|
|
|
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 10:30:12 +0100,
group: uk.politics.parliament
back
LABOURS LATEST FAILURE 1
Since New Liebour has come to power it has destroyed over 30,000 acres of
greenbelt land, building more than 45,000 homes on land that was
specifically designated to act as a green buffer arond many already crowded
towns and cities, Imagine the ecological and sociological disaster uit would
create if the scum of New liebour get away with adding another 2.5 million
news houses. Green belts ruined, flood plains built on, school fields sold
off all things Liebour promised not to do and lied. This once green and
pleasant land is going to end up looking like an run down council estate
thanks to the scum of the left.
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 10:30:12 +0100
author: \The Rifleman\
|
Re: LABOURS LATEST FAILURE 1
On 7 May, 10:30, "\"The Rifleman\"" wrote:
> Since New Liebour has come to power it has destroyed over 30,000 acres of
> greenbelt land, building more than 45,000 homes on land that was
> specifically designated to act as a green buffer arond many already crowded
> towns and cities, Imagine the ecological and sociological disaster uit would
> create if the scum of New liebour get away with adding another 2.5 million
> news houses. Green belts ruined, flood plains built on, school fields sold
> off all things Liebour promised not to do and lied. This once green and
> pleasant land is going to end up looking like an run down council estate
> thanks to the scum of the left.
Yes and things would be precisely how different if it were
Conservatives in power? Face reality , it doesn't make the slightest
bit of difference who is in charge, the end result will be the same.
Corporations pull the strings and theres nothing we can do about it.
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 04:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: LABOURS LATEST FAILURE 1
wrote in message
news:6cc56c01-8206-4943-a5b6-752d32d13f48@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On 7 May, 10:30, "\"The Rifleman\"" wrote:
>> Since New Liebour has come to power it has destroyed over 30,000 acres of
>> greenbelt land, building more than 45,000 homes on land that was
>> specifically designated to act as a green buffer arond many already
>> crowded
>> towns and cities, Imagine the ecological and sociological disaster uit
>> would
>> create if the scum of New liebour get away with adding another 2.5
>> million
>> news houses. Green belts ruined, flood plains built on, school fields
>> sold
>> off all things Liebour promised not to do and lied. This once green and
>> pleasant land is going to end up looking like an run down council estate
>> thanks to the scum of the left.
>
> Yes and things would be precisely how different if it were
> Conservatives in power? Face reality , it doesn't make the slightest
> bit of difference who is in charge, the end result will be the same.
> Corporations pull the strings and theres nothing we can do about it.
The tories have a much greater influence in rural areas, many of the plans
would have been blown out of the water, plus they are stronger on
immigration which places an unneccessary burdon on housing stock.
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 13:22:04 +0100
author: \The Rifleman\
|
Re: LABOURS LATEST FAILURE 1
On 7 May, 13:22, "\"The Rifleman\"" wrote:
> wrote in message
>
> news:6cc56c01-8206-4943-a5b6-752d32d13f48@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On 7 May, 10:30, "\"The Rifleman\"" wrote:
> >> Since New Liebour has come to power it has destroyed over 30,000 acres of
> >> greenbelt land, building more than 45,000 homes on land that was
> >> specifically designated to act as a green buffer arond many already
> >> crowded
> >> towns and cities, Imagine the ecological and sociological disaster uit
> >> would
> >> create if the scum of New liebour get away with adding another 2.5
> >> million
> >> news houses. Green belts ruined, flood plains built on, school fields
> >> sold
> >> off all things Liebour promised not to do and lied. This once green and
> >> pleasant land is going to end up looking like an run down council estate
> >> thanks to the scum of the left.
>
> > Yes and things would be precisely how different if it were
> > Conservatives in power? Face reality , it doesn't make the slightest
> > bit of difference who is in charge, the end result will be the same.
> > Corporations pull the strings and theres nothing we can do about it.
>
> The tories have a much greater influence in rural areas, many of the plans
> would have been blown out of the water, plus they are stronger on
> immigration which places an unneccessary burdon on housing stock.
Don't make me laugh. The tories have got their sticky little fingers
in every pie, just like labour. If housing makes these greedy
parasites wealthy, it would have been just the same. Stronger on
immigration, eh? But the immigration issue is now out of this
countries governments hands (no different if the tories were in). Any
European citizen can (if they want) come and work here and theres
isn't a thing we can do about it.
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 07:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: LABOURS LATEST FAILURE 1
On Wed, 07 May 2008 10:30:12 +0100, \"The Rifleman\" wrote:
> Since New Liebour has come to power it has destroyed over 30,000 acres
> of greenbelt land, building more than 45,000 homes on land that was
> specifically designated to act as a green buffer
You should see the true extent of the crimes that New Liebour have done.
They passed laws that now designate people's gardens as "brownfield"
land, and as such VERY loose planning laws apply for that, and has lead
to a huge explosion of building in people's back gardens by greedy
neighbours, and developers buying up decent housing, sometimes three or
four houses next to each other, just to knock the houses down and build a
row of shit flats, changing the face and population of a local
neighbourhood forever - for the worse.
One of the reasons people kicked that crook Red Ken out of London mayor
is because Boris said he will pass London planning laws to stop the
destruction of people's gardens for yet more immigrant housing. Visiting
London, it's been turned into a shit hole.
date: 07 May 2008 17:23:23 GMT
author: Ar
|
Re: LABOURS LATEST FAILURE 1
wrote in message
news:66bf0244-88bd-41b1-8f79-Any
> European citizen can (if they want) come and work here and theres
> isn't a thing we can do about it.
There would be if we can force through a referendum
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 18:27:23 +0100
author: \The Rifleman\
|
Re: LABOURS LATEST FAILURE 1
On 7 May, 18:27, "\"The Rifleman\"" wrote:
> wrote in message
>
> news:66bf0244-88bd-41b1-8f79-Any
>
> > European citizen can (if they want) come and work here and theres
> > isn't a thing we can do about it.
>
> There would be if we can force through a referendum
Thats two things we agree on........A European referendum and that
London is a shithole :o)
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 10:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: LABOURS LATEST FAILURE 1
wrote in message
news:0b37fca5-ca5e-4210-9cff-d5c89b51e99e@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On 7 May, 18:27, "\"The Rifleman\"" wrote:
>> wrote in message
>>
>> news:66bf0244-88bd-41b1-8f79-Any
>>
>> > European citizen can (if they want) come and work here and theres
>> > isn't a thing we can do about it.
>>
>> There would be if we can force through a referendum
>
> Thats two things we agree on........A European referendum and that
> London is a shithole :o)
The first time I visited London it was not the dirt, the overcrowding,
noise, crap tasting tap water, crime, over price goods of the miserable
fuckers living there. The first thought I had was its just a human version
of a termite colony, workers march in, workers march out no hope, no vision
no real qualitity of life, just work. Thirty years on that opinion has not
changed apart from the colony is now bigger, dirtier, more expensive but now
its diseased.
date: Thu, 8 May 2008 08:43:46 +0100
author: \The Rifleman\
|
|
|