Swirtched on mt TV tonight and there is a message on the screen:
Update to lates version 2.0 (or something to that effect). Never seen this 
before, so I clicked OK on my STB remote. The update downloaded, switched 
the box off then on again, then scanned for channels. Scan finished, and 184 
new channels added. Now I get a message No Signal - check connections. 
Nothing wrong with these. The STB is a Daewoo.
Anybody else had problems?

TIA

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 19:58:38 +0100, "BIGEYE"
 wrote:

>Swirtched on mt TV tonight and there is a message on the screen:
>Update to lates version 2.0 (or something to that effect). Never seen this 
>before, so I clicked OK on my STB remote. The update downloaded, switched 
>the box off then on again, then scanned for channels. Scan finished, and 184 
>new channels added. Now I get a message No Signal - check connections. 
>Nothing wrong with these. The STB is a Daewoo.
>Anybody else had problems?
>
>TIA 
>
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=449714&in_page_id=2

Oh dear we told him not to do that in another thread, now he has another 
paperweight!

Brian

-- 
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
 graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________


"BIGEYE"  wrote in message 
news:48c02fe0$0$2508$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
> Swirtched on mt TV tonight and there is a message on the screen:
> Update to lates version 2.0 (or something to that effect). Never seen this 
> before, so I clicked OK on my STB remote. The update downloaded, switched 
> the box off then on again, then scanned for channels. Scan finished, and 
> 184 new channels added. Now I get a message No Signal - check connections. 
> Nothing wrong with these. The STB is a Daewoo.
> Anybody else had problems?
>
> TIA
>

"Brian Gaff"  wrote in message
news:FuWvk.53155$E41.48408@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> Oh dear we told him not to do that in another thread, now he has another
> paperweight!

Do you *REALLY* have to top-post to make yourself heard ?

It has started working again.

"Ipsalo 3" <ipsalo3@> wrote in message 
news:qYmdnd_2kcplpl3VRVnyhQA@posted.plusnet...
> "Brian Gaff"  wrote in message
> news:FuWvk.53155$E41.48408@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> Oh dear we told him not to do that in another thread, now he has another
>> paperweight!
>
> Do you *REALLY* have to top-post to make yourself heard ?
>
>
>

Ipsalo 3 wrote:
> "Brian Gaff"  wrote in message
> news:FuWvk.53155$E41.48408@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> Oh dear we told him not to do that in another thread, now he has
>> another paperweight!
>
> Do you *REALLY* have to top-post to make yourself heard ?

Yes he does! Do you *really* have to be such a pratt? I've never seen you 
post anything worth reading.

On Sep 4, 9:31 pm, "Adrian"  wrote:
> Ipsalo 3 wrote:

> > Do you *REALLY* have to top-post to make yourself heard ?
>
> Yes he does! Do you *really* have to be such a pratt? I've never seen you
> post anything worth reading.

If you feel that you have nothing to learn from me then I can only
suggest you utilise the Killfile function in your newsreader software,
others have done this with success.

"Digby" <a> wrote in message 
news:pvc0c4pktfldn64tqr2efdqood5f3a0rec@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 19:58:38 +0100, "BIGEYE"
>  wrote:
>
>>Swirtched on mt TV tonight and there is a message on the screen:
>>Update to lates version 2.0 (or something to that effect). Never seen this
>>before, so I clicked OK on my STB remote. The update downloaded, switched
>>the box off then on again, then scanned for channels. Scan finished, and 
>>184
>>new channels added. Now I get a message No Signal - check connections.
>>Nothing wrong with these. The STB is a Daewoo.
>>Anybody else had problems?
>>
>>TIA
>>
> http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=449714&in_page_id=2

It doesn't sound like that in this case.

It sounds like an over the air firmware update for his box went wrong.

-- 

Brian Gregory. (In the UK)
ng@bgdsv.co.uk
To email me remove the letter vee.

In message <qYmdnd_2kcplpl3VRVnyhQA@posted.plusnet>, Ipsalo 3 
<ipsalo3@?.?.invalid> writes
>"Brian Gaff"  wrote in message
>news:FuWvk.53155$E41.48408@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> Oh dear we told him not to do that in another thread, now he has another
>> paperweight!
>
>Do you *REALLY* have to top-post to make yourself heard ?
>
>

It always makes sense to lurk for a while in a newsgroup before you post 
, especially a complaint against a regular.
-- 
Ian

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:44:49 -0700 (PDT), ipsalo.3@earthling.net wrote:

>If you feel that you have nothing to learn from me then I can only
>suggest you utilise the Killfile function in your newsreader software,
>others have done this with success

How do you know?

-- 
Alan White
Mozilla Firefox and Forte Agent.
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Lochs Long and Goil in Argyll, Scotland.
Webcam and weather:- http://windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/weather

In message stqLXpD4aHwIFwsY@nospam.demon.co.uk,
Ian  Proclaimed from the tallest tower:

> In message <qYmdnd_2kcplpl3VRVnyhQA@posted.plusnet>, Ipsalo 3
> <ipsalo3@?.?.invalid> writes
>> "Brian Gaff"  wrote in message
>> news:FuWvk.53155$E41.48408@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>>> Oh dear we told him not to do that in another thread, now he has
>>> another paperweight!
>>
>> Do you *REALLY* have to top-post to make yourself heard ?
>>
>>
>
> It always makes sense to lurk for a while in a newsgroup before you
> post , especially a complaint against a regular.

And especially if you don't know that the regular has a very good reason for 
top-posting!!

-- 
Regards,
Chris.
(Remove Elvis's shoes to email me)

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:50:22 +0100, "ChrisM"
 wrote:

>And especially if you don't know that the regular has a very good reason for 
>top-posting!!

What is a good reason for it?
-- 
Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.

Andrew wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:50:22 +0100, "ChrisM"
>  wrote:
> 
>> And especially if you don't know that the regular has a very good reason for 
>> top-posting!!
> 
> What is a good reason for it?

I assume you've read Brian's sig ?

-- 
Mark
Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply.

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:56:30 +0100, Mark Carver
<mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>> What is a good reason for it?
>
>I assume you've read Brian's sig ?

Fairy nuff :-)
-- 
Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.