Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
sport
athletics
baseball
betting
cricket
football
football....bradford-city
football...celtic
football...leeds-united
football...liverpool
football...man-city
football...newcast..united
football...rangers
football...southampton
football...sunderland
football...west-ham
football.american
football.scottish
golf
horseracing
ice-hockey
misc
orienteering
speedway
squash
swimming
  
 
date: 14 Dec 2007 09:35:58 GMT,    group: uk.sport.football        back       
A question for teh froup 2   
If I drove around the Merseyside and Mancuntian region during the week of 
5th-9th May, what are the odds of running into a UKSF'er for a pint and a 
muffin?

If anyone knows where Joe goes to grab his odds from, we could find out.

-- 
Cheers, Os
date: 14 Dec 2007 09:35:58 GMT   author:   Osbourne Ruddock

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
On 14 Dec, 09:35, Osbourne Ruddock  wrote:
> If I drove around the Merseyside and Mancuntian region during the week of
> 5th-9th May, what are the odds of running into a UKSF'er for a pint and a
> muffin?


                                     Home   Drawer  Aghey
Tony Pint n' Muffin vs Os   1.01    50        100

It's certainly youkworthy, although someone's draw system might like
the odds on the drawer. If you let me know say, six months in advance,
I can plant it in my empty social calendar.

If we could summon the spirits of Moog and Oscar G, it would be the
Northern Monkey Jambo 2008, coinciding with Liverpool's capital of
culture bid. If not, you'll have to put up with me and my lack of
knowledge of boombastic beats.

> If anyone knows where Joe goes to grab his odds from, we could find out.

 Hans Segers. HTH.
date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:19:06 -0800 (PST)   author:   Tony McChrystal

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
Tony McChrystal  wrote in
news:b5fb718c-7d5c-4c6a-8b6b-7079fc30f38a@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com: 

> 
>                                      Home   Drawer  Aghey
> Tony Pint n' Muffin vs Os   1.01    50        100

IBIOYF1P

> 
> It's certainly youkworthy, although someone's draw system might like
> the odds on the drawer. If you let me know say, six months in advance,
> I can plant it in my empty social calendar.

Is that in Outlook, Google or your drawer?

> 
> If we could summon the spirits of Moog and Oscar G, it would be the
> Northern Monkey Jambo 2008, coinciding with Liverpool's capital of
> culture bid. If not, you'll have to put up with me and my lack of
> knowledge of boombastic beats.

Sounds fantastic. We can have a pint and a muffin or a bum and scone, 
whatever takes our fancy.

Would a mid-week game at Anfield on May 7-8 be a wise idea? My son seems 
to think so, being a junior redshite'n'all.

> 
>> If anyone knows where Joe goes to grab his odds from, we could find
>> out. 
> 
>  Hans Segers. HTH.

Really? With Guppings and Bobby Internet and Joe'n'shit?

-- 
Cheers, Os
date: 15 Dec 2007 00:03:49 GMT   author:   Osbourne Ruddock

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
Tony McChrystal wrote:
> 
> If we could summon the spirits of Moog and Oscar G, it would be the
> Northern Monkey Jambo 2008, coinciding with Liverpool's capital of
> culture bid. 

One. Big. Clique.

BlueRoo
date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:32:40 +0000   author:   Roo

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
"Roo"  wrote in message 
news:5so87pF1abg7uU3@mid.individual.net...
> Tony McChrystal wrote:
>>
>> If we could summon the spirits of Moog and Oscar G, it would be the
>> Northern Monkey Jambo 2008, coinciding with Liverpool's capital of
>> culture bid.
>
> One. Big. Clique.

Are you upset because TonyMac didn't think to mention you in the above 
offhand sentence?  Maybe then at worst you could accuse TonyMac of being one 
big clique, and reserve judgement on the rest of us.  Hmmm?  Think about it.

Besides which, I think what Osbourne is actually proposing is a series of 
much smaller cliques.  It's not the same thing at all.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan
date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:11:36 GMT   author:   Joe Horowitz hey

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
"Joe Horowitz" <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote in

> Are you upset because TonyMac didn't think to mention you in the above
> offhand sentence?  Maybe then at worst you could accuse TonyMac of
> being one big clique, and reserve judgement on the rest of us.  Hmmm? 
> Think about it. 
 
> Besides which, I think what Osbourne is actually proposing is a series
> of much smaller cliques.  It's not the same thing at all.

I had a series of much smaller cliques once.

Sid
date: 18 Dec 2007 02:47:09 GMT   author:   Sid

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
On Dec 18, 3:47 pm, Sid  wrote:
>
> I had a series of much smaller cliques once.
>
R,S? AHDTWOFY?

M
date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:13:32 -0800 (PST)   author:   Mister M

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
Mister M  wrote in news:2bbaa761-ef4c-4d72-a62c-
daabbb7e6427@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> On Dec 18, 3:47 pm, Sid  wrote:

>> I had a series of much smaller cliques once.

> R,S? AHDTWOFY?

It was the Perfect Nunnxclusive Equilibrium.

Sid
date: 18 Dec 2007 12:56:05 GMT   author:   Sid

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
On 17 Dec, 21:32, Roo  wrote:
> Tony McChrystal wrote:
> > If we could summon the spirits of Moog and Oscar G, it would be the
> > Northern Monkey Jambo 2008, coinciding with Liverpool's capital of
> > culture bid.
> One. Big. Clique.

Yes, Roo, we will be. But only for one night.

Besides, Moog and Oscar G are very much dead people, and require their
spirits summoned. You, on the other hand, still post semi-regularly
and would be widely expected to attend.

If you are upset that I am forming one big clique, then by ruling
yourself out immediately, you are indeed forming a more exclusive and
excluding clique comprising yourself and your lucky hamster's gerbil's
penis.
date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:03:25 -0800 (PST)   author:   Tony McChrystal

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
Tony McChrystal  wrote in news:0825a322-
b3c5-442a-a7f8-4e04879a19a8@q3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

> Besides, Moog and Oscar G are very much dead people, and require their
> spirits summoned. You, on the other hand, still post semi-regularly
> and would be widely expected to attend.
> 
> If you are upset that I am forming one big clique, then by ruling
> yourself out immediately, you are indeed forming a more exclusive and
> excluding clique comprising yourself and your lucky hamster's gerbil's
> penis.
> 
> 

Well, if Roo and his lucky hamster's gerbil's penis can't come to the 
northojambo it would really take some of the shine off the whole event for 
me.

-- 
Cheers, Os
date: 18 Dec 2007 19:33:55 GMT   author:   Osbourne Ruddock

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
On Dec 19, 8:33 am, Osbourne Ruddock  wrote:
>
> Well, if Roo and his lucky hamster's gerbil's penis can't come to the
> northojambo it would really take some of the shine off the whole event for
> me.
>
Much like Roo has already taken the shine off his lucky hamster's
gerbil's penis.

M
date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:46:48 -0800 (PST)   author:   Mister M

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
Joe Horowitz wrote:
> 
> Are you upset because TonyMac didn't think to mention you in the above 
> offhand sentence?  Maybe then at worst you could accuse TonyMac of being one 
> big clique, and reserve judgement on the rest of us.  Hmmm?  Think about it.
> 
> Besides which, I think what Osbourne is actually proposing is a series of 
> much smaller cliques.  It's not the same thing at all.

Indeed, I stand corrected.

Several. Small. Cliques.

BlueRoo
date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:52:21 +0000   author:   Roo

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
Osbourne Ruddock wrote:
> If I drove around the Merseyside and Mancuntian region during the week of 
> 5th-9th May, what are the odds of running into a UKSF'er for a pint and a 
> muffin?

Teh lateness!

If you did drive around the Mancuntchesterarian area between the 
specified dates, I think your chances of some Chopsy action would rate 
pretty highly. No boombastic beats from this Flying Nunster (as opposed 
to a Flying Nunnster, which would be a very different ghey animal), but 
a pint and a muffin would be a strong likelihood.

We're away at Not A Proper Villa at the time, though, so you'll be 
spared Wigan's Premiership death throes.

I'll use a different email address this time, like.

C
date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:58:42 +0000   author:   Chopsy

Re: A question for teh froup 2   
Tony McChrystal wrote:
> 
> Yes, Roo, we will be. But only for one night.

Sounds like a Pink Floyd reunion or summat.  Is the gathering happening 
to stop poverty or give the little starving kids in Africa a Nintendo Wii?

> Besides, Moog and Oscar G are very much dead people, and require their
> spirits summoned. You, on the other hand, still post semi-regularly
> and would be widely expected to attend.

I have a line on the spirit of Moog, he could very possibly be summoned 
but I'm afraid Oscar G has dropped completely off the radar.  Looks like 
he finally got that life he was desperate for...

> If you are upset that I am forming one big clique, then by ruling
> yourself out immediately, you are indeed forming a more exclusive and
> excluding clique comprising yourself and your lucky hamster's gerbil's
> penis.

Pah!  You cannot have a clique on your own, with or without a lucky 
gerbil penis, an that is a fact me-ladie-o.  If this sort of 
Nunnxclusive behaviour  continues this froup will become one big, 
unhelpful, pisstake.  No-one wants to see that now, do they?

BlueRoo


BlueRoo
date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:01:26 +0000   author:   Roo

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us