Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
sport
athletics
baseball
betting
cricket
football
football....bradford-city
football...celtic
football...leeds-united
football...liverpool
football...man-city
football...newcast..united
football...rangers
football...southampton
football...sunderland
football...west-ham
football.american
football.scottish
golf
horseracing
ice-hockey
misc
orienteering
speedway
squash
swimming
  
 
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:27:11 +0100,    group: uk.sport.football.clubs.rangers        back       
Boruc   
This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, idiot 
knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers they 
are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:27:11 +0100   author:   andy

Re: Boruc   
"andy"  wrote in message 
news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers 
> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>

I reckon he's trying to get Strachan to transfer list him
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:27:42 +0100   author:   Moody Marco

Re: Boruc   
"Moody Marco"  wrote in message 
news:pYCdnb4jirN5qoba4p2dnAA@giganews.com...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers 
>> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>
>
> I reckon he's trying to get Strachan to transfer list him

Aye I think he has a hankering for italy!
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:04:22 +0100   author:   andy

Re: Boruc   
"andy"  wrote in message 
news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers 
> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>
I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:17:13 +0100   author:   JHF

Re: Boruc   
"JHF"  wrote in message 
news:S6SdnQ-7A4n6zIbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers 
>> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>
> I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
>

didnt see them, was he pissed off?
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:29:21 +0100   author:   andy

Re: Boruc   
"JHF"  wrote in message 
news:S6SdnQ-7A4n6zIbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers 
>> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>
> I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
>

As much as I dislike Strachan, I give him credit for condemning Boruc and 
also for saying the better team won.  He doesn't usually, but fair play to 
him yesterday.
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:56:26 +0100   author:   Moody Marco

Re: Boruc   
"andy"  wrote in message 
news:AZOdndG1wuaiyYbanZ2dnUVZ8qijnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "JHF"  wrote in message 
> news:S6SdnQ-7A4n6zIbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
>>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad 
>>> losers they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>>
>> I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
>>
>
> didnt see them, was he pissed off?
>
>
>

I think he said something along the lines of there being no need for it and 
it not helping anything (with regards to his not shaking hands)
date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:57:21 +0100   author:   Moody Marco

Re: Boruc   
"Moody Marco"  wrote in message

> As much as I dislike Strachan, I give him credit for condemning Boruc and 
> also for saying the better team won.  He doesn't usually, but fair play to 
> him yesterday.

Yes it was very magnanimous of WGS. Pity no one from rangers condemned the 
actions of scumbag Novo. What a hideous wee runt he is. I really hope he is 
ashamed of himself but somehow I can't see it.

littlebhoybri.
date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:45:53 GMT   author:   littlebhoybri

Re: Boruc   
littlebhoybri wrote:
> 
> "Moody Marco"  wrote in message
> 
>> As much as I dislike Strachan, I give him credit for condemning Boruc 
>> and also for saying the better team won.  He doesn't usually, but fair 
>> play to him yesterday.
> 
> Yes it was very magnanimous of WGS. Pity no one from rangers condemned 
> the actions of scumbag Novo. What a hideous wee runt he is. I really 
> hope he is ashamed of himself but somehow I can't see it.
> 
> littlebhoybri.

Yeah he should be thoroughly ashamed of himself. Imagine missing out on 
a hat-trick.

-- 
Regards,

Psychobudgie

Very deep. You should send that into Reader's Digest, they've got a page
for people like you. - Douglas Adams
date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:45:03 +0100   author:   Psychobudgie

Re: Boruc   
"andy"  wrote in message 
news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers 
> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>

Yes Borucs crime was stay on the pitch and not shake hands with his 
opponents.
While for years many Rangers players ran up the tunnel and would not show 
said maturity.

A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:03:38 GMT   author:   Floyd

Re: Boruc   
"Floyd"  wrote in message 
news:e%9Ti.66163$lV4.37385@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "andy"  wrote in message 
> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad losers 
>> they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>
>
> Yes Borucs crime was stay on the pitch and not shake hands with his 
> opponents.

Not a crime. Cheap, unprofessional and second rate, but not a crime. Dida 
and Boruc - see the connection?

> While for years many Rangers players ran up the tunnel and would not show 
> said maturity.

Rangers players, of course, being alone in doing this. In all of 
professional football, only Rangers players ran off the field and straight 
up the tunnel because the pain of defeat was too much to take. Well, good 
for them - they at least had the class to leave the field straight away, 
without trying to show up the opposition and without trying to showboat to 
their own fans after a humping.

> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.

What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:43:12 +0100   author:   FishSupper

Re: Boruc   
"Moody Marco"  wrote in message 
news:mN2dnRvDK45cx4ba4p2dnAA@giganews.com...
>
> "JHF"  wrote in message 
> news:S6SdnQ-7A4n6zIbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
>>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad 
>>> losers they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>>
>> I agree. Give Strachan credit though for his comments regarding Boruc.
>>
>
> As much as I dislike Strachan, I give him credit for condemning Boruc and 
> also for saying the better team won.  He doesn't usually, but fair play to 
> him yesterday.

As a matter of interest, why do you dislike him? I've always found Strachan 
to be a real football man and good value - as well as being a Scottish 
footballing great. You can never wish him well as long as he's in his 
present job, but I don't see what's to dislike about him.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:46:22 +0100   author:   FishSupper

Re: Boruc   
On Oct 22, 9:45 am, "littlebhoybri"  wrote:

> actions of  Novo. What a hideous wee runt he is. I really hope he is
> ashamed of himself but somehow I can't see it.
>


Thats twice you have said that are you hoping that someone else makes
the story up for you?
date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:28:13 -0700   author:   Mad Max

Re: Boruc   
"FishSupper" wrote
>
>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>
> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.

What I find farcical is people trying to blow a rather meaningless mistake 
into a massive big issue..."total wanker"...lol calm down ya eejit....maybe 
people like you are also trying make it a big thing to detract attention 
from other issues...for example, the sectarian booing of Boruc...
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:35:06 +0100   author:   liam

Re: Boruc   
"Mad Max"  wrote in message

> Thats twice you have said that are you hoping that someone else makes
> the story up for you?

I don't need anyone to make anything up. I'm guessing your one of these true 
blues that couldn't make it to the game for some real good reason so let me 
fill you in. While McManus was lying on the ground unconscious Novo was 
walking round him banging his chest punching the air and geeing up the 
crowd, real dignified don't you think.

littlebhoybri
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:41:11 GMT   author:   littlebhoybri

Re: Boruc   
"liam"  wrote in message 
news:471db24e$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "FishSupper" wrote
>>
>>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>>
>> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
>
> What I find farcical is people trying to blow a rather meaningless mistake 
> into a massive big issue..."total wanker"...lol calm down ya 
> eejit....maybe people like you are also trying make it a big thing to 
> detract attention from other issues...for example, the sectarian booing of 
> Boruc...

A "meaningless mistake"? It was no mistake, it was entirely intentional. It 
was not meaningless, it was full of meaning. Maybe you should have read his 
comments today before posting. As I said, a TOTAL wanker.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:08:24 +0100   author:   FishSupper

Re: Boruc   
"FishSupper" wrote:
> "liam" wrote:
> > "FishSupper" wrote
>
> >>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
> >>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>
> >> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
>
> > What I find farcical is people trying to blow a rather meaningless mistake
> > into a massive big issue..."total wanker"...lol calm down ya
> > eejit....maybe people like you are also trying make it a big thing to
> > detract attention from other issues...for example, the sectarian booing of
> > Boruc...
>
> A "meaningless mistake"? It was no mistake, it was entirely intentional. It
> was not meaningless, it was full of meaning. Maybe you should have read his
> comments today before posting. As I said, a TOTAL wanker.

Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:20:59 -0700   author:   liam67

Re: Boruc   
"liam"  wrote
> for example, the sectarian booing of Boruc...

What exactly is "sectarian" booing? How can booing be sectarian? Is there a 
different sound you make when booing in a sectarian manner? :-)
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:11:03 GMT   author:   Stevio

Re: Boruc   
"Stevio" wrote:
> "liam" wrote
>
> > for example, the sectarian booing of Boruc...
>
> What exactly is "sectarian" booing? How can booing be sectarian?

I was thinking of the reaction of Rangers fans when Boruc blesses
himself...
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:27:46 -0700   author:   liam67

Re: Boruc   
"FishSupper"  wrote in message 
news:WIydnYemndIE-YDanZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Floyd"  wrote in message 
> news:e%9Ti.66163$lV4.37385@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
>>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad 
>>> losers they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>>
>>
>> Yes Borucs crime was stay on the pitch and not shake hands with his 
>> opponents.
>
> Not a crime. Cheap, unprofessional and second rate, but not a crime. Dida 
> and Boruc - see the connection?
>
>> While for years many Rangers players ran up the tunnel and would not show 
>> said maturity.
>
> Rangers players, of course, being alone in doing this. In all of 
> professional football, only Rangers players ran off the field and straight 
> up the tunnel because the pain of defeat was too much to take. Well, good 
> for them - they at least had the class to leave the field straight away, 
> without trying to show up the opposition and without trying to showboat to 
> their own fans after a humping.
>
>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>
> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
 "Wanker" Mmm, methinks Arturs blessing routine has you riled. Well ...long 
may he continue to antagonize neanderthals like you.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:37:30 GMT   author:   Floyd

Re: Boruc   
"liam67"  wrote in message 
news:1193145659.327052.9150@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> "FishSupper" wrote:
>> "liam" wrote:
>> > "FishSupper" wrote
>>
>> >>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>> >>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>>
>> >> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
>>
>> > What I find farcical is people trying to blow a rather meaningless 
>> > mistake
>> > into a massive big issue..."total wanker"...lol calm down ya
>> > eejit....maybe people like you are also trying make it a big thing to
>> > detract attention from other issues...for example, the sectarian booing 
>> > of
>> > Boruc...
>>
>> A "meaningless mistake"? It was no mistake, it was entirely intentional. 
>> It
>> was not meaningless, it was full of meaning. Maybe you should have read 
>> his
>> comments today before posting. As I said, a TOTAL wanker.
>
> Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
> mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?

"intentional or not" WTF is that supposed to mean? Are you saying that he 
unintentionally didn't shake hands - 3 times?

There is no "booing issue". Boruc is booed because he's a fucking 
shit-stirring wanker. end of. And don't give me any crap about it being 
because he'a catholic either. Why isn't Majiwhatisname booed? Another Pole. 
Another catholic - never booed because nobody gives a fuck.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:13:30 +0100   author:   FishSupper

Re: Boruc   
"Floyd"  wrote in message 
news:KbrTi.259388$BW4.186717@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "FishSupper"  wrote in message 
> news:WIydnYemndIE-YDanZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "Floyd"  wrote in message 
>> news:e%9Ti.66163$lV4.37385@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>
>>> "andy"  wrote in message 
>>> news:oMOdnUi0cvYTtIba4p2dnAA@bt.com...
>>>> This guy is an embarressment for Celtic, while Rangers show maturity, 
>>>> idiot knuckledraggers like him continue to show Celtic for the bad 
>>>> losers they are, is he trying to replace lennon's farsical behaviour?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes Borucs crime was stay on the pitch and not shake hands with his 
>>> opponents.
>>
>> Not a crime. Cheap, unprofessional and second rate, but not a crime. Dida 
>> and Boruc - see the connection?
>>
>>> While for years many Rangers players ran up the tunnel and would not 
>>> show said maturity.
>>
>> Rangers players, of course, being alone in doing this. In all of 
>> professional football, only Rangers players ran off the field and 
>> straight up the tunnel because the pain of defeat was too much to take. 
>> Well, good for them - they at least had the class to leave the field 
>> straight away, without trying to show up the opposition and without 
>> trying to showboat to their own fans after a humping.
>>
>>> A fact admitted to by Derek Ferguson on radio tonight.
>>> What's farcical is you know how to operate a PC.
>>
>> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
> "Wanker" Mmm, methinks Arturs blessing routine has you riled. Well ...long 
> may he continue to antagonize neanderthals like you.

Of course. I was forgetting that when it comes to celtic, any criticism has 
to be based in sectarianism. Boruc is an embarrassment and if you're not 
embarrassed by him, that tells us all we need to know.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:22:57 +0100   author:   FishSupper

Re: Boruc   
"FishSupper" wrote
>
> "Floyd" wrote
>>>
>>> What's farcical is that you're trying to defend a total wanker.
>> "Wanker" Mmm, methinks Arturs blessing routine has you riled. Well 
>> ...long may he continue to antagonize neanderthals like you.
>
> Of course. I was forgetting that when it comes to celtic, any criticism 
> has to be based in sectarianism. Boruc is an embarrassment and if you're 
> not embarrassed by him, that tells us all we need to know.

No not any criticism. We generally accept that it is a mistake not to shake 
hands.
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:57:03 +0100   author:   liam

Re: Boruc   
"FishSupper" wrote
> "liam67" wrote
>> "FishSupper" wrote:
>>> "liam" wrote:
>>> > "FishSupper" wrote
>>
>> Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
>> mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?
>
> "intentional or not" WTF is that supposed to mean? Are you saying that he 
> unintentionally didn't shake hands - 3 times?

Man, can't you read?! Whether it was intentional or not, it was a 
mistake...your intentional stuff is completely tangential to the issue...but 
then you don't really want to discuss the main issues here...

> There is no "booing issue". Boruc is booed because he's a fucking 
> shit-stirring wanker. end of.

Why do the Rangers fans boo when he blesses himself...? Surley you don't 
think he only does it to wind you up...since I thought it was only Celtic 
fans that were paranoid... ;)
date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:58:58 +0100   author:   liam

Re: Boruc   
"liam"  wrote in message 
news:471e7cb3_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> "FishSupper" wrote
>> "liam67" wrote
>>> "FishSupper" wrote:
>>>> "liam" wrote:
>>>> > "FishSupper" wrote
>>>
>>> Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
>>> mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?
>>
>> "intentional or not" WTF is that supposed to mean? Are you saying that he 
>> unintentionally didn't shake hands - 3 times?
>
> Man, can't you read?! Whether it was intentional or not, it was a 
> mistake...your intentional stuff is completely tangential to the 
> issue...but then you don't really want to discuss the main issues here...

I can read OK. What I can't understand is how you can raise the possibility 
that it wasn't intentional - and it's not MY intentional stuff - YOU used 
the word first. And I AM discussing the main issue here , i.e Boruc is a 
wanker - and quite happy to do so.

>> There is no "booing issue". Boruc is booed because he's a fucking 
>> shit-stirring wanker. end of.
>
> Why do the Rangers fans boo when he blesses himself...?

Because he's prostituting his 'religion' in an attempt to antagonise the 
opposition. The sort of nauseating behaviour that we're used to from him. If 
it's supposed to be sectarian, why don't we boo Morawski?

> Surley you don't think he only does it to wind you up...since I thought it 
> was only Celtic fans that were paranoid... ;)

Not so much paranoid, more bitter and twisted. ;)
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:09:54 +0100   author:   FishSupper

Re: Boruc   
On Oct 23, 10:41 am, "littlebhoybri"  wrote:
> "Mad Max"  wrote in message
> > Thats twice you have said that are you hoping that someone else makes
> > the story up for you?
>
> I don't need anyone to make anything up. I'm guessing your one of these true
> blues that couldn't make it to the game for some real good reason so let me
> fill you in. While McManus was lying on the ground unconscious Novo was
> walking round him banging his chest punching the air and geeing up the
> crowd, real dignified don't you think.
>
> littlebhoybri

Awe you're hurting big time and its all the wee mans fault, no wait it
was the wee mans fault really.
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:55:47 -0700   author:   Mad Max

Re: Boruc   
On Oct 23, 2:20 pm, liam67  wrote:

>
> Whether it was intentional or not...not shaking hands is a
> mistake...wanna comment on the booing issue...?

want to comment on the sectarian singing or did you go deaf when the
vermin were singing about the Queen and Cooper?
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:58:09 -0700   author:   Mad Max

Re: Boruc   
On Oct 23, 4:11 pm, "Stevio"  wrote:
> "liam"  wrote
>
> > for example, the sectarian booing of Boruc...
>
> What exactly is "sectarian" booing? How can booing be sectarian? Is there a
> different sound you make when booing in a sectarian manner? :-)

remember their website www.ok2boo.com.double standards from liam the
racist bigot.
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:59:44 -0700   author:   Mad Max

Re: Boruc   
On Oct 23, 10:13 pm, "FishSupper"  wrote:

>
> There is no "booing issue". Boruc is booed because he's a fucking
> shit-stirring wanker. end of. And don't give me any crap about it being
> because he'a catholic either. Why isn't Majiwhatisname booed? Another Pole.
> Another catholic - never booed because nobody gives a fuck.

Aye and to think British Soldiers died making sure vermin like him
could be born, Great How Rangers and Celtic are doing what they can in
the stands yet scum like that comes all the way from poland and tries
to incite sectarianism, his own club better act before someone cracks
his jaw which could be some time soon after his latest hate filled
rant.
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:06:19 -0700   author:   Mad Max

Re: Boruc   
"Mad Max"  wrote in message 
> 
> Awe you're hurting big time and its all the wee mans fault, no wait it
> was the wee mans fault really.

ROTFLMBRAOAYYKDTHBWFHMASAHSWSHDD

littlebhoybri
date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:40:33 GMT   author:   littlebhoybri

Re: Boruc   
littlebhoybri wrote:
> "Mad Max"  wrote in message
>>
>> Awe you're hurting big time and its all the wee mans fault, no wait
>> it was the wee mans fault really.
>
> ROTFLMBRAOAYYKDTHBWFHMASAHSWSHDD

oh dear


>
> littlebhoybri

biz
date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:29:00 +0100   author:   \\?`?.?biz?.???/

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us