Rangers have apparently agreed a fee of eight million pounds with Spurs for 
the transfer of Alan Hutton.
Being discussed on Clyde one at the moment.

-- 
The Law

"The Sheriff"  wrote in message 
news:Mrafj.24925$h35.18500@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
> Rangers have apparently agreed a fee of eight million pounds with Spurs 
> for the transfer of Alan Hutton.
> Being discussed on Clyde one at the moment.
>
> -- 
> The Law

On the BBC Website now as well

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/r/rangers/7170640.stm

The Law

On Jan 3, 7:11 pm, "The Sheriff" 
wrote:
> Rangers have apparently agreed a fee of eight million pounds with Spurs for
> the transfer of Alan Hutton.
> Being discussed on Clyde one at the moment.
>
> --
> The Law



Its clyde mate, one of the reason we as a support dont listen is they
talk pish and are anti-rangers.
Remember BROON9 was a done deal, which am glad wasnt.

as for BBC all they are doing is listening to clyde last night ALLY
SAID , well funny they also said that on the 19th Ally said.

when the blood sucker reports it then i will belive.

"Mad Max"  wrote in message 
news:a3f939b2-1ce6-419e-8c2a-dcbde20231f9@5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 3, 7:11 pm, "The Sheriff" 
wrote:
> Rangers have apparently agreed a fee of eight million pounds with Spurs 
> for
> the transfer of Alan Hutton.
> Being discussed on Clyde one at the moment.
>
> --
> The Law



Its clyde mate, one of the reason we as a support dont listen is they
talk pish and are anti-rangers.
Remember BROON9 was a done deal, which am glad wasnt.

as for BBC all they are doing is listening to clyde last night ALLY
SAID , well funny they also said that on the 19th Ally said.

when the blood sucker reports it then i will belive.


Same story and similar figures being quoted on SKY as well

The Law

On Jan 3, 7:42 pm, "The Sheriff" 
wrote:

>
> Same story and similar figures being quoted on SKY as well
>
> The Law

Same story thast been doing its rounds.

Reports suggest that rangers today accepted a £8million bid from Spurs
and the deal was all but completed when the man him self apparently
decided he was staying put at ibrox. The rangers starlet has been
called a future rangers captain and even branded "The Blue Cafu", and
been watched in action by clubs like Manchester united, and a top
flight Italian side. Rangers fans will have a mixed reaction if Hutton
leaves the club, with some thinking that £8m is far too big a lump of
cash to turn down for a club with rangers current financial state.
Others will argue rangers should not sell the player who was listed as
8th best young player in the world. Hutton, who is a born and bread
rangers fan may find the wage bracket offered by 'Spurs too much to
turn down, but by the looks of it he would rather stay at rangers for
now. This could all change of course if spurs Flash-the-cash a bit
more and tempt him away from his favorite club.

"Mad Max"  wrote in message 
news:1cccd6cc-9dbb-43f3-be1c-98531fe7310f@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 3, 7:42 pm, "The Sheriff" 
wrote:

>
> Same story and similar figures being quoted on SKY as well
>
> The Law

Same story thast been doing its rounds.

Reports suggest that rangers today accepted a £8million bid from Spurs
and the deal was all but completed when the man him self apparently
decided he was staying put at ibrox. The rangers starlet has been
called a future rangers captain and even branded "The Blue Cafu", and
been watched in action by clubs like Manchester united, and a top
flight Italian side. Rangers fans will have a mixed reaction if Hutton
leaves the club, with some thinking that £8m is far too big a lump of
cash to turn down for a club with rangers current financial state.
Others will argue rangers should not sell the player who was listed as
8th best young player in the world. Hutton, who is a born and bread
rangers fan may find the wage bracket offered by 'Spurs too much to
turn down, but by the looks of it he would rather stay at rangers for
now. This could all change of course if spurs Flash-the-cash a bit
more and tempt him away from his favorite club.

Time will tell
Bottom line is we have a ready made replacement in Whittaker and eight 
million could be used to bring in some quality players.

On Jan 3, 9:01 pm, "The Sheriff" 
wrote:

>
> Time will tell
> Bottom line is we have a ready made replacement in Whittaker and eight
> million could be used to bring in some quality players.

Yes and what would make it more sweeter is the look on people like
Zebhoys faces.but i would rather he was here to keep dancing boy in
his back pocket.

"The Sheriff" wrote:
>
> Rangers have apparently agreed a fee of eight million pounds with Spurs for
> the transfer of Alan Hutton.
> Being discussed on Clyde one at the moment.

How do you see the fact that Rangers agreed to sell Hutton, but Hutton
didn't want to move? Could you have done alot with £9m, since I think
the Premiership valuations are excessive, or do you think it's
preferable that he's stayed. I recognise that he has improved and is
brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good cross in
but can't help think it get's lost in defence sometimes ie a couple of
times against Lyon, Scotland Italy first goal and second goal he
should have put the ball in Row ZZ instead of getting embroiled with
the Italian. Think it was Greame Spiers that quoted a Rangers legend
only 18 months or so ago....Rangers legend said he won't cut it....

Maybe it's just cos I'm wishing here but I think you would have had
more chance winning the league if you had £9m to spend in the transfer
market...ie buy a centre forward...

On Jan 4, 5:52 pm, liam67  wrote:
> "The Sheriff" wrote:
>
> > Rangers have apparently agreed a fee of eight million pounds with Spurs for
> > the transfer of Alan Hutton.
> > Being discussed on Clyde one at the moment.
>
> How do you see the fact that Rangers agreed to sell Hutton, but Hutton
> didn't want to move? Could you have done alot with £9m, since I think
> the Premiership valuations are excessive, or do you think it's
> preferable that he's stayed. I recognise that he has improved and is
> brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good cross in
> but can't help think it get's lost in defence sometimes ie a couple of
> times against Lyon, Scotland Italy first goal and second goal he
> should have put the ball in Row ZZ instead of getting embroiled with
> the Italian. Think it was Greame Spiers that quoted a Rangers legend
> only 18 months or so ago....Rangers legend said he won't cut it....

Spiers and a Rangers legend, eh it would have been your hero sandy
would it?

as for spiers, nobody listens to him and nobody talks to him.
>
> Maybe it's just cos I'm wishing here but I think you would have had
> more chance winning the league if you had £9m to spend in the transfer
> market...ie buy a centre forward...

You just hope that Bolton(snigger)gives you that big ONE MILLION
pounds for the thug, then you can add it to your big transfer budget
and you might just make second spot this year, but I hope he stays and
drains the wage bill him and Hinkel will feel like two new signings on
high wages

liam67 wrote:
> "The Sheriff" wrote:
>>
>> Rangers have apparently agreed a fee of eight million pounds with
>> Spurs for the transfer of Alan Hutton.
>> Being discussed on Clyde one at the moment.
>
> How do you see the fact that Rangers agreed to sell Hutton, but Hutton
> didn't want to move? Could you have done alot with £9m, since I think
> the Premiership valuations are excessive, or do you think it's
> preferable that he's stayed. I recognise that he has improved and is
> brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good cross in
> but can't help think it get's lost in defence sometimes ie a couple of
> times against Lyon, Scotland Italy first goal and second goal he
> should have put the ball in Row ZZ instead of getting embroiled with
> the Italian. Think it was Greame Spiers that quoted a Rangers legend
> only 18 months or so ago....Rangers legend said he won't cut it....
>
> Maybe it's just cos I'm wishing here but I think you would have had
> more chance winning the league if you had £9m to spend in the transfer
> market...ie buy a centre forward...

Are you seriously suggesting  that Hutton was to blame for Italy's second 
goal? That is laughable.

"Angof" wrote:
> liam67 wrote:
>
> > I recognise that he has improved and is
> > brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good cross in
> > but can't help think it get's lost in defence sometimes ie a couple of
> > times against Lyon, Scotland Italy first goal and second goal he
> > should have put the ball in Row ZZ instead of getting embroiled with
> > the Italian.
>
> Are you seriously suggesting  that Hutton was to blame for Italy's second
> goal? That is laughable.

Almost as laughable as your inability to read plain English....I said
he should have put the ball in Row ZZ...if you want to say he was to
blame for the second goal....well that's up to you, my hun chum...

On Jan 4, 7:14 pm, liam67  wrote:

> blame for the second goal....well that's up to you, my hun chum...

Thank you

liam67 wrote:
> "Angof" wrote:
>> liam67 wrote:
>>
>>> I recognise that he has improved and is
>>> brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good cross in
>>> but can't help think it get's lost in defence sometimes ie a couple
>>> of times against Lyon, Scotland Italy first goal and second goal he
>>> should have put the ball in Row ZZ instead of getting embroiled with
>>> the Italian.
>>
>> Are you seriously suggesting that Hutton was to blame for Italy's
>> second goal? That is laughable.
>
> Almost as laughable as your inability to read plain English....I said
> he should have put the ball in Row ZZ...if you want to say he was to
> blame for the second goal....well that's up to you

Is that a yes or a no?

On Jan 4, 8:25 pm, "Angof" <falg...@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)>
wrote:

>
> Is that a yes or a no?

No Angof that Liam back to his racist sectarian self, it took him a
while but its been worth the wait.:)

"Angof" wrote:
> liam67 wrote:
> > "Angof" wrote:
> >> liam67 wrote:
>
> >>> I recognise that he has improved and is
> >>> brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good cross in
> >>> but can't help think it get's lost in defence sometimes ie a couple
> >>> of times against Lyon, Scotland Italy first goal and second goal he
> >>> should have put the ball in Row ZZ instead of getting embroiled with
> >>> the Italian.
>
> >> Are you seriously suggesting that Hutton was to blame for Italy's
> >> second goal? That is laughable.
>
> > Almost as laughable as your inability to read plain English....I said
> > he should have put the ball in Row ZZ...if you want to say he was to
> > blame for the second goal....well that's up to you
>
> Is that a yes or a no?

Stop bothering me with silly questions...more importantly, would you
have sold Hutton for £8m too?

Mad Max wrote:
>
> that Liam back to his racist sectarian self

Obviously another Mad statement you can't back up...

On Jan 4, 8:58 pm, liam67  wrote:
> Mad Max wrote:
>
> > that Liam back to his racist sectarian self
>
> Obviously another Mad statement you can't back up...

Well backed up, I just needed the cherry for the cake.


please tell me no one from your ISP has contacted you in the last few
month?

Mad Max wrote:
> liam67 wrote:
> > Mad Max wrote:
>
> > > that Liam back to his racist sectarian self
>
> > Obviously another Mad statement you can't back up...
>
> Well backed up, I just needed the cherry for the cake.

Care to expand? or are you too scared I might wipe the floor with your
have baked arguments that I'm "a racist sectarian bigot since I called
Angof a German"?

> please tell me no one from your ISP has contacted you in the last few
> month?

Funnily enough they did actually...they offered me an upgrade on my
broadband speed...

On Jan 4, 9:10 pm, liam67  wrote:
> Mad Max wrote:
> > liam67 wrote:
> > > Mad Max wrote:
>
> > > > that Liam back to his racist sectarian self
>
> > > Obviously another Mad statement you can't back up...
>
> > Well backed up, I just needed the cherry for the cake.
>
> Care to expand? or are you too scared I might wipe the floor with your
> have baked arguments that I'm "a racist sectarian bigot since I called
> Angof a German"?

sure you did liam like when your lot were calling the hearts and the
dundee support the same thing, why would the streets of ireland be
spray painted with kill all germans liams, germans out. act stupid all
you want, your nothing but a bigot and you know it.

>
> > please tell me no one from your ISP has contacted you in the last few
> > month?
>
> Funnily enough they did actually...they offered me an upgrade on my
> broadband speed...

sure liam and thanks for that too.

liam67 wrote:
> "Angof" wrote:
>> liam67 wrote:
>>> "Angof" wrote:
>>>> liam67 wrote:
>>
>>>>> I recognise that he has improved and is
>>>>> brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good cross
>>>>> in but can't help think it get's lost in defence sometimes ie a
>>>>> couple of times against Lyon, Scotland Italy first goal and
>>>>> second goal he should have put the ball in Row ZZ instead of
>>>>> getting embroiled with the Italian.
>>
>>>> Are you seriously suggesting that Hutton was to blame for Italy's
>>>> second goal? That is laughable.
>>
>>> Almost as laughable as your inability to read plain English....I
>>> said he should have put the ball in Row ZZ...if you want to say he
>>> was to blame for the second goal....well that's up to you
>>
>> Is that a yes or a no?
>
> Stop bothering me with silly questions...more importantly, would you
> have sold Hutton for £8m too?

I'll take that as a yes then. Bias beyond reason.

>would you have sold Hutton for £8m too?

It was £8m plus add-ons. The answer is yes,  I probably would.

"Angof" wrote:
> liam67 wrote:
> > "Angof" wrote:
> >> liam67 wrote:
> >>> "Angof" wrote:
> >>>> liam67 wrote:
>
> >>>>> I recognise that he has improved and is
> >>>>> brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good cross
> >>>>> in but can't help think it get's lost in defence sometimes ie a
> >>>>> couple of times against Lyon, Scotland Italy first goal and
> >>>>> second goal he should have put the ball in Row ZZ instead of
> >>>>> getting embroiled with the Italian.
>
> >>>> Are you seriously suggesting that Hutton was to blame for Italy's
> >>>> second goal? That is laughable.
>
> >>> Almost as laughable as your inability to read plain English....I
> >>> said he should have put the ball in Row ZZ...if you want to say he
> >>> was to blame for the second goal....well that's up to you
>
> >> Is that a yes or a no?
>
> > Stop bothering me with silly questions...more importantly, would you
> > have sold Hutton for £8m too?
>
> I'll take that as a yes then. Bias beyond reason.

He wasn't to blame for the goal...that's abit too strong...I only
suggested he should have kicked the ball into the stand like a proper
defender would have done......don't you agree?

> >would you have sold Hutton for £8m too?
>
> It was £8m plus add-ons. The answer is yes,  I probably would.

Would have been a great bit of business for the Gers...totally agree...

Mad Max wrote:
> liam67 wrote:
> > Mad Max wrote:
> > > liam67 wrote:
> > > > Mad Max wrote:
>
> > > > > that Liam back to his racist sectarian self
>
> > > > Obviously another Mad statement you can't back up...
>
> > > Well backed up, I just needed the cherry for the cake.
>
> > Care to expand? or are you too scared I might wipe the floor with your
> > have baked arguments that I'm "a racist sectarian bigot since I called
> > Angof a German"?
>
> why would the streets of ireland be spray painted with kill all germans

So since some guy spray painted something on a wall, you've decide
that anyone that ever used the h word is a "sectarian-racist-bigot"?
Honestly Jim that doesn't make any sense...Most people that use it
mean Rangers fans. I think a few Rangers fans on here don't mind the
term either... Ally Dunn and Anti-Tim, in particular...

It just looks like you are being overly precious and want to be
offended by something that really is quite harmless...why don't you
just leave it?

On Jan 4, 10:04 pm, liam67  wrote:
> Mad Max wrote:
> > liam67 wrote:
> > > Mad Max wrote:
> > > > liam67 wrote:
> > > > > Mad Max wrote:
>
> > > > > > that Liam back to his racist sectarian self
>
> > > > > Obviously another Mad statement you can't back up...
>
> > > > Well backed up, I just needed the cherry for the cake.
>
> > > Care to expand? or are you too scared I might wipe the floor with your> > > have baked arguments that I'm "a racist sectarian bigot since I called> > > Angof a German"?
>
> > why would the streets of ireland be spray painted with kill all germans
>
> So since some guy spray painted something on a wall, you've decide
> that anyone that ever used the h word is a "sectarian-racist-bigot"?
> Honestly Jim that doesn't make any sense...Most people that use it
> mean Rangers fans. I think a few Rangers fans on here don't mind the
> term either... Ally Dunn and Anti-Tim, in particular...

some guy painted it, really. Lot of your like being called fenians
they even have songs about it as well as banners, didnt stop people
like you twisting it to suit your agenda.

thing is laim we dont sing about it, the ones with brains and old
enough to know where it comes from we dont call our selves it, and we
dont have anything we wave or wear with it on it, so dont try and use
two of the biggest clowns to post here to back up your bigotry.

was it some guy that was singing it against the hearts and Dundee
support?
>
> It just looks like you are being overly precious and want to be
> offended by something that really is quite harmless...why don't you
> just leave it?

quite harmless, bigotry is quite harmless is it liam.coming from aguy
that says he is old enough to remeber the start of the troubles in NI?
yes laim that when it all started.



why dont you answer why it painted on the streets of Ireland, why dont
you answer why it was sung against three teams this season? why dont
you tell us where it comes from


pure football related so it is.

http://www.politics.ie/viewtopic.php?t=14820

liam67 wrote:
> "Angof" wrote:
>> liam67 wrote:
>>> "Angof" wrote:
>>>> liam67 wrote:
>>>>> "Angof" wrote:
>>>>>> liam67 wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> I recognise that he has improved and is
>>>>>>> brave going forward, willing to beat people and gets a good
>>>>>>> cross in but can't help think it get's lost in defence
>>>>>>> sometimes ie a couple of times against Lyon, Scotland Italy
>>>>>>> first goal and second goal he should have put the ball in Row
>>>>>>> ZZ instead of getting embroiled with the Italian.
>>
>>>>>> Are you seriously suggesting that Hutton was to blame for Italy's
>>>>>> second goal? That is laughable.
>>
>>>>> Almost as laughable as your inability to read plain English....I
>>>>> said he should have put the ball in Row ZZ...if you want to say he
>>>>> was to blame for the second goal....well that's up to you
>>
>>>> Is that a yes or a no?
>>
>>> Stop bothering me with silly questions...more importantly, would you
>>> have sold Hutton for £8m too?
>>
>> I'll take that as a yes then. Bias beyond reason.
>
> He wasn't to blame for the goal...that's abit too strong...I only
> suggested he should have kicked the ball into the stand like a proper
> defender would have done......don't you agree?

No I do not.  He had possession and we needed a goal. Of course if he knew 
the ref would not only allow the Italian to barge him off the ball,  but 
also wrongly penalise Hutton, then yes, but hindsight is always 20/20 as 
they say.
Great philosophy though...a proper defender boots it into touch...right.

>
>>> would you have sold Hutton for £8m too?
>>
>> It was £8m plus add-ons. The answer is yes, I probably would.
>
> Would have been a great bit of business for the Gers...totally
> agree...

We don't totally agree. I never said that.