Following on (though not related) to Lawrence's post about spam.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4805760.stm

And the Institute for public policy research:-

"ippr's report cites evidence that identifies seven types of cyber-bullying, 
ranging from abusive text messages, e-mails and phone calls to bullying in 
internet chatrooms, social networking sites and instant messaging. It says 
that up to one in five pupils in London schools have experienced some form 
of cyber-bullying and that the psychological impact was similar to or worse 
than traditional bullying, partly because it allows the bully to accost the 
victim outside of school hours. And worryingly, a third of victims had never 
told an adult about the problem: in 2005 just four percent said that their 
child had been bullied online."




I find this whole trend of 'cyber-bullying' quite disturbing. Not the fact 
that the bullying happens to kids - That's a by-product of human society. 
Just the fact that as a race embracing a new mass form of communication has 
comes at a cost to some that are vulnerable. In the early days of net chat 
it was perceived as a way of communicating with others in a more impersonal 
way and therefore relatively risk free. But now, we've got death-threats 
suicides and attempted suicides.

Sad, very sad...

On Sep 25, 1:00 pm, "Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-
FILT...@clara.co.uk> wrote:
> Following on (though not related) to Lawrence's post about spam.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4805760.stm
>
> And the Institute for public policy research:-
>
> "ippr's report cites evidence that identifies seven types of cyber-bullying,
> ranging from abusive text messages, e-mails and phone calls to bullying in
> internet chatrooms, social networking sites and instant messaging. It says
> that up to one in five pupils in London schools have experienced some form
> of cyber-bullying and that the psychological impact was similar to or worse
> than traditional bullying, partly because it allows the bully to accost the
> victim outside of school hours. And worryingly, a third of victims had never
> told an adult about the problem: in 2005 just four percent said that their
> child had been bullied online."
>
> I find this whole trend of 'cyber-bullying' quite disturbing. Not the fact
> that the bullying happens to kids - That's a by-product of human society.
> Just the fact that as a race embracing a new mass form of communication has
> comes at a cost to some that are vulnerable. In the early days of net chat
> it was perceived as a way of communicating with others in a more impersonal
> way and therefore relatively risk free. But now, we've got death-threats
> suicides and attempted suicides.
>
> Sad, very sad...

It is a problem as you know I can get quite agitated and angry on the
rare occasion this however is in response to some of the sheer nasty
very personel insults that can fly around things that you would never
say to someones face . As for me would never dream of making those
types of remarks in the first place. So tempers can  flare.

I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.

lawrence13@sky.com wrote:
> On Sep 25, 1:00 pm, "Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-
> FILT...@clara.co.uk> wrote:
>> Following on (though not related) to Lawrence's post about spam.
>>
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4805760.stm
>>
>> And the Institute for public policy research:-
>>
>> "ippr's report cites evidence that identifies seven types of cyber-bullying,
>> ranging from abusive text messages, e-mails and phone calls to bullying in
>> internet chatrooms, social networking sites and instant messaging. It says
>> that up to one in five pupils in London schools have experienced some form
>> of cyber-bullying and that the psychological impact was similar to or worse
>> than traditional bullying, partly because it allows the bully to accost the
>> victim outside of school hours. And worryingly, a third of victims had never
>> told an adult about the problem: in 2005 just four percent said that their
>> child had been bullied online."
>>
>> I find this whole trend of 'cyber-bullying' quite disturbing. Not the fact
>> that the bullying happens to kids - That's a by-product of human society.
>> Just the fact that as a race embracing a new mass form of communication has
>> comes at a cost to some that are vulnerable. In the early days of net chat
>> it was perceived as a way of communicating with others in a more impersonal
>> way and therefore relatively risk free. But now, we've got death-threats
>> suicides and attempted suicides.
>>
>> Sad, very sad...
> 
> It is a problem as you know I can get quite agitated and angry on the
> rare occasion this however is in response to some of the sheer nasty
> very personel insults that can fly around things that you would never
> say to someones face . As for me would never dream of making those
> types of remarks in the first place. So tempers can  flare.
> 
> I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
> insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
> The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
> meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
> his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
> sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
> could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
> thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
> you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
> well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
> we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
> 
> 

hope the cunt fucking dies baldy.

lol. :)

-- 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/scoopex/

wrote in message 
news:1190719752.775549.284200@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

> I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
> insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
> The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
> meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
> his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
> sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
> could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
> thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
> you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
> well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
> we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
>
>
Reactions from other newsgroups posters are different in every context - 
Heated debate occurs in lots of ng's. This is particularly true of rival 
footy groups. I've no got no love for Man Utd as a team, or many other teams 
for that matter, but if my emnity (and believe it or not it sometimes is) 
reduced me to a level of threats of violence or disgusting insults about 
someones afflictions or handicaps I'd be whole heartedly ashamed and deserve 
to be castigated. Of course, i'll take the piss - god knows as a Leeds fan 
I've received enough piss-taking over the last 4 years, but it's when taking 
the piss crosses the line that bothers me. Certain posters such as RD can 
cause adverse reactions, and we've had a couple of run-ins in the past - but 
i think he'd be the first to agree that i fight fire with fire, not fire 
with insults and threats.

On Sep 25, 1:43 pm, "Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-
FILT...@clara.co.uk> wrote:
>  wrote in message
>
> news:1190719752.775549.284200@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
> > insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
> > The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
> > meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
> > his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
> > sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
> > could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
> > thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
> > you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
> > well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
> > we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
>
> Reactions from other newsgroups posters are different in every context -
> Heated debate occurs in lots of ng's. This is particularly true of rival
> footy groups. I've no got no love for Man Utd as a team, or many other teams
> for that matter, but if my emnity (and believe it or not it sometimes is)
> reduced me to a level of threats of violence or disgusting insults about
> someones afflictions or handicaps I'd be whole heartedly ashamed and deserve
> to be castigated. Of course, i'll take the piss - god knows as a Leeds fan
> I've received enough piss-taking over the last 4 years, but it's when taking
> the piss crosses the line that bothers me. Certain posters such as RD can
> cause adverse reactions, and we've had a couple of run-ins in the past - but
> i think he'd be the first to agree that i fight fire with fire, not fire
> with insults and threats.

I see scoopex has once again proved the point.

"Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-FILTER&@clara.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:1190720736.61758.0@iris.uk.clara.net...
>
>  wrote in message 
> news:1190719752.775549.284200@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
>> I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
>> insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
>> The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
>> meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
>> his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
>> sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
>> could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
>> thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
>> you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
>> well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
>> we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
>>
>>
> Reactions from other newsgroups posters are different in every context - 
> Heated debate occurs in lots of ng's. This is particularly true of rival 
> footy groups. I've no got no love for Man Utd as a team, or many other 
> teams for that matter, but if my emnity (and believe it or not it 
> sometimes is) reduced me to a level of threats of violence or disgusting 
> insults about someones afflictions or handicaps I'd be whole heartedly 
> ashamed and deserve to be castigated. Of course, i'll take the piss - god 
> knows as a Leeds fan I've received enough piss-taking over the last 4 
> years, but it's when taking the piss crosses the line that bothers me. 
> Certain posters such as RD can cause adverse reactions, and we've had a 
> couple of run-ins in the past - but i think he'd be the first to agree 
> that i fight fire with fire, not fire with insults and threats.

lol! fucking keyboard ninjas, soft as shit in real life, just a carry on 
from the days of citizens band radio, they were called microphone ninjas, 
the likes of scoopex and red devil etc, are in reality, sad and lonely and 
need to be pittied rather than fed.

"Dan"  wrote in message 
news:FF6Ki.37606$Db6.19269@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>
> "Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-FILTER&@clara.co.uk> wrote in message 
> news:1190720736.61758.0@iris.uk.clara.net...
>>
>>  wrote in message 
>> news:1190719752.775549.284200@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
>>> insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
>>> The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
>>> meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
>>> his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
>>> sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
>>> could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
>>> thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
>>> you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
>>> well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
>>> we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
>>>
>>>
>> Reactions from other newsgroups posters are different in every context - 
>> Heated debate occurs in lots of ng's. This is particularly true of rival 
>> footy groups. I've no got no love for Man Utd as a team, or many other 
>> teams for that matter, but if my emnity (and believe it or not it 
>> sometimes is) reduced me to a level of threats of violence or disgusting 
>> insults about someones afflictions or handicaps I'd be whole heartedly 
>> ashamed and deserve to be castigated. Of course, i'll take the piss - god 
>> knows as a Leeds fan I've received enough piss-taking over the last 4 
>> years, but it's when taking the piss crosses the line that bothers me. 
>> Certain posters such as RD can cause adverse reactions, and we've had a 
>> couple of run-ins in the past - but i think he'd be the first to agree 
>> that i fight fire with fire, not fire with insults and threats.
>
> lol! fucking keyboard ninjas, soft as shit in real life, just a carry on 
> from the days of citizens band radio, they were called microphone ninjas, 
> the likes of scoopex and red devil etc, are in reality, sad and lonely and 
> need to be pittied rather than fed.
>
>
I get your point. Anonymity can be used as a shield for cowards. However, RD 
whilst an annoying fucker :) does have an ability to wind folks up without 
resorting to threats and insults.  Yes RD can talk shite a lot of the time 
(my opinion) but i'd never advocate he stopped posting or blocking him.

lawrence13@sky.com wrote:
> On Sep 25, 1:43 pm, "Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-
> FILT...@clara.co.uk> wrote:
>>  wrote in message
>>
>> news:1190719752.775549.284200@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
>>> insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
>>> The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
>>> meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
>>> his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
>>> sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
>>> could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
>>> thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
>>> you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
>>> well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
>>> we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
>> Reactions from other newsgroups posters are different in every context -
>> Heated debate occurs in lots of ng's. This is particularly true of rival
>> footy groups. I've no got no love for Man Utd as a team, or many other teams
>> for that matter, but if my emnity (and believe it or not it sometimes is)
>> reduced me to a level of threats of violence or disgusting insults about
>> someones afflictions or handicaps I'd be whole heartedly ashamed and deserve
>> to be castigated. Of course, i'll take the piss - god knows as a Leeds fan
>> I've received enough piss-taking over the last 4 years, but it's when taking
>> the piss crosses the line that bothers me. Certain posters such as RD can
>> cause adverse reactions, and we've had a couple of run-ins in the past - but
>> i think he'd be the first to agree that i fight fire with fire, not fire
>> with insults and threats.
> 
> I see scoopex has once again proved the point.
> 

oh fuckoff knobsack.

lol. :)

-- 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/scoopex/

Dan wrote:
> "Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-FILTER&@clara.co.uk> wrote in message 
> news:1190720736.61758.0@iris.uk.clara.net...
>>  wrote in message 
>> news:1190719752.775549.284200@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
>>> insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
>>> The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
>>> meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
>>> his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
>>> sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
>>> could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
>>> thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
>>> you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
>>> well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
>>> we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
>>>
>>>
>> Reactions from other newsgroups posters are different in every context - 
>> Heated debate occurs in lots of ng's. This is particularly true of rival 
>> footy groups. I've no got no love for Man Utd as a team, or many other 
>> teams for that matter, but if my emnity (and believe it or not it 
>> sometimes is) reduced me to a level of threats of violence or disgusting 
>> insults about someones afflictions or handicaps I'd be whole heartedly 
>> ashamed and deserve to be castigated. Of course, i'll take the piss - god 
>> knows as a Leeds fan I've received enough piss-taking over the last 4 
>> years, but it's when taking the piss crosses the line that bothers me. 
>> Certain posters such as RD can cause adverse reactions, and we've had a 
>> couple of run-ins in the past - but i think he'd be the first to agree 
>> that i fight fire with fire, not fire with insults and threats.
> 
> lol! fucking keyboard ninjas, soft as shit in real life, just a carry on 
> from the days of citizens band radio, they were called microphone ninjas, 
> the likes of scoopex and red devil etc, are in reality, sad and lonely and 
> need to be pittied rather than fed.
> 
> 
> 

twat.

lol. :)

-- 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/scoopex/

"Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-FILTER&@clara.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:1190721609.64421.0@iris.uk.clara.net...
>
> "Dan"  wrote in message 
> news:FF6Ki.37606$Db6.19269@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>>
>> "Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-FILTER&@clara.co.uk> wrote in message 
>> news:1190720736.61758.0@iris.uk.clara.net...
>>>
>>>  wrote in message 
>>> news:1190719752.775549.284200@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
>>>> insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
>>>> The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
>>>> meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
>>>> his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
>>>> sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
>>>> could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
>>>> thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
>>>> you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
>>>> well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
>>>> we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Reactions from other newsgroups posters are different in every context - 
>>> Heated debate occurs in lots of ng's. This is particularly true of rival 
>>> footy groups. I've no got no love for Man Utd as a team, or many other 
>>> teams for that matter, but if my emnity (and believe it or not it 
>>> sometimes is) reduced me to a level of threats of violence or disgusting 
>>> insults about someones afflictions or handicaps I'd be whole heartedly 
>>> ashamed and deserve to be castigated. Of course, i'll take the piss - 
>>> god knows as a Leeds fan I've received enough piss-taking over the last 
>>> 4 years, but it's when taking the piss crosses the line that bothers me. 
>>> Certain posters such as RD can cause adverse reactions, and we've had a 
>>> couple of run-ins in the past - but i think he'd be the first to agree 
>>> that i fight fire with fire, not fire with insults and threats.
>>
>> lol! fucking keyboard ninjas, soft as shit in real life, just a carry on 
>> from the days of citizens band radio, they were called microphone ninjas, 
>> the likes of scoopex and red devil etc, are in reality, sad and lonely 
>> and need to be pittied rather than fed.
>>
>>
> I get your point. Anonymity can be used as a shield for cowards. However, 
> RD whilst an annoying fucker :) does have an ability to wind folks up 
> without resorting to threats and insults.  Yes RD can talk shite a lot of 
> the time (my opinion) but i'd never advocate he stopped posting or 
> blocking him.

I've blocked everyone who annoys me, and i can tell you it's fucking heaven, 
i don't need to be wound up over a frigging newsgroup, it's not real life, 
it's a fucking cyber world, i also block those silly CUNTS who reply to the 
weirdos and freaks, even 2 of my fellow leeds fans are on my blocked list 
for replying to the arseholes, liverpool fans  have enough intelligence to 
block the very people who ruined thier once good newsgroup. they had the 
intelligence to stop buying the sun newspaper for ruining thier reputations, 
but not blocking people who sully it once more. i used to post on thier 
group a lot a cople of years ago, even wishing them luck in the CL final, 
but last year i was hoping and praying they'd lose, for no other reason than 
having to read the several freaks who post on thier newsgroup, giving the 
impression that liverpool fans really are the scummiest cunts in the 
country. since i blocked those piss stained little kids, i'm slowly getting 
to like reading the group once again, until someone new replies to them 
causing me to read thier posts. then it's more in the bucket.
>
>
>
>
>

"scoopex"  wrote in message
news:46f8f2c4$0$28221$a9266ab1@news.buzzardnews.com...
> lawrence13@sky.com wrote:
>> On Sep 25, 1:00 pm, "Stefan Walker" <stefan.walker&SPAM-
>> FILT...@clara.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Following on (though not related) to Lawrence's post about spam.
>>>
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4805760.stm
>>>
>>> And the Institute for public policy research:-
>>>
>>> "ippr's report cites evidence that identifies seven types of
>>> cyber-bullying,
>>> ranging from abusive text messages, e-mails and phone calls to bullying
>>> in
>>> internet chatrooms, social networking sites and instant messaging. It
>>> says
>>> that up to one in five pupils in London schools have experienced some
>>> form
>>> of cyber-bullying and that the psychological impact was similar to or
>>> worse
>>> than traditional bullying, partly because it allows the bully to accost
>>> the
>>> victim outside of school hours. And worryingly, a third of victims had
>>> never
>>> told an adult about the problem: in 2005 just four percent said that
>>> their
>>> child had been bullied online."
>>>
>>> I find this whole trend of 'cyber-bullying' quite disturbing. Not the
>>> fact
>>> that the bullying happens to kids - That's a by-product of human
>>> society.
>>> Just the fact that as a race embracing a new mass form of communication
>>> has
>>> comes at a cost to some that are vulnerable. In the early days of net
>>> chat
>>> it was perceived as a way of communicating with others in a more
>>> impersonal
>>> way and therefore relatively risk free. But now, we've got death-threats
>>> suicides and attempted suicides.
>>>
>>> Sad, very sad...
>>
>> It is a problem as you know I can get quite agitated and angry on the
>> rare occasion this however is in response to some of the sheer nasty
>> very personel insults that can fly around things that you would never
>> say to someones face . As for me would never dream of making those
>> types of remarks in the first place. So tempers can  flare.
>>
>> I've recently been at it with PMD  it finally got down to personally
>> insulting threatening  emails and as usual things can get quite nasty.
>> The last mail I received from him after I insisted if he wanted to
>> meet me that he  gives me his address was PMD saying he wouldn't put
>> his home and partner at risk.  I have to say that made me feel quite
>> sick that it had come to this and the thought that he felt that I
>> could be that sort of person was very concerning.  That was it I
>> thought enough is enough. However on the over side of the coin when
>> you look at some of the stuff that scoopex has said about RD's cancer
>> well it does go beyond the pale and if he said those things face face
>> we'd all justify RD or anyone smacking him in the gob.
>>
>>
>
> hope the cunt fucking dies baldy.
>
> lol. :)
>
> -- 
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/scoopex/

you must have a lot of cyber mates then Dan!

you might as well block me then you boring cunt coz you have just made 100 
triilon people dislike you as soon as you metioned sleepin with 
sheep!(leeds)

so then block me you fat bald dyslexic mong shagging sheep shagging 
transexual cock lord!

On 26 Sep, 09:26, "goaty"  wrote:
> you must have a lot of cyber mates then Dan!
>
> you might as well block me then you boring cunt coz you have just made 100
> triilon people dislike you as soon as you metioned sleepin with
> sheep!(leeds)
>
> so then block me you fat bald dyslexic mong shagging sheep shagging
> transexual cock lord!

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

"nigeleeezzzz"  wrote in message 
news:1190795991.407854.50080@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On 26 Sep, 09:26, "goaty"  wrote:
>> you must have a lot of cyber mates then Dan!
>>
>> you might as well block me then you boring cunt coz you have just made 
>> 100
>> triilon people dislike you as soon as you metioned sleepin with
>> sheep!(leeds)
>>
>> so then block me you fat bald dyslexic mong shagging sheep shagging
>> transexual cock lord!
>
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>

great reply there again nigelzzzz did you mum help you?

"goaty"  wrote in message 
news:SVpKi.401$%q2.101@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "nigeleeezzzz"  wrote in message 
> news:1190795991.407854.50080@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> On 26 Sep, 09:26, "goaty"  wrote:
>>> you must have a lot of cyber mates then Dan!
>>>
>>> you might as well block me then you boring cunt coz you have just made 
>>> 100
>>> triilon people dislike you as soon as you metioned sleepin with
>>> sheep!(leeds)
>>>
>>> so then block me you fat bald dyslexic mong shagging sheep shagging
>>> transexual cock lord!
>>
>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>
>
> great reply there again nigelzzzz did you mum help you?
 You do make me laugh Goaty, but thankfully unlike scoopex you never go 
beyond the pale. However all this use of the word bald being used as a 
derogotory term is rather worrying and smacks of rampant group baldism

lawrence jenkins wrote:
> "goaty"  wrote in message 
> news:SVpKi.401$%q2.101@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
>> "nigeleeezzzz"  wrote in message 
>> news:1190795991.407854.50080@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 26 Sep, 09:26, "goaty"  wrote:
>>>> you must have a lot of cyber mates then Dan!
>>>>
>>>> you might as well block me then you boring cunt coz you have just made 
>>>> 100
>>>> triilon people dislike you as soon as you metioned sleepin with
>>>> sheep!(leeds)
>>>>
>>>> so then block me you fat bald dyslexic mong shagging sheep shagging
>>>> transexual cock lord!
>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>>
>> great reply there again nigelzzzz did you mum help you?
>  You do make me laugh Goaty, but thankfully unlike scoopex you never go 
> beyond the pale. However all this use of the word bald being used as a 
> derogotory term is rather worrying and smacks of rampant group baldism 
> 
> 

baldy fuckwit.

lol. :)

-- 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/scoopex/