Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
sport
athletics
baseball
betting
cricket
football
football....bradford-city
football...celtic
football...leeds-united
football...liverpool
football...man-city
football...newcast..united
football...rangers
football...southampton
football...sunderland
football...west-ham
football.american
football.scottish
golf
horseracing
ice-hockey
misc
orienteering
speedway
squash
swimming
  
 
date: Mon, 05 May 2008 02:15:54 +0100,    group: uk.sport.football        back       
Leicester City   
I need a conduit. There appears to be no recognised froup where I can 
pass on my sympathies to Leicester City for their recent demotion to the 
3rd tier.

What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?

-- 
sack artist   n.
Womaniser; gigolo; fanny rat.
date: Mon, 05 May 2008 02:15:54 +0100   author:   Tommo ³

Re: Leicester City   
yeah.


"Tommo ³"  wrote in message 
news:2LidnVg_h_JWwoPVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>I need a conduit. There appears to be no recognised froup where I can pass 
>on my sympathies to Leicester City for their recent demotion to the 3rd 
>tier.
>
> What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
>
> -- 
> sack artist   n.
> Womaniser; gigolo; fanny rat.
date: Mon, 5 May 2008 13:14:15 +0100   author:   Kevin asparagus dfs

Re: Leicester City   
Tommo wrote

> What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?

And why not ? The rest of us are.

Chris
--
Photography by Chris Gilbert
www.ravenseyegallery.co.uk
Affordable web sites
www.sitegateway.net
date: Mon, 05 May 2008 19:34:10 GMT   author:   Chris Gilbert

Re: Leicester City   
Chris Gilbert wrote:

> Tommo wrote
> 
> 
>>What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
> 
> 
> And why not ? The rest of us are.
> 
> Chris

I'm not.

Holloway was a good laugh and I think he's a decent manager. What I 
don't understand is how they came to own Derby's two best prem players.

And my lot will be in the prem next season and back in the championship 
the following season, possibly after breaking Derby's records.
date: Mon, 05 May 2008 22:41:18 +0100   author:   nigel

Re: Leicester City   
nigel wrote:
> Chris Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Tommo wrote
>>
>>> What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
>>
>> And why not ? The rest of us are.
>
> I'm not.
>
> Holloway was a good laugh and I think he's a decent manager. What I
> don't understand is how they came to own Derby's two best prem
> players.

I actually met Holloway a few years back, and he struck me as a nice
bloke. He certainly knew his football anyway. I never liked Leicester
City though. Sorry.

> And my lot will be in the prem next season and back in the
> championship the following season, possibly after breaking Derby's
> records.

I doubt anybody will EVER be as bad as Derby County. They are the worst
team we've ever seen in the Premier League!
date: Tue, 6 May 2008 18:03:50 +0100   author:   Stephen O'Connell

Re: Leicester City   
Chris Gilbert wrote:

> Tommo wrote
> 
> 
>>What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?
> 
> 
> And why not ? The rest of us are.
> 
> Chris

Apart from Ben, who although delighted that Coventry escaped relegation, 
is suffering personality implosion as all the supposed cuntspiracies 
against him are  rapidly unravelling.
date: Tue, 06 May 2008 22:21:08 +0100   author:   nigel

Re: Leicester City   
"nigel"  wrote in message 
news:eeSdnQ1S3opfVr3VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
> Apart from Ben, who although delighted that Coventry escaped relegation, 
> is suffering personality implosion as all the supposed cuntspiracies 
> against him are  rapidly unravelling.

I was particularly amused when several hundred Stoke City fans actively and 
inexplicably cuntspired collectively to keep Coventry in the Championship 
towards the end of the match against Leicester.  That was good.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 00:32:20 -0000   author:   Joe Horowitz hey

Re: Leicester City   
"Joe Horowitz" <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote in message
news:bU5Uj.32252$AL4.24416@newsfe23.ams2...
> I was particularly amused when several hundred Stoke City fans actively and inexplicably
> cuntspired collectively to keep Coventry in the Championship towards the end of the match
> against Leicester.  That was good.

Or what about the despicable ABNs, who hacked into the great man's
Facebook account this evening and cuntspiratorially made this appear
on everyone's newsfeed:

Benjamin Nunn is no longer listed as "single."

I think it's a disgrace.  The cuntspiracy has gone too far this time.


-- 
Mike
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 01:05:46 +0100   author:   Michael Cunningham

Re: Leicester City   
> Benjamin Nunn is no longer listed as "single."
>

Guys. There's four horsemen at the door. They wondered if we'd be
interested in an "Apocalypse"? I said no, but I got a pamphlet.

Gra
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 01:54:50 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Gra

Re: Leicester City   
"Joe Horowitz" <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote in message 
news:bU5Uj.32252$AL4.24416@newsfe23.ams2...
>
> "nigel"  wrote in message 
> news:eeSdnQ1S3opfVr3VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
>> Apart from Ben, who although delighted that Coventry escaped relegation, 
>> is suffering personality implosion as all the supposed cuntspiracies 
>> against him are  rapidly unravelling.
>
> I was particularly amused when several hundred Stoke City fans actively 
> and inexplicably cuntspired collectively to keep Coventry in the 
> Championship towards the end of the match against Leicester.  That was 
> good.


There was an irony to that as Stoke were the first team I ever claimed to 
support, when I was about 5.

BTN
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:23:30 +0100   author:   Sir Benjamin Nunn

Re: Leicester City   
"Tommo ³"  wrote in message 
news:2LidnVg_h_JWwoPVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
> I need a conduit. There appears to be no recognised froup where I can pass 
> on my sympathies to Leicester City for their recent demotion to the 3rd 
> tier.
>
> What are we supposed to do? Just laugh out loud?


It's amusing to see Leicester go down, but they didn't deserve to go. Not 
really.

We didn't deserve to go either. Nor did Southampton, and Sheffield Wednesday 
probably deserved to stay up too. So did Blackpool probably. And Barnsley. 
etc.

It's just one of those weird, evenly-matched seasons where the usual rules 
apply even though the scenario is an unusual one.

Leicester go down the best record of any team ever relegated (the only 
previous team to go down with 52 points had a worse goal difference). If 
they had scored a winner, we would have gone down with 53 points, which 
would have been even more historically groundbreaking and cunspiratorial.

But it's a big sigh of relief, and Coleman can now build for next season, 
where, if the rumoured Summer signings come to fruition, we'll probably be 
challenging at the other end of the table.

BTN
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:28:52 +0100   author:   Sir Benjamin Nunn

Re: Leicester City   
"Michael Cunningham"  wrote in message 
news:fvqrov$kie$1@aioe.org...
>
> Benjamin Nunn is no longer listed as "single."
>
> I think it's a disgrace.  The cuntspiracy has gone too far this time.


Heh. It could be 'Benjamin Nunn is now in a relationship' next.

And that would be seriously cuntspiratorial.

BTN
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:30:18 +0100   author:   Sir Benjamin Nunn

Re: Leicester City   
"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
news:68de96F2rqpubU1@mid.individual.net...
> There was an irony to that as Stoke were the first team I ever claimed to support, when I 
> was about 5.

Glory-hunter.


-- 
Mike
date: Thu, 8 May 2008 00:21:05 +0100   author:   Michael Cunningham

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us