Leicester City
I need a conduit. There appears to be no recognised froup where I can
pass on my sympathies to Leicester City for their recent demotion to the
3rd tier.
What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
--
sack artist n.
Womaniser; gigolo; fanny rat.
date: Mon, 05 May 2008 02:15:54 +0100
author: Tommo ³
|
Re: Leicester City
yeah.
"Tommo ³" wrote in message
news:2LidnVg_h_JWwoPVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>I need a conduit. There appears to be no recognised froup where I can pass
>on my sympathies to Leicester City for their recent demotion to the 3rd
>tier.
>
> What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
>
> --
> sack artist n.
> Womaniser; gigolo; fanny rat.
date: Mon, 5 May 2008 13:14:15 +0100
author: Kevin asparagus dfs
|
Re: Leicester City
Tommo wrote
> What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
And why not ? The rest of us are.
Chris
--
Photography by Chris Gilbert
www.ravenseyegallery.co.uk
Affordable web sites
www.sitegateway.net
date: Mon, 05 May 2008 19:34:10 GMT
author: Chris Gilbert
|
Re: Leicester City
Chris Gilbert wrote:
> Tommo wrote
>
>
>>What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
>
>
> And why not ? The rest of us are.
>
> Chris
I'm not.
Holloway was a good laugh and I think he's a decent manager. What I
don't understand is how they came to own Derby's two best prem players.
And my lot will be in the prem next season and back in the championship
the following season, possibly after breaking Derby's records.
date: Mon, 05 May 2008 22:41:18 +0100
author: nigel
|
Re: Leicester City
nigel wrote:
> Chris Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Tommo wrote
>>
>>> What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
>>
>> And why not ? The rest of us are.
>
> I'm not.
>
> Holloway was a good laugh and I think he's a decent manager. What I
> don't understand is how they came to own Derby's two best prem
> players.
I actually met Holloway a few years back, and he struck me as a nice
bloke. He certainly knew his football anyway. I never liked Leicester
City though. Sorry.
> And my lot will be in the prem next season and back in the
> championship the following season, possibly after breaking Derby's
> records.
I doubt anybody will EVER be as bad as Derby County. They are the worst
team we've ever seen in the Premier League!
date: Tue, 6 May 2008 18:03:50 +0100
author: Stephen O'Connell
|
Re: Leicester City
Chris Gilbert wrote:
> Tommo wrote
>
>
>>What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
>
>
> And why not ? The rest of us are.
>
> Chris
Apart from Ben, who although delighted that Coventry escaped relegation,
is suffering personality implosion as all the supposed cuntspiracies
against him are rapidly unravelling.
date: Tue, 06 May 2008 22:21:08 +0100
author: nigel
|
Re: Leicester City
"nigel" wrote in message
news:eeSdnQ1S3opfVr3VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
> Apart from Ben, who although delighted that Coventry escaped relegation,
> is suffering personality implosion as all the supposed cuntspiracies
> against him are rapidly unravelling.
I was particularly amused when several hundred Stoke City fans actively and
inexplicably cuntspired collectively to keep Coventry in the Championship
towards the end of the match against Leicester. That was good.
--
Joe
"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 00:32:20 -0000
author: Joe Horowitz hey
|
Re: Leicester City
"Joe Horowitz" <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote in message
news:bU5Uj.32252$AL4.24416@newsfe23.ams2...
> I was particularly amused when several hundred Stoke City fans actively and inexplicably
> cuntspired collectively to keep Coventry in the Championship towards the end of the match
> against Leicester. That was good.
Or what about the despicable ABNs, who hacked into the great man's
Facebook account this evening and cuntspiratorially made this appear
on everyone's newsfeed:
Benjamin Nunn is no longer listed as "single."
I think it's a disgrace. The cuntspiracy has gone too far this time.
--
Mike
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 01:05:46 +0100
author: Michael Cunningham
|
Re: Leicester City
> Benjamin Nunn is no longer listed as "single."
>
Guys. There's four horsemen at the door. They wondered if we'd be
interested in an "Apocalypse"? I said no, but I got a pamphlet.
Gra
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 01:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
author: Gra
|
Re: Leicester City
"Joe Horowitz" <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote in message
news:bU5Uj.32252$AL4.24416@newsfe23.ams2...
>
> "nigel" wrote in message
> news:eeSdnQ1S3opfVr3VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
>> Apart from Ben, who although delighted that Coventry escaped relegation,
>> is suffering personality implosion as all the supposed cuntspiracies
>> against him are rapidly unravelling.
>
> I was particularly amused when several hundred Stoke City fans actively
> and inexplicably cuntspired collectively to keep Coventry in the
> Championship towards the end of the match against Leicester. That was
> good.
There was an irony to that as Stoke were the first team I ever claimed to
support, when I was about 5.
BTN
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:23:30 +0100
author: Sir Benjamin Nunn
|
Re: Leicester City
"Tommo ³" wrote in message
news:2LidnVg_h_JWwoPVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
> I need a conduit. There appears to be no recognised froup where I can pass
> on my sympathies to Leicester City for their recent demotion to the 3rd
> tier.
>
> What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
It's amusing to see Leicester go down, but they didn't deserve to go. Not
really.
We didn't deserve to go either. Nor did Southampton, and Sheffield Wednesday
probably deserved to stay up too. So did Blackpool probably. And Barnsley.
etc.
It's just one of those weird, evenly-matched seasons where the usual rules
apply even though the scenario is an unusual one.
Leicester go down the best record of any team ever relegated (the only
previous team to go down with 52 points had a worse goal difference). If
they had scored a winner, we would have gone down with 53 points, which
would have been even more historically groundbreaking and cunspiratorial.
But it's a big sigh of relief, and Coleman can now build for next season,
where, if the rumoured Summer signings come to fruition, we'll probably be
challenging at the other end of the table.
BTN
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:28:52 +0100
author: Sir Benjamin Nunn
|
Re: Leicester City
"Michael Cunningham" wrote in message
news:fvqrov$kie$1@aioe.org...
>
> Benjamin Nunn is no longer listed as "single."
>
> I think it's a disgrace. The cuntspiracy has gone too far this time.
Heh. It could be 'Benjamin Nunn is now in a relationship' next.
And that would be seriously cuntspiratorial.
BTN
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:30:18 +0100
author: Sir Benjamin Nunn
|
Re: Leicester City
"Sir Benjamin Nunn" wrote in message
news:68de96F2rqpubU1@mid.individual.net...
> There was an irony to that as Stoke were the first team I ever claimed to support, when I
> was about 5.
Glory-hunter.
--
Mike
date: Thu, 8 May 2008 00:21:05 +0100
author: Michael Cunningham
|