...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus 
should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.

Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even 
then they ran you close.

Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as 
Chelsea's.

And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound 
mark.

Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:

Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you 
classless clueless nouveau chavs.


End message.

(;}) wrote:
> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus 
> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
> 
> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even 
> then they ran you close.
> 
> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as 
> Chelsea's.
> 
> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound 
> mark.
> 
> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
> 
> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you 
> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
> 
> 
> End message. 
> 
> 

Oh dear, oh dear. You really should learn to read chum, or at least 
actually understand what words mean. What I said was.....just for the 
record (not that you will understand it)  that MU fully deserved the 
title because they were the best side in the Prem league. But, in reply 
to a post which said that MU could afford to be ten points behind at the 
New Year but still win the title, I pointed out that this was a bit 
optimistic when Liverpool and Arsenal are still around and that.....
.....READ IT CAREFULY NOW.......Chelsea gave them a start and almost 
caught them despite having most of their top players out for months.

So a ten point start might seem a bit hopeful?  Luck was never mentioned.

But on the topic of ABU's, I am pretty sure that you, with the type of 
childish comments seen above, have managed to recruit plenty to those
ranks, all by yourself.

LC

After serious thinking (;}) wrote :
> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus 
> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even 
> then they ran you close.
>
> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as 
> Chelsea's.
>
> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound 
> mark.
>
> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you 
> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
>
> End message.

Chelsea already proved they have done that by the amount of injuries 
they suffered last season and still ran you mightily close.  If anyone 
moans about the injuries it is the Utd posters like yourself, SteveH, 
Red Devil and Swerve.

The Arsenal posters don't go down that road, neither do the Spuds and 
rarely the Chelsea boys.  Come to think of it I have not heard much 
moaning and wailing from the Liverpool camp.

Am I telling any falsehoods here ?

-- 
Count Baldoni

lescor wrote on 02/10/2008 :
> (;}) wrote:
>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus 
>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>> 
>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even 
>> then they ran you close.
>> 
>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as 
>> Chelsea's.
>> 
>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound 
>> mark.
>> 
>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>> 
>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you 
>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>> 
>> 
>> End message. 
>> 
>> 
>
> Oh dear, oh dear. You really should learn to read chum, or at least actually 
> understand what words mean. What I said was.....just for the record (not that 
> you will understand it)  that MU fully deserved the title because they were 
> the best side in the Prem league. But, in reply to a post which said that MU 
> could afford to be ten points behind at the New Year but still win the title, 
> I pointed out that this was a bit optimistic when Liverpool and Arsenal are 
> still around and that.....
> .....READ IT CAREFULY NOW.......Chelsea gave them a start and almost caught 
> them despite having most of their top players out for months.
>
> So a ten point start might seem a bit hopeful?  Luck was never mentioned.
>
> But on the topic of ABU's, I am pretty sure that you, with the type of 
> childish comments seen above, have managed to recruit plenty to those
> ranks, all by yourself.
>
> LC

Fair post Les and straight to the point.

-- 
Count Baldoni

On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even
> then they ran you close.
>
> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
> Chelsea's.

Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
injured list.

> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound
> mark.

You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
£75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30
this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.

> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> End message.

Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.

Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.

"Baldoni"  wrote in message
news:6kjrk9F8aqcnU1@mid.individual.net...
> After serious thinking (;}) wrote :
>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>
>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
>> even then they ran you close.
>>
>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
>> Chelsea's.
>>
>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
>> pound mark.
>>
>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>
>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>
>>
>> End message.
>
> Chelsea already proved they have done that by the amount of injuries they
> suffered last season and still ran you mightily close.  If anyone moans
> about the injuries it is the Utd posters like yourself, SteveH, Red Devil
> and Swerve.
>
> The Arsenal posters don't go down that road, neither do the Spuds and
> rarely the Chelsea boys.  Come to think of it I have not heard much
> moaning and wailing from the Liverpool camp.
>
> Am I telling any falsehoods here ?
>
> -- 
> Count Baldoni
>
>

As usual YES you are.

And as usual you are sucking up to everyone that trolls the United NG, 
fishing for allies.
Go have your afternoon nap Baldrick, your meds will kick in soon enough.

JIBBER!!!!

"Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even
> then they ran you close.
>
> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
> Chelsea's.

Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
injured list.

> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound
> mark.

You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
£75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.

> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> End message.

Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.

Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.

----------------------------------------------------------------------


Would have been a decent post Naff, if your figures weren't all fucked.

Never mind though.

on 02/10/2008, Diablos Rojos supposed :
> "Baldoni"  wrote in message
> news:6kjrk9F8aqcnU1@mid.individual.net...
>> After serious thinking (;}) wrote :
>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>
>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
>>> even then they ran you close.
>>>
>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
>>> Chelsea's.
>>>
>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
>>> pound mark.
>>>
>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>
>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>
>>>
>>> End message.
>>
>> Chelsea already proved they have done that by the amount of injuries they
>> suffered last season and still ran you mightily close.  If anyone moans
>> about the injuries it is the Utd posters like yourself, SteveH, Red Devil
>> and Swerve.
>>
>> The Arsenal posters don't go down that road, neither do the Spuds and
>> rarely the Chelsea boys.  Come to think of it I have not heard much
>> moaning and wailing from the Liverpool camp.
>>
>> Am I telling any falsehoods here ?
>>
>> -- Count Baldoni
>>
>>
>
> As usual YES you are.
>
> And as usual you are sucking up to everyone that trolls the United NG, 
> fishing for allies.
> Go have your afternoon nap Baldrick, your meds will kick in soon enough.
>
> JIBBER!!!!

Excuse me I think the fellow was making a point and it is fair game to 
make a point or indeed a criticism without being labled a troll.  I 
also believe that what I have included myself is fair and worthy 
comment.  I also believe that some of the Utd posters wear their Red 
Devil club badges a tad to close to their hearts.

-- 
Count Baldoni

"Baldoni"  wrote in message 
news:6kjtn4F87akkU1@mid.individual.net...

Hush now, sleepy time.

Diablos Rojos pretended :
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
> news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>
>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even
>> then they ran you close.
>>
>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
>> Chelsea's.
>
> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> injured list.
>
>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound
>> mark.
>
> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>
>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>
>> End message.
>
> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Would have been a decent post Naff, if your figures weren't all fucked.
>
> Never mind though.

Who sits atop the table ?

-- 
Count Baldoni

"Baldoni"  wrote in message 
news:6kjtr6F8d2okU1@mid.individual.net...
> Diablos Rojos pretended :
>> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
>> news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>
>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and 
>>> even
>>> then they ran you close.
>>>
>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
>>> as
>>> Chelsea's.
>>
>> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
>> injured list.
>>
>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion 
>>> pound
>>> mark.
>>
>> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
>> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
>> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
>> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>>
>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>
>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>
>>> End message.
>>
>> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
>> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>>
>> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Would have been a decent post Naff, if your figures weren't all fucked.
>>
>> Never mind though.
>
> Who sits atop the table ?
>
> -- 
> Count Baldoni
>
>

And that has what to do with his incorrect figures? you arselicker.

On 2 Oct, 13:37, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even
> > then they ran you close.
>
> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
> > Chelsea's.
>
> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> injured list.
>
> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound
> > mark.
>
> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30
> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > End message.
>
> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Would have been a decent post Naff, if your figures weren't all fucked.
>
> Never mind though.

http://tinyurl.com/3sa448

Suck on that, Ginger.

"lescor"  wrote in message 
news:48E4AD94.8090403@btinternet.com...
> (;}) wrote:
>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus 
>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>
>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and 
>> even then they ran you close.
>>
>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as 
>> Chelsea's.
>>
>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion 
>> pound mark.
>>
>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>
>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you 
>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>
>>
>> End message.
>
> Oh dear, oh dear. You really should learn to read chum, or at least 
> actually understand what words mean. What I said was.....just for the 
> record (not that you will understand it)  that MU fully deserved the title 
> because they were the best side in the Prem league.



Les mate, I will be staggered if you can find a quote of you saying the 
above, without the qualification of, but you were lucky due to Chelsea's 
injuries or somesuch. See if you can.



But, in reply
> to a post which said that MU could afford to be ten points behind at the 
> New Year but still win the title, I pointed out that this was a bit 
> optimistic when Liverpool and Arsenal are still around and that.....
> .....READ IT CAREFULY NOW.......Chelsea gave them a start and almost 
> caught them despite having most of their top players out for months.



By most of their top players Les, do you mean two or three?

And were you aware that United had as many and more top players out for the 
same length of time as Chelsea's players, and longer?

And do you not feel that if a team has half a billion quid's worth of free 
money to spend on whoever they like in the entire world then they should be 
able to cope with a few injuries?

United were.

"Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even
> then they ran you close.
>
> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
> Chelsea's.

Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
injured list.

----

Happy to do so Naff, mate.

Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.



> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound
> mark.

You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
£75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.

-----

When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it again 
every summer.



> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> End message.

Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.

---
Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries are 
more extensive.

You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your place 
in the table in early October.

No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've proved 
yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did last 
season, should Chelsea stop being top.



Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.

----

Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.

Ouch.

"Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
news:c1742adf-78d6-4bbb-8897-2819f94db8fd@v53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Oct, 13:37, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and 
> > even
> > then they ran you close.
>
> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
> > as
> > Chelsea's.
>
> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> injured list.
>
> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion 
> > pound
> > mark.
>
> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > End message.
>
> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Would have been a decent post Naff, if your figures weren't all fucked.
>
> Never mind though.

http://tinyurl.com/3sa448

Suck on that, Ginger.


===============================================

Well done that in fact proved that we didn't spend £75mill last year, nice 
try though, hats off to ya and all that.

On 2 Oct, 14:09, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:c1742adf-78d6-4bbb-8897-2819f94db8fd@v53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 13:37, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> >news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> > On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> > > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
> > > even
> > > then they ran you close.
>
> > > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad
> > > as
> > > Chelsea's.
>
> > Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> > injured list.
>
> > > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
> > > pound
> > > mark.
>
> > You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> > their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> > £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30
> > this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> > > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> > > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > > End message.
>
> > Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> > table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> > Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Would have been a decent post Naff, if your figures weren't all fucked.
>
> > Never mind though.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3sa448
>
> Suck on that, Ginger.
>
> ===============================================
>
> Well done that in fact proved that we didn't spend £75mill last year, nice
> try though, hats off to ya and all that.

You should learn how to read what's actually been written, it'll stop
you making a twat of yourself so often:

"You lot signed £75m of players last summer"  I didn't say you'd spent
the money up front, you buffoon.

"(;})"  wrote in message 
news:4A3Fk.17758$yU7.3646@newsfe19.ams2...
>
> "lescor"  wrote in message 
> news:48E4AD94.8090403@btinternet.com...
>> (;}) wrote:
>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus 
>>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>
>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and 
>>> even then they ran you close.
>>>
>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
>>> as Chelsea's.
>>>
>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion 
>>> pound mark.
>>>
>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>
>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you 
>>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>
>>>
>>> End message.
>>
>> Oh dear, oh dear. You really should learn to read chum, or at least 
>> actually understand what words mean. What I said was.....just for the 
>> record (not that you will understand it)  that MU fully deserved the 
>> title because they were the best side in the Prem league.
>
>
>
> Les mate, I will be staggered if you can find a quote of you saying the 
> above, without the qualification of, but you were lucky due to Chelsea's 
> injuries or somesuch. See if you can.
>
>
>
> But, in reply
>> to a post which said that MU could afford to be ten points behind at the 
>> New Year but still win the title, I pointed out that this was a bit 
>> optimistic when Liverpool and Arsenal are still around and that.....
>> .....READ IT CAREFULY NOW.......Chelsea gave them a start and almost 
>> caught them despite having most of their top players out for months.
>
>
>
> By most of their top players Les, do you mean two or three?
>
> And were you aware that United had as many and more top players out for 
> the same length of time as Chelsea's players, and longer?
>
> And do you not feel that if a team has half a billion quid's worth of free 
> money to spend on whoever they like in the entire world then they should 
> be able to cope with a few injuries?
>
> United were.

Doesn't work like that, though. If Liverpool had 2 Torres', do you think 
Kuyt would play? Or Keane? I doubt any team can keep like-for-like players 
on the bench or in the reserves. It's only logical that the reserve players 
are not going to be quite as good as their 1st team counterparts. Even if 
Chelsea have trillions, they're not going to tempt the "new Deco" or the 
"next Zidane" to join the club and sit there patiently waiting for a 1st 
teamer to get injured so they can play.....

No top-class player is going to want to be an understudy just waiting for an 
injury, and knowing that as soon as the player is fit, he's back on the 
bench (unless it's Harry Kewell and his amazing recovery for finals!). Not 
with the huge exposure, bonuses and sponsorship money they get for playing 
regularly in the 1st team.

So I think most managers and fans can have a legitimate (small) moan about 
injuries, especially the lower placed teams who don't have the reserves of 
Chelsea etc. But even Chelsea would miss their top players because you're 
just never going to have someone as good as them, to step in. Good, but not 
*as* good.

On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and even
> > then they ran you close.
>
> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
> > Chelsea's.
>
> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> injured list.
>
> ----
>
> Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>
> Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.

Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?

> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion pound
> > mark.
>
> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30
> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> -----
>
> When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it again
> every summer.

So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
Good.  Next point.

> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > End message.
>
> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> ---
> Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries are
> more extensive.

Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.

> You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your place
> in the table in early October.
>
> No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've proved
> yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did last
> season, should Chelsea stop being top.

At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
my identity, LOL.

> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> ----
>
> Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>
> Ouch.

Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.

"mentalguy2008"  wrote in message 
news:FP4Fk.19646$yU7.15208@newsfe19.ams2...
>
> "(;})"  wrote in message 
> news:4A3Fk.17758$yU7.3646@newsfe19.ams2...
>>
>> "lescor"  wrote in message 
>> news:48E4AD94.8090403@btinternet.com...
>>> (;}) wrote:
>>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus 
>>>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>>
>>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and 
>>>> even then they ran you close.
>>>>
>>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
>>>> as Chelsea's.
>>>>
>>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion 
>>>> pound mark.
>>>>
>>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>>
>>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you 
>>>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> End message.
>>>
>>> Oh dear, oh dear. You really should learn to read chum, or at least 
>>> actually understand what words mean. What I said was.....just for the 
>>> record (not that you will understand it)  that MU fully deserved the 
>>> title because they were the best side in the Prem league.
>>
>>
>>
>> Les mate, I will be staggered if you can find a quote of you saying the 
>> above, without the qualification of, but you were lucky due to Chelsea's 
>> injuries or somesuch. See if you can.
>>
>>
>>
>> But, in reply
>>> to a post which said that MU could afford to be ten points behind at the 
>>> New Year but still win the title, I pointed out that this was a bit 
>>> optimistic when Liverpool and Arsenal are still around and that.....
>>> .....READ IT CAREFULY NOW.......Chelsea gave them a start and almost 
>>> caught them despite having most of their top players out for months.
>>
>>
>>
>> By most of their top players Les, do you mean two or three?
>>
>> And were you aware that United had as many and more top players out for 
>> the same length of time as Chelsea's players, and longer?
>>
>> And do you not feel that if a team has half a billion quid's worth of 
>> free money to spend on whoever they like in the entire world then they 
>> should be able to cope with a few injuries?
>>
>> United were.
>
> Doesn't work like that, though. If Liverpool had 2 Torres', do you think 
> Kuyt would play? Or Keane? I doubt any team can keep like-for-like players 
> on the bench or in the reserves. It's only logical that the reserve 
> players are not going to be quite as good as their 1st team counterparts. 
> Even if Chelsea have trillions, they're not going to tempt the "new Deco" 
> or the "next Zidane" to join the club and sit there patiently waiting for 
> a 1st teamer to get injured so they can play.....
>
> No top-class player is going to want to be an understudy just waiting for 
> an injury, and knowing that as soon as the player is fit, he's back on the 
> bench (unless it's Harry Kewell and his amazing recovery for finals!). Not 
> with the huge exposure, bonuses and sponsorship money they get for playing 
> regularly in the 1st team.
>
> So I think most managers and fans can have a legitimate (small) moan about 
> injuries, especially the lower placed teams who don't have the reserves of 
> Chelsea etc. But even Chelsea would miss their top players because you're 
> just never going to have someone as good as them, to step in. Good, but 
> not *as* good.


Good point.

But that's why the likes of Brown, Park, Fletcher, Nani, O'Shea, etc are so 
valuable.

"Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
news:52f67f83-1005-466b-b701-21b415552d04@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and 
> > even
> > then they ran you close.
>
> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
> > as
> > Chelsea's.
>
> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> injured list.
>
> ----
>
> Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>
> Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.

Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?


---

Still way too bright for you though, aren't I Naff.




> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion 
> > pound
> > mark.
>
> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> -----
>
> When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it 
> again
> every summer.

So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
Good.  Next point.



Always Simpleton's favoured tactic, though most outgrow it by junior school.



> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > End message.
>
> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> ---
> Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries are
> more extensive.

Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.



Check it out yourself you lazy twat. PMSL




> You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your 
> place
> in the table in early October.
>
> No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've proved
> yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did 
> last
> season, should Chelsea stop being top.

At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
my identity, LOL.


Yes, Naff Simpleton's your real name isn't it.

PMSL




> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> ----
>
> Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>
> Ouch.

Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.


I'll obviously never reach the lofty heights of the above.

Could you provide us with a few more examples of your excellent work, Naff. 
I'd like to see how the pros do it.

PMSL

"Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
news:6e069eb9-4793-4e3d-94b4-23a75dba3eff@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Oct, 14:09, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:c1742adf-78d6-4bbb-8897-2819f94db8fd@v53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 13:37, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> >news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> > On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other 
> > > Abus
> > > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
> > > even
> > > then they ran you close.
>
> > > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad
> > > as
> > > Chelsea's.
>
> > Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> > injured list.
>
> > > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
> > > pound
> > > mark.
>
> > You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> > their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> > £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
> > this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> > > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions 
> > > you
> > > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > > End message.
>
> > Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> > table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> > Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Would have been a decent post Naff, if your figures weren't all fucked.
>
> > Never mind though.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3sa448
>
> Suck on that, Ginger.
>
> ===============================================
>
> Well done that in fact proved that we didn't spend £75mill last year, nice
> try though, hats off to ya and all that.

You should learn how to read what's actually been written, it'll stop
you making a twat of yourself so often:

"You lot signed £75m of players last summer"  I didn't say you'd spent
the money up front, you buffoon.

=================================================

Classic... absolute classic.

Again well done.

"(;})"  wrote in message 
news:jT4Fk.1909$g36.1486@newsfe01.ams2...
>
> "mentalguy2008"  wrote in message 
> news:FP4Fk.19646$yU7.15208@newsfe19.ams2...
>>
>> "(;})"  wrote in message 
>> news:4A3Fk.17758$yU7.3646@newsfe19.ams2...
>>>
>>> "lescor"  wrote in message 
>>> news:48E4AD94.8090403@btinternet.com...
>>>> (;}) wrote:
>>>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other 
>>>>> Abus should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>>>
>>>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and 
>>>>> even then they ran you close.
>>>>>
>>>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
>>>>> as Chelsea's.
>>>>>
>>>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion 
>>>>> pound mark.
>>>>>
>>>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>>>
>>>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions 
>>>>> you classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> End message.
>>>>
>>>> Oh dear, oh dear. You really should learn to read chum, or at least 
>>>> actually understand what words mean. What I said was.....just for the 
>>>> record (not that you will understand it)  that MU fully deserved the 
>>>> title because they were the best side in the Prem league.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Les mate, I will be staggered if you can find a quote of you saying the 
>>> above, without the qualification of, but you were lucky due to Chelsea's 
>>> injuries or somesuch. See if you can.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But, in reply
>>>> to a post which said that MU could afford to be ten points behind at 
>>>> the New Year but still win the title, I pointed out that this was a bit 
>>>> optimistic when Liverpool and Arsenal are still around and that.....
>>>> .....READ IT CAREFULY NOW.......Chelsea gave them a start and almost 
>>>> caught them despite having most of their top players out for months.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> By most of their top players Les, do you mean two or three?
>>>
>>> And were you aware that United had as many and more top players out for 
>>> the same length of time as Chelsea's players, and longer?
>>>
>>> And do you not feel that if a team has half a billion quid's worth of 
>>> free money to spend on whoever they like in the entire world then they 
>>> should be able to cope with a few injuries?
>>>
>>> United were.
>>
>> Doesn't work like that, though. If Liverpool had 2 Torres', do you think 
>> Kuyt would play? Or Keane? I doubt any team can keep like-for-like 
>> players on the bench or in the reserves. It's only logical that the 
>> reserve players are not going to be quite as good as their 1st team 
>> counterparts. Even if Chelsea have trillions, they're not going to tempt 
>> the "new Deco" or the "next Zidane" to join the club and sit there 
>> patiently waiting for a 1st teamer to get injured so they can play.....
>>
>> No top-class player is going to want to be an understudy just waiting for 
>> an injury, and knowing that as soon as the player is fit, he's back on 
>> the bench (unless it's Harry Kewell and his amazing recovery for 
>> finals!). Not with the huge exposure, bonuses and sponsorship money they 
>> get for playing regularly in the 1st team.
>>
>> So I think most managers and fans can have a legitimate (small) moan 
>> about injuries, especially the lower placed teams who don't have the 
>> reserves of Chelsea etc. But even Chelsea would miss their top players 
>> because you're just never going to have someone as good as them, to step 
>> in. Good, but not *as* good.
>
>
> Good point.
>
> But that's why the likes of Brown, Park, Fletcher, Nani, O'Shea, etc are 
> so valuable.

Definitely, good squad players, but none of them are ever going to set the 
world alight. It definitely helps having the likes of Brown and O'Shea who 
can cover different positions even if I think they are shite. Nani is OK, 
but Park is a typical Asian player... lots of work but not much talent. I'm 
not really sure what Fletcher brings to the team apart from his looks.

"(;})"  wrote in message 
news:6Y4Fk.1910$g36.249@newsfe01.ams2...
>
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
> news:52f67f83-1005-466b-b701-21b415552d04@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>>
>> news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>>
>> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>
>> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and 
>> > even
>> > then they ran you close.
>>
>> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
>> > as
>> > Chelsea's.
>>
>> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
>> injured list.
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>>
>> Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.
>
> Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
> gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?
>
>
> ---
>
> Still way too bright for you though, aren't I Naff.
>
>
>
>
>> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion 
>> > pound
>> > mark.
>>
>> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
>> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
>> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
>> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>>
>> -----
>>
>> When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it 
>> again
>> every summer.
>
> So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
> Good.  Next point.
>
>
>
> Always Simpleton's favoured tactic, though most outgrow it by junior 
> school.
>
>
>
>> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>
>> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>
>> > End message.
>>
>> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
>> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>>
>> ---
>> Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries are
>> more extensive.
>
> Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.
>
>
>
> Check it out yourself you lazy twat. PMSL
>
>
>
>
>> You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your 
>> place
>> in the table in early October.
>>
>> No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've proved
>> yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did 
>> last
>> season, should Chelsea stop being top.
>
> At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
> my identity, LOL.
>
>
> Yes, Naff Simpleton's your real name isn't it.
>
> PMSL
>
>
>
>
>> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>>
>> Ouch.
>
> Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.
>
>
> I'll obviously never reach the lofty heights of the above.
>
> Could you provide us with a few more examples of your excellent work, 
> Naff. I'd like to see how the pros do it.
>
> PMSL
>
>


He did actually make a slightly funny post just a couple of weeks back.... 
honest.

"mentalguy2008" <



> Definitely, good squad players, but none of them are ever going to set the 
> world alight.


That's why the balance of a squad is so vital. Has there ever been anyone 
better at it than Fergie?



It definitely helps having the likes of Brown and O'Shea who
> can cover different positions even if I think they are shite. Nani is OK, 
> but Park is a typical Asian player... lots of work but not much talent. 
> I'm not really sure what Fletcher brings to the team apart from his looks.



The Fletcher duvet and fried mars bar set is one of the biggest Christmas 
sellers in the highlands.

On 2 Oct, 15:44, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "(;})"  wrote in message
>
> news:6Y4Fk.1910$g36.249@newsfe01.ams2...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
> >news:52f67f83-1005-466b-b701-21b415552d04@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com..> > On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> >> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> >>news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com..> >> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> >> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> >> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> >> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
> >> > even
> >> > then they ran you close.
>
> >> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad
> >> > as
> >> > Chelsea's.
>
> >> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> >> injured list.
>
> >> ----
>
> >> Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>
> >> Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.
>
> > Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
> > gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?
>
> > ---
>
> > Still way too bright for you though, aren't I Naff.
>
> >> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
> >> > pound
> >> > mark.
>
> >> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> >> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> >> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30
> >> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> >> -----
>
> >> When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it
> >> again
> >> every summer.
>
> > So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
> > Good.  Next point.
>
> > Always Simpleton's favoured tactic, though most outgrow it by junior
> > school.
>
> >> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> >> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> >> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> >> > End message.
>
> >> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> >> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> >> ---
> >> Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries are
> >> more extensive.
>
> > Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.
>
> > Check it out yourself you lazy twat. PMSL
>
> >> You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your
> >> place
> >> in the table in early October.
>
> >> No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've proved
> >> yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did
> >> last
> >> season, should Chelsea stop being top.
>
> > At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
> > my identity, LOL.
>
> > Yes, Naff Simpleton's your real name isn't it.
>
> > PMSL
>
> >> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> >> ----
>
> >> Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>
> >> Ouch.
>
> > Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.
>
> > I'll obviously never reach the lofty heights of the above.
>
> > Could you provide us with a few more examples of your excellent work,
> > Naff. I'd like to see how the pros do it.
>
> > PMSL
>
> He did actually make a slightly funny post just a couple of weeks back...> honest.

So we've had the "You're mad" post and now the "You're unfunny" post.
All you need is to recycle one of your stalker posts then you can just
set the machine to auto-reply for you.

"Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:6kjtgjF8c8ebU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Baldoni"  wrote in message
> news:6kjrk9F8aqcnU1@mid.individual.net...
>> After serious thinking (;}) wrote :
>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>
>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
>>> even then they ran you close.
>>>
>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
>>> as
>>> Chelsea's.
>>>
>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
>>> pound mark.
>>>
>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>
>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>
>>>
>>> End message.
>>
>> Chelsea already proved they have done that by the amount of injuries they
>> suffered last season and still ran you mightily close.  If anyone moans
>> about the injuries it is the Utd posters like yourself, SteveH, Red Devil
>> and Swerve.
>>
>> The Arsenal posters don't go down that road, neither do the Spuds and
>> rarely the Chelsea boys.  Come to think of it I have not heard much
>> moaning and wailing from the Liverpool camp.
>>
>> Am I telling any falsehoods here ?
>>
>> -- 
>> Count Baldoni
>>
>>
>
> As usual YES you are.
>
> And as usual you are sucking up to everyone that trolls the United NG, 
> fishing for allies.
> Go have your afternoon nap Baldrick, your meds will kick in soon enough.
>
> JIBBER!!!!
>
>

Punchy is even making up lies about me in order to ingratiate himself with 
the other trolls.

Pathetic toadying from a pathetic man.

"Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
news:3c699e44-6a25-4569-b26d-12b07a3d121f@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Oct, 15:44, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "(;})"  wrote in message
>
> news:6Y4Fk.1910$g36.249@newsfe01.ams2...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
> >news:52f67f83-1005-466b-b701-21b415552d04@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> >> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> >>news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> >> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other 
> >> > Abus
> >> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> >> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
> >> > even
> >> > then they ran you close.
>
> >> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as 
> >> > bad
> >> > as
> >> > Chelsea's.
>
> >> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> >> injured list.
>
> >> ----
>
> >> Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>
> >> Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.
>
> > Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
> > gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?
>
> > ---
>
> > Still way too bright for you though, aren't I Naff.
>
> >> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
> >> > pound
> >> > mark.
>
> >> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> >> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> >> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
> >> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> >> -----
>
> >> When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it
> >> again
> >> every summer.
>
> > So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
> > Good.  Next point.
>
> > Always Simpleton's favoured tactic, though most outgrow it by junior
> > school.
>
> >> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> >> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions 
> >> > you
> >> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> >> > End message.
>
> >> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> >> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> >> ---
> >> Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries 
> >> are
> >> more extensive.
>
> > Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.
>
> > Check it out yourself you lazy twat. PMSL
>
> >> You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your
> >> place
> >> in the table in early October.
>
> >> No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've 
> >> proved
> >> yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did
> >> last
> >> season, should Chelsea stop being top.
>
> > At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
> > my identity, LOL.
>
> > Yes, Naff Simpleton's your real name isn't it.
>
> > PMSL
>
> >> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> >> ----
>
> >> Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>
> >> Ouch.
>
> > Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.
>
> > I'll obviously never reach the lofty heights of the above.
>
> > Could you provide us with a few more examples of your excellent work,
> > Naff. I'd like to see how the pros do it.
>
> > PMSL
>
> He did actually make a slightly funny post just a couple of weeks back....
> honest.

So we've had the "You're mad" post and now the "You're unfunny" post.
All you need is to recycle one of your stalker posts then you can just
set the machine to auto-reply for you.


What?

You mean there's an actual person thinking up your posts?

"Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
news:3c699e44-6a25-4569-b26d-12b07a3d121f@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Oct, 15:44, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "(;})"  wrote in message
>
> news:6Y4Fk.1910$g36.249@newsfe01.ams2...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
> >news:52f67f83-1005-466b-b701-21b415552d04@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> >> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> >>news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> >> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other 
> >> > Abus
> >> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> >> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
> >> > even
> >> > then they ran you close.
>
> >> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as 
> >> > bad
> >> > as
> >> > Chelsea's.
>
> >> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> >> injured list.
>
> >> ----
>
> >> Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>
> >> Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.
>
> > Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
> > gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?
>
> > ---
>
> > Still way too bright for you though, aren't I Naff.
>
> >> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
> >> > pound
> >> > mark.
>
> >> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> >> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> >> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
> >> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> >> -----
>
> >> When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it
> >> again
> >> every summer.
>
> > So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
> > Good.  Next point.
>
> > Always Simpleton's favoured tactic, though most outgrow it by junior
> > school.
>
> >> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> >> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions 
> >> > you
> >> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> >> > End message.
>
> >> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> >> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> >> ---
> >> Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries 
> >> are
> >> more extensive.
>
> > Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.
>
> > Check it out yourself you lazy twat. PMSL
>
> >> You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your
> >> place
> >> in the table in early October.
>
> >> No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've 
> >> proved
> >> yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did
> >> last
> >> season, should Chelsea stop being top.
>
> > At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
> > my identity, LOL.
>
> > Yes, Naff Simpleton's your real name isn't it.
>
> > PMSL
>
> >> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> >> ----
>
> >> Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>
> >> Ouch.
>
> > Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.
>
> > I'll obviously never reach the lofty heights of the above.
>
> > Could you provide us with a few more examples of your excellent work,
> > Naff. I'd like to see how the pros do it.
>
> > PMSL
>
> He did actually make a slightly funny post just a couple of weeks back....
> honest.

So we've had the "You're mad" post and now the "You're unfunny" post.
All you need is to recycle one of your stalker posts then you can just
set the machine to auto-reply for you.

====================================================

Think you're getting a touch confused here, I've done no such thing in 
response to you and in fact the post you were responding to was admitting 
that you did make _a_ funny post.

Getting a bit carried away with yourself here Naff.

"(;})"  wrote in message 
news:Ga5Fk.1911$g36.795@newsfe01.ams2...
>
> "mentalguy2008" <
>
>
>
>> Definitely, good squad players, but none of them are ever going to set 
>> the world alight.
>
>
> That's why the balance of a squad is so vital. Has there ever been anyone 
> better at it than Fergie?
>
>
>
> It definitely helps having the likes of Brown and O'Shea who
>> can cover different positions even if I think they are shite. Nani is OK, 
>> but Park is a typical Asian player... lots of work but not much talent. 
>> I'm not really sure what Fletcher brings to the team apart from his 
>> looks.
>
>
>
> The Fletcher duvet and fried mars bar set is one of the biggest Christmas 
> sellers in the highlands.

LMAO

Yes, I have to admit that no matter what, Fergie always seems to have just 
enough talent on the pitch to keep getting results. He's obviously very 
astute when he sizes up potential signings. Even if they're not 
world-beaters, they fit in pretty well and he doesn't chuck them straight 
in. He's made some shocking buys, but on the whole he's done a good job 
keeping the team balanced with the top stars and the newer, younger guys. 
Unlike Wenger whose team fell apart when Viera left and Henry decided not to 
bother any more.

On 2 Oct, 15:51, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:3c699e44-6a25-4569-b26d-12b07a3d121f@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 15:44, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "(;})"  wrote in message
>
> >news:6Y4Fk.1910$g36.249@newsfe01.ams2...
>
> > > "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
> > >news:52f67f83-1005-466b-b701-21b415552d04@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> > > On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> > >> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> > >>news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> > >> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > >> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other
> > >> > Abus
> > >> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > >> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
> > >> > even
> > >> > then they ran you close.
>
> > >> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as
> > >> > bad
> > >> > as
> > >> > Chelsea's.
>
> > >> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> > >> injured list.
>
> > >> ----
>
> > >> Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>
> > >> Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.
>
> > > Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
> > > gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?
>
> > > ---
>
> > > Still way too bright for you though, aren't I Naff.
>
> > >> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
> > >> > pound
> > >> > mark.
>
> > >> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> > >> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> > >> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30
> > >> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> > >> -----
>
> > >> When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it
> > >> again
> > >> every summer.
>
> > > So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
> > > Good.  Next point.
>
> > > Always Simpleton's favoured tactic, though most outgrow it by junior
> > > school.
>
> > >> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > >> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions
> > >> > you
> > >> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > >> > End message.
>
> > >> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> > >> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> > >> ---
> > >> Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries
> > >> are
> > >> more extensive.
>
> > > Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.
>
> > > Check it out yourself you lazy twat. PMSL
>
> > >> You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your
> > >> place
> > >> in the table in early October.
>
> > >> No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've
> > >> proved
> > >> yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did
> > >> last
> > >> season, should Chelsea stop being top.
>
> > > At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
> > > my identity, LOL.
>
> > > Yes, Naff Simpleton's your real name isn't it.
>
> > > PMSL
>
> > >> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> > >> ----
>
> > >> Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>
> > >> Ouch.
>
> > > Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.
>
> > > I'll obviously never reach the lofty heights of the above.
>
> > > Could you provide us with a few more examples of your excellent work,
> > > Naff. I'd like to see how the pros do it.
>
> > > PMSL
>
> > He did actually make a slightly funny post just a couple of weeks back.> > honest.
>
> So we've had the "You're mad" post and now the "You're unfunny" post.
> All you need is to recycle one of your stalker posts then you can just
> set the machine to auto-reply for you.
>
> What?
>
> You mean there's an actual person thinking up your posts?

PMSL - Stinky just bust the whoosh-o-meter.  ROTFLMAO.

Your hyperhidrosis is obviously making you more and more stupid by the
day, LOL

"Swerve"  wrote in message 
news:48e4dfa7$0$2915$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
>
> "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:6kjtgjF8c8ebU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "Baldoni"  wrote in message
>> news:6kjrk9F8aqcnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> After serious thinking (;}) wrote :
>>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>>>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>>
>>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
>>>> even then they ran you close.
>>>>
>>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
>>>> as
>>>> Chelsea's.
>>>>
>>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
>>>> pound mark.
>>>>
>>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>>
>>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>>>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> End message.
>>>
>>> Chelsea already proved they have done that by the amount of injuries 
>>> they
>>> suffered last season and still ran you mightily close.  If anyone moans
>>> about the injuries it is the Utd posters like yourself, SteveH, Red 
>>> Devil
>>> and Swerve.
>>>
>>> The Arsenal posters don't go down that road, neither do the Spuds and
>>> rarely the Chelsea boys.  Come to think of it I have not heard much
>>> moaning and wailing from the Liverpool camp.
>>>
>>> Am I telling any falsehoods here ?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Count Baldoni
>>>
>>>
>>
>> As usual YES you are.
>>
>> And as usual you are sucking up to everyone that trolls the United NG, 
>> fishing for allies.
>> Go have your afternoon nap Baldrick, your meds will kick in soon enough.
>>
>> JIBBER!!!!
>>
>>
>
> Punchy is even making up lies about me in order to ingratiate himself with 
> the other trolls.
>
> Pathetic toadying from a pathetic man.
>

It's quite laughable how they all club together in their trolling of the 
United NG now.

"Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message 
news:356a42a0-3410-4a2c-acb8-df800bdc6dc5@t42g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Oct, 15:51, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:3c699e44-6a25-4569-b26d-12b07a3d121f@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 15:44, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "(;})"  wrote in message
>
> >news:6Y4Fk.1910$g36.249@newsfe01.ams2...
>
> > > "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
> > >news:52f67f83-1005-466b-b701-21b415552d04@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > > On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> > >> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> > >>news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> > >> On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > >> > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other
> > >> > Abus
> > >> > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > >> > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries 
> > >> > and
> > >> > even
> > >> > then they ran you close.
>
> > >> > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as
> > >> > bad
> > >> > as
> > >> > Chelsea's.
>
> > >> Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> > >> injured list.
>
> > >> ----
>
> > >> Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>
> > >> Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.
>
> > > Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
> > > gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?
>
> > > ---
>
> > > Still way too bright for you though, aren't I Naff.
>
> > >> > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the 
> > >> > billion
> > >> > pound
> > >> > mark.
>
> > >> You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more 
> > >> than
> > >> their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot 
> > >> signed
> > >> £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30+m
> > >> this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> > >> -----
>
> > >> When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do 
> > >> it
> > >> again
> > >> every summer.
>
> > > So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
> > > Good.  Next point.
>
> > > Always Simpleton's favoured tactic, though most outgrow it by junior
> > > school.
>
> > >> > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > >> > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions
> > >> > you
> > >> > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > >> > End message.
>
> > >> Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> > >> table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> > >> ---
> > >> Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries
> > >> are
> > >> more extensive.
>
> > > Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.
>
> > > Check it out yourself you lazy twat. PMSL
>
> > >> You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about 
> > >> your
> > >> place
> > >> in the table in early October.
>
> > >> No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've
> > >> proved
> > >> yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you 
> > >> did
> > >> last
> > >> season, should Chelsea stop being top.
>
> > > At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
> > > my identity, LOL.
>
> > > Yes, Naff Simpleton's your real name isn't it.
>
> > > PMSL
>
> > >> Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> > >> ----
>
> > >> Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>
> > >> Ouch.
>
> > > Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.
>
> > > I'll obviously never reach the lofty heights of the above.
>
> > > Could you provide us with a few more examples of your excellent work,
> > > Naff. I'd like to see how the pros do it.
>
> > > PMSL
>
> > He did actually make a slightly funny post just a couple of weeks 
> > back....
> > honest.
>
> So we've had the "You're mad" post and now the "You're unfunny" post.
> All you need is to recycle one of your stalker posts then you can just
> set the machine to auto-reply for you.
>
> What?
>
> You mean there's an actual person thinking up your posts?

PMSL - Stinky just bust the whoosh-o-meter.  ROTFLMAO.

Your hyperhidrosis is obviously making you more and more stupid by the
day, LOL

==============================================


HAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAA

HAHAHHAHHHAHHA
BWEEEEEEEHHHA

HAHHAHHAHAHHAHHAHHAAAAAAAAA

I'm sure the jokes linked to LDs deodorant post of four years ago will be 
eternally hilarious, wooooooooooo you crack me up Naff.

HOOOOOOOOHOHOOHHOOHHOHOHHOOOOOOO


groan

(;}) pretended :
> "mentalguy2008" <
>
>
>
>> Definitely, good squad players, but none of them are ever going to set the 
>> world alight.
>
>
> That's why the balance of a squad is so vital. Has there ever been anyone 
> better at it than Fergie?
>
>
>
> It definitely helps having the likes of Brown and O'Shea who
>> can cover different positions even if I think they are shite. Nani is OK, 
>> but Park is a typical Asian player... lots of work but not much talent. I'm 
>> not really sure what Fletcher brings to the team apart from his looks.
>
>
>
> The Fletcher duvet and fried mars bar set is one of the biggest Christmas 
> sellers in the highlands.

Yes Fabio Capello.

-- 
Count Baldoni

Swerve formulated on Thursday :
> "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:6kjtgjF8c8ebU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "Baldoni"  wrote in message
>> news:6kjrk9F8aqcnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> After serious thinking (;}) wrote :
>>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>>>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>>
>>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
>>>> even then they ran you close.
>>>>
>>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad as
>>>> Chelsea's.
>>>>
>>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
>>>> pound mark.
>>>>
>>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>>
>>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>>>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> End message.
>>>
>>> Chelsea already proved they have done that by the amount of injuries they
>>> suffered last season and still ran you mightily close.  If anyone moans
>>> about the injuries it is the Utd posters like yourself, SteveH, Red Devil
>>> and Swerve.
>>>
>>> The Arsenal posters don't go down that road, neither do the Spuds and
>>> rarely the Chelsea boys.  Come to think of it I have not heard much
>>> moaning and wailing from the Liverpool camp.
>>>
>>> Am I telling any falsehoods here ?
>>>
>>> -- Count Baldoni
>>>
>>>
>>
>> As usual YES you are.
>>
>> And as usual you are sucking up to everyone that trolls the United NG, 
>> fishing for allies.
>> Go have your afternoon nap Baldrick, your meds will kick in soon enough.
>>
>> JIBBER!!!!
>>
>>
>
> Punchy is even making up lies about me in order to ingratiate himself with 
> the other trolls.
>
> Pathetic toadying from a pathetic man.

No toadying from me squire. You are what you are son and getting the 
excuses in a a safeguard pre-match to keep face is an old ploy of yours 
me old china.

-- 
Count Baldoni

Diablos Rojos used his keyboard to write :
> "Swerve"  wrote in message 
> news:48e4dfa7$0$2915$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
>>
>> "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
>> news:6kjtgjF8c8ebU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> "Baldoni"  wrote in message
>>> news:6kjrk9F8aqcnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> After serious thinking (;}) wrote :
>>>>> ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
>>>>> should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>>>>>
>>>>> Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
>>>>> even then they ran you close.
>>>>>
>>>>> Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad 
>>>>> as
>>>>> Chelsea's.
>>>>>
>>>>> And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
>>>>> pound mark.
>>>>>
>>>>> Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>>>>>
>>>>> Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
>>>>> classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> End message.
>>>>
>>>> Chelsea already proved they have done that by the amount of injuries they
>>>> suffered last season and still ran you mightily close.  If anyone moans
>>>> about the injuries it is the Utd posters like yourself, SteveH, Red Devil
>>>> and Swerve.
>>>>
>>>> The Arsenal posters don't go down that road, neither do the Spuds and
>>>> rarely the Chelsea boys.  Come to think of it I have not heard much
>>>> moaning and wailing from the Liverpool camp.
>>>>
>>>> Am I telling any falsehoods here ?
>>>>
>>>> -- Count Baldoni
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> As usual YES you are.
>>>
>>> And as usual you are sucking up to everyone that trolls the United NG, 
>>> fishing for allies.
>>> Go have your afternoon nap Baldrick, your meds will kick in soon enough.
>>>
>>> JIBBER!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Punchy is even making up lies about me in order to ingratiate himself with 
>> the other trolls.
>>
>> Pathetic toadying from a pathetic man.
>>
>
> It's quite laughable how they all club together in their trolling of the 
> United NG now.

What a complete and utter load of horseshit "Oh poor Utd everyone is 
ganging up on us, but we can take it as we are the 2nd biggest club in 
the world, which is why we follow Utd", Boo fucking hoo !

-- 
Count Baldoni

On 2 Oct, 15:33, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:52f67f83-1005-466b-b701-21b415552d04@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 14:06, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> >news:ca30e7b8-3a2e-4a64-a3e2-b94485f2486e@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> > On 2 Oct, 11:49, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
> > > ...Will of course be seized upon by the likes of Les and the other Abus
> > > should United manage to retain the Premiership again this season.
>
> > > Les will say again, you were lucky Chelsea had all those injuries and
> > > even
> > > then they ran you close.
>
> > > Few will care to remember that United's injury list is at least as bad
> > > as
> > > Chelsea's.
>
> > Back up your claim and name the 8 first-team players you have on the
> > injured list.
>
> > ----
>
> > Happy to do so Naff, mate.
>
> > Just as soon as you've backed up the sums you've outlined below.
>
> Stinky's tired old tactic when unable to answer a point.  You haven't
> gotten any brighter under your new alias, have you?
>
> ---
>
> Still way too bright for you though, aren't I Naff.

Funny how you still like to think you're smarter than me, even though
I in fact outsmart you aevery time you're dumb enough to try your
luck.  In this case, Stinky, unfortunately, Google is not your friend.

> > > And Chelsea's recent spending is creeping ever closer to the billion
> > > pound
> > > mark.
>
> > You lot have reclaimed your position as the club that spends more than
> > their rivals on trying to buy, I mean, win the league.  You lot signed
> > £75m of players last summer - more than Chelsea, and another £30
> > this summer on a lazy Bulgarian - again, more than Chelsea.
>
> > -----
>
> > When you spend half a billion quid Naff, you tend not to need to do it
> > again
> > every summer.
>
> So you concede you're once more spending more than us on transfers?
> Good.  Next point.
>
> Always Simpleton's favoured tactic, though most outgrow it by junior school.

What, you mean the 'show Timmy up to be a lying twat' tactic?  Yup,
you're right, it is one of my favourite tactics.

> > > Roman, Scolari, Kenyon (you wanker), my advice to you is:
>
> > > Buy a decent fucking squad with enough cover in the vital positions you
> > > classless clueless nouveau chavs.
>
> > > End message.
>
> > Funny how our inadequate squad, with all its injuries, sits atop the
> > table, while your bunch puff and wheeze trying to keep up.
>
> > ---
> > Yes, the point always did fly right over your head. United's injuries are
> > more extensive.
>
> Yet you can't prove it.  How strange.
>
> Check it out yourself you lazy twat. PMSL

Whenever Timmy says, "Check it out for yourself", we all know that
translates as, "I can't answer your point, leave me alone".  LOL

> > You're starting to sound like a scouser, complacently happy about your
> > place
> > in the table in early October.
>
> > No doubt, being the archetypical know-nothing glory-hunter you've proved
> > yourself to be, you will vanish back where you came from, like you did
> > last
> > season, should Chelsea stop being top.
>
> At least I haven't been utterly humiliated on here I've had to change
> my identity, LOL.
>
> Yes, Naff Simpleton's your real name isn't it.

Oh dear, he's now pretending he hasn't changed his persona.  Or is it
simply that I've found another word you don't know the meaning of,
like ape and mimic, lol.

> > Still too easy, mate, no matter which sock puppet you use.
>
> > ----
>
> > Oh dear, that bit you on the arse, didn't it mate.
>
> > Ouch.
>
> Stinky Timmy still shite at thinking up funny retorts, I see.
>
> I'll obviously never reach the lofty heights of the above.
>
> Could you provide us with a few more examples of your excellent work, Naff.
> I'd like to see how the pros do it.

BWAHAHAHAHA, Stinky's had over a year to find one single, solitary
instance of when he's said anything even remotely interesting - and he
still hasn't managed to do it.  PMSL.

On 2 Oct, 16:06, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(nospam)@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein"  wrote in message
>
> news:356a42a0-3410-4a2c-acb8-df800bdc6dc5@t42g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On 2 Oct, 15:51, "\(;}\)"  wrote:
>
>
>
&g