Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:04:13 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.politics.guns        back       
Re: Federal judge rules police cannot detain people for openly carrying guns   
On Oct 9, 9:57 pm, Bama Brian  wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 10:39 am, Bama Brian  wrote:
> >> Daniel wrote:
> >>> On Oct 7, 1:27 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>> Daniel  wrote innews:8c5a27d4-d14d-480f-9c87-4576cece3136@g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com:
> >>>>> On Oct 6, 11:21 pm, "SaPeIsMa"  wrote:
> >>>>>> "Daniel"  wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:c932a16e-1ade-4a83-8775-68d5ca8323e2@p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com
> >>>>>> ... On Oct 5, 9:06 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Daniel  wrote
> >>>>>>> innews:c64ce367-2725-4fc3-95b9-d896473d18e8@j19g2000vbp.googlegroups
> >>>>>>> .co
> >>>>> m:
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 4, 6:19 pm, "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)
> >>>>>>>> @comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Daniel  wrote
> >>>>>>>>> innews:44b98dc4-d0b0-4f18-aed9-fbfe
> >>>>>>>> fd0fa...@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 28, 2:32 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Bert Hyman  wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9C947EFFAE7DBVeebleFetzer@ 216.250.184.7:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Innews:Xns9C8E753094C71piotu0345go2r3ndec@216.196.97.131nrac
> >>>>>>>>>>>> lap
> >>>>> tr
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well if everybody's carrying guns how do you tell the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> criminal
> >>>>> s
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from the law-abiding citizens? You wait until they murder
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> somebody, righ
> >>>>>>>>>> t
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Spaniel?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's the way the law works in a civilized society; you
> >>>>>>>>>>>> have t
> >>>>> o
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wait until a crime's actually been committed before locking
> >>>>>>>>>>>> someone up.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, preventing crimes by requiring background checks on
> >>>>>>>>>>> every gun transaction, whether FFL or private, would be a big
> >>>>>>>>>>> ste
> >>>>> p
> >>>>>>>>>>> in the right direction. So anybody who has a gun who hasn't
> >>>>>>>>>>> had a background check
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>> automatically a criminal.
> >>>>>>>>>> And how many criminals bother to legally purchase a gun?
> >>>>>>>>> If they are felons, they cannot legally purchase one. Period...
> >>>>>>>> Exactly.
> >>>>>>> If you don't get background checks on private gun sales, you can't
> >>>>>>> catc
> >>>>> h
> >>>>>>> any felons who buy those guns, and that's exactly what you want eh
> >>>>>>> Spaniel?
> >>>>>> #
> >>>>>> # How many felons buy their guns legally?
> >>>>>> #
> >>>>>> <whisper on>
> >>>>>> Do you think he can figure out that since felons can NOT legally
> >>>>>> posess firearms, the very act of purchasing one is an illegal act > >>>>>> <whisper off>
> >>>>> He can't figure out if the sun is shiniing or not.
> >>>> When felons buy guns through private sellers there's no way to tell if
> >>>> the sale is legal or illegal because there's no background check.  So the
> >>>> default assumption is that the sale is legal.
> >>> If a felon buys a gun, it is an UNLAWFUL PURCHASE, and both the felon
> >>> AND the seller face criminal charges.
> >>> So I ask you dipshits AGAIN, How many felons buy guns legally?
> >> Shit, who cares what you ask?  You're nothing but a troll.
>
> > You should take your own adice. Learn who you are insulting.
>
> At the moment you're just another troll.  That you believe in the 2nd
> Amemdment is a good thing - but it's just a start towards maintaining
> your status as a free citizen.  The last hundred years in the US have
> been an accelerated march to outright tyranny, beginning with the War On
> (Some) Drugs back in the 1930's.  (Look up Henry J. Anslinger for some
> information on the fedgov's beginning drug war.)  So unless you are
> willing to stand up for all the rights that the fedgov is trying to take
> away, you're just another part of the problem.
>
> So as to who you are, tell us, Daniel.  Drop the Ad Hominems and talk to
> us as a civil person does.  If you can't do that, expect more abuse
> until you get tired of it and go annoy some other group.

I serve my fucking country. What the fuck do you do, you stupid piece
of shit.
date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:04:13 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Daniel

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us