|
|
|
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:27:19 -0000,
group: uk.sport.football.clubs.rangers
back
Back on top
And rightly so, back where we belong!
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:27:19 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
"andy" wrote in message
news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
> And rightly so, back where we belong!
Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:55:51 -0800
author: ZB
|
Re: Back on top
"ZB" wrote in message
news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>
> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>
Do those sour plums taste nice ZB. . . ;o)
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me.
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:36:09 -0000
author: Voice Of Reason Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn
|
Re: Back on top
"ZB" wrote in message
news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>
> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>
Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point gap!
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:21:44 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
"andy" wrote in message
news:et-dnYBhHK5Be-LanZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "ZB" wrote in message
> news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "andy" wrote in message
>> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>>
>> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>>
>
> Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point
> gap!
Rangers don't "belong" at the top.
The title race is still wide open.
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:18:41 -0800
author: ZB
|
Re: Back on top
On Jan 6, 12:18 am, "ZB" wrote:
>
> Rangers "belong" at the top.
>
> The title race is still wide open.
Fruit market must have made a killing today.
when you get that lemon out your mouth, Happy days man.
Celtic - you can run but you cant hide
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:25:33 -0800 (PST)
author: Mad Max
|
Re: Back on top
"ZB" wrote in message
news:5ual35F1fnmmkU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> news:et-dnYBhHK5Be-LanZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "ZB" wrote in message
>> news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>>>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>>>
>>> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>>>
>>
>> Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point
>> gap!
>
> Rangers don't "belong" at the top.
>
> The title race is still wide open.
Yes it is still wide open, but as far as the legions of Rangers fans are
concerned were back on top where we belong.
The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:40:50 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
On Jan 6, 11:40 am, "andy" wrote:
>
> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
If they turn up.
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 06:48:31 -0800 (PST)
author: Mad Max
|
Re: Back on top
"andy" wrote in message
news:94adneOa54vUIx3anZ2dnUVZ8sylnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "ZB" wrote in message
> news:5ual35F1fnmmkU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "andy" wrote in message
>> news:et-dnYBhHK5Be-LanZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>
>>> "ZB" wrote in message
>>> news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>>> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>>>>
>>>> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point
>>> gap!
>>
>> Rangers don't "belong" at the top.
>>
>> The title race is still wide open.
>
> Yes it is still wide open, but as far as the legions of Rangers fans are
> concerned were back on top where we belong.
Once again, saying you "belong" on top is arrogant pish.
> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:37:49 -0800
author: ZB
|
Re: Back on top
"andy" wrote:
>
> And rightly so, back where we belong!
Werrapeepul!!!.....;)...
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:42:08 -0800 (PST)
author: liam67
|
Re: Back on top
"ZB" wrote in message
news:5uclfvF1h111gU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> news:94adneOa54vUIx3anZ2dnUVZ8sylnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "ZB" wrote in message
>> news:5ual35F1fnmmkU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>> news:et-dnYBhHK5Be-LanZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "ZB" wrote in message
>>>> news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>>>> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point
>>>> gap!
>>>
>>> Rangers don't "belong" at the top.
>>>
>>> The title race is still wide open.
>>
>> Yes it is still wide open, but as far as the legions of Rangers fans are
>> concerned were back on top where we belong.
>
>
> Once again, saying you "belong" on top is arrogant pish.
Nope, i see Rangers as a top of the league team...why shouldnt I? We have
won it more times than anyone else.
>
>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall an OF
game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a single point
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 19:03:20 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
"liam67" wrote in message
news:68374b53-ac69-49cf-a10a-c7ef0316f81d@41g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> "andy" wrote:
>>
>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>
> Werrapeepul!!!.....;)...
LOL
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 19:03:36 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
"andy" wrote:
> "ZB" wrote:
> > "andy" wrote in message
> >> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> > When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>
> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall an OF
> game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a single point
Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:28:07 -0800 (PST)
author: liam67
|
Re: Back on top
"liam67" wrote in message
news:eac0094a-631d-4191-8457-d46095559794@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> "andy" wrote:
>> "ZB" wrote:
>> > "andy" wrote in message
>> >> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>
>> > When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>
>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall an OF
>> game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a single point
>
> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days, after yo
lot dominating us for a long time.
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:53:16 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
On Jan 6, 9:53 pm, "andy" wrote:
> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days, after yo
> lot dominating us for a long time.
Is it me Andy or is there a lot of lemons and not enough asprin on
this group today ;-)
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:05:51 -0800 (PST)
author: Mad Max
|
Re: Back on top
"Mad Max" wrote in message
news:5d596ae6-96b3-4c7b-bf9b-47cc7934e3e3@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 6, 9:53 pm, "andy" wrote:
> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days, after
> yo
> lot dominating us for a long time.
Is it me Andy or is there a lot of lemons and not enough asprin on
this group today ;-)
och thier too used to having it thier way, now no one is talking about
celtic anymore thier fed up
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:53:02 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
"andy" wrote
> "liam67" wrote
>> "andy" wrote:
>>> "ZB" wrote:
>>> > "andy" wrote in message
>>> >> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>
>>> > When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>
>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall an OF
>>> game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a single point
>>
>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>
> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days, after
> yo lot dominating us for a long time.
...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a number of
years...
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:29:54 -0000
author: liam
|
Re: Back on top
liam wrote:
> "andy" wrote
>> "liam67" wrote
>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>> "ZB" wrote:
>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>
>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>
>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall
>>>> an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a
>>>> single point
>>>
>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>
>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>
> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
> number of years...
True...two is a number.
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:50:58 -0000
author: Angof (no need for Mail)
|
Re: Back on top
"Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
news:13o44h1nja5883b@corp.supernews.com...
> liam wrote:
>> "andy" wrote
>>> "liam67" wrote
>>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
>>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>>
>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall
>>>>> an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a
>>>>> single point
>>>>
>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>>
>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>
>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>> number of years...
>
> True...two is a number.
;-)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:03:55 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
"Angof" wrote
> liam wrote:
>> "andy" wrote
>>> "liam67" wrote
>>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
>>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>>
>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall
>>>>> an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a
>>>>> single point
>>>>
>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>>
>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>
>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>> number of years...
>
> True...two is a number.
...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or maybe he
was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:15:27 -0000
author: liam
|
Re: Back on top
liam wrote:
> "Angof" wrote
>> liam wrote:
>>> "andy" wrote
>>>> "liam67" wrote
>>>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
>>>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
>>>>>> taking a single point
>>>>>
>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>>>
>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>>
>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>> number of years...
>>
>> True...two is a number.
>
> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a longer
spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty years of age?
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:52:28 -0000
author: Angof (no need for Mail)
|
Re: Back on top
"Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
news:13o484bf2ul6150@corp.supernews.com...
> liam wrote:
>> "Angof" wrote
>>> liam wrote:
>>>> "andy" wrote
>>>>> "liam67" wrote
>>>>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
>>>>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
>>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
>>>>>>> taking a single point
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>>>>
>>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>>>
>>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>>> number of years...
>>>
>>> True...two is a number.
>>
>> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>
> Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
> longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty years
> of age?
I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 40
this year!
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:56:34 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
andy wrote:
> "Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
> news:13o484bf2ul6150@corp.supernews.com...
>> liam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>>>> number of years...
>>>>
>>>> True...two is a number.
>>>
>>> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>>> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>>
>> Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
>> longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
>> years of age?
>
> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and
> im 40 this year!
There you go then.
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:37:11 -0000
author: Angof (no need for Mail)
|
Re: Back on top
It was noted in: (13o4ao74bufvt58@corp.supernews.com),
that Angof <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> spouted forth their words
of wisdom...:
> andy wrote:
>> "Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
>> news:13o484bf2ul6150@corp.supernews.com...
>>> liam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>>>>> number of years...
>>>>>
>>>>> True...two is a number.
>>>>
>>>> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>>>> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>>>
>>> Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
>>> longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
>>> years of age?
>>
>> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and
>> im 40 this year!
>
> There you go then.
I can only remember one period of domination in Scottish football, and that
was for NINE years...
But then again, I *am* only in my late 20s .. ;-)
--
www.bebo.com/bizenya79
www.myspace.com/bizenya
Mothers of teens know why some animals eat their young.
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:36:47 -0000
author: \\?`?.?biz?.???/
|
Re: Back on top
"andy" wrote:
> "Angof" wrote:
> > liam wrote:
> >> "Angof" wrote
> >>> liam wrote:
> >>>> "andy" wrote
> >>>>> "liam67" wrote
> >>>>>> "andy" wrote:
> >>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> >>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>
> >>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
> >>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
> >>>>>>> taking a single point
>
> >>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
> >>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>
> >>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
> >>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>
> >>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
> >>>> number of years...
>
> >>> True...two is a number.
>
> >> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
> >> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>
> > Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
> > longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty years
> > of age?
>
> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 40
> this year!
Is that 40 in dog years? Certainly *that* sounds like a "long
time".... ;)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:18:17 -0800 (PST)
author: liam67
|
Re: Back on top
"liam67" wrote in message
news:f4c0b05a-28d1-4197-aacc-f08eeaa266e4@1g2000hsl.googlegroups.com...
"andy" wrote:
> "Angof" wrote:
> > liam wrote:
> >> "Angof" wrote
> >>> liam wrote:
> >>>> "andy" wrote
> >>>>> "liam67" wrote
> >>>>>> "andy" wrote:
> >>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> >>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>
> >>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
> >>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
> >>>>>>> taking a single point
>
> >>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
> >>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>
> >>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
> >>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>
> >>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
> >>>> number of years...
>
> >>> True...two is a number.
>
> >> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
> >> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>
> > Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
> > longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
> > years
> > of age?
>
> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 40
> this year!
Is that 40 in dog years? Certainly *that* sounds like a "long
time".... ;)
that would be 280...ffs were not that far away from having won that many
titles ;-)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:29:19 -0000
author: andy
|
Re: Back on top
"andy" wrote:
> "liam67" wrote:
> "andy" wrote:
> > "Angof" wrote:
> > > liam wrote:
> > >> "Angof" wrote
> > >>> liam wrote:
> > >>>> "andy" wrote
> > >>>>> "liam67" wrote
> > >>>>>> "andy" wrote:
> > >>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> > >>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>
> > >>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
> > >>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
> > >>>>>>> taking a single point
>
> > >>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
> > >>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>
> > >>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
> > >>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>
> > >>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
> > >>>> number of years...
>
> > >>> True...two is a number.
>
> > >> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
> > >> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>
> > > Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
> > > longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
> > > years
> > > of age?
>
> > I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 40
> > this year!
>
> Is that 40 in dog years? Certainly *that* sounds like a "long
> time".... ;)
>
> that would be 280...ffs were not that far away from having won that many
> titles ;-)
..if you are saying 280 years until the Gers win the title
next....well then you would be talking my kind of language... ;)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:40:53 -0800 (PST)
author: liam67
|
Re: Back on top
" \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote
> It was noted in: (13o4ao74bufvt58@corp.supernews.com),
> that Angof <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> spouted forth their
> words of wisdom...:
>
>> andy wrote:
>>> "Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
>>> news:13o484bf2ul6150@corp.supernews.com...
>>>> liam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>>>>>> number of years...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True...two is a number.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>>>>> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>>>>
>>>> Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
>>>> longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
>>>> years of age?
>>>
>>> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and
>>> im 40 this year!
>>
>> There you go then.
>
> I can only remember one period of domination in Scottish football, and
> that was for NINE years...
> But then again, I *am* only in my late 20s .. ;-)
What is it about Rangers fans and people wanting to dig up former
glories.... ;)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:30:02 -0000
author: liam
|
Re: Back on top
"liam67" wrote in message
news:f212df38-5f49-4b3d-99e0-5374598abd2a@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> "andy" wrote:
>> "liam67" wrote:
>> "andy" wrote:
>> > "Angof" wrote:
>> > > liam wrote:
>> > >> "Angof" wrote
>> > >>> liam wrote:
>> > >>>> "andy" wrote
>> > >>>>> "liam67" wrote
>> > >>>>>> "andy" wrote:
>> > >>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>> "andy" wrote in message
>> > >>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>
>> > >>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes
>> > >>>>>>>> ;-)
>>
>> > >>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
>> > >>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
>> > >>>>>>> taking a single point
>>
>> > >>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park
>> > >>>>>> last
>> > >>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>
>> > >>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these
>> > >>>>> days,
>> > >>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>
>> > >>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>> > >>>> number of years...
>>
>> > >>> True...two is a number.
>>
>> > >> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>> > >> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>>
>> > > Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
>> > > longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
>> > > years
>> > > of age?
>>
>> > I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im
>> > 40
>> > this year!
>>
>> Is that 40 in dog years? Certainly *that* sounds like a "long
>> time".... ;)
>>
>> that would be 280...ffs were not that far away from having won that many
>> titles ;-)
>
> ..if you are saying 280 years until the Gers win the title
> next....well then you would be talking my kind of language... ;)
Ha! the next 280 days more like ;-)
date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:18:03 -0000
author: andy
|
|
|