:15:39 +0200, Anonymous  wrote:

A number of out of context quotes to several different post and replys
>
>> It was a humourous dig at the person who posted with a latin anonymous name.
> <t>
> This is of intensely inward when you to work not , till then , prayer when show
> to be your name. I wonder if you wish you fui anyone to hide. I suspected when
> this is so. This is a shame when you are not mighty to gain full respect of thin
> skin those ground , since you would to meet with when they truly are a belonging
> to a household ground and unshaken to share its to use. Never mind , this is your
> loss , is this not?
> </t>

> The translation was not very good, and I don't see it as a "Humorous dig", it was
> an attempt to try and look big at my expense. Why could there not of been a nice reply.

Well thats how I saw it. Maybe it's my british sense of humour?

>
>> The fact of the matter is that most of us are fed up with people using false names,
>> auto-remailers and any other method of hiding their identity whilst having a free pop
>> at the rest for whatever reason.
>
> Just because I use a CX remailer for newsgroup access does not mean that I have other
> intentions, it is just the only way I can currently access newsgroups as my Texan ISP
> has stopped usenet access for all users. So because I have limited usenet access does
> that warrent you to provoke fun at me.

I think you meant "warrant" and "poke"? Have you tried Google groups?
I assume your ISP hasnt blocked Google? Then you could post messages
which wrap text a little more succesfully.
>
> Just show me where I have in this newsgroup I have had "a free pop" at you or anyone.
> I have not, therefore you just jumped into this assumption and abused me whilst trying 
> to gain pickwick points with your fellow buds.

I dont think the poster said that you had taken a "free pop" they were
explaining that we have a spate of anonymous and rude posts recently.
I havent a clue what "pickwick points" are. Something to do with
arrowheads? I think you are barking up the wrong tree if you think
folks are trying to score points off you. I think you are being a
little too sensitive about this.

>
> Besides if I want to hide my identity then this is not a crime especially if you look
> through previous posters on this new group who have also done the
> same and they did not get abused in latin
>

 As to the anonymous issue you could add a signature to your posts so
at least we had some clue as to who was posting.

Perhaps you could help us? Are you the same person who has posted as
:-
 "Anonymous ", 
"George Orwell " and
"Nomen Nescio " ?

 Or are there three of you out there?

As a friendly gesture have a free template sig:-
"
--

<your first name here>
Rocket Flyer
Somewhere in Texas
USA
"

Then we could tell it was you despite having posted via three
different anonomysing services.

To be fair a number of people have tried to help you and have posted
replys with the kind of info you are after or explained why there isnt
info available. You havent replied to any of these posts or
acknowledge their help.

Cheers Mike 8-{>

--
UKRA #1208 L2 RSO             EARS # 1118
TRA  #3207 L1
-=*=- Gravity is a harsh Mistress -=*=-
-=*=-          The Tick           -=*=-
Remove .co.uk from Reply To: address.