Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
sport
athletics
baseball
betting
cricket
football
football....bradford-city
football...celtic
football...leeds-united
football...liverpool
football...man-city
football...newcast..united
football...rangers
football...southampton
football...sunderland
football...west-ham
football.american
football.scottish
golf
horseracing
ice-hockey
misc
orienteering
speedway
squash
swimming
  
 
date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:47:30 +0100,    group: uk.sport.football.clubs.rangers        back       
UEFA rankings as of today   
at the moment before the final, i.e. this is as bad as it gets:


Team Coefficient - Rangers 8th
Country Coefficient - Scotland 5th
Team Ranking - Rangers 24th
Country Ranking - Scotland 10th


If we beat Zenit, I think Scotland would move up to 4th in the coefficients 
and Rangers would move up to 5th behind Man U, Chealsea, Liverpool and 
Barcelona - not bad company - and up 4 places in the Team ranking to 20th.

Scotland would be behind only England, Spain and Germany. Again, not bad 
company.

For those that are interested, Celtic are currently in 41st position but 
likely at best to fall about 10 places next year - providing they do well in 
the CL - largely due to the Glorious Artmedia of Bratislava.

Course, maths ain't my strong point so feel free to correct me.
date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:47:30 +0100   author:   FishSupper

Re: UEFA rankings as of today   
"FishSupper"  wrote
> Team Coefficient - Rangers 8th
> Country Coefficient - Scotland 5th
> Team Ranking - Rangers 24th
> Country Ranking - Scotland 10th

What's the difference between the ranking and the coefficient placing? How 
does that work?
date: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:37:42 GMT   author:   Stevio

Re: UEFA rankings as of today   
"Stevio"  wrote in message 
news:aBiWj.2887$DZ6.603@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> "FishSupper"  wrote
>> Team Coefficient - Rangers 8th
>> Country Coefficient - Scotland 5th
>> Team Ranking - Rangers 24th
>> Country Ranking - Scotland 10th
>
> What's the difference between the ranking and the coefficient placing? How 
> does that work?
Coefficient is calculated on this season alone, the Ranking is calculated 
over several seasons
date: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:38:45 GMT   author:   Oso osobear(beard)@ntlworld.com

Re: UEFA rankings as of today   
On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:47:30 +0100, "FishSupper"  wrote:

>at the moment before the final, i.e. this is as bad as it gets:
>
>
>Team Coefficient - Rangers 8th
>Country Coefficient - Scotland 5th
>Team Ranking - Rangers 24th
>Country Ranking - Scotland 10th
>
>
>If we beat Zenit, I think Scotland would move up to 4th in the coefficients 
>and Rangers would move up to 5th behind Man U, Chealsea, Liverpool and 
>Barcelona - not bad company - and up 4 places in the Team ranking to 20th.
>
>Scotland would be behind only England, Spain and Germany. Again, not bad 
>company.
>
>For those that are interested, Celtic are currently in 41st position but 
>likely at best to fall about 10 places next year - providing they do well in 
>the CL - largely due to the Glorious Artmedia of Bratislava.
>
>Course, maths ain't my strong point so feel free to correct me. 

I wouldn't read too much into UEFA rankings mate, they're usually a
load of bollocks. Rangers higher than Celtic? LOL.
date: Wed, 14 May 2008 21:43:48 +0100   author:   Sniffer-Dog

Re: UEFA rankings as of today   
"Sniffer-Dog"  wrote in message 
news:vljm24tah7lh3eovkb005dmdibc7jj72ht@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:47:30 +0100, "FishSupper"  wrote:
>
>>at the moment before the final, i.e. this is as bad as it gets:
>>
>>
>>Team Coefficient - Rangers 8th
>>Country Coefficient - Scotland 5th
>>Team Ranking - Rangers 24th
>>Country Ranking - Scotland 10th
>>
>>
>>If we beat Zenit, I think Scotland would move up to 4th in the 
>>coefficients
>>and Rangers would move up to 5th behind Man U, Chealsea, Liverpool and
>>Barcelona - not bad company - and up 4 places in the Team ranking to 20th.
>>
>>Scotland would be behind only England, Spain and Germany. Again, not bad
>>company.
>>
>>For those that are interested, Celtic are currently in 41st position but
>>likely at best to fall about 10 places next year - providing they do well 
>>in
>>the CL - largely due to the Glorious Artmedia of Bratislava.
>>
>>Course, maths ain't my strong point so feel free to correct me.
>
> I wouldn't read too much into UEFA rankings mate, they're usually a
> load of bollocks. Rangers higher than Celtic? LOL.
>
And just which final did Celtic get into this year?
date: Wed, 14 May 2008 20:44:51 GMT   author:   Oso osobear(beard)@ntlworld.com

Re: UEFA rankings as of today   
"FishSupper"  wrote in message
news:-MWdnYxTe781DbTVnZ2dnUVZ8uSdnZ2d@bt.com...
> at the moment before the final, i.e. this is as bad as it gets:
>
>
> Team Coefficient - Rangers 8th
> Country Coefficient - Scotland 5th
> Team Ranking - Rangers 24th
> Country Ranking - Scotland 10th
>
>
> If we beat Zenit, I think Scotland would move up to 4th in the
coefficients
> and Rangers would move up to 5th behind Man U, Chealsea, Liverpool and
> Barcelona - not bad company - and up 4 places in the Team ranking to 20th.
>
> Scotland would be behind only England, Spain and Germany. Again, not bad
> company.
>
> For those that are interested, Celtic are currently in 41st position but
> likely at best to fall about 10 places next year - providing they do well
in
> the CL - largely due to the Glorious Artmedia of Bratislava.
>
> Course, maths ain't my strong point so feel free to correct me.

Correct you? sure.  Load of fucking bollocks mate!



James
aka
Commander Hughes

>
date: Wed, 14 May 2008 23:06:14 +0100   author:   Commander Hughes

Re: UEFA rankings as of today   
"Commander Hughes"  wrote in message 
news:g0fnq1$7jj$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
>
> "FishSupper"  wrote in message
> news:-MWdnYxTe781DbTVnZ2dnUVZ8uSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>> at the moment before the final, i.e. this is as bad as it gets:
>>
>>
>> Team Coefficient - Rangers 8th
>> Country Coefficient - Scotland 5th
>> Team Ranking - Rangers 24th
>> Country Ranking - Scotland 10th
>>
>>
>> If we beat Zenit, I think Scotland would move up to 4th in the
> coefficients
>> and Rangers would move up to 5th behind Man U, Chealsea, Liverpool and
>> Barcelona - not bad company - and up 4 places in the Team ranking to 
>> 20th.
>>
>> Scotland would be behind only England, Spain and Germany. Again, not bad
>> company.
>>
>> For those that are interested, Celtic are currently in 41st position but
>> likely at best to fall about 10 places next year - providing they do well
> in
>> the CL - largely due to the Glorious Artmedia of Bratislava.
>>
>> Course, maths ain't my strong point so feel free to correct me.
>
> Correct you? sure.  Load of fucking bollocks mate!
>
Obviously you weren't taught logical disputation.
date: Wed, 14 May 2008 22:14:09 GMT   author:   Oso osobear(beard)@ntlworld.com

Re: UEFA rankings as of today   
"Oso" <osobear(beard)@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:RuJWj.3651$DZ6.3554@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> "Commander Hughes"  wrote in message
> news:g0fnq1$7jj$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
> >
> > "FishSupper"  wrote in message
> > news:-MWdnYxTe781DbTVnZ2dnUVZ8uSdnZ2d@bt.com...
> >> at the moment before the final, i.e. this is as bad as it gets:
> >>
> >>
> >> Team Coefficient - Rangers 8th
> >> Country Coefficient - Scotland 5th
> >> Team Ranking - Rangers 24th
> >> Country Ranking - Scotland 10th
> >>
> >>
> >> If we beat Zenit, I think Scotland would move up to 4th in the
> > coefficients
> >> and Rangers would move up to 5th behind Man U, Chealsea, Liverpool and
> >> Barcelona - not bad company - and up 4 places in the Team ranking to
> >> 20th.
> >>
> >> Scotland would be behind only England, Spain and Germany. Again, not
bad
> >> company.
> >>
> >> For those that are interested, Celtic are currently in 41st position
but
> >> likely at best to fall about 10 places next year - providing they do
well
> > in
> >> the CL - largely due to the Glorious Artmedia of Bratislava.
> >>
> >> Course, maths ain't my strong point so feel free to correct me.
> >
> > Correct you? sure.  Load of fucking bollocks mate!
> >
> Obviously you weren't taught logical disputation.

Obviously your team can't play other than defensive, shite "ten men in the
box cos we can do fuck all else" football.

If they could have got the linesmen and ref in there as well you know well
they would have done that too.

Get it up ye.  Time for bed son, your mother needs the computer.

James
aka
Commander Hughes

>
>
date: Wed, 14 May 2008 23:32:18 +0100   author:   Commander Hughes

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us