Who are the enemy?

On Apr 30, 5:57 pm, "liam*"  wrote:
> Who are the enemy?

All that rain is forcing the trolls out from under their bridge.

Why dont you phone the dublin news paper that coined the phrase for
the Dublin Loyal might help ease your headache thinking its sectarian.

On Apr 30, 11:21 pm, Mad Max  wrote:
> On Apr 30, 5:57 pm, "liam*"  wrote:
>
> > Who are the enemy?
>
> All that rain is forcing the trolls out from under their bridge.
>
> Why dont you phone the dublin news paper that coined the phrase for
> the Dublin Loyal might help ease your headache thinking its sectarian.

No one mentioned the 's' word.

Who are the enemy? You seem to know.

On May 1, 1:47 pm, HoopsBhoy  wrote:
> On Apr 30, 11:21 pm, Mad Max  wrote:
>
> > On Apr 30, 5:57 pm, "liam*"  wrote:
>
> > > Who are the enemy?
>
> > All that rain is forcing the trolls out from under their bridge.
>
> > Why dont you phone the dublin news paper that coined the phrase for
> > the Dublin Loyal might help ease your headache thinking its sectarian.
>
> No one mentioned the 's' word.
>
> Who are the enemy? You seem to know.

Everyone knows how small minded Liam can be and yes I do know.

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Who are the enemy?
>

Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
(regarding the Dublin Loyal).

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> Who are the enemy?
>
> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).

You got a link or anything?

"HoopsBhoy"  wrote in message 
news:06188910-5cf1-4343-b6d8-ce600d6db3e2@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 30, 11:21 pm, Mad Max  wrote:
> On Apr 30, 5:57 pm, "liam*"  wrote:
>
> > Who are the enemy?
>
> All that rain is forcing the trolls out from under their bridge.
>
> Why dont you phone the dublin news paper that coined the phrase for
> the Dublin Loyal might help ease your headache thinking its sectarian.

No one mentioned the 's' word.

Who are the enemy? You seem to know.

Maybe the bastards whom your fellow supporters were showing their affection 
for, with their some men fought for silver banner.

Andy.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481adee6$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>>
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> Who are the enemy?
>>
>> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
>> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>
> You got a link or anything?
>


No...just something I read on RM.  The Irish Times did an article on the 
Dublin Loyal and (jokingly) coined the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines'.

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481adee6$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>>
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> Who are the enemy?
>>
>> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
>> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>
> You got a link or anything?
>

The only refernce I can find is this and it refers to Man Utd.

http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/sport/2007/0205/1170363595455.html

"Oso" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
> >news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>
> >> "liam*"  wrote in message
> >>news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> >>> Who are the enemy?
>
> >> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase
> >> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>
> > You got a link or anything?
>
> The only refernce I can find is this and it refers to Man Utd.
>
> http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/sport/2007/0205/1170363595455.html

It's sligtly doubtful that this particular Irish Times article was
their creative inspiration.

"Angof" wrote:
> "liam*"  wrote in message
>
> news:481adee6$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > "Angof"  wrote in message
> >news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>
> >> "liam*"  wrote in message
> >>news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> >>> Who are the enemy?
>
> >> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase
> >> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>
> > You got a link or anything?
>
> No...just something I read on RM.  The Irish Times did an article on the> Dublin Loyal and (jokingly) coined the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines'.

What's RM?

"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:231e3c05-14f1-475c-aed3-4f86dfd3b551@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
"Angof" wrote:
> "liam*"  wrote in message
>
> news:481adee6$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > "Angof"  wrote in message
> >news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>
> >> "liam*"  wrote in message
> >>news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> >>> Who are the enemy?
>
> >> Ask the Irish Times. I believe it was they that coined the phrase
> >> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>
> > You got a link or anything?
>
> No...just something I read on RM. The Irish Times did an article on the
> Dublin Loyal and (jokingly) coined the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines'.

>What's RM?

Rangers Media...a forum.

"Angof" wrote:
> "liam67" wrote:
> "Angof" wrote:
> > "liam*"  wrote in message
>
> >news:481adee6$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > > "Angof"  wrote in message
> > >news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>
> > >> "liam*"  wrote in message
> > >>news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> > >>> Who are the enemy?
>
> > >> Ask the Irish Times. I believe it was they that coined the phrase
> > >> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>
> > > You got a link or anything?
>
> > No...just something I read on RM. The Irish Times did an article on the
> > Dublin Loyal and (jokingly) coined the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines'.
> >What's RM?
>
> Rangers Media...a forum.

Wasn't I pulled up once for saying I heard something on Real Radio...?

"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:6b8af531-4d27-4196-89b9-de0a7bf8974d@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> "Angof" wrote:
>> "liam67" wrote:
>> "Angof" wrote:
>> > "liam*"  wrote in message
>>
>> >news:481adee6$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>
>> > > "Angof"  wrote in message
>> > >news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>>
>> > >> "liam*"  wrote in message
>> > >>news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> > >>> Who are the enemy?
>>
>> > >> Ask the Irish Times. I believe it was they that coined the phrase
>> > >> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>>
>> > > You got a link or anything?
>>
>> > No...just something I read on RM. The Irish Times did an article on the
>> > Dublin Loyal and (jokingly) coined the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines'.
>> >What's RM?
>>
>> Rangers Media...a forum.
>
> Wasn't I pulled up once for saying I heard something on Real Radio...?

I don't know...were you?

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:XOadnfFNeYkqwYbVRVnyugA@plusnet...
> "liam67"  wrote in message 
> news:6b8af531-4d27-4196-89b9-de0a7bf8974d@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> "Angof" wrote:
>>> "liam67" wrote:
>>> "Angof" wrote:
>>> > "liam*"  wrote in message
>>>
>>> >news:481adee6$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>
>>> > > "Angof"  wrote in message
>>> > >news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>>>
>>> > >> "liam*"  wrote in message
>>> > >>news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> > >>> Who are the enemy?
>>>
>>> > >> Ask the Irish Times. I believe it was they that coined the phrase
>>> > >> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>>>
>>> > > You got a link or anything?
>>>
>>> > No...just something I read on RM. The Irish Times did an article on 
>>> > the
>>> > Dublin Loyal and (jokingly) coined the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines'.
>>> >What's RM?
>>>
>>> Rangers Media...a forum.
>>
>> Wasn't I pulled up once for saying I heard something on Real Radio...?
>
> I don't know...were you?

Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would 
call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at 
least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The Irish 
Times that coined the phrase in this context...

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481b66e7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

> Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would 
> call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at 
> least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The Irish 
> Times that coined the phrase in this context...
"Justify the assertion"?  Was I hell, I did 30 secs typing various 
combinations into a search engine and the Irish Times internal search 
engine, 5 minutes of filtering bad hits and that is all I could come up 
with.  Just satisfying my curiosity.

On May 2, 4:02 pm, liam67  wrote:
> "Oso" wrote:
> > "liam*" wrote
> >> "Angof"  wrote in message
> > >news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>
> > >> "liam*"  wrote in message
> > >>news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> > >>> Who are the enemy?
>
> > >> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase
> > >> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>
> > > You got a link or anything?
>
> > The only refernce I can find is this and it refers to Man Utd.
>
> >http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/sport/2007/0205/1170363595455.html
>
> It's sligtly doubtful that this particular Irish Times article was
> their creative inspiration.

Why, does it not seat with your mind set?

"Oso" <osobear(beard)@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:Y8LSj.47293$B83.44848@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:481b66e7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
>> Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would 
>> call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at 
>> least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The 
>> Irish Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>
> "Justify the assertion"?  Was I hell, I did 30 secs typing various 
> combinations into a search engine and the Irish Times internal search 
> engine, 5 minutes of filtering bad hits and that is all I could come up 
> with.  Just satisfying my curiosity.

I was wondering if this justified Angof's assertion. Since the existing 
support he had was from a Rangers forum....

Funny how when ZB repeats a forum assertion about the RST, Angof accused him 
of being a liar. But for Angof it seems fine  to use the phrase "I read it 
in a forum". Funny that....

"Drew"  wrote in message
news:b0ff2$4819ce90$20952@news.teranews.com...
> "HoopsBhoy"  wrote in message 
> news:06188910-5cf1-4343-b6d8-ce600d6db3e2@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 30, 11:21 pm, Mad Max  wrote:
>> On Apr 30, 5:57 pm, "liam*"  wrote:
>>
>> > Who are the enemy?
>>
>> All that rain is forcing the trolls out from under their bridge.
>>
>> Why dont you phone the dublin news paper that coined the phrase for
>> the Dublin Loyal might help ease your headache thinking its sectarian.
>
> No one mentioned the 's' word.
>
> Who are the enemy? You seem to know.
>
> Maybe the bastards whom your fellow supporters were showing their 
> affection for, with their some men fought for silver banner.

What was the silver banner and what has this got to do with Dublin being 
"the enemy"?

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481c2876$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> Funny how when ZB repeats a forum assertion about the RST, Angof accused 
> him of being a liar.

Wrong.  I said people may well have said what he claimed.

On May 3, 9:58 am, "liam*"  wrote:
> "Drew"  wrote in message
>
> news:b0ff2$4819ce90$20952@news.teranews.com...
>
>
>
> > "HoopsBhoy"  wrote in message
> >news:06188910-5cf1-4343-b6d8-ce600d6db3e2@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...> > On Apr 30, 11:21 pm, Mad Max  wrote:
> >> On Apr 30, 5:57 pm, "liam*"  wrote:
>
> >> > Who are the enemy?
>
> >> All that rain is forcing the trolls out from under their bridge.
>
> >> Why dont you phone the dublin news paper that coined the phrase for
> >> the Dublin Loyal might help ease your headache thinking its sectarian.
>
> > No one mentioned the 's' word.
>
> > Who are the enemy? You seem to know.
>
> > Maybe the bastards whom your fellow supporters were showing their
> > affection for, with their some men fought for silver banner.
>
> What was the silver banner and what has this got to do with Dublin being
> "the enemy"?

maybe it would suit you better to look at your own instead of hurting
and looking for some reason to start one of your bigoted trolls, the
silver banner was hanging from the corner of the LJWA stand, Part of
an IRA SONG.

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481c2876$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Oso" <osobear(beard)@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:Y8LSj.47293$B83.44848@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
>>
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:481b66e7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>
>>> Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would 
>>> call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at 
>>> least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The 
>>> Irish Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>>
>> "Justify the assertion"?  Was I hell, I did 30 secs typing various 
>> combinations into a search engine and the Irish Times internal search 
>> engine, 5 minutes of filtering bad hits and that is all I could come up 
>> with.  Just satisfying my curiosity.
>
> I was wondering if this justified Angof's assertion. Since the existing 
> support he had was from a Rangers forum....
>
> Funny how when ZB repeats a forum assertion about the RST, Angof accused 
> him of being a liar. But for Angof it seems fine  to use the phrase "I 
> read it in a forum". Funny that....

LOL, good spot. Someone ought to tell the fanny it's a NG and he needs to 
calm down a bit. Maybe he needs to get himself a good ride or something, 
release some of the stress.

"ZB"  wrote in message
news:6842umF2qg594U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:481c2876$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Oso" <osobear(beard)@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>> news:Y8LSj.47293$B83.44848@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
>>>
>>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>>> news:481b66e7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>
>>>> Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one 
>>>> would call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it 
>>>> Angof?....at least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that 
>>>> it was The Irish Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>>>
>>> "Justify the assertion"?  Was I hell, I did 30 secs typing various 
>>> combinations into a search engine and the Irish Times internal search 
>>> engine, 5 minutes of filtering bad hits and that is all I could come up 
>>> with.  Just satisfying my curiosity.
>>
>> I was wondering if this justified Angof's assertion. Since the existing 
>> support he had was from a Rangers forum....
>>
>> Funny how when ZB repeats a forum assertion about the RST, Angof accused 
>> him of being a liar. But for Angof it seems fine  to use the phrase "I 
>> read it in a forum". Funny that....
>
> LOL, good spot. Someone ought to tell the fanny it's a NG and he needs to 
> calm down a bit. Maybe he needs to get himself a good ride or something, 
> release some of the stress.

Angof does seem to get himself quite stressed about the daftest things. It's 
a ng FFS! The fool should definitely lighten up.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:ZMSdna6gWLkC1YHVnZ2dnUVZ8vKdnZ2d@plusnet...
>
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:481c2876$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>
>> Funny how when ZB repeats a forum assertion about the RST, Angof accused 
>> him of being a liar.
>
> Wrong.  I said people may well have said what he claimed.

You asked him for proof that the RST was involved in the BJK. And since he 
only said he read it on Follow Follow, you said he was lying. Below is the 
quote. I know I am stating the obvious but you look a bit of a fool Angof.

Angof
>Angof
>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention' 
>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>
> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your inability to 
> answer that you were lying yet again.

news:5IOdnSWAi-RWVZDVnZ2dnUVZ8selnZ2d@plusnet

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481cebf0$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:ZMSdna6gWLkC1YHVnZ2dnUVZ8vKdnZ2d@plusnet...
>>
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:481c2876$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>
>>> Funny how when ZB repeats a forum assertion about the RST, Angof accused 
>>> him of being a liar.
>>
>> Wrong.  I said people may well have said what he claimed.
>
> You asked him for proof that the RST was involved in the BJK. And since he 
> only said he read it on Follow Follow, you said he was lying.

No...I said he may well have read someone saying that that on FF but that 
obviously doesn't mean that the RST were heavilly involved (even if he could 
show these individuals were members of any particular organisation)...and of 
course the RST wasn't involved at all.


>Below is the  quote.>

>>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention' 
>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?

And?  ZB made that up in one of his hissy fits after making an arse of 
himself over his stupid 'enjoying paedophillia' rant.  Don't forget the 
context either.  He was asking if Rangers FC had contacted the RST over this 
imaginary involvement in the 'invention' of BJK.

Angof
>Angof
>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention' 
>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>
> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your inability to 
> answer that you were lying yet again.

He read something on Follow Follow, you ask for proof, he had none, you 
called him a liar. What part of this don't you understand Angof?

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481da3b5$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Angof
>>Angof
>>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention' 
>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>>
>> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your inability to 
>> answer that you were lying yet again.
>
> He read something on Follow Follow, you ask for proof, he had none, you 
> called him a liar. What part of this don't you understand Angof?

I don't understand your point for a start.  The quotes you give were before 
he even claimed he saw high up members of the RST (who he wont name) 
'inventing' the BJK thing.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:CI2dnYQtXLA2OoDVnZ2dnUVZ8tWvnZ2d@plusnet...
>
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:481da3b5$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> Angof
>>>Angof
>>>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention' 
>>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>>>
>>> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your inability to 
>>> answer that you were lying yet again.
>>
>> He read something on Follow Follow, you ask for proof, he had none, you 
>> called him a liar. What part of this don't you understand Angof?
>
> I don't understand your point for a start.  The quotes you give were 
> before he even claimed he saw high up members of the RST (who he wont 
> name) 'inventing' the BJK thing.

Let's start from basics then shall we. Did you write "I didn't know the RST 
were ' heavily involved in the invention'
(sic)...you have proof of that?"?


And did you write "What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from 
your inability to
 answer that you were lying yet again."?

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481daab8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:CI2dnYQtXLA2OoDVnZ2dnUVZ8tWvnZ2d@plusnet...
>>
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:481da3b5$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> Angof
>>>>Angof
>>>>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention' 
>>>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>>>>
>>>> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your inability 
>>>> to answer that you were lying yet again.
>>>
>>> He read something on Follow Follow, you ask for proof, he had none, you 
>>> called him a liar. What part of this don't you understand Angof?
>>
>> I don't understand your point for a start.  The quotes you give were 
>> before he even claimed he saw high up members of the RST (who he wont 
>> name) 'inventing' the BJK thing.
>
> Let's start from basics then shall we. Did you write "I didn't know the 
> RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'
> (sic)...you have proof of that?"?
>
>
> And did you write "What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from 
> your inability to
> answer that you were lying yet again."?
>

Yes. You have a point?

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:4eedneBocNkULYDVnZ2dnUVZ8smgnZ2d@plusnet...
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:481daab8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>> news:CI2dnYQtXLA2OoDVnZ2dnUVZ8tWvnZ2d@plusnet...
>>>
>>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>>> news:481da3b5$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>> Angof
>>>>>Angof
>>>>>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention' 
>>>>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your inability 
>>>>> to answer that you were lying yet again.
>>>>
>>>> He read something on Follow Follow, you ask for proof, he had none, you 
>>>> called him a liar. What part of this don't you understand Angof?
>>>
>>> I don't understand your point for a start.  The quotes you give were 
>>> before he even claimed he saw high up members of the RST (who he wont 
>>> name) 'inventing' the BJK thing.
>>
>> Let's start from basics then shall we. Did you write "I didn't know the 
>> RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'
>> (sic)...you have proof of that?"?
>>
>>
>> And did you write "What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from 
>> your inability to
>> answer that you were lying yet again."?
>
> Yes. You have a point?

LOL. You couldn't make it up. Are you a liar for quoting Rangers media?

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481db3d7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:4eedneBocNkULYDVnZ2dnUVZ8smgnZ2d@plusnet...
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:481daab8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>> news:CI2dnYQtXLA2OoDVnZ2dnUVZ8tWvnZ2d@plusnet...
>>>>
>>>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:481da3b5$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>> Angof
>>>>>>Angof
>>>>>>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention' 
>>>>>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your inability 
>>>>>> to answer that you were lying yet again.
>>>>>
>>>>> He read something on Follow Follow, you ask for proof, he had none, 
>>>>> you called him a liar. What part of this don't you understand Angof?
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand your point for a start.  The quotes you give were 
>>>> before he even claimed he saw high up members of the RST (who he wont 
>>>> name) 'inventing' the BJK thing.
>>>
>>> Let's start from basics then shall we. Did you write "I didn't know the 
>>> RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'
>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?"?
>>>
>>>
>>> And did you write "What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume 
>>> from your inability to
>>> answer that you were lying yet again."?
>>
>> Yes. You have a point?
>
> LOL. You couldn't make it up. Are you a liar for quoting Rangers media?
>
>

Liam you are once again making a cunt of it.  I never said ZB was a liar in 
that quote because of anything he claimed was said on a forum.  Those quotes 
were from the very beginning of the (sub) thread and before he made any wild 
claims about  these high up members of the RST and what they were saying on 
FF.   I was saying he was a liar when he made his hysterical claim that the 
RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'  (of BJK).  Read the thread 
and it might help you to keep up.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:vOadnbF1B5B5S4DVnZ2dnUVZ8qWhnZ2d@plusnet...
> "liam*"  wrote in message
> news:481db3d7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>> news:4eedneBocNkULYDVnZ2dnUVZ8smgnZ2d@plusnet...
>>> "liam*"  wrote in message
>>> news:481daab8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>>> news:CI2dnYQtXLA2OoDVnZ2dnUVZ8tWvnZ2d@plusnet...
>>>>> "liam*"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:481da3b5$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>>> Angof
>>>>>>>Angof
>>>>>>>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'
>>>>>>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your
>>>>>>> inability to answer that you were lying yet again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He read something on Follow Follow, you ask for proof, he had none,
>>>>>> you called him a liar. What part of this don't you understand Angof?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't understand your point for a start.  The quotes you give were
>>>>> before he even claimed he saw high up members of the RST (who he wont
>>>>> name) 'inventing' the BJK thing.
>>>>
>>>> Let's start from basics then shall we. Did you write "I didn't know the
>>>> RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'
>>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?"?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And did you write "What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume
>>>> from your inability to
>>>> answer that you were lying yet again."?
>>>
>>> Yes. You have a point?
>>
>> LOL. You couldn't make it up. Are you a liar for quoting Rangers media?
>
> Liam you are once again making a cunt of it.  I never said ZB was a liar
> in that quote because of anything he claimed was said on a forum.  Those
> quotes were from the very beginning of the (sub) thread and before he made
> any wild claims about  these high up members of the RST and what they were
> saying on FF.   I was saying he was a liar when he made his hysterical
> claim that the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'  (of BJK).
> Read the thread and it might help you to keep up.

You haven't answered my question. Why was that?

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481e231d$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:vOadnbF1B5B5S4DVnZ2dnUVZ8qWhnZ2d@plusnet...
>> "liam*"  wrote in message
>> news:481db3d7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>> news:4eedneBocNkULYDVnZ2dnUVZ8smgnZ2d@plusnet...
>>>> "liam*"  wrote in message
>>>> news:481daab8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:CI2dnYQtXLA2OoDVnZ2dnUVZ8tWvnZ2d@plusnet...
>>>>>> "liam*"  wrote in message
>>>>>> news:481da3b5$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>>>> Angof
>>>>>>>>Angof
>>>>>>>>> I didn't know the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'
>>>>>>>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume from your
>>>>>>>> inability to answer that you were lying yet again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He read something on Follow Follow, you ask for proof, he had none,
>>>>>>> you called him a liar. What part of this don't you understand Angof?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't understand your point for a start.  The quotes you give were
>>>>>> before he even claimed he saw high up members of the RST (who he wont
>>>>>> name) 'inventing' the BJK thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's start from basics then shall we. Did you write "I didn't know 
>>>>> the
>>>>> RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'
>>>>> (sic)...you have proof of that?"?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And did you write "What's the matter...no answer?  I can only assume
>>>>> from your inability to
>>>>> answer that you were lying yet again."?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. You have a point?
>>>
>>> LOL. You couldn't make it up. Are you a liar for quoting Rangers media?
>>
>> Liam you are once again making a cunt of it.  I never said ZB was a liar
>> in that quote because of anything he claimed was said on a forum.  Those
>> quotes were from the very beginning of the (sub) thread and before he 
>> made
>> any wild claims about  these high up members of the RST and what they 
>> were
>> saying on FF.   I was saying he was a liar when he made his hysterical
>> claim that the RST were ' heavily involved in the invention'  (of BJK).
>> Read the thread and it might help you to keep up.
>
> You haven't answered my question. Why was that?
>
>
>

The answer to that question is no, obviously.

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:481b66e7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
>
> Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would 
> call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at 
> least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The Irish 
> Times that coined the phrase in this context...

I may have been wrong in saying the Irish Times.  Someone told me it was 'an 
Irish broadsheet' so it may have been a different paper.  My bad.  I did 
find a link to an article by a Mr. Eoghan Harris on the Irish Independent 
site where he says: '...the Dublin Rangers Supporters Club which carries the 
witty slogan 'Behind Enemy Lines' -- a phrase coined by a Dublin journalist 
as a little joke'.

http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-should-raise-rangers-banner-1311717.html

Is that source objective enough for you?

"Angof"  wrote in message 
news:IeCdnSrBhtGRjL3VnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@plusnet...
>
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:481b66e7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>
>> Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would 
>> call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at 
>> least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The 
>> Irish Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>
> I may have been wrong in saying the Irish Times.  Someone told me it was 
> 'an Irish broadsheet' so it may have been a different paper.  My bad.  I 
> did find a link to an article by a Mr. Eoghan Harris on the Irish 
> Independent site where he says: '...the Dublin Rangers Supporters Club 
> which carries the witty slogan 'Behind Enemy Lines' -- a phrase coined by 
> a Dublin journalist as a little joke'.
>
> http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-should-raise-rangers-banner-1311717.html
>
> Is that source objective enough for you?
>


Enjoyed that, quite witty :~)

Now halfwit needs to inquire of the original journo "who the enemy are"

Andy. 

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"Angof" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
> > "Angof" wrote:
>
> > Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would> > call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at
> > least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The Irish
> > Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>
> I may have been wrong in saying the Irish Times.  Someone told me it was 'an
> Irish broadsheet' so it may have been a different paper.  My bad.  I did
> find a link to an article by a Mr. Eoghan Harris on the Irish Independent
> site where he says: '...the Dublin Rangers Supporters Club which carries the
> witty slogan 'Behind Enemy Lines' -- a phrase coined by a Dublin journalist
> as a little joke'.
>
> http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-...
>
> Is that source objective enough for you?

...I'm surprised you'd quote a alleged friend of Cathal Goulding,
Chief of Staff of the IRA....but whatever floats your boat Angof...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eoghan_Harris

"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:e8a76a26-5e76-462c-835e-52a0cee4008c@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
"Angof" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
> > "Angof" wrote:
>
> > Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would
> > call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at
> > least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The 
> > Irish
> > Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>
> I may have been wrong in saying the Irish Times. Someone told me it was 
> 'an
> Irish broadsheet' so it may have been a different paper. My bad. I did
> find a link to an article by a Mr. Eoghan Harris on the Irish Independent
> site where he says: '...the Dublin Rangers Supporters Club which carries 
> the
> witty slogan 'Behind Enemy Lines' -- a phrase coined by a Dublin 
> journalist
> as a little joke'.
>
> http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-...
>
> Is that source objective enough for you?

>>>...I'm surprised you'd quote a alleged friend of Cathal Goulding,
>>>Chief of Staff of the IRA....but whatever floats your boat Angof...

>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eoghan_Harris

How the fuck am I supposed to know who his 'alleged' friends are?  What I'm 
not at all surprised about is that you evade the point.  The bloke writes 
for the Independent and says that the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines', in 
relation to The Dublin Loyal, was first coined by an Irish journalist.  Is 
that source objective enough for you?

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:XfKdna9tQIJ8E73VnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@plusnet...
> "liam67"  wrote in message 
> news:e8a76a26-5e76-462c-835e-52a0cee4008c@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> "Angof" wrote:
>> "liam*" wrote:
>> > "Angof" wrote:
>>
>> > Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one 
>> > would
>> > call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at
>> > least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The 
>> > Irish Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>>
>> I may have been wrong in saying the Irish Times. Someone told me it was 
>> 'an
>> Irish broadsheet' so it may have been a different paper. My bad. I did
>> find a link to an article by a Mr. Eoghan Harris on the Irish Independent
>> site where he says: '...the Dublin Rangers Supporters Club which carries 
>> the
>> witty slogan 'Behind Enemy Lines' -- a phrase coined by a Dublin 
>> journalist
>> as a little joke'.
>>
>> http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-...
>>
>> Is that source objective enough for you?
>
>>>>...I'm surprised you'd quote a alleged friend of Cathal Goulding,
>>>>Chief of Staff of the IRA....but whatever floats your boat Angof...
>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eoghan_Harris
>
> How the fuck am I supposed to know who his 'alleged' friends are?  What 
> I'm not at all surprised about is that you evade the point.  The bloke 
> writes for the Independent and says that the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines', 
> in relation to The Dublin Loyal, was first coined by an Irish journalist. 
> Is that source objective enough for you?

It suggests on wikipedia that Eoghan Harris was an IRA associate. I'm a tad 
suprised you'd quote an IRA man. Maybe you don't mind the IRA nowadays. And 
doesn't it matter who Harris's friends are? if we are to assess his 
objectivity. Would be good to have the original article. Apparently IRA man 
Harris has form for making things up...maybe abit like yourself in this 
context?

"Drew" wrote:
> "Angof" wrote
> > "liam*"  wrote in message
> >news:481b66e7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> >> "Angof"  wrote in message
>
> >> Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one would
> >> call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it Angof?....at> >> least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The
> >> Irish Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>
> > I may have been wrong in saying the Irish Times.  Someone told me it was
> > 'an Irish broadsheet' so it may have been a different paper.  My bad.  I
> > did find a link to an article by a Mr. Eoghan Harris on the Irish
> > Independent site where he says: '...the Dublin Rangers Supporters Club
> > which carries the witty slogan 'Behind Enemy Lines' -- a phrase coined by
> > a Dublin journalist as a little joke'.
>
> >http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-...
>
> > Is that source objective enough for you?
>
> Enjoyed that, quite witty :~)
>
> Now halfwit needs to inquire of the original journo "who the enemy are"

Apparently Harris was a leading Irish Republican in Official Sinn Fein
in the 1960s...never realised you liked those guys so much...

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:482097a5$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:XfKdna9tQIJ8E73VnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@plusnet...
>> "liam67"  wrote in message 
>> news:e8a76a26-5e76-462c-835e-52a0cee4008c@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> "Angof" wrote:
>>> "liam*" wrote:
>>> > "Angof" wrote:
>>>
>>> > Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one 
>>> > would
>>> > call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it 
>>> > Angof?....at
>>> > least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The 
>>> > Irish Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>>>
>>> I may have been wrong in saying the Irish Times. Someone told me it was 
>>> 'an
>>> Irish broadsheet' so it may have been a different paper. My bad. I did
>>> find a link to an article by a Mr. Eoghan Harris on the Irish 
>>> Independent
>>> site where he says: '...the Dublin Rangers Supporters Club which carries 
>>> the
>>> witty slogan 'Behind Enemy Lines' -- a phrase coined by a Dublin 
>>> journalist
>>> as a little joke'.
>>>
>>> http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-...
>>>
>>> Is that source objective enough for you?
>>
>>>>>...I'm surprised you'd quote a alleged friend of Cathal Goulding,
>>>>>Chief of Staff of the IRA....but whatever floats your boat Angof...
>>
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eoghan_Harris
>>
>> How the fuck am I supposed to know who his 'alleged' friends are?  What 
>> I'm not at all surprised about is that you evade the point.  The bloke 
>> writes for the Independent and says that the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines', 
>> in relation to The Dublin Loyal, was first coined by an Irish journalist. 
>> Is that source objective enough for you?
>
> It suggests on wikipedia that Eoghan Harris was an IRA associate.

It does suggest that he may have been associated with members of the IRA 
when he was a Marxist and involved with Irish republican politics.  It also 
states that he is now a critic of Sein Fein,  has shunned Marxism
and was also a critic of the IRA when at RTE.

> suprised you'd quote an IRA man. Maybe you don't mind the IRA nowadays. 
> And  doesn't it matter who Harris's friends are? if we are to assess his 
> objectivity.

Well if Bertie Ahren would appoint him to the Irish Senate, and companies 
like RTE and The Sunday Independent  are willing to employ him, I think it's 
reasonable to accept what he says regarding something as mundane as this.
Hehe...you seem absolutely desperate to tarnish this source Liam.

>Would be good to have the original article.  Apparently IRA man    Harris 
>has form for making things up...maybe abit like yourself in this context?

LOL.  Grow some balls.  I've given you a good source to back up what I had 
heard previously.

"Angof" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
> > "Angof"  wrote in message
> >news:XfKdna9tQIJ8E73VnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@plusnet...
> >> "liam67"  wrote in message
> >>news:e8a76a26-5e76-462c-835e-52a0cee4008c@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com..> >> "Angof" wrote:
> >>> "liam*" wrote:
> >>> > "Angof" wrote:
>
> >>> > Probably...Rangers Media, <cough, cough> it's not exactly what one
> >>> > would
> >>> > call....eh...an objective source of information, now is it
> >>> > Angof?....at
> >>> > least oso made some attempt to justify the assertion that it was The> >>> > Irish Times that coined the phrase in this context...
>
> >>> I may have been wrong in saying the Irish Times. Someone told me it was
> >>> 'an
> >>> Irish broadsheet' so it may have been a different paper. My bad. I did> >>> find a link to an article by a Mr. Eoghan Harris on the Irish
> >>> Independent
> >>> site where he says: '...the Dublin Rangers Supporters Club which carries
> >>> the
> >>> witty slogan 'Behind Enemy Lines' -- a phrase coined by a Dublin
> >>> journalist
> >>> as a little joke'.
>
> >>>http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-..> >>> Is that source objective enough for you?
>
> >>>>>...I'm surprised you'd quote a alleged friend of Cathal Goulding,
> >>>>>Chief of Staff of the IRA....but whatever floats your boat Angof...
>
> >>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eoghan_Harris
>
> >> How the fuck am I supposed to know who his 'alleged' friends are?  What
> >> I'm not at all surprised about is that you evade the point.  The bloke
> >> writes for the Independent and says that the phrase 'Behind Enemy Lines> >> in relation to The Dublin Loyal, was first coined by an Irish journalist.
> >> Is that source objective enough for you?
>
> > It suggests on wikipedia that Eoghan Harris was an IRA associate.
>
> It does suggest that he may have been associated with members of the IRA
> when he was a Marxist and involved with Irish republican politics.  It also
> states that he is now a critic of Sein Fein,  has shunned Marxism
> and was also a critic of the IRA when at RTE.
>
> > suprised you'd quote an IRA man. Maybe you don't mind the IRA nowadays.
> > And  doesn't it matter who Harris's friends are? if we are to assess his
> > objectivity.
>
> Well if Bertie Ahren would appoint him to the Irish Senate, and companies
> like RTE and The Sunday Independent  are willing to employ him, I think it's
> reasonable to accept what he says regarding something as mundane as this.
> Hehe...you seem absolutely desperate to tarnish this source Liam.
>
> >Would be good to have the original article.  Apparently IRA man    Harris
> >has form for making things up...maybe abit like yourself in this context?> LOL.  Grow some balls.  I've given you a good source to back up what I had
> heard previously.

Well you've given me a source, that's certainly true. Eoghan Harris is
an interesting old character. A controversial figure, one might say.
He was an official IRA man and now has become very critical of
republican leaders. He was active in the IRA and now he claims "Irish
republicans were engaged in a sectarian war of ethnic cleansing". It
is true that he was appointed to the Irish Senate by Bertie Ahern, the
recently resigned Taoiseach, whom has not had his own troubles to
seek.  But somethings just don't add up. Harris was an IRA man, but
described the 1916 rising as perpetrated by "suicide bombers, I mean
suicide terrorists". He's also been described, according to wikipedia,
as "a hypocrite and inconsistent". He is critical of John Hume, the
noble peace prize winner. Indeed wikipedia says Harris claimed to have
won an award from the Berlin International Film Festival which was all
made up. All very curious. Makes one think that objectivity is not the
central issue here. More one of reliability. I've no evidence that
contradicts Harris. So I wouldn't go so far as to call him a liar, as
you called ZB on his RST assertion even though you presented no
evidence to refute him. But let's just say that "Behind Enemy Lines"
was coined by a Dublin journalist, although one really should caveat a
claim that Harris's word is gospel.

Overall your position here is also very curious. You said you read in
Rangers Media that the "Behind Enemy Lines" phrase was coined in the
Irish Times, but this has changed to someone told you that it was an
Irish broad sheet. And a search of the Irish Times web site finds no
mention of "Behind Enemy Lines" and "Dublin Loyal" together. Was your
claim that the quote was from the Irish Times without foundation? Four
days ago you never had a link, but it was only now that one appears.
Can you see why I'm slightly intrigued by your weak position here.
Did you actually spend four days searching the web for a link???

On May 6, 6:01 pm, "Angof"  wrote:

>
> How the fuck am I supposed to know who his 'alleged' friends are?  What I'm

Unless you're involved Angof you wouldnt know, Liam clearly does and
this supports his mind set.

"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:bb2a83eb-6e47-49b0-bb5d-30c5fd069bf0@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
"Angof" wrote:

>Well you've given me a source, that's certainly true. Eoghan Harris is
>an interesting old character. A controversial figure, one might say.
>He was an official IRA man

Your first lie didn't take long.  Struggling aren't you Liam?

I in your pathetic and desperate looking atempt to rubbish the writer I 
notice you ignore the fact that Bertie Ahern appointed him to the Irish 
senate and he is respected enough to be employed by organisations such as 
RTE and the Sunday Indepenent, amongst others.

On a side note, with your attitude  it's a good job you weren't involved in 
the peace process, eh Liam?

>But let's just say that "Behind Enemy Lines"
>was coined by a Dublin journalist, although one really should caveat a
>claim that Harris's word is gospel.

Not saying anyone's word is 'gospel', but WTF would he make that up?


>Overall your position here is also very curious. You said you read in
>Rangers Media that the "Behind Enemy Lines" phrase was coined in the
>Irish Times, but this has changed to someone told you that it was an
>Irish broad sheet. And a search of the Irish Times web site finds no
>mention of "Behind Enemy Lines" and "Dublin Loyal" together. Was your
>claim that the quote was from the Irish Times without foundation?

I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not the 
Irish Times.  Can you not read Liam.


>Four days ago you never had a link, but it was only now that one appears.
>Can you see why I'm slightly intrigued by your weak position here.

Weak position?  LOL...I've proved my position you arse. Grow those balls 
Liam.

"Angof"  wrote in message 
news:bdGdnensDKkqxLzVnZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d@plusnet...
>
> "liam67"  wrote in message 
> news:bb2a83eb-6e47-49b0-bb5d-30c5fd069bf0@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> "Angof" wrote:
>
>>Well you've given me a source, that's certainly true. Eoghan Harris is
>>an interesting old character. A controversial figure, one might say.
>>He was an official IRA man
>
> Your first lie didn't take long.  Struggling aren't you Liam?
>
> I in your pathetic and desperate looking atempt to rubbish the writer I 
> notice you ignore the fact that Bertie Ahern appointed him to the Irish 
> senate and he is respected enough to be employed by organisations such as 
> RTE and the Sunday Indepenent, amongst others.
>
> On a side note, with your attitude  it's a good job you weren't involved 
> in the peace process, eh Liam?
>
>>But let's just say that "Behind Enemy Lines"
>>was coined by a Dublin journalist, although one really should caveat a
>>claim that Harris's word is gospel.
>
> Not saying anyone's word is 'gospel', but WTF would he make that up?
>
>
>>Overall your position here is also very curious. You said you read in
>>Rangers Media that the "Behind Enemy Lines" phrase was coined in the
>>Irish Times, but this has changed to someone told you that it was an
>>Irish broad sheet. And a search of the Irish Times web site finds no
>>mention of "Behind Enemy Lines" and "Dublin Loyal" together. Was your
>>claim that the quote was from the Irish Times without foundation?
>
> I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not the 
> Irish Times.  Can you not read Liam.
>
>
>>Four days ago you never had a link, but it was only now that one appears.
>>Can you see why I'm slightly intrigued by your weak position here.
>
> Weak position?  LOL...I've proved my position you arse. Grow those balls 
> Liam.
>
Angof, just ignore the wee fantasist.

It is obvious to all and sundry that his preconceived perceptions will 
colour his views no matter what evidence is presented.  He twists events to 
fit his preconceptions rather than evidence. You could say he has a lot in 
common with German Eugenics "scientists" in the 1930s in that respect.  Just 
put both of liams idnetities on your ignore list and leave it alone. 
Remember, there is no reasoning with the deluded.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:bdGdnensDKkqxLzVnZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d@plusnet...
> "liam67"  wrote in message 
> news:bb2a83eb-6e47-49b0-bb5d-30c5fd069bf0@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> "Angof" wrote:
>
>>Well you've given me a source, that's certainly true. Eoghan Harris is
>>an interesting old character. A controversial figure, one might say.
>>He was an official IRA man
>
> Your first lie didn't take long.  Struggling aren't you Liam?
>
> I in your pathetic and desperate looking atempt to rubbish the writer I 
> notice you ignore the fact that Bertie Ahern appointed him to the Irish 
> senate and he is respected enough to be employed by organisations such as 
> RTE and the Sunday Indepenent, amongst others.

Best go back and read what I wrote.

> On a side note, with your attitude  it's a good job you weren't involved 
> in the peace process, eh Liam?
>
>>But let's just say that "Behind Enemy Lines"
>>was coined by a Dublin journalist, although one really should caveat a
>>claim that Harris's word is gospel.
>
> Not saying anyone's word is 'gospel', but WTF would he make that up?

Never said he made it up.

>>Overall your position here is also very curious. You said you read in
>>Rangers Media that the "Behind Enemy Lines" phrase was coined in the
>>Irish Times, but this has changed to someone told you that it was an
>>Irish broad sheet. And a search of the Irish Times web site finds no
>>mention of "Behind Enemy Lines" and "Dublin Loyal" together. Was your
>>claim that the quote was from the Irish Times without foundation?
>
> I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not the 
> Irish Times.  Can you not read Liam.

Do you have any evidence that this was in an Irish broadsheet? All Harris 
suggests is that "Behind Enemy Lines" was coined by a Dublin journalist. No 
mention of a particular newspaper, never mind a broadsheet. First you say it 
was The Irish Times. No evidence for that. Then you say that it was coined 
by a Irish Broadsheet. No evidence for that. What will your position be 
next?

>>Four days ago you never had a link, but it was only now that one appears.
>>Can you see why I'm slightly intrigued by your weak position here.
>
> Weak position?  LOL...I've proved my position you arse.

You've not proved your position, even after four days. You admit that you've 
made mistakes in this thread. You certainly made the Irish Times thing up. 
Are you just making the Irish broad sheet thing up now too?

"Oso" wrote:
>
> Angof, just ignore the wee fantasist.

What? like youself...

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:48216bd7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:bdGdnensDKkqxLzVnZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d@plusnet...
>> "liam67"  wrote in message 
>> news:bb2a83eb-6e47-49b0-bb5d-30c5fd069bf0@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> "Angof" wrote:
>>
>>>Well you've given me a source, that's certainly true. Eoghan Harris is
>>>an interesting old character. A controversial figure, one might say.
>>>He was an official IRA man
>>
>> Your first lie didn't take long.  Struggling aren't you Liam?
>>
>> I in your pathetic and desperate looking atempt to rubbish the writer I 
>> notice you ignore the fact that Bertie Ahern appointed him to the Irish 
>> senate and he is respected enough to be employed by organisations such as 
>> RTE and the Sunday Indepenent, amongst others.
>
> Best go back and read what I wrote.
>
>> On a side note, with your attitude  it's a good job you weren't involved 
>> in the peace process, eh Liam?
>>
>>>But let's just say that "Behind Enemy Lines"
>>>was coined by a Dublin journalist, although one really should caveat a
>>>claim that Harris's word is gospel.
>>
>> Not saying anyone's word is 'gospel', but WTF would he make that up?
>
> Never said he made it up.
>
>>>Overall your position here is also very curious. You said you read in
>>>Rangers Media that the "Behind Enemy Lines" phrase was coined in the
>>>Irish Times, but this has changed to someone told you that it was an
>>>Irish broad sheet. And a search of the Irish Times web site finds no
>>>mention of "Behind Enemy Lines" and "Dublin Loyal" together. Was your
>>>claim that the quote was from the Irish Times without foundation?
>>
>> I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not the 
>> Irish Times.  Can you not read Liam.
>
> Do you have any evidence that this was in an Irish broadsheet? All Harris 
> suggests is that "Behind Enemy Lines" was coined by a Dublin journalist. 
> No mention of a particular newspaper, never mind a broadsheet. First you 
> say it was The Irish Times. No evidence for that. Then you say that it was 
> coined by a Irish Broadsheet. No evidence for that. What will your 
> position be next?
>
>>>Four days ago you never had a link, but it was only now that one appears.
>>>Can you see why I'm slightly intrigued by your weak position here.
>>
>> Weak position?  LOL...I've proved my position you arse.
>
> You've not proved your position, even after four days. You admit that 
> you've made mistakes in this thread. You certainly made the Irish Times 
> thing up. Are you just making the Irish broad sheet thing up now too?
>

Grow some balls Liam.  While it can be fun watching you make a twat of 
yourself for the umpteenth time, your squirming is beginning to get boring.

"Angof" wrote
> "liam*" wrote
>>"Angof" wrote
>>> I've proved my position
>>
>> You've not proved your position, even after four days. You admit that 
>> you've made mistakes in this thread. You certainly made the Irish Times 
>> thing up. Are you just making the Irish broad sheet thing up?
>
>  your squirming is beginning to get boring.

..Shall we change your catch phrase from "Is it on YouTube?".....to "Is it 
in an Irish broadsheet?"....RFLMFAO @ you.....

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:482172cd$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof" wrote
>> "liam*" wrote
>>>"Angof" wrote
>>>> I've proved my position
>>>
>>> You've not proved your position, even after four days. You admit that 
>>> you've made mistakes in this thread. You certainly made the Irish Times 
>>> thing up. Are you just making the Irish broad sheet thing up?
>>
>>  your squirming is beginning to get boring.
>
> ..Shall we change your catch phrase from "Is it on YouTube?".....to "Is it 
> in an Irish broadsheet?"....RFLMFAO @ you.....
>

No balls Liam.  I think you are the only person on these groups who wouldn't 
hold their hands up and said , 'aye fair enough', when presented with the 
supporting evidence on the Independent site.  Pathetic really.

"Angof"  wrote in message
 news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> Who are the enemy?
>
> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).



On 7 May, 08:26, "Angof"  wrote:
> I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not the
> Irish Times.


...RFLMFAO @ you...

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:482175f8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> Who are the enemy?
>>
>> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
>> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>
>
>
> On 7 May, 08:26, "Angof"  wrote:
>> I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not the
>> Irish Times.
>
>
> ...RFLMFAO @ you...
>

Rather than growing those balls your little humiliation seems to have driven 
you back to the not very bright schoolboy behavior.   Poor wee Liam.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:BOCdncTxfeMLbLzVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:482175f8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>> news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>>> news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>> Who are the enemy?
>>>
>>> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
>>> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>>
>> On 7 May, 08:26, "Angof"  wrote:
>>> I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not the
>>> Irish Times.
>>
>> ...RFLMFAO @ you...
>
> Rather than growing those balls your little humiliation seems to have 
> driven you back to the not very bright schoolboy behavior.   Poor wee 
> Liam.

LOL I'm humiliated?!?...LOL...tbh it's mainly your changing position that 
amuses me so. First it was The Irish Times that coined the phrase "Behind 
Enemy Lines", then it was an Irish broadsheet. Just "my bad". Trouble is 
you've only given us evidence, after 4 days, that the phrase was coined by a 
"Dublin journalist". No mention nowhere of broadsheets. Was this 
intentional? Is that just your "bad" too? Why shouldn't I think you've also 
made the broadsheet thing up? You are all over the shop mate...

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:482228d7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:BOCdncTxfeMLbLzVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:482175f8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>> news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>>>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>> Who are the enemy?
>>>>
>>>> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
>>>> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>>>
>>> On 7 May, 08:26, "Angof"  wrote:
>>>> I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not 
>>>> the
>>>> Irish Times.
>>>
>>> ...RFLMFAO @ you...
>>
>> Rather than growing those balls your little humiliation seems to have 
>> driven you back to the not very bright schoolboy behavior.   Poor wee 
>> Liam.
>


>... the phrase was coined by a "Dublin journalist".

Yes it was.  Grow some balls and stop your pathetic squirming sonny.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:9eOdnf_sENdpAb_VnZ2dnUVZ8sylnZ2d@plusnet...
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:482228d7$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>> news:BOCdncTxfeMLbLzVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
>>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>>> news:482175f8$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>>> news:DpqdnZ3CJurUT4fVnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@plusnet...
>>>>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>>>>> news:4818a75e$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>>> Who are the enemy?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask the Irish Times.  I believe it was they that coined the phrase 
>>>>> (regarding the Dublin Loyal).
>>>>
>>>> On 7 May, 08:26, "Angof"  wrote:
>>>>> I said that was my bad and should have been Irish broadsheet and not 
>>>>> the
>>>>> Irish Times.
>>>>
>>>> ...RFLMFAO @ you...
>>>
>>> your little humiliation seems to have driven you back to the not very 
>>> bright schoolboy behaviorPoor wee  Liam.
>>.
>>.LOL I'm humiliated?!?...LOL...tbh it's mainly your changing position that 
>>.amuses me so. First it was The Irish Times that coined the phrase "Behind 
>>.Enemy Lines", then it was an Irish broadsheet. Just "my bad". Trouble is 
>>.you've only given us evidence, after 4 days, that the phrase was coined 
>>by a ."Dublin journalist". No mention nowhere of broadsheets. Was this 
>>.intentional? Is that just your "bad" too? Why shouldn't I think you've 
>>also .made the broadsheet thing up? You are all over the shop mate...
>
> Yes it was.  Grow some balls and stop your pathetic squirming sonny.

Why won't you admit that the *broadsheet* thing was made up? You seemed 
happy to admit your other "bad" over the *Irish Times*, though it took 4 
days. You're all over the shop...

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:4822b5f3$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>>.
>>>.

>>>...the phrase was coined by a "Dublin journalist".
>

>> Yes it was.  Grow some balls and stop your pathetic squirming sonny.

>
> Why won't you admit that the *broadsheet* thing was made up?

Because it wasn't.  I was told that by someone in a PM when I checked for 
confirmation  (he took a few days to reply BTW).  Believe what you want as 
far as that goes but I think The Irish Independant was a good source.

>You seemed  happy to admit your other "bad" over the *Irish Times*

That's right.  When I first heard of this a couple of months ago I thought 
it was the Irish Times that the Dublin Loyal guy said first coined the 
phrase.  It may well have been but at the same time I may be remembering 
wrongly and it was a different paper.  Suffice to say I have provided a good 
source, to back up my 'assertion', that all but the testicularly challenged 
would be happy to accept.  About time you grew up Liam.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:fOudnTjuj5SKW7_VRVnyiQA@plusnet...
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:4822b5f3$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>>>.
>>>>.
>
>>.LOL I'm humiliated?!?...LOL...tbh it's mainly your changing position that 
>>.amuses me so. First it was The Irish Times that coined the phrase "Behind 
>>.Enemy Lines", then it was an Irish broadsheet. Just "my bad". Trouble is 
>>.you've only given us evidence, after 4 days, that the phrase was coined 
>>by a ."Dublin journalist". No mention nowhere of broadsheets. Was this 
>>.intentional? Is that just your "bad" too? Why shouldn't I think you've 
>>also .made the broadsheet thing up? You are all over the shop mate...
>
> Yes it was.  Grow some balls and stop your pathetic squirming sonny.
>
>>
>> Why won't you admit that the *broadsheet* thing was made up?
>
> Because it wasn't.  I was told that by someone in a PM when I checked for 
> confirmation  (he took a few days to reply BTW).  Believe what you want as 
> far as that goes but I think The Irish Independant was a good source.
>
>>You seemed  happy to admit your other "bad" over the *Irish Times*
>
> That's right.  When I first heard of this a couple of months ago I thought 
> it was the Irish Times that the Dublin Loyal guy said first coined the 
> phrase.  It may well have been but at the same time I may be remembering 
> wrongly and it was a different paper.  Suffice to say I have provided a 
> good source, to back up my 'assertion', that all but the testicularly 
> challenged would be happy to accept.  About time you grew up Liam.

So you don't have evidence to back up your claim that "Behind Enemy Lines" 
was coined in an Irish *Broadsheet*. That's fine. People make assertions on 
here and they don't have evidence to back them up. I guess you are no 
different.

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:4822d1cf$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:fOudnTjuj5SKW7_VRVnyiQA@plusnet...
>>
>> That's right.  When I first heard of this a couple of months ago I 
>> thought it was the Irish Times that the Dublin Loyal guy said first 
>> coined the phrase.  It may well have been but at the same time I may be 
>> remembering wrongly and it was a different paper.  Suffice to say I have 
>> provided a good source, to back up my 'assertion', that all but the 
>> testicularly challenged would be happy to accept.  About time you grew up 
>> Liam.
>
> So you don't have evidence to back up your claim that "Behind Enemy Lines" 
> was coined in an Irish *Broadsheet*. That's fine. People make assertions 
> on here and they don't have evidence to back them up. I guess you are no 
> different.

Playing with semantics, a sure sign you've lost it.  I gave you the evidence 
alright.  You can squirm about in that gonadless fashion of yours but that 
is plain for all to see.  Grow up.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:hqudnT2a--7Ebb_VRVnyiQA@plusnet...
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:4822d1cf$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>> news:fOudnTjuj5SKW7_VRVnyiQA@plusnet...
>>>
>>>LOL I'm humiliated?!?...LOL...tbh it's mainly your changing position that 
>>>amuses me so. First it was The Irish Times that coined the phrase "Behind 
>>>Enemy Lines", then it was an Irish broadsheet. Just "my bad". Trouble is 
>>>you've only given us evidence, after 4 days, that the phrase was coined 
>>>by a ."Dublin journalist". No mention nowhere of broadsheets. Was this 
>>>intentional? Is that just your "bad" too? Why shouldn't I think you've 
>>>also .made the broadsheet thing up? You are all over the shop mate...
>>
>>  About time you grew up  Liam.
>>
>> So you don't have evidence to back up your claim that "Behind Enemy 
>> Lines" was coined in an Irish *Broadsheet*. That's fine. People make 
>> assertions on here and they don't have evidence to back them up. I guess 
>> you are no different.
>
> Playing with semantics, a sure sign you've lost it.

C'mon Angof just admit "it was in an Irish broadsheet" was your "bad". Your 
evidence suggests it was coined by a Dublin journalist. No mention of 
broadsheets. Or is saying you read something in a Rangers forum sufficient 
evidence for any assertion now?

On May 8, 7:38 pm, "liam*"  wrote:


http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-should-raise-rangers-banner-1311717.html?r=RSS

Mad Max wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
>
> http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eoghan-harris/taoiseach-...

Yes we know about Harris's article in which it says the expression was 
"coined by a Dublin journalist." We're more interested in Angof's position 
here. First it was that the Irish Times coined the phrase. Then he 
discovered the Irish Independent article, and his position became it was "an 
Irish broadsheet" instead of the Irish Times. But he's got nothing to back 
up the "broadsheet" claim, except the shite he reads in Rangers Media. What 
he really needs is the original article, if it exists, but we aint never 
gonna see that.

And the really funny thing is Angof was calling ZB a liar for repeating 
things he read on Follow Follow, which couldn't be corroborated. Funny that. 
Wonder what that makes Angof...

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:482348bc$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:hqudnT2a--7Ebb_VRVnyiQA@plusnet...
>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>> news:4822d1cf$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>> news:fOudnTjuj5SKW7_VRVnyiQA@plusnet...
>>>>
>>>>LOL I'm humiliated?!?...LOL...tbh it's mainly your changing position 
>>>>that amuses me so. First it was The Irish Times that coined the phrase 
>>>>"Behind Enemy Lines", then it was an Irish broadsheet. Just "my bad". 
>>>>Trouble is you've only given us evidence, after 4 days, that the phrase 
>>>>was coined by a ."Dublin journalist". No mention nowhere of broadsheets. 
>>>>Was this intentional? Is that just your "bad" too? Why shouldn't I think 
>>>>you've also .made the broadsheet thing up? You are all over the shop 
>>>>mate...
>>>
>>>  About time you grew up  Liam.
>>>
>>> So you don't have evidence to back up your claim that "Behind Enemy 
>>> Lines" was coined in an Irish *Broadsheet*. That's fine. People make 
>>> assertions on here and they don't have evidence to back them up. I guess 
>>> you are no different.
>>
>> Playing with semantics, a sure sign you've lost it.
>
> C'mon Angof just admit "it was in an Irish broadsheet" was your "bad". 
> Your evidence suggests it was coined by a Dublin journalist.  No mention 
> of broadsheets.

Yep...playing with semantics, a sure sign you've lost it.


> Or is saying you read something in a Rangers forum sufficient evidence for 
> any assertion now?

I've given you evidence from an excellent source.  The fact tht you tried 
hard to rubbish that source to the point of lying is a good indicator of 
that.  Grow those balls Liam.

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:482396c5$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Mad Max wrote:
>> "liam*" wrote:
>>
> Yes we know about Harris's article in which it says the expression was 
> "coined by a Dublin journalist."

Yes it was.


> And the really funny thing is Angof was calling ZB a liar for repeating 
> things he read on Follow Follow...

No.  That is a lie in it's self.  You ran away from the thread where you 
were making a cunt of that so I don't know why you bring it up here.

"Angof"  wrote in message
news:6f6dnb_v5oAxm7nVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:482348bc$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>> news:hqudnT2a--7Ebb_VRVnyiQA@plusnet...
>>> "liam*"  wrote in message 
>>> news:4822d1cf$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>> "Angof"  wrote in message
>>>> news:fOudnTjuj5SKW7_VRVnyiQA@plusnet...
>>>>>
>>>>>LOL I'm humiliated?!?...LOL...tbh it's mainly your changing position 
>>>>>that amuses me so. First it was The Irish Times that coined the phrase 
>>>>>"Behind Enemy Lines", then it was an Irish broadsheet. Just "my bad". 
>>>>>Trouble is you've only given us evidence, after 4 days, that the phrase 
>>>>>was coined by a ."Dublin journalist". No mention nowhere of 
>>>>>broadsheets. Was this intentional? Is that just your "bad" too? Why 
>>>>>shouldn't I think you've also .made the broadsheet thing up? You are 
>>>>>all over the shop mate...
>>>>
>>>>  About time you grew up  Liam.
>>>>
>>>> So you don't have evidence to back up your claim that "Behind Enemy 
>>>> Lines" was coined in an Irish *Broadsheet*. That's fine. People make 
>>>> assertions on here and they don't have evidence to back them up. I 
>>>> guess you are no different.
>>>
>>> Playing with semantics, a sure sign you've lost it.
>>
>> C'mon Angof just admit "it was in an Irish broadsheet" was your "bad". 
>> Your evidence suggests it was coined by a Dublin journalist.  No mention 
>> of broadsheets.
>
> Yep...playing with semantics, a sure sign you've lost it.
>
>> Or is saying you read something in a Rangers forum sufficient evidence 
>> for any assertion now?
>
> I've given you evidence from an excellent source.  The fact tht you tried 
> hard to rubbish that source to the point of lying is a good indicator of 
> that.  Grow those balls Liam.

So you've given up on the assertion that "Behind Enemy Lines" was coined by 
an "Irish broadsheet" then? It's just semantics now...LOL

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:482416f1$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "Angof"  wrote in message
> news:6f6dnb_v5oAxm7nVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
>>
>> I've given you evidence from an excellent source.  The fact tht you tried 
>> hard to rubbish that source to the point of lying is a good indicator of 
>> that.  Grow those balls Liam.
>
> So you've given up on the assertion that "Behind Enemy Lines" was coined 
> by an "Irish broadsheet" then? It's just semantics now...

Yes it is...a sure indicator that you are struggling  (as was your stupid 
ridiculing of the source that backfired so badly,  you are wise to continue 
to ignore that point).  BTW...I made no 'assertion'...read the thread.

Your