Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the 
infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit of 
enginerring!

"andy"  wrote in message 
news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the 
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit 
> of enginerring!
>

Moonbeams...LMAO!

"andy"  wrote in message 
news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the 
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit 
> of enginerring!
>
Sooooooo gullible!!

On Jan 6, 11:32 am, "andy"  wrote:
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit of
> enginerring!

Andy any idea who your stalker is?


this keerydale floyd goes every where you go.

"Mad Max"  wrote in message 
news:59d7193b-58af-446d-afaa-2a2cb4344cea@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 6, 11:32 am, "andy"  wrote:
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit 
> of
> enginerring!

Andy any idea who your stalker is?


this keerydale floyd goes every where you go.

no but he evidently loves me ;-)

"dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
news:Vq6gj.83815$036.5396@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining 
>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd 
>> bit of enginerring!
>>
> Sooooooo gullible!!
>

why?

"andy"  wrote in message 
news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the 
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit 
> of enginerring!

Only way i can see them doing it would be building one tier upwards but that 
would need a shitload of strengthening work done to the building including 
any work on adding to the grade B section (which would take as much time in 
planning permission being passed as it would building knowing the powers 
that be!).If they wanted to go to 70,000 id have thought it would have been 
better to move location than just add.And if building goes ahead i wonder if 
they will have to groundshare or use hampden for a season.Similar things 
happened at highbury when they wanted to expand (similar in the way they 
have a graded part of the ground one side),in the end they had two 
choices....either forget the idea or move location.

JB

On Jan 6, 5:02 pm, "Jonbhoy"  wrote:
> "andy"  wrote in message
>
> news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> > Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> > infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit
> > of enginerring!
>
> Only way i can see them doing it would be building one tier upwards but that
> would need a shitload of strengthening work done to the building includingDone

> any work on adding to the grade B section (which would take as much time in

Done

> planning permission being passed as it would building knowing the powers

Done.

> that be!).If they wanted to go to 70,000 id have thought it would have been
> better to move location than just add.And if building goes ahead i wonder if
> they will have to groundshare or use hampden for a season.Similar things

yip like parkhead.

> happened at highbury when they wanted to expand (similar in the way they
> have a graded part of the ground one side),in the end they had two
> choices....either forget the idea or move location.
>
  you would like that wouldnt you..

"Jonbhoy"  wrote in message 
news:veGdncWZj8MjlBzaRVnyvwA@giganews.com...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining 
>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd 
>> bit of enginerring!
>
> Only way i can see them doing it would be building one tier upwards but 
> that would need a shitload of strengthening work done to the building 
> including any work on adding to the grade B section (which would take as 
> much time in planning permission being passed as it would building knowing 
> the powers that be!).If they wanted to go to 70,000 id have thought it 
> would have been better to move location than just add.And if building goes 
> ahead i wonder if they will have to groundshare or use hampden for a 
> season.Similar things happened at highbury when they wanted to expand 
> (similar in the way they have a graded part of the ground one side),in the 
> end they had two choices....either forget the idea or move location.
>
> JB
>

Arsenal have made a fortune turning Highbury into flats

"Moody Marco"  wrote in message 
news:9dKdnZ1bas4PvhzanZ2dnUVZ8smgnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Jonbhoy"  wrote in message 
> news:veGdncWZj8MjlBzaRVnyvwA@giganews.com...
>>
>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>> news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining 
>>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a 
>>> wierd bit of enginerring!
>>
>> Only way i can see them doing it would be building one tier upwards but 
>> that would need a shitload of strengthening work done to the building 
>> including any work on adding to the grade B section (which would take as 
>> much time in planning permission being passed as it would building 
>> knowing the powers that be!).If they wanted to go to 70,000 id have 
>> thought it would have been better to move location than just add.And if 
>> building goes ahead i wonder if they will have to groundshare or use 
>> hampden for a season.Similar things happened at highbury when they wanted 
>> to expand (similar in the way they have a graded part of the ground one 
>> side),in the end they had two choices....either forget the idea or move 
>> location.
>>
>> JB
>>
>
> Arsenal have made a fortune turning Highbury into flats

Indeed,but is still a small amount in terms of money towards their 
stadium.Thats what i am trying to say though,if Rangers want to build a 
stadium that size they would be better moving location.Remember though the 
cost of building a 70,000 seater stadium in Glasgow will be huge,but even 
building apartments etc on "the old ibrox" wont raise anything like the 
amount of money raised in terms of building in islington.

JB

"andy"  wrote in message 
news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the 
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit 
> of enginerring!

Maybe they'll just tear out the seats and put in smaller ones.

"Grande Mal"  wrote in message 
news:%8ggj.55733$5l3.20296@edtnps82...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining 
>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd 
>> bit of enginerring!
>
> Maybe they'll just tear out the seats and put in smaller ones.

Aye right.  I can barely fit my wide load on to the ones they have already.


-- 
Fidei Coticula Crux

"andy"  wrote in message 
news:OqadncBkfZlvnhzanZ2dnUVZ8uWdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
> news:Vq6gj.83815$036.5396@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>> news:U-GdnV6bP_ymIR3anZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining 
>>> the infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a 
>>> wierd bit of enginerring!
>>>
>> Sooooooo gullible!!
>>
>
> why?
>

How many times are you going to swallow his pipe-dreams?

Remember King and Lewis' investments and how it would take Rangers to 
another level?  Rangers would spend a tenner for every Celtic fiver? 
Supercasino?Moonbeams?  lol

Not all Rangers supporters are gullible, there was a section chanting about 
David Murray's lies not so long ago.  He's desperate to leave but no-one's 
interested in taking over.

On Jan 8, 10:32 am, "dü the hüsker"  wrote:

>
> Not all Rangers supporters are gullible, there was a section chanting about
> David Murray's lies not so long ago.  He's desperate to leave but no-one's
> interested in taking over.

Really, care to back that up?

"Mad Max"  wrote in message 
news:b25cb960-f752-429a-8a1e-b4b4ad34fa4a@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 8, 10:32 am, "dü the hüsker"  wrote:

>
> Not all Rangers supporters are gullible, there was a section chanting 
> about
> David Murray's lies not so long ago. He's desperate to leave but no-one's
> interested in taking over.

Really, care to back that up?

Sure, which bit are you too gullible to understand?

On Jan 8, 11:27 pm, "dü the hüsker"  wrote:
> "Mad Max"  wrote in message
>
> news:b25cb960-f752-429a-8a1e-b4b4ad34fa4a@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 8, 10:32 am, "dü the hüsker"  wrote:
>
>
> Really, care to back that up?
>
> Sure, which bit are you too gullible to understand?

 make it easy for you.

"He's desperate to leave but no-one's interested in taking over."

On 6 Jan, 11:32, "andy"  wrote:
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit of
> enginerring!

Retaining the main stands Famous red brick facade at Ibrox park and
creating a new 70000 seater stadium in an almost city centre location
would certainly attract Multi Million Pound investments from many
interested parties.
How much of the area around Ibrox Belongs to Rangers , carparks etc?

It was noted in: 
(827a5d29-4b2a-4280-80d6-37b350d94a91@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com),
that Tommy  spouted forth their words of wisdom...:

> On 6 Jan, 11:32, "andy"  wrote:
>> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining 
>> the
>> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit 
>> of
>> enginerring!
>
> Retaining the main stands Famous red brick facade at Ibrox park and
> creating a new 70000 seater stadium in an almost city centre location
> would certainly attract Multi Million Pound investments from many
> interested parties.
> How much of the area around Ibrox Belongs to Rangers , carparks etc?


Dunno, not that much of an expansive area around it though.

Surprised no-one has touched on this though: What about the Glasgow 
Commonwealth games? Could there not be justification in building a Huge big 
70K seater in a central location for the hosting of that?

Similar to what Man City did, could there not be some joint venture between 
Glasgow and the money men at Ibrox? AFAIK the commonwealth games run outside 
the football season, so there'd be no real negative side to it from a 
Rangers point of view.

Unless I'm missing something?

biz


-- 
 www.bebo.com/bizenya79
 www.myspace.com/bizenya
I don't like people who take drugs... Customs men for example. - Mick Miller

On 6 Jan, 11:32, "andy"  wrote:
> Looks like were going for a 70000 seater stadium, apparently reatining the
> infrasructure of the present bulding but expanding, should be a wierd bit of
> enginerring!

Lets hope this super stadium can handle a wee bit of rain.

You can run but you cant hide.

On Jan 13, 10:50 am, HoopsBhoy  wrote:
> On 6 Jan, 11:32, "andy"  wrote:

>
> You can run but you cant hide.

Hide from who?

On Jan 13, 2:15 pm, Mad Max  wrote:
> On Jan 13, 10:50 am, HoopsBhoy  wrote:
>
> > On 6 Jan, 11:32, "andy"  wrote:
>
> > You can run but you cant hide.
>
> Hide from who?

From us.

Hosepipe Loyal

On Jan 13, 2:22 pm, HoopsBhoy  wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2:15 pm, Mad Max  wrote:

>
> From us.
>

sure Bud what ever you think.