Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he went 
home disappointed.

Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, then 
he didn't make a pass in the last 20.

And another clean-sheet!!

"dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
> went home disappointed.
>
> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>
> And another clean-sheet!!

FFS - what u doing posting about football??? ;-)

"dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
> went home disappointed.

Why would he be dissapointed ?

>
> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>
> And another clean-sheet!!

I should certainly hope so when playing against a team that's sitting 2nd 
bottom of the table and your teams 2nd from the top and playing at home, or 
is that a good result for Celtic in your eyes ?
Cant really work out what your trying to imply in this post mate.
It looks like you think Michael McCurry has a hidden agenda a gainst celtic 
and that a one nil win (via an O.G.(but they all count )) against 2nd bottom 
Kilmarnock is a great result at CP

P.S. clean sheet should not be hyphenated

-- 


V.O.R.

If you dont believe me, ask me.

In article ,
 "Voice Of Reason" <Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn> wrote:

> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
> > Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
> > went home disappointed.
> 
> Why would he be dissapointed ?
> 
> > Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
> > then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
> >
> > And another clean-sheet!!
> 
> I should certainly hope so when playing against a team that's sitting 2nd 
> bottom of the table and your teams 2nd from the top and playing at home, or 
> is that a good result for Celtic in your eyes ?
> Cant really work out what your trying to imply in this post mate.
> It looks like you think Michael McCurry has a hidden agenda a gainst celtic 
> and that a one nil win (via an O.G.(but they all count )) against 2nd bottom 
> Kilmarnock is a great result at CP
> 
> P.S. clean sheet should not be hyphenated

Don't you just love it when someone who can't spell has the cheek to 
pull someone else up for their grammar? Very disappointing. ;)


Casper

"dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
> went home disappointed.
>
> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>
> And another clean-sheet!!
>

I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in the 
past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but no 
cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.

"Casper" <casper@nt/world.com> wrote in message 
news:casper-430567.02122920012008@news.ntli.net...
> In article ,
> "Voice Of Reason" <Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn> wrote:
>
>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
>> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> > Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it 
>> > did.
>> > Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he
>> > went home disappointed.
>>
>> Why would he be dissapointed ?
>>
>> > Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so,
>> > then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>> >
>> > And another clean-sheet!!
>>
>> I should certainly hope so when playing against a team that's sitting 2nd
>> bottom of the table and your teams 2nd from the top and playing at home, 
>> or
>> is that a good result for Celtic in your eyes ?
>> Cant really work out what your trying to imply in this post mate.
>> It looks like you think Michael McCurry has a hidden agenda a gainst 
>> celtic
>> and that a one nil win (via an O.G.(but they all count )) against 2nd 
>> bottom
>> Kilmarnock is a great result at CP
>>
>> P.S. clean sheet should not be hyphenated
>
> Don't you just love it when someone who can't spell has the cheek to
> pull someone else up for their grammar? Very disappointing. ;)
>
>
> Casper
well u cant spoke englian right

In article ,
 "andy"  wrote:

> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
> > Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
> > went home disappointed.
> >
> > Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
> > then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
> >
> > And another clean-sheet!!
> 
> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in the 
> past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but no 
> cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried. 

Thankfully you're not, and we're not. Things will rectify themselves 
shortly. Meantime, we'll take the 3 points and move on. Good luck up at 
ICT this afternoon.. It's going to be effing baltic and blowing a gale. 
I'm sure you'll cope, though. 

Casper

In article ,
 "andy"  wrote:

> "Casper" <casper@nt/world.com> wrote in message 
> news:casper-430567.02122920012008@news.ntli.net...
> >
> > Don't you just love it when someone who can't spell has the cheek to
> > pull someone else up for their grammar? Very disappointing. ;)
> 
> well u cant spoke englian right 

Pissed again, Andy? Can't say I blame you. Hey, at least you might get 
to see your team at home tomorrow. ;)


Casper

"andy"  wrote in message 
news:YcmdnT1j5KAvMw_anZ2dnUVZ8vGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
>> went home disappointed.
>>
>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>
>> And another clean-sheet!!
>>
>
> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in 
> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but 
> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.

Years ago?????There was me thinking the PLG era wasnt classified as that 
yet!

JB

andy wrote:
> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
>> went home disappointed.
>>
>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>
>> And another clean-sheet!!
>>
> 
> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in the 
> past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but no 
> cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried. 
> 
> 

There was me thinking we have the top two scorers in the league, and you 
play one up front, with the one usually doing lamp post impressions for 
the majority of games.

I think you've got it the wrong way around mate.

Casper wrote:
> In article ,
>  "andy"  wrote:
> 
>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
>> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
>>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
>>> went home disappointed.
>>>
>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>>
>>> And another clean-sheet!!
>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in the 
>> past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but no 
>> cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried. 
> 
> Thankfully you're not, and we're not. Things will rectify themselves 
> shortly. Meantime, we'll take the 3 points and move on. Good luck up at 
> ICT this afternoon.. It's going to be effing baltic and blowing a gale. 
> I'm sure you'll cope, though. 
> 
> Casper

I'm sure Rangers will be fine up there with the dynamic and potent 
attack that Andy has been telling us about.

"Voice Of Reason" <Voice-Of-Reason@Every-Turn> wrote in message 
news:13p56ln9tu7k8f6@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
>> went home disappointed.
>
> Why would he be dissapointed ?
>
>>
>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>
>> And another clean-sheet!!
>
> I should certainly hope so when playing against a team that's sitting 2nd 
> bottom of the table and your teams 2nd from the top and playing at home, 
> or is that a good result for Celtic in your eyes ?
> Cant really work out what your trying to imply in this post mate.
> It looks like you think Michael McCurry has a hidden agenda a gainst 
> celtic and that a one nil win (via an O.G.(but they all count )) against 
> 2nd bottom Kilmarnock is a great result at CP
>
> P.S. clean sheet should not be hyphenated
>
> -- 
Hilarious.   Thanks!!

"andy"  wrote in message 
news:YcmdnT1j5KAvMw_anZ2dnUVZ8vGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
>> went home disappointed.
>>
>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>
>> And another clean-sheet!!
>>
>
> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in 
> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but 
> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.

Nope, I thought a lot of decent play earned us 3 points.  A goal was always 
coming.

"ZB"  wrote in message 
news:5vf77uF1mghb7U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did. 
>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he 
>> went home disappointed.
>>
>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>
>> And another clean-sheet!!
>
> FFS - what u doing posting about football??? ;-)

I know, shame on me for my extremism.  Back to 'my club is bigger/better and 
less bigoted/racist than your club'.

And by the way, it's cheesy toast.

"Casper" <casper@nt/world.com> wrote in message 
news:casper-4A6F54.02472720012008@news.ntli.net...
> In article ,
> "andy"  wrote:
>
>> "Casper" <casper@nt/world.com> wrote in message
>> news:casper-430567.02122920012008@news.ntli.net...
>> >
>> > Don't you just love it when someone who can't spell has the cheek to
>> > pull someone else up for their grammar? Very disappointing. ;)
>>
>> well u cant spoke englian right
>
> Pissed again, Andy? Can't say I blame you. Hey, at least you might get
> to see your team at home tomorrow. ;)
>
>
> Casper

hah I wasnt pished, read the previous post

"Will"  wrote in message 
news:fmv65q$lji$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> Casper wrote:
>> In article ,
>>  "andy"  wrote:
>>
>>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
>>> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it 
>>>> did. Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual 
>>>> but he went home disappointed.
>>>>
>>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so, 
>>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>>>
>>>> And another clean-sheet!!
>>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
>>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in 
>>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but 
>>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>>
>> Thankfully you're not, and we're not. Things will rectify themselves 
>> shortly. Meantime, we'll take the 3 points and move on. Good luck up at 
>> ICT this afternoon.. It's going to be effing baltic and blowing a gale. 
>> I'm sure you'll cope, though. Casper
>
> I'm sure Rangers will be fine up there with the dynamic and potent attack 
> that Andy has been telling us about.

2-0 rangers today Will

"andy" wrote:
> "Will" wrote:
> > Casper wrote:
> >> In article ,
> >>  "andy"  wrote:
>
> >>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
> >>>news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it
> >>>> did. Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual
> >>>> but he went home disappointed.
>
> >>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so> >>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>
> >>>> And another clean-sheet!!
> >>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
> >>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in
> >>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but
> >>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>
> >> Thankfully you're not, and we're not. Things will rectify themselves
> >> shortly. Meantime, we'll take the 3 points and move on. Good luck up at> >> ICT this afternoon.. It's going to be effing baltic and blowing a gale.> >> I'm sure you'll cope, though. Casper
>
> > I'm sure Rangers will be fine up there with the dynamic and potent attack
> > that Andy has been telling us about.
>
> 2-0 rangers today Will

Maybe if you start playing 4-4-2....

"liam*"  wrote in message 
news:f775ee73-ec3d-46d7-ac54-0f8083c929a6@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
"andy" wrote:
> "Will" wrote:
> > Casper wrote:
> >> In article ,
> >> "andy"  wrote:
>
> >>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
> >>>news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it
> >>>> did. Might have started gettign a bit twitchy. McCurry was his usual
> >>>> but he went home disappointed.
>
> >>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say 
> >>>> so,
> >>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>
> >>>> And another clean-sheet!!
> >>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
> >>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers 
> >>> in
> >>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play 
> >>> but
> >>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>
> >> Thankfully you're not, and we're not. Things will rectify themselves
> >> shortly. Meantime, we'll take the 3 points and move on. Good luck up at
> >> ICT this afternoon.. It's going to be effing baltic and blowing a gale.
> >> I'm sure you'll cope, though. Casper
>
> > I'm sure Rangers will be fine up there with the dynamic and potent 
> > attack
> > that Andy has been telling us about.
>
> 2-0 rangers today Will

Maybe if you start playing 4-4-2....

Well it should have been 2-0

"dü the hüsker"  wrote in message 
news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it did.

>
> And another clean-sheet!!
>

Ahem

On Jan 20, 10:52 am, "dü the hüsker"  wrote:

> Nope, I thought a lot of decent play earned us 3 points.  A goal was always
> coming.

There was me thinking that Martyn Corrigan scoring in his own net got
yous three points, must be a new system that Fifa are trying out, in
the event of a draw award three points to the team that looked
decent..

"andy"  wrote in message 
news:qvmdnQn1IrV06A7anZ2dnUVZ8tWvnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "liam*"  wrote in message 
> news:f775ee73-ec3d-46d7-ac54-0f8083c929a6@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> "andy" wrote:
>> "Will" wrote:
>> > Casper wrote:
>> >> In article ,
>> >> "andy"  wrote:
>>
>> >>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
>> >>>news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> >>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it
>> >>>> did. Might have started gettign a bit twitchy. McCurry was his usual
>> >>>> but he went home disappointed.
>>
>> >>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say 
>> >>>> so,
>> >>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>
>> >>>> And another clean-sheet!!
>> >>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
>> >>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers 
>> >>> in
>> >>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play 
>> >>> but
>> >>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>>

Yes, we are dreadful up front, but we are have still scored more than anyone
else in the premere league and  Venegore is the the top scorer in the
premere league.  Not bad for playing dreadful up front.

It was noted in: (sJFkj.155296$036.99132@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of wisdom...:

> "andy"  wrote in message
> news:YcmdnT1j5KAvMw_anZ2dnUVZ8vGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
>> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it 
>>> did.
>>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he
>>> went home disappointed.
>>>
>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so,
>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>>
>>> And another clean-sheet!!
>>>
>>
>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in
>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but
>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>
> Nope, I thought a lot of decent play earned us 3 points.  A goal was 
> always
> coming.

So did the team stop TRYING to score a goal after 64 minutes? Because it 
never *did* come did it?


-- 
 www.bebo.com/bizenya79
 www.myspace.com/bizenya
If you are dialing from a touch-tone phone, Why do you call it 'dialing'?

"andy" wrote:
> "liam*" wrote:
> "andy" wrote:
> > "Will" wrote:
> > > Casper wrote:
> > >> In article ,
> > >> "andy"  wrote:
>
> > >>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
> > >>>news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > >>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it
> > >>>> did. Might have started gettign a bit twitchy. McCurry was his usual
> > >>>> but he went home disappointed.
>
> > >>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say
> > >>>> so,
> > >>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>
> > >>>> And another clean-sheet!!
> > >>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
> > >>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers
> > >>> in
> > >>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play> > >>> but
> > >>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>
> > >> Thankfully you're not, and we're not. Things will rectify themselves
> > >> shortly. Meantime, we'll take the 3 points and move on. Good luck up at
> > >> ICT this afternoon.. It's going to be effing baltic and blowing a gale.
> > >> I'm sure you'll cope, though. Casper
>
> > > I'm sure Rangers will be fine up there with the dynamic and potent
> > > attack
> > > that Andy has been telling us about.
>
> > 2-0 rangers today Will
>
> Maybe if you start playing 4-4-2....
>
> Well it should have been 2-0

Not sure the bookies would pay out on it...but you were kinda
close... ;)

On Jan 20, 6:24 pm, "celticbhoy60"  wrote:

>
> Yes, we are dreadful up front, but we are have still scored more than anyone
> else in the premere league and  Venegore is the the top scorer in the
> premere league.  Not bad for playing dreadful up front.


This Venegore guy which team does he play for in the premere league
and which country is it in?

" \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" <moc.liamG@aynezib> wrote in message 
news:I7KdnSA8VNseCA7anZ2dnUVZ8qqlnZ2d@bt.com...
> It was noted in: (sJFkj.155296$036.99132@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
> that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of 
> wisdom...:
>
>> "andy"  wrote in message
>> news:YcmdnT1j5KAvMw_anZ2dnUVZ8vGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>
>>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
>>> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it 
>>>> did.
>>>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but he
>>>> went home disappointed.
>>>>
>>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so,
>>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>>>
>>>> And another clean-sheet!!
>>>>
>>>
>>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
>>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers in
>>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play but
>>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>>
>> Nope, I thought a lot of decent play earned us 3 points.  A goal was 
>> always
>> coming.
>
> So did the team stop TRYING to score a goal after 64 minutes? Because it 
> never *did* come did it?
>
>

I think you'll find it came about the 64th minute.

It was noted in: (dSNkj.156610$036.153348@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of wisdom...:

> " \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" <moc.liamG@aynezib> wrote in message
> news:I7KdnSA8VNseCA7anZ2dnUVZ8qqlnZ2d@bt.com...
>> It was noted in: (sJFkj.155296$036.99132@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
>> that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of
>> wisdom...:
>>
>>> "andy"  wrote in message
>>> news:YcmdnT1j5KAvMw_anZ2dnUVZ8vGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
>>>> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it
>>>>> did.
>>>>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but 
>>>>> he
>>>>> went home disappointed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say so,
>>>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>>>>
>>>>> And another clean-sheet!!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
>>>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers 
>>>> in
>>>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play 
>>>> but
>>>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>>>
>>> Nope, I thought a lot of decent play earned us 3 points.  A goal was
>>> always
>>> coming.
>>
>> So did the team stop TRYING to score a goal after 64 minutes? Because it
>> never *did* come did it?
>>
>>
>
> I think you'll find it came about the 64th minute.

You can't see an accident coming, you are basically saying
"We were playing so well, they were bound to score an own goal"

??



-- 
 www.bebo.com/bizenya79
 www.myspace.com/bizenya
Why do psychics have to ask for your name?

" \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" <moc.liamG@aynezib> wrote in message 
news:27adnXbDCrXiQw7anZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
> It was noted in: (dSNkj.156610$036.153348@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
> that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of 
> wisdom...:
>
>> " \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" <moc.liamG@aynezib> wrote in message
>> news:I7KdnSA8VNseCA7anZ2dnUVZ8qqlnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> It was noted in: (sJFkj.155296$036.99132@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
>>> that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of
>>> wisdom...:
>>>
>>>> "andy"  wrote in message
>>>> news:YcmdnT1j5KAvMw_anZ2dnUVZ8vGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> "dü the hüsker"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:nptkj.9388$xm1.8082@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>> Thought we played well first half but thankful the goal came when it
>>>>>> did.
>>>>>> Might have started gettign a bit twitchy.  McCurry was his usual but 
>>>>>> he
>>>>>> went home disappointed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Donati was MOTM for me until I turned to the guy next to me to say 
>>>>>> so,
>>>>>> then he didn't make a pass in the last 20.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And another clean-sheet!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I take it you think a lucky own goal earned you 3 points?
>>>>> Celtic are playing dreadful upfront, a problem we have had at Rangers 
>>>>> in
>>>>> the past, the same script as we had years ago, lots of build up play 
>>>>> but
>>>>> no cutting edge, if I was you I would be worried.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I thought a lot of decent play earned us 3 points.  A goal was
>>>> always
>>>> coming.
>>>
>>> So did the team stop TRYING to score a goal after 64 minutes? Because it
>>> never *did* come did it?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think you'll find it came about the 64th minute.
>
> You can't see an accident coming, you are basically saying
> "We were playing so well, they were bound to score an own goal"
>
> ??
>
I said nothing like that and well you know it biz.  If you apply enough 
pressure, a goal of any form is very likely to come along.  Celtic must have 
had about 20 attempts on goal and I think I read we had 12 corners. 
Accidents or mistakes are forced by pressure and good play.

Anyway, from the subject title, I was making it clear that 3 points was the 
main thing.  I'm sure you don't care much that your victory today was 
fortunate.  3 points is the end result.

It was noted in: (ckRkj.156704$036.59231@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of wisdom...:

> " \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" <moc.liamG@aynezib> wrote in message
> news:27adnXbDCrXiQw7anZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
>> It was noted in: (dSNkj.156610$036.153348@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
>> that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of
>> wisdom...:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, I thought a lot of decent play earned us 3 points.  A goal was
>>>>> always
>>>>> coming.
>>>>
>>>> So did the team stop TRYING to score a goal after 64 minutes? Because 
>>>> it
>>>> never *did* come did it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think you'll find it came about the 64th minute.
>>
>> You can't see an accident coming, you are basically saying
>> "We were playing so well, they were bound to score an own goal"
>>
>> ??
>>
> I said nothing like that and well you know it biz.  If you apply enough
> pressure, a goal of any form is very likely to come along.  Celtic must 
> have
> had about 20 attempts on goal and I think I read we had 12 corners.
> Accidents or mistakes are forced by pressure and good play.
>
> Anyway, from the subject title, I was making it clear that 3 points was 
> the
> main thing.  I'm sure you don't care much that your victory today was
> fortunate.  3 points is the end result.

Fair enough.
I concede that I was being pedantic :-P

biz

-- 
 www.bebo.com/bizenya79
 www.myspace.com/bizenya
If it were not for Thomas Edison, we would all be watching television in the
dark. - Michael L.

" \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" <moc.liamG@aynezib> wrote in message 
news:bbGdnRwUF-O0dA7aRVnyjQA@bt.com...
> It was noted in: (ckRkj.156704$036.59231@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
> that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of 
> wisdom...:
>
>> " \¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" <moc.liamG@aynezib> wrote in message
>> news:27adnXbDCrXiQw7anZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> It was noted in: (dSNkj.156610$036.153348@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk),
>>> that dü the hüsker  spouted forth their words of
>>> wisdom...:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, I thought a lot of decent play earned us 3 points.  A goal was
>>>>>> always
>>>>>> coming.
>>>>>
>>>>> So did the team stop TRYING to score a goal after 64 minutes? Because 
>>>>> it
>>>>> never *did* come did it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think you'll find it came about the 64th minute.
>>>
>>> You can't see an accident coming, you are basically saying
>>> "We were playing so well, they were bound to score an own goal"
>>>
>>> ??
>>>
>> I said nothing like that and well you know it biz.  If you apply enough
>> pressure, a goal of any form is very likely to come along.  Celtic must 
>> have
>> had about 20 attempts on goal and I think I read we had 12 corners.
>> Accidents or mistakes are forced by pressure and good play.
>>
>> Anyway, from the subject title, I was making it clear that 3 points was 
>> the
>> main thing.  I'm sure you don't care much that your victory today was
>> fortunate.  3 points is the end result.
>
> Fair enough.
> I concede that I was being pedantic :-P
>
> biz
>
Are you feeling alright? ;-)