|
|
|
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:27:11 +0100,
group: uk.sport.football.clubs.rangers
back
Boruc
This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, idiot
knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers they
are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:27:11 +0100
author: andy
|
Re: Boruc
"andy" wrote in message
news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers
> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>
I reckon he's trying to get Strachan to transfer list him
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:27:42 +0100
author: Moody Marco
|
Re: Boruc
"Moody Marco" wrote in message
news:pYCdnb4jirN5qoba4p2dnAA@giganews.com...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers
>> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>
>
> I reckon he's trying to get Strachan to transfer list him
Aye I think he has a hankering for italy!
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:04:22 +0100
author: andy
|
Re: Boruc
"andy" wrote in message
news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers
> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>
I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:17:13 +0100
author: JHF
|
Re: Boruc
"JHF" wrote in message
news:S6SdnQ-7A4n6zIbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers
>> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>
> I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
>
didnt see them, was he pissed off?
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:29:21 +0100
author: andy
|
Re: Boruc
"JHF" wrote in message
news:S6SdnQ-7A4n6zIbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers
>> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>
> I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
>
As much as I dislike Strachan, I give him credit for condemning Boruc and
also for saying the better team won. He doesn't usually, but fair play to
him yesterday.
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:56:26 +0100
author: Moody Marco
|
Re: Boruc
"andy" wrote in message
news:AZOdndG1wuaiyYbanZ2dnUVZ8qijnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "JHF" wrote in message
> news:S6SdnQ-7A4n6zIbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "andy" wrote in message
>> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
>>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad
>>> losers they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>>
>> I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
>>
>
> didnt see them, was he pissed off?
>
>
>
I think he said something along the lines of there being no need for it and
it not helping anything (with regards to his not shaking hands)
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:57:21 +0100
author: Moody Marco
|
Re: Boruc
"Moody Marco" wrote in message
> As much as I dislike Strachan, I give him credit for condemning Boruc and
> also for saying the better team won. He doesn't usually, but fair play to
> him yesterday.
Yes it was very magnanimous of WGS. Pity no one from rangers condemned the
actions of scumbag Novo. What a hideous wee runt he is. I really hope he is
ashamed of himself but somehow I can't see it.
littlebhoybri.
date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:45:53 GMT
author: littlebhoybri
|
Re: Boruc
littlebhoybri wrote:
>
> "Moody Marco" wrote in message
>
>> As much as I dislike Strachan, I give him credit for condemning Boruc
>> and also for saying the better team won. He doesn't usually, but fair
>> play to him yesterday.
>
> Yes it was very magnanimous of WGS. Pity no one from rangers condemned
> the actions of scumbag Novo. What a hideous wee runt he is. I really
> hope he is ashamed of himself but somehow I can't see it.
>
> littlebhoybri.
Yeah he should be thoroughly ashamed of himself. Imagine missing out on
a hat-trick.
--
Regards,
Psychobudgie
Very deep. You should send that into Reader's Digest, they've got a page
for people like you. - Douglas Adams
date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:45:03 +0100
author: Psychobudgie
|
Re: Boruc
"andy" wrote in message
news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers
> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>
Yes Borucs crime was stay on the pitch and not shake hands with his
opponents.
While for years many Rangers players ran up the tunnel and would not show
said maturity.
A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:03:38 GMT
author: Floyd
|
Re: Boruc
"Floyd" wrote in message
news:e%9Ti.66163$lV4.37385@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "andy" wrote in message
> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers
>> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>
>
> Yes Borucs crime was stay on the pitch and not shake hands with his
> opponents.
Not a crime. Cheap, unprofessional and second rate, but not a crime. Dida
and Boruc - see the connection?
> While for years many Rangers players ran up the tunnel and would not show
> said maturity.
Rangers players, of course, being alone in doing this. In all of
professional football, only Rangers players ran off the field and straight
up the tunnel because the pain of defeat was too much to take. Well, good
for them - they at least had the class to leave the field straight away,
without trying to show up the opposition and without trying to showboat to
their own fans after a humping.
> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:43:12 +0100
author: FishSupper
|
Re: Boruc
"Moody Marco" wrote in message
news:mN2dnRvDK45cx4ba4p2dnAA@giganews.com...
>
> "JHF" wrote in message
> news:S6SdnQ-7A4n6zIbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "andy" wrote in message
>> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
>>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad
>>> losers they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>>
>> I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
>>
>
> As much as I dislike Strachan, I give him credit for condemning Boruc and
> also for saying the better team won. He doesn't usually, but fair play to
> him yesterday.
As a matter of interest, why do you dislike him? I've always found Strachan
to be a real football man and good value - as well as being a Scottish
footballing great. You can never wish him well as long as he's in his
present job, but I don't see what's to dislike about him.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:46:22 +0100
author: FishSupper
|
Re: Boruc
On Oct 22, 9:45 am, "littlebhoybri" wrote:
> actions of Novo. What a hideous wee runt he is. I really hope he is
> ashamed of himself but somehow I can't see it.
>
Thats twice you have said that are you hoping that someone else makes
the story up for you?
date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:28:13 -0700
author: Mad Max
|
Re: Boruc
"FishSupper" wrote
>
>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>
> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
What I find farcical is people trying to blow a rather meaningless mistake
into a massive big issue..."total wanker"...lol calm down ya eejit....maybe
people like you are also trying make it a big thing to detract attention
from other issues...for example, the sectarian booing of Boruc...
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:35:06 +0100
author: liam
|
Re: Boruc
"Mad Max" wrote in message
> Thats twice you have said that are you hoping that someone else makes
> the story up for you?
I don't need anyone to make anything up. I'm guessing your one of these true
blues that couldn't make it to the game for some real good reason so let me
fill you in. While McManus was lying on the ground unconscious Novo was
walking round him banging his chest punching the air and geeing up the
crowd, real dignified don't you think.
littlebhoybri
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:41:11 GMT
author: littlebhoybri
|
Re: Boruc
"liam" wrote in message
news:471db24e$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "FishSupper" wrote
>>
>>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>>
>> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
>
> What I find farcical is people trying to blow a rather meaningless mistake
> into a massive big issue..."total wanker"...lol calm down ya
> eejit....maybe people like you are also trying make it a big thing to
> detract attention from other issues...for example, the sectarian booing of
> Boruc...
A "meaningless mistake"? It was no mistake, it was entirely intentional. It
was not meaningless, it was full of meaning. Maybe you should have read his
comments today before posting. As I said, a TOTAL wanker.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:08:24 +0100
author: FishSupper
|
Re: Boruc
"FishSupper" wrote:
> "liam" wrote:
> > "FishSupper" wrote
>
> >>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
> >>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>
> >> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
>
> > What I find farcical is people trying to blow a rather meaningless mistake
> > into a massive big issue..."total wanker"...lol calm down ya
> > eejit....maybe people like you are also trying make it a big thing to
> > detract attention from other issues...for example, the sectarian booing of
> > Boruc...
>
> A "meaningless mistake"? It was no mistake, it was entirely intentional. It
> was not meaningless, it was full of meaning. Maybe you should have read his
> comments today before posting. As I said, a TOTAL wanker.
Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:20:59 -0700
author: liam67
|
Re: Boruc
"liam" wrote
> for example, the sectarian booing of Boruc...
What exactly is "sectarian" booing? How can booing be sectarian? Is there a
different sound you make when booing in a sectarian manner? :-)
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:11:03 GMT
author: Stevio
|
Re: Boruc
"Stevio" wrote:
> "liam" wrote
>
> > for example, the sectarian booing of Boruc...
>
> What exactly is "sectarian" booing? How can booing be sectarian?
I was thinking of the reaction of Rangers fans when Boruc blesses
himself...
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:27:46 -0700
author: liam67
|
Re: Boruc
"FishSupper" wrote in message
news:WIydnYemndIE-YDanZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Floyd" wrote in message
> news:e%9Ti.66163$lV4.37385@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>> "andy" wrote in message
>> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
>>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad
>>> losers they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>>
>>
>> Yes Borucs crime was stay on the pitch and not shake hands with his
>> opponents.
>
> Not a crime. Cheap, unprofessional and second rate, but not a crime. Dida
> and Boruc - see the connection?
>
>> While for years many Rangers players ran up the tunnel and would not show
>> said maturity.
>
> Rangers players, of course, being alone in doing this. In all of
> professional football, only Rangers players ran off the field and straight
> up the tunnel because the pain of defeat was too much to take. Well, good
> for them - they at least had the class to leave the field straight away,
> without trying to show up the opposition and without trying to showboat to
> their own fans after a humping.
>
>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>
> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
"Wanker" Mmm, methinks Arturs blessing routine has you riled. Well ...long
may he continue to antagonize neanderthals like you.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:37:30 GMT
author: Floyd
|
Re: Boruc
"liam67" wrote in message
news:1193145659.327052.9150@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> "FishSupper" wrote:
>> "liam" wrote:
>> > "FishSupper" wrote
>>
>> >>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>> >>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>>
>> >> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
>>
>> > What I find farcical is people trying to blow a rather meaningless
>> > mistake
>> > into a massive big issue..."total wanker"...lol calm down ya
>> > eejit....maybe people like you are also trying make it a big thing to
>> > detract attention from other issues...for example, the sectarian booing
>> > of
>> > Boruc...
>>
>> A "meaningless mistake"? It was no mistake, it was entirely intentional.
>> It
>> was not meaningless, it was full of meaning. Maybe you should have read
>> his
>> comments today before posting. As I said, a TOTAL wanker.
>
> Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
> mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?
"intentional or not" WTF is that supposed to mean? Are you saying that he
unintentionally didn't shake hands - 3 times?
There is no "booing issue". Boruc is booed because he's a fucking
shit-stirring wanker. end of. And don't give me any crap about it being
because he'a catholic either. Why isn't Majiwhatisname booed? Another Pole.
Another catholic - never booed because nobody gives a fuck.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:13:30 +0100
author: FishSupper
|
Re: Boruc
"Floyd" wrote in message
news:KbrTi.259388$BW4.186717@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "FishSupper" wrote in message
> news:WIydnYemndIE-YDanZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "Floyd" wrote in message
>> news:e%9Ti.66163$lV4.37385@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>
>>> "andy" wrote in message
>>> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>>>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity,
>>>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad
>>>> losers they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes Borucs crime was stay on the pitch and not shake hands with his
>>> opponents.
>>
>> Not a crime. Cheap, unprofessional and second rate, but not a crime. Dida
>> and Boruc - see the connection?
>>
>>> While for years many Rangers players ran up the tunnel and would not
>>> show said maturity.
>>
>> Rangers players, of course, being alone in doing this. In all of
>> professional football, only Rangers players ran off the field and
>> straight up the tunnel because the pain of defeat was too much to take.
>> Well, good for them - they at least had the class to leave the field
>> straight away, without trying to show up the opposition and without
>> trying to showboat to their own fans after a humping.
>>
>>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>>
>> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
> "Wanker" Mmm, methinks Arturs blessing routine has you riled. Well ...long
> may he continue to antagonize neanderthals like you.
Of course. I was forgetting that when it comes to celtic, any criticism has
to be based in sectarianism. Boruc is an embarrassment and if you're not
embarrassed by him, that tells us all we need to know.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:22:57 +0100
author: FishSupper
|
Re: Boruc
"FishSupper" wrote
>
> "Floyd" wrote
>>>
>>> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
>> "Wanker" Mmm, methinks Arturs blessing routine has you riled. Well
>> ...long may he continue to antagonize neanderthals like you.
>
> Of course. I was forgetting that when it comes to celtic, any criticism
> has to be based in sectarianism. Boruc is an embarrassment and if you're
> not embarrassed by him, that tells us all we need to know.
No not any criticism. We generally accept that it is a mistake not to shake
hands.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:57:03 +0100
author: liam
|
Re: Boruc
"FishSupper" wrote
> "liam67" wrote
>> "FishSupper" wrote:
>>> "liam" wrote:
>>> > "FishSupper" wrote
>>
>> Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
>> mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?
>
> "intentional or not" WTF is that supposed to mean? Are you saying that he
> unintentionally didn't shake hands - 3 times?
Man, can't you read?! Whether it was intentional or not, it was a
mistake...your intentional stuff is completely tangential to the issue...but
then you don't really want to discuss the main issues here...
> There is no "booing issue". Boruc is booed because he's a fucking
> shit-stirring wanker. end of.
Why do the Rangers fans boo when he blesses himself...? Surley you don't
think he only does it to wind you up...since I thought it was only Celtic
fans that were paranoid... ;)
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:58:58 +0100
author: liam
|
Re: Boruc
"liam" wrote in message
news:471e7cb3_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "FishSupper" wrote
>> "liam67" wrote
>>> "FishSupper" wrote:
>>>> "liam" wrote:
>>>> > "FishSupper" wrote
>>>
>>> Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
>>> mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?
>>
>> "intentional or not" WTF is that supposed to mean? Are you saying that he
>> unintentionally didn't shake hands - 3 times?
>
> Man, can't you read?! Whether it was intentional or not, it was a
> mistake...your intentional stuff is completely tangential to the
> issue...but then you don't really want to discuss the main issues here...
I can read OK. What I can't understand is how you can raise the possibility
that it wasn't intentional - and it's not MY intentional stuff - YOU used
the word first. And I AM discussing the main issue here , i.e Boruc is a
wanker - and quite happy to do so.
>> There is no "booing issue". Boruc is booed because he's a fucking
>> shit-stirring wanker. end of.
>
> Why do the Rangers fans boo when he blesses himself...?
Because he's prostituting his 'religion' in an attempt to antagonise the
opposition. The sort of nauseating behaviour that we're used to from him. If
it's supposed to be sectarian, why don't we boo Morawski?
> Surley you don't think he only does it to wind you up...since I thought it
> was only Celtic fans that were paranoid... ;)
Not so much paranoid, more bitter and twisted. ;)
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:09:54 +0100
author: FishSupper
|
Re: Boruc
On Oct 23, 10:41 am, "littlebhoybri" wrote:
> "Mad Max" wrote in message
> > Thats twice you have said that are you hoping that someone else makes
> > the story up for you?
>
> I don't need anyone to make anything up. I'm guessing your one of these true
> blues that couldn't make it to the game for some real good reason so let me
> fill you in. While McManus was lying on the ground unconscious Novo was
> walking round him banging his chest punching the air and geeing up the
> crowd, real dignified don't you think.
>
> littlebhoybri
Awe you're hurting big time and its all the wee mans fault, no wait it
was the wee mans fault really.
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:55:47 -0700
author: Mad Max
|
Re: Boruc
On Oct 23, 2:20 pm, liam67 wrote:
>
> Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
> mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?
want to comment on the sectarian singing or did you go deaf when the
vermin were singing about the Queen and Cooper?
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:58:09 -0700
author: Mad Max
|
Re: Boruc
On Oct 23, 4:11 pm, "Stevio" wrote:
> "liam" wrote
>
> > for example, the sectarian booing of Boruc...
>
> What exactly is "sectarian" booing? How can booing be sectarian? Is there a
> different sound you make when booing in a sectarian manner? :-)
remember their website www.ok2boo.com.double standards from liam the
racist bigot.
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:59:44 -0700
author: Mad Max
|
Re: Boruc
On Oct 23, 10:13 pm, "FishSupper" wrote:
>
> There is no "booing issue". Boruc is booed because he's a fucking
> shit-stirring wanker. end of. And don't give me any crap about it being
> because he'a catholic either. Why isn't Majiwhatisname booed? Another Pole.
> Another catholic - never booed because nobody gives a fuck.
Aye and to think British Soldiers died making sure vermin like him
could be born, Great How Rangers and Celtic are doing what they can in
the stands yet scum like that comes all the way from poland and tries
to incite sectarianism, his own club better act before someone cracks
his jaw which could be some time soon after his latest hate filled
rant.
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:06:19 -0700
author: Mad Max
|
Re: Boruc
"Mad Max" wrote in message
>
> Awe you're hurting big time and its all the wee mans fault, no wait it
> was the wee mans fault really.
ROTFLMBRAOAYYKDTHBWFHMASAHSWSHDD
littlebhoybri
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:40:33 GMT
author: littlebhoybri
|
Re: Boruc
littlebhoybri wrote:
> "Mad Max" wrote in message
>>
>> Awe you're hurting big time and its all the wee mans fault, no wait
>> it was the wee mans fault really.
>
> ROTFLMBRAOAYYKDTHBWFHMASAHSWSHDD
oh dear
>
> littlebhoybri
biz
date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:29:00 +0100
author: \\?`?.?biz?.???/
|
|
|