"Moody Marco" wrote
> liam* wrote:
>> "Moody Marco" wrote:
>>>
>>> he's been pish against Rangers in all 3 OF games this season.
>>
>> Yeah McGeady is pish in old firm games that's why Rangers started with
>> two full backs marking him last Wednesday. In case you only read
>> tabloids Moody, here are some quotes about McGeady from the big
>> papers' reviews of that match...
>>
>> The Times
>> "In terms of football, though, it was McGeady who remained the
>> peerless performer. His twists and turns left Barry Ferguson chasing
>> shadows, and the midfield player brought Celtic’s own substitute, Mark
>> Wilson, into the play."
>>
>> The Scotsman
>> "But, apart from the need of a more significant presence in Celtic's
>> half, there was the possibility of Kirk Broadfoot, already cautioned
>> as he became more frustrated with McGeady's tormenting runs, heading
>> for further trouble."
>
> Those 2 quotes have just prove what I (and sme) are saying.  So thanks.

He wasn't pish against Rangers last week as you suggested earlier. He played 
a significant part in getting Broadfoot subbed, which Glen Gibbons in the 
Scotsman saw as well. Obviously Rangers think he is a threat since they had 
two men on him last Wednesday and two men in the Old Firm gam before that. 
The thing to recognise about McGeady is he's not Cuellar and not employed 
not to make mistakes. He takes risks, alot of things don't pay off, which is 
why wingers can sometimes be frustrating as maybe sme suggest, but a lot of 
things do pay off as is indicated by his treble player of the years award. 
And if the press weren't dominated by huns imho, he'd win that award as 
well.