Someone is hijacking my name.  I did not write that last message Re: Roll 
call .

celticbhoy60 wrote:
> Someone is hijacking my name.  I did not write that last message Re: Roll 
> call . 
> 
> 

I presume it's Jimmy Bigot spoofing - there were quite a number of them 
this morning.

"celticbhoy60" wrote:
>
> Someone is hijacking my name.  I did not write that last message Re: Roll
> call .

Happened to me too John. I wish someone of the posters in here would
get hijacked... ;)

"liam*"  wrote in message
news:afb812be-4f39-41b5-9686-d41050131a37@v17g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
"celticbhoy60" wrote:
>
> Someone is hijacking my name. I did not write that last message Re: Roll
> call .

Happened to me too John. I wish someone of the posters in here would
get hijacked... ;)

Name any names?  ;-)

"Will"  wrote in message
news:fn4i78$iga$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> celticbhoy60 wrote:
>> Someone is hijacking my name.  I did not write that last message Re: Roll
>> call .
>
> I presume it's Jimmy Bigot spoofing - there were quite a number of them
> this morning.

Yeah that was my first thought but not so sure

"celticbhoy60" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
> "celticbhoy60" wrote:
>
> > Someone is hijacking my name. I did not write that last message Re: Roll> > call .
>
> Happened to me too John. I wish someone of the posters in here would
> get hijacked... ;)
>
> Name any names?  ;-)

Naming names can apparently get you reported.. ;)

On Jan 22, 1:40 pm, "celticbhoy60"  wrote:
> "Will"  wrote in message
>
> news:fn4i78$iga$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>
> > celticbhoy60 wrote:
> >> Someone is hijacking my name.  I did not write that last message Re: Roll
> >> call .
>
> > I presume it's Jimmy Bigot spoofing - there were quite a number of them
> > this morning.
>
> Yeah that was my first thought but not so sure

Well you would be wrong John

On Jan 22, 10:57 am, Will  wrote:
> celticbhoy60 wrote:
> > Someone is hijacking my name.  I did not write that last message Re: Roll
> > call .
>
> I presume it's Jimmy Bigot spoofing - there were quite a number of them
> this morning.

Thats funny coming from you Will, apart from that i havent been here
for two days and you being the newsgroup genius on all things Pc and
Internet(so you told us) you should have figured out who.

Nobody knows , eh.

Its that M15 tosser who has highjacked all the usernames.

"Chuckles McGuigan"  wrote in message 
news:171b8734-d145-48e1-b75c-ee70a348d318@i72g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 22, 1:40 pm, "celticbhoy60"  wrote:
> "Will"  wrote in message
>
> news:fn4i78$iga$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>
> > celticbhoy60 wrote:
> >> Someone is hijacking my name. I did not write that last message Re: 
> >> Roll
> >> call .
>
> > I presume it's Jimmy Bigot spoofing - there were quite a number of them
> > this morning.
>
> Yeah that was my first thought but not so sure

Well you would be wrong John

Abuse report sent

General, to prosecute these two
    people, Pao Chee Wan and Wai Alan." Attorney General:--"My Lord,
    I intimated before that this matter was under consideration; I do
    not think I am at liberty to say under whose consideration."
    His Lordship:--"I direct the prosecution, and will take the
    responsibility. It is the course in England and I will pursue it
    here." The Attorney General:--"You have publicly directed it;
    and I will report it to the proper quarter." His Lordship:--"The
    Attorney General at home is constantly ordered by the Court to
    prosecute. On my responsibility alone I do this." The Attorney
    General:--"May I ask your Lordship to say on what charge?" His
    Lordship:--"Under Sections 50 and 51 of No. 4 of 1865, and also
    for assault." The Attorney General continued to raise objections,
    when the Chief Justice said: "I have said as much as I choose to
    say, and I will not be put to question by the Attorney General. If
    you have any difficulty, come to the Court in Chambers."

Governor Hennessy, in reporting the incident to the Secretary of State
at Lon