On Oct 7, 4:19 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Daniel  wrote innews:ba859483-2cca-40fd-908d-8aa14569d33e@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 7, 1:07 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> Daniel  wrote in
> >> news:2c2bdc09-3e2a-42cc-8152-
> >> a9acc1466...@d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> > On Oct 6, 11:19 pm, nraclaptrap <nraclapt...@invalid.invalid>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >> > Why do you want me to get another check?  Is it because your
> >> >> > real objective is to get all guns and gun owners registered
>
> >> >> Yes.
>
> >> >> > so that you and
> >> >> > your Progressives can set the next law in place to confiscate
> >> >> > all of the guns of those that don't approve of your taking over
> >> >> > of the government or swear allegiance to the government or
> >> >> > leader?  
>
> >> >> Yes.
>
> >> > Too bad the Second Amendment won't allow you to do that.
>
> >> The Second Amendment has nothing to do with the states' reserved
> >> police power, which includes the power to enact and enforce laws
> >> affecting public safety.
>
> > Of course you're wrong, but that's nothing new.
>
> Prove it, Spaniel.


The Second Amendment proves you wrong.

>
> >> Your fake knowledge of the Second Amendment is like a tea-bagger's
> >> fake knowledge of "death panels" and "Obama was born in Kenya".  It's
> >> something you can choose to believe but it's not something you can
> >> make true.
>
> >> And we have tons of recorded history and law that proves it.
>
> > No, you don't.
>
> http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/
>
> http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/constpap.asp
>
> Prove your point or heel, Spaniel.
>
> >> Now, if the right wing of the US Supreme Court keeps lying about the
> >> Second Amendment, at least one justice will be impeached and removed.
> >> Guess who, Spaniel.  The issue here isn't left vs right, but rather
> >> the Constitutionally mandated preservation and efficiency of the
> >> National Guard, aka the well-regulated militia of the Second
> >> Amendment.
>
> > Newsflash, dumbfuck. You're the only uninformed one here. There is NO
> > link between military service and the RKBA.
>
> There is, but you'll never understand it.  It's too much mental work for
> you to sort out.

No, there isn't and you have failed to prove it on the NUMEROUS
occasions that you have tried.

>
> > I have asked you time and
> > time again to prove your allegation, and you have run like a bitch
> > every time.
>
> You ask for proof and yet you're incapable of critical reasoning, which
> is the only way you could understand the truth.
>
> If that's the best you can do you'll make a fine tea-bagger.
>
> >> So it's not about you as an individual, Spaniel; it's about the whole
> >> body of the people,
>
> > Hint: the Second Amendment IS and individual right.
>
> How would you know?  You're incapable of doing your own homework so you
> get it from the NRA and other rightwing propagandists.
>
> Without an independent mind you'll never be free.

The Second Amendment SAYS it is an individual right in plain English.
The fact that you don't understand that proves your ignorance.

>
> >> and how the National Guard is necessary to the
> >> security of our respective states.
>
> > The National Guard has nothing to do with the Second Amendment.
>
> And you just showed how ignorant you are, Spaniel.


You say that without providing any evidence to support your case, and
the Second Amendment supports mine, so the ONLY ignorant one here is
you, as usual.