Re: Why Border is better than SRT and BCL; Was SRT needs 172 runs to
overtake Lara
On Aug 9, 1:16 pm, Villanova wrote:
> jzfredricks wrote:
> > On Aug 9, 12:37 pm, Villanova wrote:
> >> SRT never had the talented players in the team and support
> >> from BCCI like Border did in his team and from ACB.
>
> > There are many stupid things said on the internet, but saying 'India
> > had no talented players while SRT was playing' ranks pretty damn high
> > on that list. I'll assume you got lucky when doing the maths.
>
> jzfredricks,
>
> English is not my native language but one thing is sure, I
> have better comprehension skills than you.
>
> I never said India had "no" talented players while SRT was
> playing.
>
> The comparison was between the talent available to SRT and Border.
>
> You are a great spindoctor.
>
> >> I'll assume you got lucky when doing the maths.
>
> You are right. So there is no need to clone me unlike you
> geniuses who needs to be cloned like this dog. LOL
>
> WOMAN PAYS $50,000 FOR FIRST COMMERCIAL CANINE REPLICATIONhttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.golf/msg/66b7ea5fe4610a62?hl=en
>
> --
> posted viawww.usenetfast.com- Fastest downloads from $4.50/month !
But the man is right, you have no idea. Border was in a worse team,
whether you're aware of that fact or not.
>> I forgot you are one of the same folks that couldnt
>> locate iraq on a world map but knew they had WMDs.
Your english is up there, is it cricketleague? I guess everyone is
incorrect when they don't say weapons of mass destructions.
date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
author: R. Spanditt
|