|
|
|
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:43:38 +0100,
group: uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic
back
What we need NOT to do
Am i right in saying that for Rangers to LOSE the league we need to
Lose another 2 games (celtic win by 2 points) unlikely
Lose 1 game draw 1 game (celtic could win on goal difference) Hmmmm, doubt
it, though not beyond the possibilities
Draw 2 games ( celtic could/would win on goal difference) hope not
Draw 3 games (celtic win by two points) remote
while celtic need to win ALL their games ?
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me.
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:43:38 +0100
author: Voice Of Reason Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and Rangers
Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
The rest is right.
--
JMcG67
'[image: http://i25.tinypic.com/2qsnghu.jpg]' (http://tinypic.com)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JMcG67's Profile: http://www.monthehoops.co.uk/member.php?userid=13
View this thread: http://www.monthehoops.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2751
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:54:59 +0200
author: JMcG67
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"JMcG67" wrote in message
news:JMcG67.38jc2w@no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au...
>
> Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and Rangers
> Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
>
> The rest is right.
>
>
> --
> JMcG67
Thats actually scenario 2, but your right, my mistake. I was taking the draw
as one point dropped instead of two, voddy and spice rum mix dont make good
maths sklls LOL
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me.
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:06:57 +0100
author: Voice Of Reason Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> "JMcG67" wrote:
>
> > Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and Rangers
> > Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
>
> > The rest is right.
>
>
> Thats actually scenario 2, but your right, my mistake. I was taking the draw
> as one point dropped instead of two, voddy and spice rum mix dont make good
> maths sklls LOL
I blame the Scottish education system myself... ;)
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
author: liam*
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"liam*" wrote in message
news:d266cac8-7b27-43f8-adb6-c2cb6aedcb09@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>> "JMcG67" wrote:
>>
>> > Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and Rangers
>> > Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
>>
>> > The rest is right.
>>
>>
>> Thats actually scenario 2, but your right, my mistake. I was taking the
>> draw
>> as one point dropped instead of two, voddy and spice rum mix dont make
>> good
>> maths sklls LOL
>
> I blame the Scottish education system myself... ;)
Aye but it would have been worse if i had a seperate education.;o)
A bit like the celtic fan on the radio clyde (sure it was clyde, might have
been radio scotland) phone in 11 days ago who was convinced that since
celtic had beaten Rangers and also had two games in hand there was no way
that they could be caught, oops, shoulda went to specsavers before looking
at the league table i think
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me.
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:55 +0100
author: Voice Of Reason Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
> > "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> >> "JMcG67" wrote:
>
> >> > Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and Rangers
> >> > Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
>
> >> > The rest is right.
>
> >> Thats actually scenario 2, but your right, my mistake. I was taking the
> >> draw
> >> as one point dropped instead of two, voddy and spice rum mix dont make
> >> good
> >> maths sklls LOL
>
> > I blame the Scottish education system myself... ;)
>
> Aye but it would have been worse if i had a seperate education.;o)
> A bit like the celtic fan on the radio clyde (sure it was clyde, might have
> been radio scotland) phone in 11 days ago who was convinced that since
> celtic had beaten Rangers and also had two games in hand there was no way
> that they could be caught, oops, shoulda went to specsavers before looking
> at the league table i think
The Celt had obviously forgotton about those 14 fixtures that you've
still to play in the last week of the season... ;)
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
author: liam*
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"liam*" wrote in message
news:830965b3-8ef8-4e93-8eb5-b09b6d819ba7@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
> "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>> "liam*" wrote:
>> > "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>> >> "JMcG67" wrote:
>>
>> >> > Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and
>> >> > Rangers
>> >> > Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
>>
>> >> > The rest is right.
>>
>> >> Thats actually scenario 2, but your right, my mistake. I was taking
>> >> the
>> >> draw
>> >> as one point dropped instead of two, voddy and spice rum mix dont make
>> >> good
>> >> maths sklls LOL
>>
>> > I blame the Scottish education system myself... ;)
>>
>> Aye but it would have been worse if i had a seperate education.;o)
>> A bit like the celtic fan on the radio clyde (sure it was clyde, might
>> have
>> been radio scotland) phone in 11 days ago who was convinced that since
>> celtic had beaten Rangers and also had two games in hand there was no way
>> that they could be caught, oops, shoulda went to specsavers before
>> looking
>> at the league table i think
>
> The Celt had obviously forgotton about those 14 fixtures that you've
> still to play in the last week of the season... ;)
Na, more like he couldnt count
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me.
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:23:58 +0100
author: Voice Of Reason Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
> > "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> >> "liam*" wrote:
> >> > "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> >> >> "JMcG67" wrote:
>
> >> >> > Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and
> >> >> > Rangers
> >> >> > Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
>
> >> >> > The rest is right.
>
> >> >> Thats actually scenario 2, but your right, my mistake. I was taking
> >> >> the
> >> >> draw
> >> >> as one point dropped instead of two, voddy and spice rum mix dont make
> >> >> good
> >> >> maths sklls LOL
>
> >> > I blame the Scottish education system myself... ;)
>
> >> Aye but it would have been worse if i had a seperate education.;o)
> >> A bit like the celtic fan on the radio clyde (sure it was clyde, might
> >> have
> >> been radio scotland) phone in 11 days ago who was convinced that since
> >> celtic had beaten Rangers and also had two games in hand there was no way
> >> that they could be caught, oops, shoulda went to specsavers before
> >> looking
> >> at the league table i think
>
> > The Celt had obviously forgotton about those 14 fixtures that you've
> > still to play in the last week of the season... ;)
>
> Na, more like he couldnt count
Well, once you sober up you could give him lessons Mr Morgans Spiced
Rum... :¬)
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
author: liam*
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"liam*" wrote in message
news:753bd7d3-d173-43b2-abc8-1e6d32493a45@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
"Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
> > "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> >> "liam*" wrote:
> >> > "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
> >> >> "JMcG67" wrote:
>
> >> >> > Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and
> >> >> > Rangers
> >> >> > Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
>
> >> >> > The rest is right.
>
> >> >> Thats actually scenario 2, but your right, my mistake. I was taking
> >> >> the
> >> >> draw
> >> >> as one point dropped instead of two, voddy and spice rum mix dont
> >> >> make
> >> >> good
> >> >> maths sklls LOL
>
> >> > I blame the Scottish education system myself... ;)
>
> >> Aye but it would have been worse if i had a seperate education.;o)
> >> A bit like the celtic fan on the radio clyde (sure it was clyde, might
> >> have
> >> been radio scotland) phone in 11 days ago who was convinced that since
> >> celtic had beaten Rangers and also had two games in hand there was no
> >> way
> >> that they could be caught, oops, shoulda went to specsavers before
> >> looking
> >> at the league table i think
>
> > The Celt had obviously forgotton about those 14 fixtures that you've
> > still to play in the last week of the season... ;)
>
> Na, more like he couldnt count
>Well, once you sober up you could give him lessons Mr Morgans Spiced
>Rum... :¬)
You theyin ammm pithed hic !
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me.
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:12:15 +0100
author: Voice Of Reason Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"Voice Of Reason" wrote
> "liam*" wrote
> "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>> "liam*" wrote:
>> > "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>> >> "liam*" wrote:
>> >> > "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>> >> >> "JMcG67" wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > Scenario 1 is wrong. If Celtic win their remaining games, and
>> >> >> > Rangers
>> >> >> > Lose 1 and Draw 1, Celtic win the league by 1 point.
>>
>> >> >> > The rest is right.
>>
>> >> >> Thats actually scenario 2, but your right, my mistake. I was taking
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> draw
>> >> >> as one point dropped instead of two, voddy and spice rum mix dont
>> >> >> make
>> >> >> good
>> >> >> maths sklls LOL
>>
>> >> > I blame the Scottish education system myself... ;)
>>
>> >> Aye but it would have been worse if i had a seperate education.;o)
>> >> A bit like the celtic fan on the radio clyde (sure it was clyde, might
>> >> have
>> >> been radio scotland) phone in 11 days ago who was convinced that since
>> >> celtic had beaten Rangers and also had two games in hand there was no
>> >> way
>> >> that they could be caught, oops, shoulda went to specsavers before
>> >> looking
>> >> at the league table i think
>>
>> > The Celt had obviously forgotton about those 14 fixtures that you've
>> > still to play in the last week of the season... ;)
>>
>> Na, more like he couldnt count
>
>>Well, once you sober up you could give him lessons Mr Morgans Spiced
>>Rum... :¬)
>
> You theyin ammm pithed hic !
lol...nice one VOR...and another thing, if you win all your remaining games
this year, Rangers would have the most successful season of any Scottish
side in a generation...and then you really would have cause for voddies with
rum mixer...
date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:43:18 +0100
author: liam
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
On 27 Apr, 17:43, "Voice Of Reason" <Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn>
wrote:
> Am i right in saying that for Rangers to LOSE the league we need to
>
> Lose another 2 games (celtic win by 2 points) unlikely
>
> Lose 1 game draw 1 game (celtic could win on goal difference) Hmmmm, doubt> it, though not beyond the possibilities
>
> Draw 2 games ( celtic could/would win on goal difference) hope not
>
> Draw 3 games (celtic win by two points) remote
>
> while celtic need to win ALL their games ?
>
> --
>
> V.O.R.
>
> If you dont believe me, ask me.
From 6th April:
Rangers 8 Games left
celtic 7 games left
Points difference now Rangers
If Rangers draw the last 8 games: 8points from 24 (*equal to winning
2 losing 5 and drawing 1*) : Total points 83
If celtic draw 2 and win 5 they win 17 points: Total points 85
FUCK IT: Rangers need to get 90 points to guarantee winning the
league.
5 wins & 3 losses (15 points), or
4 wins, 3 draws & 1 loss (15 points)
3 wins & 5 draws (14 points), or
2 wins & 6 draws, (12 points),or
1 win & 7 draws (10 points) or
NOW:
celtic Played 35: goals 80pts
Motherwell(a) Hibs(h) Dundee utd(a)
Rangers Played 32: goals 75 points
Hibs(a)Motherwell(h)Dundee utd(h)Aberdeen(a) {St mirren(a)
Motherwell(a)TBA}
We still need 90 points to guarantee winning the league.
date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
author: Tommy
|
Re: What we need NOT to do
"Tommy" wrote
>
>We still need 90 points to guarantee winning the league.
Now Tommy be honest, have you been drinking in Bar VOR? ;)
date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:36:06 +0100
author: liam*
|
|
|
