|
|
|
date: Wed, 07 May 2008 17:47:13 +0100,
group: uk.sport.golf
back
Rules Question
Today while playing a medal I asked one of the others to attend the
flagstick for a long put, all on the green . He did so but failed to
remove the stick. The
ball hit same and stopped within a foot and after quietly saying thank
you I putted out.
Who gets penalised.
--
Regards Jaygee
date: Wed, 07 May 2008 17:47:13 +0100
author: jaygee
|
Re: Rules Question
On Wed, 07 May 2008 17:47:13 +0100, jaygee wrote:
>Today while playing a medal I asked one of the others to attend the
>flagstick for a long put, all on the green . He did so but failed to
>remove the stick. The
>ball hit same and stopped within a foot and after quietly saying thank
>you I putted out.
>Who gets penalised.
You are penalised[1]. See Rule 17-1, Note 2 and Rule 17-3.
Standard disclaimer applies: In general, I am a fool and thus cannot
be counted upon to provide the correct ruling. Use my advice at your
own peril. ;-)
[1] Should read "You are penalized" if you are an arrogant, ignorant
resident of the United States and do not understand the subtleties of
spelling outside of the borders of said country. Again, ;-)
--
jvdp
Nobody fears the Chopra
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
date: Wed, 07 May 2008 13:42:33 -0400
author: John van der Pflum
|
Re: Rules Question
"jaygee" wrote in message
news:q72dnRZcn_uPQLzVnZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@plusnet...
> Today while playing a medal I asked one of the others to attend the
> flagstick for a long put, all on the green . He did so but failed to
> remove the stick. The
> ball hit same and stopped within a foot and after quietly saying thank
> you I putted out.
> Who gets penalised.
> --
> Regards Jaygee
John is correct.
If your ball in motion after a stroke from the putting green strikes the
flagstick you incur a penalty of loss of hole or two strokes in stroke play
(Rule 17-3 c).
If your stroke was played from off the putting green, you incur the penalty
only if the flagstick had been removed from the hole or was being attended
or held up with your authority (Rule 17-3a).
You only escape these penalties if the flagstick was attended without your
authority in which case the person attending it incurs the penalty instead
(Rule 17-2 Exception and 17-2).
You were correct to play your ball from the place where it came to rest
after the deflection.
regards,
Malcolm
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 19:37:22 +0100
author: M L Wadsworth
|
Re: Rules Question
M L Wadsworth wrote:
> John is correct.
>
> If your ball in motion after a stroke from the putting green strikes the
> flagstick you incur a penalty of loss of hole or two strokes in stroke play
> (Rule 17-3 c).
> If your stroke was played from off the putting green, you incur the penalty
> only if the flagstick had been removed from the hole or was being attended
> or held up with your authority (Rule 17-3a).
> You only escape these penalties if the flagstick was attended without your
> authority in which case the person attending it incurs the penalty instead
> (Rule 17-2 Exception and 17-2).
>
> You were correct to play your ball from the place where it came to rest
> after the deflection.
Thank you gentlemen for your swift replies, not what I wanted to hear
but I accept your reading.
Seems strange that something I have no control over can attract a two
shot penalty.
I will just have to explain every time I need the flag attended :-))
--
Regards Jaygee
date: Wed, 07 May 2008 20:19:34 +0100
author: jaygee
|
Re: Rules Question
When I attend the flag for another player I make a point of ensuring that it
is part lifted from the centre of the hole and even on occasion hold it at
the back of the hole.
"jaygee" wrote in message
news:beSdne_tJ9Nbnb_VnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@plusnet...
>M L Wadsworth wrote:
>
>> John is correct.
>>
>> If your ball in motion after a stroke from the putting green strikes the
>> flagstick you incur a penalty of loss of hole or two strokes in stroke
>> play (Rule 17-3 c).
>> If your stroke was played from off the putting green, you incur the
>> penalty only if the flagstick had been removed from the hole or was being
>> attended or held up with your authority (Rule 17-3a).
>> You only escape these penalties if the flagstick was attended without
>> your authority in which case the person attending it incurs the penalty
>> instead (Rule 17-2 Exception and 17-2).
>>
>> You were correct to play your ball from the place where it came to rest
>> after the deflection.
>
> Thank you gentlemen for your swift replies, not what I wanted to hear but
> I accept your reading.
> Seems strange that something I have no control over can attract a two shot
> penalty.
> I will just have to explain every time I need the flag attended :-))
>
>
> --
> Regards Jaygee
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 21:01:58 +0100
author: Stewart
|
Re: Rules Question
Stewart wrote:
> When I attend the flag for another player I make a point of ensuring
> that it is part lifted from the centre of the hole and even on
> occasion hold it at the back of the hole.
This would be normal practise but in this case the gentleman tending the
flag claimed he did not know he was required to remove it from the hole
>> -- Regards Jaygee
>
>
date: Wed, 07 May 2008 21:20:44 +0100
author: jaygee
|
Re: Rules Question
jaygee in <q72dnRZcn_uPQLzVnZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@plusnet>:
>Today while playing a medal I asked one of the others to attend the
>flagstick for a long put, all on the green . He did so but failed to
>remove the stick. The
>ball hit same and stopped within a foot and after quietly saying thank
>you I putted out.
>Who gets penalised.
It depends...
<decision quote>
17-3/2 Opponent or Fellow-Competitor Attending Flagstick for Player Fails
to Remove It; Players Ball Strikes
Flagstick
Q. A requests B, his opponent or a fellow-competitor, to attend the
flagstick, and B complies. A putts too firmly and B fails to remove the
flagstick. As ball strikes the flagstick. What is the ruling?
A. If B failed to remove the flagstick for the purpose of causing A to
incur a penalty, B is disqualified in both match play and stroke play for a
serious breach of Rule 1-2. In stroke play, in equity (Rule 1-4), A must
replay the stroke without penalty.
If Bs failure to remove the flagstick was for the purpose of preventing
As ball from going beyond the flagstick and not for the purpose of causing
A to incur a penalty, in match play B lost the hole under Rule
1-2 when he failed to remove the flagstick before As ball reached the
hole. The fact that As ball subsequently struck the flagstick (a breach of
Rule 17-3a) is irrelevant since B had already lost the hole. In stroke
play, B incurs a penalty of two strokes under Rule 1-2, and A incurs the
same penalty under Rule 17-3a.
If Bs failure to remove the flagstick was not deliberate, e.g., the
flagstick stuck in the socket or B was distracted and did not see A putt, A
incurs a penalty of loss of hole in match play or two strokes in stroke
play under Rule 17-3. B incurs no penalty.
<unquote>
Ciao,
Paul
date: Wed, 07 May 2008 22:35:31 +0200
author: Paul Schmitz-Josten
|
Re: Rules Question
On Wed, 7 May 2008 19:37:22 +0100, "M L Wadsworth"
wrote:
>
>"jaygee" wrote in message
>news:q72dnRZcn_uPQLzVnZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@plusnet...
>> Today while playing a medal I asked one of the others to attend the
>> flagstick for a long put, all on the green . He did so but failed to
>> remove the stick. The
>> ball hit same and stopped within a foot and after quietly saying thank
>> you I putted out.
>> Who gets penalised.
>> --
>> Regards Jaygee
>
>John is correct.
I am saving this email for the rest of my life. :-)
--
jvdp
Nobody fears the Chopra
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
date: Wed, 07 May 2008 19:13:19 -0400
author: John van der Pflum
|
Re: Rules Question
On Wed, 07 May 2008 21:20:44 +0100, jaygee wrote:
>Stewart wrote:
>> When I attend the flag for another player I make a point of ensuring
>> that it is part lifted from the centre of the hole and even on
>> occasion hold it at the back of the hole.
>
>This would be normal practise but in this case the gentleman tending the
>flag claimed he did not know he was required to remove it from the hole
Wow -- that is a new one. I've never heard that before.
--
jvdp
Nobody fears the Chopra
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
date: Wed, 07 May 2008 19:15:49 -0400
author: John van der Pflum
|
Re: Rules Question
John van der Pflum wrote:
> [1] Should read "You are penalized" if you are an arrogant, ignorant
> resident of the United States and do not understand the subtleties of
> spelling outside of the borders of said country. Again, ;-)
I don't think you should apologise for regionalisation of spelling
conventions.
Unless you want a prise for self-deprecation.
--
Cheers
Colin Wilson
------------------------------------------------------------------
Trentham Golf Club: http://www.trenthamgolf.com
Barnbougle Dunes: http://publishing.kyneton.net.au/barnbougle
------------------------------------------------------------------
date: Thu, 08 May 2008 00:42:51 GMT
author: Colin Wilson
|
Re: Rules Question
"jaygee" wrote in message
news:beSdne_tJ9Nbnb_VnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@plusnet...
>M L Wadsworth wrote:
> Thank you gentlemen for your swift replies, not what I wanted to hear but
> I accept your reading.
> Seems strange that something I have no control over can attract a two shot
> penalty.
> I will just have to explain every time I need the flag attended :-))
>
>
> --
> Regards Jaygee
You do have some control - you can choose who attends the flagstick for you!
But why did you have it attended in the first place?
I only have it attended if it is so far away that I just cannot see it from
my stance and that is fairly rare.
This is particularly true in singles match play since if my opponent attends
the flagstick for me, he gains quite a lot of helpful knowledge about the
pace of the green and the borrow - more than he would get from standing to
the side.
In four-ball match play I never permit an opponent to attend for me - I
always insist my partner does it.
Sometimes, if it may help my partner with his putt, I will ask him to
attend even though I can easily see the hole.
I am amazed that a player have not yet learned how to attend a flagstick.
Was it his first ever time on a golf course?
Regards,
Malcolm
date: Thu, 8 May 2008 07:45:38 +0100
author: M L Wadsworth
|
Attending a Flagstick
I have never found in any publication, instructions on how to attend a
flagstick yet so often one sees it done badly.
When I first started playing golf I vividly remember a round I played with a
scottish golfer of mature years during which he taught me all the etiquette
of golf. I have always been grateful to him and his instruction has
remained etched in my memory.
Some may be interested in the intructions below, taken from my documentation
for the Rules School I run from time to time for new golfers:
Malcolm
"Attending a Flagstick
Do not stand within an arms length of the flagstick unless you are about to
remove it or attend it, otherwise you will be deemed to be attending it.
Only attend for a player if he has no caddie and no partner.
Always check the player wants the flagstick attended. Some players like the
flagstick in the hole until they have aligned their putt and then want it
removed.
Approach the flagstick taking care not to tread on any players line of
putt.
Carefully lift the flagstick from its socket and unless it is required to be
held up in the air, rest it in the hole but out of the socket, between the
socket and the ball.
Unless required to hold the flagstick up in the air, gather in the flag with
the hand that will hold the flagstick so it will not be flapping while the
player is making his stroke.
Hold the flagstick at arms-length to the side or, if required to hold it up
in the air, vertically above the hole.
Make sure you are not casting a shadow across the hole or the players line
of play.
Hold the flagstick upright. If it is not possible to hold it upright while
gathering in the flag or holding it at arms-length, lean it backwards but
make it appears vertical to the player.
In leaning a flagstick backwards, be careful not to allow it to lean against
the edge of the hole as it will cause damage.
If carrying a club yourself, there is no penalty if it is touching the
putting green while you are attending the flagstick but it is prudent not to
let it do so otherwise you might be thought to be indicating the line of
putt, particularly if attending for your partner.
Pay full attention to the stroke about to be played.
Stand perfectly still and quiet while the player prepares for and makes his
stroke.
Once the ball is in motion, remove the flagstick and stand away: dont wait
until the ball is near the hole.
Unless the flagstick is required to be re-centred in the hole, lay it down
gently with the flag under the flagstick so it will not flap, well away from
all subsequent play of the hole.
When the flagstick is to be re-centred in the hole, take care not to touch
any part of the putting green around the lip of the hole and make sure the
flagstick is properly centred and upright with the flag free to fly, before
walking away."
date: Thu, 8 May 2008 08:49:52 +0100
author: M L Wadsworth
|
Re: Rules Question - Oops!
Oops!
A couple of grammar mistakes - sorry:
> You do have some control - you can choose who attends the flagstick for
> you!
> But why did you have it attended in the first place?
"it" being the hole not the flagstick!!!
>
> I only have it attended if it is so far away that I just cannot see it
> from my stance and that is fairly rare.
>
> This is particularly true in singles match play since if my opponent
> attends the flagstick for me, he gains quite a lot of helpful knowledge
> about the pace of the green and the borrow - more than he would get from
> standing to the side.
>
> In four-ball match play I never permit an opponent to attend for me - I
> always insist my partner does it.
> Sometimes, if it may help my partner with his putt, I will ask him to
> attend even though I can easily see the hole.
>
> I am amazed that a player have
"has" not "have"
not yet learned how to attend a flagstick.
> Was it his first ever time on a golf course?
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
>
date: Thu, 8 May 2008 08:56:11 +0100
author: M L Wadsworth
|
Re: Rules Question
M L Wadsworth wrote:
> You do have some control - you can choose who attends the flagstick for you!
> But why did you have it attended in the first place?
I could not see the hole because of the contours of the green and the
distance.
My intention was to lag up but I hit it a bit firmly :-)
> I am amazed that a player have not yet learned how to attend a flagstick.
> Was it his first ever time on a golf course?
No, I think he has been playing for at least a season. It has now been
explained to him.
--
Regards Jaygee
date: Thu, 08 May 2008 10:16:11 +0100
author: jaygee
|
Re: Attending a Flagstick
M L Wadsworth wrote:
> I have never found in any publication, instructions on how to attend a
> flagstick yet so often one sees it done badly.
> When I first started playing golf I vividly remember a round I played with a
> scottish golfer of mature years during which he taught me all the etiquette
> of golf. I have always been grateful to him and his instruction has
> remained etched in my memory.
>
> Some may be interested in the intructions below, taken from my documentation
> for the Rules School I run from time to time for new golfers:
>
> Malcolm
>
<snipped>
Malcolm,
If I might add a note to your list.....
If in charge of the flagstick while the rest of the group is holing out,
do not rest the flagstick on the ground, especially in the vicinity of
the player's line of putt. In fact do not let the flagstick rest on the
ground at all, ever! (I often see players actually leaning on the
flagstick!). Pros and experienced caddies will often invert the
flagstick while holding it off the ground when others are holing out.
There is a fine line between 'innocently' looking after the flagstick,
and breaching Rule 8-2b (Indicating Line of Play on the Putting Green).
Any doubt on the matter can only be resolved against the player if the
person holding the flagstick is his partner or either of their caddies.
An astute opponent in Matchplay would generally have no difficulty with
a claim against the player, claimed innocence or not!
cheers
david
date: Fri, 09 May 2008 09:03:01 +1000
author: david s-a
|
Re: Attending a Flagstick
david s-a wrote:
> M L Wadsworth wrote:
>> I have never found in any publication, instructions on how to attend a
>> flagstick yet so often one sees it done badly.
>> When I first started playing golf I vividly remember a round I played
>> with a scottish golfer of mature years during which he taught me all
>> the etiquette of golf. I have always been grateful to him and his
>> instruction has remained etched in my memory.
>>
>> Some may be interested in the intructions below, taken from my
>> documentation for the Rules School I run from time to time for new
>> golfers:
>>
>> Malcolm
>>
>
>
> <snipped>
>
> Malcolm,
>
> If I might add a note to your list.....
>
> If in charge of the flagstick while the rest of the group is holing out,
> do not rest the flagstick on the ground, especially in the vicinity of
> the player's line of putt. In fact do not let the flagstick rest on the
> ground at all, ever! (I often see players actually leaning on the
> flagstick!). Pros and experienced caddies will often invert the
> flagstick while holding it off the ground when others are holing out.
>
> There is a fine line between 'innocently' looking after the flagstick,
> and breaching Rule 8-2b (Indicating Line of Play on the Putting Green).
> Any doubt on the matter can only be resolved against the player if the
> person holding the flagstick is his partner or either of their caddies.
> An astute opponent in Matchplay would generally have no difficulty with
> a claim against the player, claimed innocence or not!
>
> cheers
> david
Easy enough when you're tootling around in the 'professional' 5 hour
rounds but during your regular Saturday 4-ball or match play it's better
to just plonk the flag down, out of the way so it's least likely to be hit.
As for the astuteness of a matchplayer in making spurious accusations
and pressing them upon an innocent claim I find that debatable. Surely
one could only go with it after repeated behaviour or other evidence
like talking to each other during the lining up and standing holding the
flag process.
In your experience, how often has such a claim been made at all or made
and upheld, or have just warnings been given?
--
Durram
date: Fri, 09 May 2008 10:14:43 +0100
author: Demetri (Durram)
|
Re: Rules Question
On 7 May, 18:42, John van der Pflum wrote:
>
> [1] Should read "You are penalized" if you are an arrogant, ignorant
> resident of the United States
That's the correct original spelling. It was our side that changed.
date: Fri, 9 May 2008 06:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
author: johnty
|
Re: Attending a Flagstick
Demetri (Durram) wrote:
>>
>> There is a fine line between 'innocently' looking after the flagstick,
>> and breaching Rule 8-2b (Indicating Line of Play on the Putting Green).
>> Any doubt on the matter can only be resolved against the player if the
>> person holding the flagstick is his partner or either of their
>> caddies. An astute opponent in Matchplay would generally have no
>> difficulty with a claim against the player, claimed innocence or not!
>>
>> cheers
>> david
>
> Easy enough when you're tootling around in the 'professional' 5 hour
> rounds but during your regular Saturday 4-ball or match play it's better
> to just plonk the flag down, out of the way so it's least likely to be hit.
Of course!
>
> As for the astuteness of a matchplayer in making spurious accusations
> and pressing them upon an innocent claim I find that debatable.
In Pennant Matchplay, which is an extremely competitive interclub 'team'
event here, spurious accusations are common and although often made
under a misunderstanding of the rules, necessitating clarification by a
rules official, some do succeed! The most common one I have found is a
breach of Rule 14-2b. Although surprisingly this has happened at
'Senior' and 'Veteran' events this more usually occurs among the lower
echelons of the Pennant grades and in the Colts divisions, mostly at the
beginning of the Pennant season. The 'word' soon gets around...and
detail of the rule soon becomes embedded in these player's minds. Rule
26-1, the 'Provisional Ball' definition, as well as Rule 27 and its
general implications, get a fair bit of action as well!
Surely
> one could only go with it after repeated behaviour or other evidence
> like talking to each other during the lining up and standing holding the
> flag process.
In normal competition Matchplay we don't interfere with this...it is up
to the players themselves to make the claims, and of course a player is
entitled to 'ignore' a breach if he sees fit. It is only where we have
been formally appointed as 'referees' (as distinct from 'rules
officials'), we are obliged to ensure there is no breach of the
rules....and we will make a ruling if a breach is observed.
>
> In your experience, how often has such a claim been made at all or made
> and upheld, or have just warnings been given?
>
In over twelve years acting at both State and National level I have made
a ruling on just two claims on this, but on numerous occasions I have
had to 'explain' this and many other rules to players while walking up
the next fairway!
The R&A write rules for this game and expect them to be observed.
cheers
david
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 08:54:41 +1000
author: david s-a
|
Re: Rules Question
johnty wrote:
> That's the correct original spelling. It was our side that changed.
Microsoft's spell checker is changing us all back. :)
FWIW, the ship that sailed into Port Phillip in 1835 to found Melbourne
was named the Enterprize (http://www.enterprize.com.au).
--
Cheers
Colin Wilson
------------------------------------------------------------------
Trentham Golf Club: http://www.trenthamgolf.com
Barnbougle Dunes: http://publishing.kyneton.net.au/barnbougle
------------------------------------------------------------------
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 01:11:14 GMT
author: Colin Wilson
|
Re: Rules Question
"Colin Wilson" wrote in message
news:SC6Vj.9023$ko5.7990@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> johnty wrote:
>
>> That's the correct original spelling. It was our side that changed.
>
> Microsoft's spell checker is changing us all back. :)
>
> FWIW, the ship that sailed into Port Phillip in 1835 to found Melbourne
> was named the Enterprize (http://www.enterprize.com.au).
>
> --
> Cheers
> Colin Wilson
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Trentham Golf Club: http://www.trenthamgolf.com
> Barnbougle Dunes: http://publishing.kyneton.net.au/barnbougle
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
......and some people think Hawkestone Park only has one "e" and that is at
the end, but I have a golf shirt that proves there is also an "e" in the
middle ;-).
Malcolm
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 07:43:57 +0100
author: M L Wadsworth
|
Re: Attending a Flagstick
david s-a wrote:
> Demetri (Durram) wrote:
>
>>>
>>> There is a fine line between 'innocently' looking after the
>>> flagstick, and breaching Rule 8-2b (Indicating Line of Play on the
>>> Putting Green).
>>> Any doubt on the matter can only be resolved against the player if
>>> the person holding the flagstick is his partner or either of their
>>> caddies. An astute opponent in Matchplay would generally have no
>>> difficulty with a claim against the player, claimed innocence or not!
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> david
>>
>> Easy enough when you're tootling around in the 'professional' 5 hour
>> rounds but during your regular Saturday 4-ball or match play it's
>> better to just plonk the flag down, out of the way so it's least
>> likely to be hit.
>
> Of course!
>
>>
>> As for the astuteness of a matchplayer in making spurious accusations
>> and pressing them upon an innocent claim I find that debatable.
>
> In Pennant Matchplay, which is an extremely competitive interclub 'team'
> event here, spurious accusations are common and although often made
> under a misunderstanding of the rules, necessitating clarification by a
> rules official, some do succeed! The most common one I have found is a
> breach of Rule 14-2b. Although surprisingly this has happened at
> 'Senior' and 'Veteran' events this more usually occurs among the lower
> echelons of the Pennant grades and in the Colts divisions, mostly at the
> beginning of the Pennant season. The 'word' soon gets around...and
> detail of the rule soon becomes embedded in these player's minds. Rule
> 26-1, the 'Provisional Ball' definition, as well as Rule 27 and its
> general implications, get a fair bit of action as well!
>
> Surely
>> one could only go with it after repeated behaviour or other evidence
>> like talking to each other during the lining up and standing holding
>> the flag process.
>
> In normal competition Matchplay we don't interfere with this...it is up
> to the players themselves to make the claims, and of course a player is
> entitled to 'ignore' a breach if he sees fit. It is only where we have
> been formally appointed as 'referees' (as distinct from 'rules
> officials'), we are obliged to ensure there is no breach of the
> rules....and we will make a ruling if a breach is observed.
>>
>> In your experience, how often has such a claim been made at all or
>> made and upheld, or have just warnings been given?
>>
>
> In over twelve years acting at both State and National level I have made
> a ruling on just two claims on this, but on numerous occasions I have
> had to 'explain' this and many other rules to players while walking up
> the next fairway!
>
> The R&A write rules for this game and expect them to be observed.
>
> cheers
> david
>
>
>
Interesting stuff from the 'front line', thanks.
Club houses wouldn't be the same without the odd discussion or dispute
or two and at our club the common bones of contention during our time of
renewal are Abnormal Ground Conditions, Ground Under Repair and what and
where is lost as a number of our boundaries have Lateral Water Hazards
up to the OOB markers!
Great fun
--
D
date: Sat, 10 May 2008 09:39:12 +0100
author: Durram (Demetri)
|
Re: Attending a Flagstick
On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:39:12 +0100, Durram (Demetri) said...
> Club houses wouldn't be the same without the odd discussion or dispute
> or two and at our club the common bones of contention during our time of
> renewal are Abnormal Ground Conditions, Ground Under Repair and what and
> where is lost as a number of our boundaries have Lateral Water Hazards
> up to the OOB markers!
We used to have one of those. Last year the OOB was moved to the in-
course side of the ditch and the LWT was removed. Much less scope for
argument now!
--
Mark Myers
usenet at mcm2007 dot plus dot com
I call that a radical interpretation of the text.
date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:36:25 +0100
author: Mark Myers
|
|
|