After watching today's game, are there any opposition fans out there that 
would like to comment on whether Rangers played anti football today (cant 
actually work out what anti football is really) or did they play positive 
football ?
And if anyone cares to stand up and be counted, can they give an accurate 
account of what ANTI FOOTBALL really means, I have asked a couple of times 
in the past in this NG but have met a resistance to the question. What's the 
odds no one actually comes out with an actual description, cannae wait for 
the replies.

-- 


V.O.R.

If you dont believe me, ask me.

Voice Of Reason wrote:
> After watching today's game, are there any opposition fans out there
> that would like to comment on whether Rangers played anti football
> today (cant actually work out what anti football is really) or did
> they play positive football ?
> And if anyone cares to stand up and be counted, can they give an
> accurate account of what ANTI FOOTBALL really means,

It doesn't mean anything.  It was a phrase invented by a bad losing wee 
shitebag who has bags of talent and flair and who got himself all wound up 
because his bags of talent and flair failed to break down a much less 
talented but harder working team at Ibrox.

I'd rather call it 
"playing-to-your-strengths-and-still-in-for-4-trophies-in-mid-May-football".

How many trophies can Mr Bags-of-Talent-and-Flair Messi win this season, I 
wonder? It doesn't seem to have gotten him very far.