MI5 Persecution:. Molestation during Travel

MI5s persecution of. me varies in intensity. Since 1990 it has been steady
for perhaps 80% of the time; there was a notable quiet period. in 1993, and
another quiet period. in Jan-Feb 1995, as well as a hiatus in the first two
months of 1999. It puzzles me. that they cease and restart, seemingly
without any logic or reason. But one. aspect of MI5s activities against me
which is. relatively predictable is this weeks articles topic, which is
Molestation during Travel. Almost every. time I cross the Atlantic, go to
the Continent or even try to enjoy a holiday in this country, you can. bet
that MI5 will be there doing their utmost to wreck it. all.

This aspect of the harassment is. particularly relevant as I will be
travelling to Europe again. in a months time, with naturally the Minidisc
recorder in tow; so it will. be interesting to see if I can record the
abuse which will almost certainly take place, either on the Tube. going to
the airport, at the airport, on the flight, in the terminal building -. MI5
have. previously instituted instances of abuse at each of these locations,
so well see how much taxpayers money they waste this time, and. whether it
will prove possible to capture their abuse. on minidisc.

Read about the MI5 Persecution on the. Web

June 1992 in. Polands mountain resort of Zakopane

The persecution started in June 1990, and for the first two. years I stayed
in the UK apart from. a couple of brief day trips to Calais. By the summer
of 1992 Id. had enough of being cooped up in England with abusive fellow
employees egged on by an abusive secret police service,. and decided to
spend 10 days in southern Poland, on what was intended to be. a holiday at
the. mountain resort town of Zakopane.

Unfortunately the psychopaths of the Security Service were. not willing to
allow me to enjoy a holiday. in peace and quiet. The journey to Zakopane
was. by coach from the meeting point at Londons Victoria coach station
(National Express) followed by ferry. followed by another coach across
Europe. As we left Victoria a youth and. his girlfriend started a loud
tirade of abuse directed at "this bloke", where. the "bloke" was never
named, but it was very clear that the "bloke". was myself. The youth said
"they". had "found somebody from his school, and he was always really
stressed at school,. a real psycho". Again, the label "they" was not
elaborated on, but it was clear that. "they" = the persecutors from
MI5. The boy also said,. "he was in a bed and breakfast for only one night
and they. got him". By a not unexpected coincidence I had been in a B&B in
Oxford a week previously,. which had been booked from work; other things
lead me to the conclusion. that the company's offices were bugged for most
of the 2 1/2 years that I was there, so. "they" would have known a room in
the B&B had. been booked. After a few minutes of this I went back to where
they were sitting and. asked where they were travelling. The boy named a
village in France,. and the girl's giggling suddenly ceased; presumably it
permeated to. her brain cell what the purpose of the boy's abuse was.

It is now very clear to me. that MI5 were trying to have me incarcerated,
assaulted or killed. on this trip across Europe. The degree of verbal
violence inescapably leads. to this conclusion. When we arrived at our
destination, it became clear that many. people, both in our tour group and
its guide,. and among the ordinary residents of the town, knew there was a
movement under way to "get" me. MI5 employed. many people and significant
resources for an action which. they knew would only take a maximum of ten
days. A commercial operation would never have. felt able to waste such
resources on such an unproductive and temporary action;. only a
state-sponsored, taxpayer-funded entity like. the Security Service would be
able. to be so wasteful.

To give some examples. of what happened in those ten days; I was walking in
some woods outside the town, when. a Polish woman, looking at me, said the
English "shit". in a strongly Polish-accented voice. For the first three
years. 1990-92 MI5 had been trying to force this word on me. Another
example; I was walking near my "hotel" when a mother. said laughing to her
child, "a wiesz ze to prawdziwy wariat". which means "you know hes a real
madman". And the "TV. reacting" happened there too; on Polish TV, a bemused
looking journalist said. to another, "to jest sprawa Anglikow", which means
"its the concern of the English", in other words, none. of our business,
despite what the English are trying to. force down our throats.

Just before we left for home, I went with some others. from our group to a
nearby bar. There a man shouted at me the same sexual. obscenity which MI5
have constantly thrown at me these last three years.. I think MI5 try to
justify their various terms of abuse by repeating them at me. until I say
them, either while conscious. or while talking in my sleep; and then they
seize on my saying those words to "prove" that. the obscenities are "my
fault", et cetera. This rather stupid reasoning of theirs can actually. be
seen as indicative of the. psychopathic condition attributed to them in a
previous article; blaming the victim for the crime you inflict on him. is
how. psychopaths think.

Nor did the persecutors let up. during the return trip. Returning on the
ferry over the channel, a rather insalubrious-looking. guy talked to his
mates about "and you know this bloke, hes really mad you. know, hes really
mad". On the National Express. return coach to London, a group of five or
six young. people started shouting at me. I slumped in my seat and tried to
avoid presenting a target, so they got. ever more strident - "whats the
matter with. you, cant you hear us?" One of the other people who had been
on the trip to Poland asked them why they. were shouting at me, and they
said, "hes been to. Cambridge", to which the co-holidayer asked them, "have
you been. to Cambridge?" presumably thinking they were aggrieved fellow
students, but they answered "no". Even after I left the coach at. Elephant
and. Castle abuse continued; in the tube station, two kids started throwing
abuse at me; one of them said to the other, "and. you know he works?" to
which the other. answered "yes".

Immediate Aftermath of November. 1992

As. you will know from previous articles, my manager at OCG - ARIS/Oxford,
Mr Mitchell, induced a mental breakdown in me in. the months leading up to
Nov/92. The diagnosis. was regarded by the persecutors as a victory for
them, because few if any people give credence. to allegations of harassment
when they are made by somebody suffering from schizophrenia.. There is also
a bias against the. mentally ill, an "institutionalised bigotry" in society
comparable to the. institutionalised racism against blacks.

However, MI5 did not let up on. persecuting me following Nov/92. In
December 1992 I flew by charter jet to. Alicante in Spain for two weeks
recuperation. MI5. planted one of their people on the flight, a youth who
tried to start some noises that "hes. a nutter". One of the other
passengers replied, "oh hes a nutter is. he? oh well!" and the youth shut
up and said nothing for the rest of the. flight. I think it would be fair
to say that the youth on the flight was embarrassed by what. he had been
asked to do in making the flight "uncomfortable" for me; he. sounded
defensive. rather than aggressive.

My first trip to Canada in. June 1993

Ive already covered. this in a previous article so Ill just give a brief
summary here. On. 10 June 1993 I flew British Airways from Heathrow to
Torontos Pearson Airport. On de-planing from the aircraft, one. of a group
of four fellow passengers looked. at me and said, laughing, "if he tries to
run away. well find him". It was quite obvious that these four men were the
ones who. had been harassing me since 1990.

I did nothing to apprehend them or bring this incident. to the attention of
the airport authorities,. mostly because this was my very first visit to
Canada, and the last thing I wanted was to get into a dispute before. I had
even finished disembarking. In retrospect, I can. see this was a terrible
mistake;. I should have made every effort to detain and identify these
people.

Subsequently I have. made numerous attempts to obtain the names of these
people. from British Airways passenger lists, by talking to BA, through a
lawyer in Ontario, through a solicitor in England, through the UK. police,
and also through private detectives in the UK.. But all my efforts have
come to nothing. BA have told me they keep passenger lists for a. period of
seven years, so they will still have the. list for this 1993 flight. I did
not see or. hear anything during the rest of my visit to Ontario in 1993
which would have lead me to believe that. I was being watched or followed.

Journey across Canada. in summer 1994

As I think Ive already said in previous articles I emigrated. to Canada in
late. May 1994. For six weeks between late May 1994 and early July 1994 I
travelled across Canada from coast to. coast, starting in Toronto, visiting
various cities and ending up in British Columbia. I. saw this both as
something of a holiday, and the chance to get to know a little better. my
adopted. country.

As you can guess,. MI5 followed me everywhere I went during these six
weeks. In. Toronto, where I started this trip in late May, I was spoken
about by one youth to another with the. words "hes an idiot", to which the
other replied, laughing sympathetically, "good luck to. him".

A couple of days later I went to. Montreal and stayed at the YMCA
downtown.. As you can guess (this is all so predictable, isnt it?) MI5
followed me there and bugged my room at the YMCA. Not only. that, but they
managed to set-up. an instance of "newscaster reaction" from a local
television station; while I was watching. a Vermont TV news programme on
the. set in my room, the woman reporter said, "well theyre just tired and
they want to go home", which sounds like a pretty. unprofessional thing to
say until you realise she was trying. to say of me that I was the one that
was supposed to. be tired, and they (ie MI5) wanted me to go home to the
UK.

On the bus journey across. the North American continent, it was quite clear
that MI5 were following me every step on the way. For the first part. of
the journey they actually put someone on the bus with me,. a youth who said
at me "that guys paranoid" and tried to. incite other passengers to attack
me.. I stopped for a couple of days in Winnipeg in central Canada, and on
leaving the town heard. on the radio a female presenter ranting about
"insanity! insanity!". It is very tiring travelling such a. long distance
by bus; I took the journey in two steps, each of about 36 hours; and it. is
especially tiring when you know MI5 are watching. you and harassing you
every step. of the way.

When I finally got to. Vancouver, MI5 instituted the usual harassment, in
very short order. I. was surprised how quickly they were able to induce
hatred. towards me in elements of the general populace; the Security
Service must have employed a number. of agents and serious resources in a
very short period. of time; and for no real gain, because I havent been
back to BC for almost five years, so. all their "work" appears to be for
nothing. In downtown Vancouver a street person. said in front of me,
"theyre all talking about him". For a few days I was staying. at Pauls
Guest House (345 W.14th Ave); on the. day I left, the owner Paul shouted at
no-one in. particular, "hes going to Victoria" - which was quite accurate,
I was indeed going to the provincial. capital Victoria on Vancouver
Island. But I had not told anyone. at the guest house where I was going; I
had only mentioned. to my parents back in England on the phone that I was
going away from Vancouver for. a few days. Which leads me to suppose that
MI5s bugging of. the phone in my parents house yielded the
"intelligence" that I intended to visit Victoria, and they. had passed the
information on to. Paul.

When I got to. Victoria it was again obvious that the persecutors were
"doing their stuff" there. as well. On the street I was identified as being
English, although I had not said anything so my accent. hadnt given me
away; and returning by ferry to the mainland, I was abused. by a Canadian
woman who said, "hes. a nutter! you can run but you cant hide". During my
years in Canada I have never heard the word. "nutter" on any other
occasion; I do not think it is part of Canadians. vocabulary; so the
Canadian woman on. the ferry, who was obviously talking about me, must have
been supplied with this word by the English persecutors. And once I. got
back. to Vancouver, staying at the Austin Hotel on Granville St, I listened
to a conversation in the apartment. block directly opposite, and a man
saying, "hes paranoid, so thats as bad as it can be, so why are they. doing
this to. him?".

Holiday in the. States, August 1995

By 1995 I was living in Canada, and. in August I went down the eastern
seaboard. to Florida and as far as Key West by car. As you can guess (this
is all so. boring and predictable, isnt it?) MI5 followed me every step of
the way. I can see in retrospect that this must have. been quite easy for
them as they had. my car bugged, both on the inside to listen to anything
that was said and what radio station I was listening to, as well. as what
must have been a tracker device. installed to track it across long
distances.

The first city I visited was Philadelphia. In the. old Congress Hall where
the. first US Congress assembled, the woman guide started referring to my
situation, saying that "all these people in Europe were. watching it", and
they were "a little paranoid" at this 18th-century experiment. in
democracy. Also I had recently written a newsgroup post where. Id described
a. (female) poster as "wet-nosed" (implying "canine"), and a young girl in
Philadelphia remarked, "so. he thinks were dogs?" There were two or three
more incidents during this. holiday in the eastern States, including a
radio station down near Miami, showing "they" had tracked. me all the way
there, and were bugging the inside of my car; but I didnt record. the
details and Ive. forgotten some of it now. Also down in Miami Beach a
French tourist in a. lift expressed support for me with the words, "cest
incroyable". ie. its incredible, meaning that MI5s well-known actions
against me. were beyond belief.

To go back a bit, in about May/June 1995 Id visited New York,. again by
car, and was insulted several times by people using the same words. that
had been used against me in. England. In Central Park, and elderly
Englishman (not a real gentleman - but then the Engish. view of themselves
as "gentlemen" etc is quite laughable) looked at me and said. "idiot". And
while I was eating in a streetside restaurant a New York youth. started
laughing and said something like,. "I cant believe it, hes actually here" -
I. think that was because I had had an expressed wish to visit New York for
some years before this, although after this. visit I wont be going there
again. for a very long time.

Visit to Poland. December 1995/January 1996

In December 1995 I flew (BA again, unfortunately - every time. Ive flown BA
one of these incidents has happened, presumably MI5. is happier setting up
harassment on British-domiciled carrier). from Montreal to Berlin and
travelled on to Poland to visit family. MI5 naturally harassed. me in
Poland during my brief stay. They followed me around and. got Polish people
to take part in the harassment. In one case two Polish youths. talked in
front of me saying in. English (with marked Polish accents), "fucked up
men,. fuck you". There were also other incidents which I dont remember too
clearly since it was. some time ago.

The return flight. connected through Heathrow, and in the transit lounge
MI5 again set-up harassment against me. In Poland they were talking. their
abuse in English, and in. London they set Polish people after me to speak
in Polish; they heard me on the phone to my father,. and said "a wiesz ze
to Polski wariat", in an almost sympathetic,. inclusive fashion
(translation. "you know. hes a Polish nutter"). Once on the flight to
Montreal I was again set upon by two English. youths, one of whom spoke and
the other listened. The. aggressive "fat bastard" youth said, "if he wants
to be a wanker" (its my fault theyre harassing me,. you see),
self-justification that "hes a. nutter" (so we have to keep on abusing him,
because hes ill),. as well as talking about the town in Poland where I had
been staying. He also said, "he. doesnt know who we are", but as already
remarked in a previous. article, that was at best a half-denial of my guess
expressed in internet newsgroups that the people after. me were MI5 - if
anything. its a half-confirmation rather than a half-denial.

These incidents. are still going on. You can hear digitised audio files of
abuse on a BA flight to Berlin in 1998 on the Web at. address

On this flight they were again attacking. my mental health; "paranoid, hes
paranoid" and "nutter" are discernable. The last "during travel". contact
was at Ottawa. Airport on 21 July 1998, when "Alan Holdsworth" the
psychopath MI5 agent, dressed as a vagrant,. was pacing aggressively in the
departure area. In three. weeks I will again be travelling to Europe; we
will see what fresh acts of molestation MI5. perpetrate during this trip.

473


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
      ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem

MI5. are Afraid to Admit They're Behind the Persecution

MI5 have issued a formal denial of. any involvement in my life to the
Security Service Tribunal, as you. might expect them to; but, more
importantly, the. persecutors have never denied that theyre from the
Security. Service, despite several years of accusations from my corner on
usenet and in faxed articles. I am not surprised that. the Security Service
Tribunal found "no determination in your favour". I am however. a little
surprised that the persecutors have refused to. confirm my identification
of. them; by doing so, they implicitly admit that my guess was right.

"No determination in. your favour" says the Security Service Tribunal

In 1997, I made a complaint to the Security Service Tribunal,. giving only
the bare outlines of my case. I do not think it. would have made very much
difference if Id made a much more detailed. complaint, since the Tribunal
has no ability to perform investigatory. functions. It can only ask MI5 if
they have an interest in a subject, to. which MI5 are of course free to be
"economical with the truth". A couple of. months after my complaint the
Tribunal. replied that;

The Security Service Tribunal have now investigated your. complaint and
have. asked me to inform you that no determination in your favour has been
made on. your complaint.

Needless to say this reply didnt surprise me. in the slightest. It is a
well established fact that the secret service are a den. of liars and the
Tribunal a toothless. watchdog, so to see them conforming to these
stereotypes might. be disappointing but unsurprising.

It is noteworthy that the. Tribunal never gives the plaintiff information
on whether. the "no determination in your favour" is because MI5 claims to
have no interest in. him, or whether they claim their interest is
"justified". In the 1997 report of the Security Service Commissioner. he
writes that "The ambiguity of. the terms in which the notification of the
Tribunals. decision is expressed is intentional", since a less ambiguous
answer would. indicate to the plaintiff whether he were indeed under MI5
surveillance. But I note. that the ambiguity also allows MI5 to get away
with lying to the question of their. interest in me; they can claim to the
Tribunal that they. have no interest, but at a future date, when it becomes
clear that they did indeed place me. under surveillance and harassment,
they can claim their interest was "justified" - and. the Tribunal will
presumably. not admit that in their previous reply MI5 claimed to have no
interest.

"He. doesnt know who we are"

In early January 1996 I. flew on a British Airways jet from London to
Montreal; also present on the plane, about three. or four rows behind me,
were. two young men, one of them fat and voluble, the other silent. It was
quite clear that these two had been planted on. the aircraft to "wind me
up". The fat youth described the town in Poland where I. had spent
Christmas, and made some. unpleasant personal slurs against me. Most
interestingly, he said the words,. "he doesnt know who we are".

Now I find this particular form of words very interesting,. because while
it is not a clear admission, it is only a half-hearted attempt. at denial
of my guess that "they" = "MI5". Had my guess been wrong, the fat. youth
would. surely have said so more clearly. What he was trying to do was to
half-deny something he knew to be true, and he was. limited to making
statements which he knew to be not false; so he. made a lukewarm denial
which on. the face of it means nothing, but in fact acts as a confirmation
of. my guess of who "they" are.

On one. of the other occasions when I saw the persecutors in person, on the
BA flight to Toronto in. June 1993, one of the group of four men said, "if
he tries to run away well find him". But the other three stayed. totally
quiet. and avoided eye contact. They did so to avoid being apprehended and
identified - since if they were identified, their. employers would have
been revealed, and it would become known that it was the. secret services
who were behind the. persecution.

Why are MI5 So Afraid. to admit their involvement?

If you think about it, what has been. going on in Britain for the last nine
years is simply. beyond belief. The British declare themselves to be
"decent" by definition, so when they engage in indecent. activities such as
the persecution of. a mentally ill person, their decency "because were
British". is still in the forefront of their minds, and a process of mental
doublethink kicks in, where their antisocial and indecent. activities are
blamed on the victim "because its his fault were. persecuting him", and
their self-regard and self-image of. decency remains untarnished. As
remarked. in another article some time ago, this process is basically the
same as a large number of Germans employed fifty years ago. against Slavic
"untermenschen" and the Jewish "threat" - the. Germans declared, "Germans
are known  to be decent and the minorities. are at fault for what we do to
them" - so they were able. to retain the view of themselves as being
"decent".

Now suppose this entire episode had happened in some. other country. The
British have a poor view of the French,. so lets say it had all happened in
France.. Suppose there was a Frenchman, of non-French extraction, who was
targeted by the French. internal security apparatus, for the dubious
amusement of French television newscasters, and tortured. for 9 years with
various sexual and other verbal abuse. and taunts of "suicide". Suppose
this all came out into the open. Naturally, the. French authorities would
try hard to place the blame on their victim - and in. their own country,
through the same state-controlled media which. the authorities employ as
instruments of torture, their view might prevail -. but what on earth would
people overseas make of their actions? Where would their. "decency" be
then?

This is. why MI5 are so afraid to admit theyre behind the
persecution. Because if they did admit responsibility,. then they would be
admitting that there was an action against me. - and if the truth came out,
then the walls would come. tumbling down. And if the persecutors were to
admit they were from MI5, then you. can be sure I would report the
fact; and the persecutors support would fall away, among the mass. media as
well as among the. general public. When I started identifying MI5 as the
persecutors in 1995 and 1996 there was a sharp. reduction in media
harassment, since people read my internet newsgroup posts. and knew I was
telling the truth. The persecutors cannot deny my claim that theyre. MI5,
because then I would report their denial and they would be seen. as liars -
but they. cannot admit it either, as that would puncture their campaign
against me.. So they are forced to maintain a ridiculous silence on the
issue of their identity, in the. face of vociferous accusations on internet
newsgroups and. faxed articles.

Have MI5 lied to the. Home Secretary?

In order for the. Security Services to bug my home, they would either have
needed a. warrant from the Home Secretary, or they might have instituted
the bugging without a warrant. Personally I think it is more likely. that
they didnt apply for a. warrant - I cannot see any Home Secretary giving
MI5 authority to bug. a residence to allow television newscasters to
satisfy their rather voyeuristic needs vis-a-vis one. of their
audience. But it is possible that the Security. Service presented a warrant
in some form. before a home secretary at some point in the last nine years,
for telephone tapping or surveillance of my residence, or interception. of
postal. service.

So the possibility presents itself that a Home. Secretary might have signed
a warrant presented. to him based on MI5 lies. Just as MI5 lie to the
Security Service Tribunal,. so they might have lied to a Home Secretray
himself. MI5 and MI6. are naturally secretive services former home
secretary Roy Jenkins said, they have a "secretive. atmosphere
... secretive vis-a-vis the government as well as. [enemies]". Jenkins
also said he "did not form a very high. regard for how they discharged
their. duties".

It was only a few years ago that MI5 was brought into any sot. the
extraordinary thing is that British media organisations. like the state-
and taxpayer-funded BBC take such an active part. in the MI5-inspired
campaign of harassment. We have after all. heard of MI5 trying to bribe
broadcast journalists; but surely there must be a substantial number. who
are not bought or blackmailed by the Security Services,. and who take part
in the "abuse by newscasters" of. their own volition? The BBC is supposed
to be independent. of the government of the day as well as the
Establishment in general. While perhaps. it is childish to think that the
BBC is anything other than effectively state-controlled, the. degree of
collusion between the BBC and the. British Secret Police MI5 is something
you would not find in many countries.. Individual tele-journalists in other
countries would have enough self-esteem not to allow themselves to. be
controlled by their. secret police - seemingly, BBC broadcasters like
Martyn Lewis and. Nicholas Witchell have such a low opinion of their
employing organisation that. they see no wrong in dragging the BBCs
no-longer-good name through yet. more mud, at the mere request (whether
supported by financial. or other inducements) of the British secret Police,
MI5.

And when. challenged, these broadcasters LIE about their involvement, with
just as little shame as MI5 themselves. The BBCs Information. dept have
said. that;

"I. can assure you that the BBC would never engage in any form of
surveillance activity such as you. describe"

which is an out-and-out lie. Buerk and. Lewis have themselves lied to their
colleagues in the BBCs. Information department over the "newscaster
watching", but unsurprisingly they refuse to. put these denials in
writing. Doubtless. if the "newscaster watching" ever comes to light, Buerk
and Lewis will. then continue to lie by lying about these denials. So much
for the "impartial". BBC, a nest of liars bought and paid for by the
Security. Services!

It is obvious that the persecution. is at the instigation of MI5 themselves
- they have. read my post, and only they have the surveillance technology
and media/political access. Yet they have lied outright to the. Security
Service. Tribunal. Similarly, BBC newscasters Michael Buerk and Martyn
Lewis have. lied to members of their own organisation. The continuing
harassment indicates they are all petrified of. this business coming out
into the open. I will continue to do everything possible to ensure. that
their. wrongdoing is exposed.

2135


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
      ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem