Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
sport
athletics
baseball
betting
cricket
football
football....bradford-city
football...celtic
football...leeds-united
football...liverpool
football...man-city
football...newcast..united
football...rangers
football...southampton
football...sunderland
football...west-ham
football.american
football.scottish
golf
horseracing
ice-hockey
misc
orienteering
speedway
squash
swimming
  
 
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:04 +0000 (UTC),    group: uk.sport.horseracing        back       
Re: M.I'5.Pers ecution ` Harassment t hrough the Radi o   
get 0ff this site as we dont want to read this rubbish

jake

 wrote in message news:yj0711311004105859@4ax.com...
>
> MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 9 July,. 1999
>
> Harassment. in Poland, July 1999
>
> And still it continues.... in my. last fax I said that provided MI5 made 
> no
> attempts. at harassment during my two-week holiday this summer, or after I
> returned to England, then. I would discontinue these faxes. Unfortunately
> MI5. have continued to harass me, both during the holiday and after my
> return to London. I really. dont want to continue these articles, since
> they. take up so much time and effort, not to mention expense; but the
> Security Service wont even let me have a holiday in peace and quiet, so. I
> have to make further efforts. to bring their activities out into the open.
>
> In early July I visited my. aunt and her family in Poland. On Saturday 3
> July 1999, I went to a family. barbecue at an allotment outside the
> city. One of. my aunts family has previously shown himself to be in the
> "enemy" camp, by saying the. Polish equivalent of "something wrong with
> him", and various other unprovoked insults.. It is disappointing that one
> of my family. could forsake the usual ties of blood and take part in the
> actions against me, but thats the. way it is. This guy turned up at the
> barbecue, and started. making insults against me. In particular, he 
> started
> to say something about the video camera which. I had brought along on the
> trip, and the relevance of the video-camera to my fight against. the
> persecution. It seemed pretty. obvious to me that my enemies had told him
> to turn up to this. occasion, and most likely schooled him in precisely
> what words to say;. since hes an  unintelligent person and would not be
> able. to think for himself what insults to make against me.
>
> Harassment in London, week ending Friday 9 July. 1999
>
> Got. back to London Wednesay afternoon. Two incidents on the Underground
> returning from the airport. Unfortunately I. wasnt recording because I
> wasnt expecting trouble, so. these slipped through the net. One of these
> was verbal sexual abuse, of the type Ive. heard many, many times before
> these last three-and-a-half. years.
>
> Yesterday, Thursday 8/July/1999, I switched on Heart FM which had. never
> "got at" me. before.... and the presenter started making jokes about "mad,
> crazy" etc. Again, wasnt recording this because Id never. had any trouble
> from. this radio station and wasnt expecting any.
>
> Also yesterday, on a bus (155?) from Balham to. Clapham, a couple of girls
> started harassing me. with taunts of "crazy". By now I was expecting
> trouble and recorded an audio file. of this instance of abuse, at web URL;
>
>
> The cynical reader might think my demeanour or behaviour. had given rise 
> to
> the taunts of "crazy" recorded above. But I assure you my. behaviour on 
> the
> bus would not have made anyone think I was ill; and the. taunts the
> previous day were the same sexual words as. previously; so I'm quite sure
> that these incidents are either deliberately staged,. or indicative of an
> overall high level of awareness among the London public, particularly. in
> the part of. London where I live.
>
> Keith Hill. MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever
> refuses. to help.
>
>
> MI5 Persecution: Harassment through the. Radio
>
> One of the aspects of the MI5 persecution has been harassment. through the
> broadcast and print media; and one of the. aspects of harassment through
> the broadcast media is being. "got at" by radio presenters. This being 
> "got
> at" from the. radio takes various forms, the most obvious form being
> through overt or. hidden words and insults. But there are other, subtler
> forms. In Canada a couple of. years ago, I used to listen to the local
> radio stations every morning driving to. work, and listened to the music
> only, switching between radio station presets rapidly as soon as. a
> presenters voice came on, so that I would not be. subjected to any verbal
> harassment by the D.J.s. But they found a way. around this; they kept on
> playing the same song, every bl**dy morning at the. same time, which had
> the words "all coming back to me"; the perceptive. reader will remember
> that the words "coming back" have special meaning. (see the Private Eye
> cover at web URL;. for the
> hidden. meaning).
>
> And thats not the only time theyve allowed. the songs themselves to be 
> used
> as abuse against me; many years ago Radio-1. in the UK did exactly the
> same, and the DJ even made it explicitly. clear by saying, "dont you
> sometimes feel as if the songs were. made just for you".
>
> "We should be done for attempted manslaughter" says. Chris Tarrant
>
> Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it" from. the start. One of the first
> things I heard in the summer of 1990 was from a. Capital DJ who said, "If
> he listens to Capital. then he can't be all bad" (supportive, you
> see. We're. not bastards). Much of what came over the radio in 1990 is now
> so far away the precise details have. been obliterated by time. No diary
> was kept of the. details, and although archives if they exist may give
> pointers, the ambiguity of what broadcasters said would leave. that open 
> to
> re-interpretation.
>
> In spring 1994, Chris. Tarrant on his Capital morning show made an aside 
> to
> someone else in the studio, about a. person he didn't identify. He said,
> "You know this bloke? He says we're trying. to kill him. We should be done
> for. attempted manslaughter".
>
> That mirrored something I had said a. day or two before. What Tarrant said
> was understood by the staff. member in the studio he was saying it to; 
> they
> said, "Oh no, don't say that" to Tarrant. If any archives exist of. the
> morning show (probably unlikely). then it could be found there; what he
> said was so out of context that he would be very hard put. to find an
> explanation. A couple of days later, someone. at the site where I was
> working repeated the remark. although in a different way; they said there
> had been people in. a computer room when automatic fire extinguishers went
> off and those people were "thinking of suing for attempted. manslaughter".
>
> Pirate Radio "gets. at" me
>
> In another. incident in 1990/91, Id been listening to a pirate radio
> station in South London for. half an hour, when there was an audible phone
> call in the background, then total. silence for a few moments, followed by
> shrieks of laughter. "So what are we supposed. to say now? Deadly
> torture? Hes going to talk to. us now, isnt he?" which meant that they
> could hear what I would say in my room. Note the word "deadly". - they 
> give
> away their. purpose.
>
> It constantly surprised me that MI5 are so easily. able to subvert
> broadcasters, and, in this case of the pirate station, to do so,. so
> quickly. I think the answer to this question. is that they must have very
> wide contacts in the broadcast media;. presumably some or in fact many of
> those contacts are. literally "bought". In the same way as they tried to
> buy Jon Snow of Channel Four news, they. must have bought many 
> broadcasters
> and use them both directly to make insults. against me, and promulgate
> their points of view;. but also, they must use these "bought" broadcasters
> to influence other. television and radio presenters, who might not even be
> aware. that it was on MI5s behalf that they were being influenced to "get
> at". me.
>
> BBC-Radio-1 D.J.s celebrate my job termination. in November 1991
>
> This is another one from the "early years". At the beginning. of November
> 1991 my employment in Woking, Surrey. was terminated. Chris Tarrant of
> Capital-FM had. already made nasty remarks about both my work for the
> company, and the managers of the company themselves - "so. theyre not
> really a serious company, well theyd have to be to employ. you wouldnt
> they".
>
> So when I was terminated, as you can expect, BBC Radio 1. D.J.s
> celebrated. On. the Saturday afternoon (either 9/Nov/1991 or 16/Nov/1991 -
> I cannot remember precisely) I briefly listened to. Radio-1 and heard the
> disc jockeys loudly proclaiming "youre useless, you. should be sacked". On
> the same day, I went down to the Kwik-Fit in Tooting to get. my cars tyres
> replaced,. and in the office ran into a couple of their staff, one of them
> with an Australian accent, who said "what do you. think about it then? Its
> getting killed on. the radio."
>
> Plainly, if a random car-repair shop in Tooting knew about. the
> persecution, then many. thousands of other people across the capital and
> all over the country must have known. And the phrase. "getting
> killed" shows very. clear awareness of what the MI5 Persecutors intentions
> towards. me were in 1991, and judging by the continuing harassment, still
> remain. today.
>
> Recent Feedback from. Virgin-Radio
>
> As readers will know, from mid-March 1999 for. some four months, every
> weekend, I have bombarded. Westminster MPs with faxes about the terrible,
> all-encompassing MI5 Persecution. (Jesting aside,. it really is terrible
> and all-encompassing, in the UK anyway.). In June 1999, after I'd been at
> it some three months, I started getting. "covert" feedback from Virgin
> Radio.
>
> The first feedback I got was from Danny Baker, on Sunday 13th. June. That
> weekend I was sending an article which. contained biting criticism of the
> police inaction in this case. Danny. Baker on his Virgin radio show 
> started
> an angry rant that "he knows it's rubbish", ie. he was rubbishing what. 
> I'd
> said in that weekend's faxed article.. Unfortunately I wasn't recording
> this. programme.
>
> The next possible Virgin-Radio feedback was a week. later on 19th June
> 1999. This. is contained in the audio file above, in which Johnny Boy on
> his "Wheels of Steel" programme. says;
>
> "and. if you would like to put a triple play together, ahhh.... because
> quite frankly Hipster and. me are running out of ideas...."
>
> He goes on to counter Hipster's "how dare you" with a protestation that. 
> he
> is "only joking".  You can. listen to this incident on my website at URL;
>
>
> What I reckon is that my article faxed. to MPs that weekend was forwarded
> by one of the recipients to Virgin Radio. My article. had included the
> words;
>
> "I am beginning to run out of. both new topics and energy to write these
> articles."
>
> So what I reckon is that Johnny Boy read the. article.... and rephrased 
> the
> above line "run. out of ... new topics" to "running out of ideas". I
> recognise that this is a pretty tenuous inference to make.... but. do
> listen to the audio file, from the "ahhh...." pause in JB's. speech you 
> can
> guess he is about to say something "risky". and at someone's
> expense. Anyway, I listen to. the Wheels of Steel regularly and will
> continue to. do so, recording it as I always do - so any future funny
> remarks. will get immortalised on my website! (There was a previous
> incident from August 1998. which is preserved at web URL;
>
> but I am sufficiently uncertain about it that I have not included it. in
> this. article.)
>
> First Ever Radio Reference - Alan Freeman. of BBC-Radio-1
>
> The first time I was ever referred to on the radio. was sometime in May or
> June of 1990, by Alan Freeman of BBC-Radio-1. Note. that this isnt an
> "interactive listening" episode, its different, this. was Freeman reading
> out a letter. from one of my "real life" enemies.
>
> Id acrimoniously. broken up with some former friends in January of 1990,
> and I think. they were still trying to cause me trouble in June of that
> year. Freeman on his rock show. read out a letter from an "Andrew
> Turner"; one of my acquaintances from January. 1990 had been called Andy
> Turner, so I think. its the same guy. Freeman quoted Turner as saying
> various. things about me, in particular Freeman said "thats a hell of a
> letter you wrote there Andy", "with a schizophrenic. you're never alone",
> and something about the "one who wore out his. welcome with random
> precision" (from the words. of the Pink Floyd song).
>
> When. I was looking for primary causes of the MI5 persecution, this letter
> which Freeman had read out on his programme struck me. as being 
> potentially
> one of the sources of the persecution.. I know Turner and various others 
> in
> that group were very bitter at what they saw as their. failure and my
> undeserved success, and. they were quite determined to upset the
> applecart. Of course. several other primary causes are possible; I do not
> know why MI5 chose me as opposed to. someone else, and MI5 are hardly
> likely. to tell me.
>
> "Absolute Obscene". David Hepworth of GLR
>
> This one Ive assigned a 100%. rating on the website. There are actually 
> two
> separate incidents, which are linked. through the D.J.s choice of
> words. The first incident can be heard in computer audio at web. URL;
>
>
> On  21/Feb/1997, I was listening to. BBC GLR, by stealth. Back in 1990 I
> used to have Capital blaring out of the speakers all over. the garden ("if
> he listens to Capital then. he can't be all bad", thanks ever so much). 
> But
> now I listen on. my walkman on headphones with the volume turned right
> down. It could not possibly. be overheard by any listening device, no
> matter how sensitive, because sound does not carry from the. phones.
>
> Yet somehow they. are still able to tell which station I am listening to 
> on
> the walkman. And last night, I bravely tuned to GLR 94.9FM at. around
> 8.45pm. Everything went well for the first half hour. or so. Around 
> 9.10pm,
> Hepworth said the following. after the song "Come Around" by the
> Muttonbirds.
>
> "coming up. after this, we got the rock-and-roll A-level, we have, I
> assume, Brian do we. have an embarrassment of prizes in there, we do, 
> don't
> we, absolute obscene amounts of prizes, there will no doubt be a riot. at
> the back door, and. that's, er, A-level coming up after this"
>
> The key phrases. in what he said are, "EMBARRASSMENT of prizes", and what
> he himself emphasized verbally, "ABSOLUTE OBSCENE amount of. prizes". It 
> is
> my belief (based on content and tone of voice) that when he. spoke these
> phrases. he knew I was listening, and that the phrases refer directly to 
> my
> situation.. The "EMBARRASSMENT" is the embarrassment he and other media
> people. would feel at having their wrongdoing exposed; the "ABSOLUTE
> OBSCENE". (which he verbally emphasized) described the disgusting sexual
> abuse which. the harassers have been throwing at me.
>
> There was a second incident, on 9/May/1997, which may. be found on the web
> (with computer audio) at. URL;
>
>
> This. incident again contains the words "absolute embarrassment of 
> prizes",
> with the same emphasis as. the first instance, and laughter following the
> phrase. So theyre aware of the complaint I made. on Usenet after the first
> incident; and they are so arrogant that they do exactly the. same
> again. They are so arrogant,. they know they are being recorded and that
> what they. say will be published on the web, but they dont care. What
> corrupt media, and. what a corrupt country to have such corruption in its
> media.
>
> 7843
>
>
> --
> Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
>      ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem
date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:40:41 GMT   author:   jake

M`I'5`Persec ution ` bu gging and coun ter-surveillance   
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-=. MI5: bugging and counter-surveillance -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ?. I mean if
PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the. place from top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there I would know if anything was out of place.. If I was
PO: >really. suspicious, I would call in one of those bug detection teams which
PO: >have those machines that pick up the. transmitted radio waves. This
PO: >reminds me of BUGS, that new. programme on BBC1 on

That's exactly what we did. We went to a competent, professional. detective
agency in London,. paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. They used
scanner. devices which go to over 1 GHz and would pick up any nearby
transmitter in that. range, they also checked the phones and found
nothing... but if the tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't. find
anything,. would they?

CS: >Doesn't this. suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be found?

You can assume that they've done this. sort of thing to other people in more
"serious" cases, where they would know. the targets would suspect the
presence of electronic surveillance. So they. will have developed techniques
and devices which are not readily detectable either by. visual inspection or
by electronic means. What those techniques might be, I. couldn't guess.

In this case, the existence of bugging. devices was clear from the
beginning,. and they "rubbed it in" with what was said by the boy on the
coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance. people to be
called in, who. they knew would fail to detect the bugging devices, causing
loss of credibility to the other things I would have to say. relating to the
harassment.

I did all the things. someone in my situation would do to try to find the
bugs. In addition to calling in professional. help using electronic
counter-surveillance, I made a close visual inspection. of electrical
equipment, plus. any points where audio or video surveillance devices might
have been concealed. Of. course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance
"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require visible. supporting
circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put a small video. surveillance
device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a. TV
or video. It would be necessary to physically break in to. a property to fit
such a. device.

3157
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:04 +0000 (UTC)   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us