Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
sport
athletics
baseball
betting
cricket
football
football....bradford-city
football...celtic
football...leeds-united
football...liverpool
football...man-city
football...newcast..united
football...rangers
football...southampton
football...sunderland
football...west-ham
football.american
football.scottish
golf
horseracing
ice-hockey
misc
orienteering
speedway
squash
swimming
  
 
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:27:19 -0000,    group: uk.sport.football.clubs.rangers        back       
Back on top   
And rightly so, back where we belong!
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:27:19 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
"andy"  wrote in message 
news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
> And rightly so, back where we belong!

Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:55:51 -0800   author:   ZB

Re: Back on top   
"ZB"  wrote in message 
news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>
> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>

Do those sour plums taste nice ZB. . .  ;o)

-- 


V.O.R.

If you dont believe me, ask me.
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:36:09 -0000   author:   Voice Of Reason Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn

Re: Back on top   
"ZB"  wrote in message 
news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>
> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>

Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point gap!
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:21:44 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
"andy"  wrote in message 
news:et-dnYBhHK5Be-LanZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "ZB"  wrote in message 
> news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>>
>> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>>
>
> Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point 
> gap!

Rangers don't "belong" at the top.

The title race is still wide open.
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:18:41 -0800   author:   ZB

Re: Back on top   
On Jan 6, 12:18 am, "ZB"  wrote:

>
> Rangers "belong" at the top.
>
> The title race is still wide open.

Fruit market must have made a killing today.

when you get that lemon out your mouth,  Happy days man.

Celtic - you can run but you cant hide
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:25:33 -0800 (PST)   author:   Mad Max

Re: Back on top   
"ZB"  wrote in message 
news:5ual35F1fnmmkU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:et-dnYBhHK5Be-LanZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "ZB"  wrote in message 
>> news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>>> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>>>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>>>
>>> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>>>
>>
>> Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point 
>> gap!
>
> Rangers don't "belong" at the top.
>
> The title race is still wide open.

Yes it is still wide open, but as far as the legions of Rangers fans are 
concerned were back on top where we belong.

The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:40:50 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
On Jan 6, 11:40 am, "andy"  wrote:

>
> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!

If they turn up.
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 06:48:31 -0800 (PST)   author:   Mad Max

Re: Back on top   
"andy"  wrote in message 
news:94adneOa54vUIx3anZ2dnUVZ8sylnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "ZB"  wrote in message 
> news:5ual35F1fnmmkU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>> news:et-dnYBhHK5Be-LanZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>
>>> "ZB"  wrote in message 
>>> news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>>>>
>>>> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point 
>>> gap!
>>
>> Rangers don't "belong" at the top.
>>
>> The title race is still wide open.
>
> Yes it is still wide open, but as far as the legions of Rangers fans are 
> concerned were back on top where we belong.


Once again, saying you "belong" on top is arrogant pish.

> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!

When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:37:49 -0800   author:   ZB

Re: Back on top   
"andy" wrote:
>
> And rightly so, back where we belong!

Werrapeepul!!!.....;)...
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:42:08 -0800 (PST)   author:   liam67

Re: Back on top   
"ZB"  wrote in message 
news:5uclfvF1h111gU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:94adneOa54vUIx3anZ2dnUVZ8sylnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "ZB"  wrote in message 
>> news:5ual35F1fnmmkU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>>> news:et-dnYBhHK5Be-LanZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "ZB"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:5ua25rF1g3i75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>>>>> news:NpSdnVylXrGWUeLanZ2dnUVZ8q6onZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you "belong" at the top andy? Sounds like arrogant pish to me!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because we deserve to be, your just pissed off! Stand by for a 4 point 
>>>> gap!
>>>
>>> Rangers don't "belong" at the top.
>>>
>>> The title race is still wide open.
>>
>> Yes it is still wide open, but as far as the legions of Rangers fans are 
>> concerned were back on top where we belong.
>
>
> Once again, saying you "belong" on top is arrogant pish.

Nope, i see Rangers as a top of the league team...why shouldnt I? We have 
won it more times than anyone else.

>
>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)

LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall an OF 
game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a single point
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 19:03:20 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:68374b53-ac69-49cf-a10a-c7ef0316f81d@41g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> "andy" wrote:
>>
>> And rightly so, back where we belong!
>
> Werrapeepul!!!.....;)...

LOL
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 19:03:36 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
"andy" wrote:
> "ZB"  wrote:
> > "andy"  wrote in message
> >> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> > When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>
> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall an OF
> game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a single point

Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:28:07 -0800 (PST)   author:   liam67

Re: Back on top   
"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:eac0094a-631d-4191-8457-d46095559794@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> "andy" wrote:
>> "ZB"  wrote:
>> > "andy"  wrote in message
>> >> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>
>> > When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>
>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall an OF
>> game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a single point
>
> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....


No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days, after yo 
lot dominating us for a long time.
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:53:16 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
On Jan 6, 9:53 pm, "andy"  wrote:

> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days, after yo
> lot dominating us for a long time.

Is it me Andy or is there a lot of lemons and not enough asprin on
this group today ;-)
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:05:51 -0800 (PST)   author:   Mad Max

Re: Back on top   
"Mad Max"  wrote in message 
news:5d596ae6-96b3-4c7b-bf9b-47cc7934e3e3@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 6, 9:53 pm, "andy"  wrote:

> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days, after 
> yo
> lot dominating us for a long time.

Is it me Andy or is there a lot of lemons and not enough asprin on
this group today ;-)

och thier too used to having it thier way, now no one is talking about 
celtic anymore thier fed up
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:53:02 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
"andy" wrote
> "liam67" wrote
>> "andy" wrote:
>>> "ZB"  wrote:
>>> > "andy"  wrote in message
>>> >> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>
>>> > When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>
>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall an OF
>>> game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a single point
>>
>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>
> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days, after 
> yo lot dominating us for a long time.

...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a number of 
years...
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:29:54 -0000   author:   liam

Re: Back on top   
liam wrote:
> "andy" wrote
>> "liam67" wrote
>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>> "ZB"  wrote:
>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>
>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>
>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall
>>>> an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a
>>>> single point
>>>
>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>
>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>
> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
> number of years...

True...two is a number.
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:50:58 -0000   author:   Angof (no need for Mail)

Re: Back on top   
"Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message 
news:13o44h1nja5883b@corp.supernews.com...
> liam wrote:
>> "andy" wrote
>>> "liam67" wrote
>>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>>> "ZB"  wrote:
>>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>>
>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall
>>>>> an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a
>>>>> single point
>>>>
>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>>
>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>
>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>> number of years...
>
> True...two is a number.

;-)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:03:55 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
"Angof" wrote
> liam wrote:
>> "andy" wrote
>>> "liam67" wrote
>>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>>> "ZB"  wrote:
>>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>>
>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant recall
>>>>> an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like taking a
>>>>> single point
>>>>
>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>>
>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>
>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>> number of years...
>
> True...two is a number.

...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or maybe he 
was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:15:27 -0000   author:   liam

Re: Back on top   
liam wrote:
> "Angof" wrote
>> liam wrote:
>>> "andy" wrote
>>>> "liam67" wrote
>>>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>>>> "ZB"  wrote:
>>>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
>>>>>> taking a single point
>>>>>
>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>>>
>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>>
>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>> number of years...
>>
>> True...two is a number.
>
> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)

Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a longer 
spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty years of age?
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:52:28 -0000   author:   Angof (no need for Mail)

Re: Back on top   
"Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message 
news:13o484bf2ul6150@corp.supernews.com...
> liam wrote:
>> "Angof" wrote
>>> liam wrote:
>>>> "andy" wrote
>>>>> "liam67" wrote
>>>>>> "andy" wrote:
>>>>>>> "ZB"  wrote:
>>>>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
>>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
>>>>>>> taking a single point
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
>>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>>>>
>>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
>>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>>>
>>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>>> number of years...
>>>
>>> True...two is a number.
>>
>> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>
> Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a 
> longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty years 
> of age?

I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 40 
this year!
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:56:34 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
andy wrote:
> "Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
> news:13o484bf2ul6150@corp.supernews.com...
>> liam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>>>> number of years...
>>>>
>>>> True...two is a number.
>>>
>>> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>>> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>>
>> Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
>> longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
>> years of age?
>
> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and
> im 40 this year!

There you go then.
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:37:11 -0000   author:   Angof (no need for Mail)

Re: Back on top   
It was noted in: (13o4ao74bufvt58@corp.supernews.com),
that Angof <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> spouted forth their words 
of wisdom...:

> andy wrote:
>> "Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
>> news:13o484bf2ul6150@corp.supernews.com...
>>> liam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>>>>> number of years...
>>>>>
>>>>> True...two is a number.
>>>>
>>>> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>>>> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>>>
>>> Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
>>> longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
>>> years of age?
>>
>> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and
>> im 40 this year!
>
> There you go then.

I can only remember one period of domination in Scottish football, and that 
was for NINE years...
But then again, I *am* only in my late 20s .. ;-)


-- 
 www.bebo.com/bizenya79
 www.myspace.com/bizenya
Mothers of teens know why some animals eat their young.
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:36:47 -0000   author:   \\?`?.?biz?.???/

Re: Back on top   
"andy" wrote:
> "Angof" wrote:
> > liam wrote:
> >> "Angof" wrote
> >>> liam wrote:
> >>>> "andy" wrote
> >>>>> "liam67" wrote
> >>>>>> "andy" wrote:
> >>>>>>> "ZB"  wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> >>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>
> >>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
> >>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
> >>>>>>> taking a single point
>
> >>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
> >>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>
> >>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
> >>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>
> >>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
> >>>> number of years...
>
> >>> True...two is a number.
>
> >> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
> >> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>
> > Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
> > longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty years
> > of age?
>
> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 40
> this year!

Is that 40 in dog years? Certainly *that* sounds like a "long
time".... ;)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:18:17 -0800 (PST)   author:   liam67

Re: Back on top   
"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:f4c0b05a-28d1-4197-aacc-f08eeaa266e4@1g2000hsl.googlegroups.com...
"andy" wrote:
> "Angof" wrote:
> > liam wrote:
> >> "Angof" wrote
> >>> liam wrote:
> >>>> "andy" wrote
> >>>>> "liam67" wrote
> >>>>>> "andy" wrote:
> >>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> >>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>
> >>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
> >>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
> >>>>>>> taking a single point
>
> >>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
> >>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>
> >>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
> >>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>
> >>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
> >>>> number of years...
>
> >>> True...two is a number.
>
> >> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
> >> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>
> > Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
> > longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty 
> > years
> > of age?
>
> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 40
> this year!

Is that 40 in dog years? Certainly *that* sounds like a "long
time".... ;)

that would be 280...ffs were not that far away from having won that many 
titles ;-)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:29:19 -0000   author:   andy

Re: Back on top   
"andy" wrote:
> "liam67" wrote:
> "andy" wrote:
> > "Angof" wrote:
> > > liam wrote:
> > >> "Angof" wrote
> > >>> liam wrote:
> > >>>> "andy" wrote
> > >>>>> "liam67" wrote
> > >>>>>> "andy" wrote:
> > >>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
> > >>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>
> > >>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes ;-)
>
> > >>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
> > >>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
> > >>>>>>> taking a single point
>
> > >>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park last
> > >>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>
> > >>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these days,
> > >>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>
> > >>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
> > >>>> number of years...
>
> > >>> True...two is a number.
>
> > >> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
> > >> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>
> > > Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
> > > longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
> > > years
> > > of age?
>
> > I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 40
> > this year!
>
> Is that 40 in dog years? Certainly *that* sounds like a "long
> time".... ;)
>
> that would be 280...ffs were not that far away from having won that many
> titles ;-)

..if you are saying 280 years until the Gers win the title
next....well then you would be talking my kind of language... ;)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:40:53 -0800 (PST)   author:   liam67

Re: Back on top   
" \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote
> It was noted in: (13o4ao74bufvt58@corp.supernews.com),
> that Angof <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> spouted forth their 
> words of wisdom...:
>
>> andy wrote:
>>> "Angof" <falger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
>>> news:13o484bf2ul6150@corp.supernews.com...
>>>> liam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>>>>>>> number of years...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True...two is a number.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>>>>> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>>>>
>>>> Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
>>>> longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
>>>> years of age?
>>>
>>> I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and
>>> im 40 this year!
>>
>> There you go then.
>
> I can only remember one period of domination in Scottish football, and 
> that was for NINE years...
> But then again, I *am* only in my late 20s .. ;-)

What is it about Rangers fans and people wanting to dig up former 
glories.... ;)
date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:30:02 -0000   author:   liam

Re: Back on top   
"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:f212df38-5f49-4b3d-99e0-5374598abd2a@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> "andy" wrote:
>> "liam67" wrote:
>> "andy" wrote:
>> > "Angof" wrote:
>> > > liam wrote:
>> > >> "Angof" wrote
>> > >>> liam wrote:
>> > >>>> "andy" wrote
>> > >>>>> "liam67" wrote
>> > >>>>>> "andy" wrote:
>> > >>>>>>> "ZB" wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
>> > >>>>>>>>> The gap should be widened when we play your mob!
>>
>> > >>>>>>>> When you get beat, it doesn't widen the gap, the gap closes 
>> > >>>>>>>> ;-)
>>
>> > >>>>>>> LOL, your team is nowhere good enough at the moment, I cant
>> > >>>>>>> recall an OF game since Walter came back where you looked like
>> > >>>>>>> taking a single point
>>
>> > >>>>>> Weren't you rather fortunate when you won 1-0 at Celtic Park 
>> > >>>>>> last
>> > >>>>>> season? Not that it worries me if you are being complacent....
>>
>> > >>>>> No not really, I just think we have the edge on Celtic these 
>> > >>>>> days,
>> > >>>>> after yo lot dominating us for a long time.
>>
>> > >>>> ...it was certainly true that we dominated Scottish football for a
>> > >>>> number of years...
>>
>> > >>> True...two is a number.
>>
>> > >> ...maybe andy was thinking more of seven years as a "long time", or
>> > >> maybe he was thinking more in dog years.... ;)
>>
>> > > Nah...two years is a long time to him as he's probably never known a
>> > > longer spell of Celtic 'domination'. Would anyone under about forty
>> > > years
>> > > of age?
>>
>> > I can not remember Celtic ever dominationg more than two years..and im 
>> > 40
>> > this year!
>>
>> Is that 40 in dog years? Certainly *that* sounds like a "long
>> time".... ;)
>>
>> that would be 280...ffs were not that far away from having won that many
>> titles ;-)
>
> ..if you are saying 280 years until the Gers win the title
> next....well then you would be talking my kind of language... ;)

Ha! the next 280 days more like ;-)
date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:18:03 -0000   author:   andy

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us