|
|
|
date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:30:26 +0100,
group: uk.tech.digital-tv
back
Re: Scam call from 08716641448
In , Roderick
Stewart wrote:
>In article <g5nof3$kpa$1@scotsman.ed.ac.uk>, Angus Rae wrote:
>> > Roderick Stewart wrote:
>> >> What does "BT Privacy at home" cost?
>> >
>> > Absolutely nada, nowt, zero and nothing.
>>
>> Correcting myself; the CLID side of it costs nothing as long as you make
>> a couple of chargeable calls a month, otherwise they reserve the right
>> to levy the normal charge - shouldn't be an issue unless you're on
>> holiday for a month or use a 3rd party calling system that's on an 0800
>> number. Or just don't make any phone calls.
>
>Not likely to have cost me much then, and since I registered on the TPS
>website anyway, I probably wouldn't achieve anything by trying to change my
>BT account.
Well if you're currently being charged for Caller Display, you'd achieve
getting this for free. So it's definitely worth checking your bill.
NB: The "TPS registration" part of BT Privacy is optional. And the third
part of BT Privacy is a nice set of "go away salespeople" stickers for
your front door.
HTH
date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:30:26 +0100
author: Mike Henry {$mrtickle$}@nospam.demon.co.uk
|
Re: Scam call from 08716641448
In article , Mike Henry wrote:
> NB: The "TPS registration" part of BT Privacy is optional. And the third
> part of BT Privacy is a nice set of "go away salespeople" stickers for
> your front door.
What I really need are some "go away Jehovah's witnesses I'm not in the
mood for a religious debate and I'll probably put your leaflets through
the shredder without even reading them" stickers.
Rod.
date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:29:19 +0100
author: Roderick Stewart
|
Re: Scam call from 08716641448
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:30:26 +0100, Mike Henry
<{$mrtickle$}@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In , Roderick
>Stewart wrote:
>
>>In article <g5nof3$kpa$1@scotsman.ed.ac.uk>, Angus Rae wrote:
>>> > Roderick Stewart wrote:
>>> >> What does "BT Privacy at home" cost?
>>> >
>>> > Absolutely nada, nowt, zero and nothing.
>>>
>>> Correcting myself; the CLID side of it costs nothing as long as you make
>>> a couple of chargeable calls a month, otherwise they reserve the right
>>> to levy the normal charge - shouldn't be an issue unless you're on
>>> holiday for a month or use a 3rd party calling system that's on an 0800
>>> number. Or just don't make any phone calls.
>>
>>Not likely to have cost me much then, and since I registered on the TPS
>>website anyway, I probably wouldn't achieve anything by trying to change my
>>BT account.
>
>Well if you're currently being charged for Caller Display, you'd achieve
>getting this for free. So it's definitely worth checking your bill.
>
>NB: The "TPS registration" part of BT Privacy is optional. And the third
>part of BT Privacy is a nice set of "go away salespeople" stickers for
>your front door.
BT told me that TPS was compulsory and I never got any stickers.
Waaaaaaa! <Stamps foot> ;-)
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Owing to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
(")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking most articles
posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
everyone you will need use a different method of posting.
See http://improve-usenet.org
date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:50:01 +0100
author: Mark
|
Re: Scam call from 08716641448
In , Mark
wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:30:26 +0100, Mike Henry
><{$mrtickle$}@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>In , Roderick
>>Stewart wrote:
>>
>>>In article <g5nof3$kpa$1@scotsman.ed.ac.uk>, Angus Rae wrote:
>>>> > Roderick Stewart wrote:
>>>> >> What does "BT Privacy at home" cost?
>>>> >
>>>> > Absolutely nada, nowt, zero and nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Correcting myself; the CLID side of it costs nothing as long as you make
>>>> a couple of chargeable calls a month, otherwise they reserve the right
>>>> to levy the normal charge - shouldn't be an issue unless you're on
>>>> holiday for a month or use a 3rd party calling system that's on an 0800
>>>> number. Or just don't make any phone calls.
>>>
>>>Not likely to have cost me much then, and since I registered on the TPS
>>>website anyway, I probably wouldn't achieve anything by trying to change my
>>>BT account.
>>
>>Well if you're currently being charged for Caller Display, you'd achieve
>>getting this for free. So it's definitely worth checking your bill.
>>
>>NB: The "TPS registration" part of BT Privacy is optional. And the third
>>part of BT Privacy is a nice set of "go away salespeople" stickers for
>>your front door.
>
>BT told me that TPS was compulsory
Was this over the phone? That was a flat lie if so.
The website was very clear when I did it online. Box to tick if I wanted
TPS registration, or untick if not.
>and I never got any stickers.
>Waaaaaaa! <Stamps foot> ;-)
You should ask for them! :-) I think it was online again with a tickbox,
but it was a few years ago now.
date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:28:53 +0100
author: Mike Henry {$mrtickle$}@nospam.demon.co.uk
|
|
|